Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Wimbledon 2022

17810121340

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Isner wins...he was really terrific.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Isner very gracious in victory



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,327 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    He really was.

    He's so calm and understated, what a blessed relief from some of the histrionics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭Denny61


    Fantastic match ..puts murray back in his box ..and his arrogance too . Thinks he Can show up and alll fall in to place..BBC Were bigging up isner when they knew Murray was jst whistling in the wind...Isner is 37 ..cmon .and you rarely hear of him ..bbc telling us he's at the top .lol .ya at the top as regards..tallest player..lol.and same with Emma radancu today..another one trick pony .won the us open last year. Brits bigging her up as nxt best thing in tennis .the girl she beat hasn't been heard of either ..one pillock has suggested that even if she never wins again. She will be Regarded as one of the best lol lol .ah ya the British on their wacky backy again lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It's great to watch a player with a simple game plan but who executes it very well. Had more than Murray to beat tonight and played his service games with great consistency and ruthlessness. If he could only improve his own return of serve a bit!

    Had to laugh when he observed that he hasn't got to play on centre court much because he's not very good - kinda showed up where his opponent is at!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Only turned pro at 22 having obtained a degree from the University of Georgia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    Isner is currently @ 50/1 to win the tournament - worth a punt?😶



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A small punt for interest only I would argue.

    The man is a class act but a servebot hasn't won Wimbledon since 2001 and the grass blend of the courts changed after that very final to make the courts more durable over the 2 weeks which works against the Isner type player, especially over 5 sets.

    He's also 37, even though his sort of game is less of a toll on the body and he turned pro late after college.

    His own serve is never going to fire 100% all match every match and when he comes up against a guy who is on his return game and holding his own serve he'll be beaten, even if every set has to go to a tie-break.

    That's the way that it has always gone so far anyways!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    If he can keep banging in serves like last night and follow up with deft volleys and half volleys, who knows?

    You'd need to be looking at who are good at dealing with that serve, both Djok and Nadal are pretty good in that dept. But they have to progress as well.

    Other parts of Isners game seem pretty suspect, needs a deal of luck to break serve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Can't believe the Isner - Mahut match was 12 years ago.

    Wimbledon would always be on back then in my house but I wasn't working then so had much more free time.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That match was a servebot squidgame

    Record length etc but it did go on too long...

    Don't remember watching much of it tbh

    The BBC did a short podcast piece recently on the "Sporting Witness" podcast with the match umpire

    One interesting thing that he said was that the Wimbledon blazers wanted him to announce to the crowd when the previous match record length had been broken.

    But the umpire wouldn't do it no matter how he was pushed as he felt that the announcement and the probable crowd reaction might well disturb the rhythm of one or both of the players (obviously locked in an over-an-back serve-game cadence at the time)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,327 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    Batista-Agut gone with covid now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,999 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Kvitova was lucky to hold on against Bogdan, only saw the last few games of the second set, Bogdan apparently came back from 5-1 down in the second set (she lost first set 6-1). Kvitova was really struggling, doesn't look fully fit to me, had it gone to a third, I think she'd have lost, Bogdan looked much fresher and was playing better. I had Kvitova as a decent chance of winning it out, but, don't think she'll last the full two weeks now, doesn't look like she'd be able to last a long 3 setter. I'd say Bogdan is kicking herself right now for letting her off the hook.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Liam Broady has taken the first set 6-2 against Diego Schwartzman...



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Kyrgios absolutely batters Krajinovic.

    As said, the actual test is when he comes up against some adversity as he loses the looseness of game style that he thrives on and may well lose the plot.

    but even Kyrgios knows that he may never get a better chance to go deep



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Long 3 setter? Been said before but these grand slams should 5 setters for men & women. Equality and all that.



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    God no.

    That would produce some absolutely horrific spectacles doing that for rounds 1 to the final.

    Serena Williams could barely put one foot in front of the other after 3 sets the other night for example and Tan could barely tap her 2nd serve over the net and had to cancel her doubles the next day as she was not up to it.

    That would have been a real Blxxk-and-Tan horror show

    Also the scheduling of the slams would be thrown up in the air.

    Keep it at 3.

    "maybe" have the final best of 5 - to try to give the punters some value for their final ticket and throw the tv companies a bone for a return on their tv rights.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Katie Boulter has taken pliskova to a third set.

    Harriet Dart has taken first set against Jessica Pegula

    Liam broady lost second set and down a double break in third....

    Watson also through to third round...with winnable looking match



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    I don't think it is 100 percent their choice. They did have them in the past but they were got rid off due to poor ratings and scheduling issues they caused seemingly.

    Post edited by gmisk on


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    All is well between Tan and her doubles partner

    "Harmony" is restored

    Untitled Image




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Katie Boulter knocks out Pliskova! I know she beat her at Eastbourne but still a cracking result for her on centre court and with all the pressure that entails!



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boulter takes out a Top 10 player (world number 7) and last year's finalist to boot- hope that she gets some proper recognition for that.

    That's an excellent result even though she hadn't been getting much of a mention compared to some others even on the BBC (others who have never beaten anyone in the Top 10)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Harmony Tan backs up her win over Williams beating Sara Sorribes Tormo 6-3, 6-4...maybe made the right choice giving the doubles a swerve!



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Completely the correct decision by Tan to dump the doubles, even if she had lost today.

    All first-round likely losers (low-rankers) sign up to doubles as they know that the likelihood of going out is high.

    Tan would have had to have made the doubles final (of which there was no chance having never made it past the first round in doubles in a slam) to approach the cash she now has guaranteed for the singles third round.

    Pretty much a career-defining run with the exposure that she got getting past Williams and her furthest at any slam



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Liam Broady has some how managed to take Schwartzman to a 5th set...despite losing 11 games in a row at one stage...mad stuff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Liam Broady now up a double break...5-1 and serving for the match...what an insane turnaround!...and he is through!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Swiatek has lost the second set against Kerkhove (world number 138 and a lucky loser)....wow now that is a surprise! In truth her opponent has done very little.

    I would expect she will kick things up a gear in the third, but she has been very flat.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,753 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Jesus, Swiatek drops the second set to lucky loser Kerkhove. Hitting a lot of unforced errors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,385 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    She has been poor.

    But clicked into gear a tad and has broke.

    6-3 final set. Tougher than it should have been.


    Shapovalov out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Great to see Murray competitive again, always liked his personality and dry humour. Gets ridiculed as being dry but I think that's unfair, he's just genuinely modest and down to earth.

    Looking at him play, it's hard not to feel sad for him, what could of been. Fanboys for the big 3 like to rewrite history for their main man, but the reality is Murray toppled them. And for a period, before injuries really plagued him, had a peak Djokovics' number. For about a year, he was the undisputed best player in the world.

    Recalling off memory, beat Djokovic in several majors and won an Olympics, and straight setted him once or twice over this period if I'm not mistaken.

    If we consider the big 3 were the best ever, where does that leave Murray? Seeing as he got the better of the lot of them only for injury to derail it? I'd argue when he put his game together, he may not have been the greatest in any one department, but had the most complete game of the lot.

    At his peak, I think he surpassed the peak of any of the big 3. Only for injury, he was on the brink of being the dominant player! Shame to see how it turned out for him



Advertisement