The Pushback against Leftism

Nothing. I don't think anything needs to change. Transwomen are not women. They're men, and as such, can continue using the male toilets or male changing rooms. Men won't care, even slightly, should a transwoman enter their area.

But should a Transwoman/transman enter a female only space, the biologically/nature women should be able to request them to leave. They should have that choice.

You keep pushing the extremes.. which is often the problem with the Trans topic. If the trans advocates/activists were more willing to moderate their views, there would be a greater chance of some compromises happening.. but all you're doing, is encouraging a resistance to such beliefs to form. People are getting rather annoyed at the aggressive attitudes of the advocates/activists.

You keep bringing this up as if someone was pushing for them to be deleted, executed, or whatever. What are you basing the idea that anyone wants the end of transpeople? And no.. leave the religious nutcases out of this.

Also, they have the right to exist as they please, except where it involves other people. That's the problem. Those other people have rights too.

Nobody said anything he claimed. He twisted others points so that he could defend the "victims" and rise the wonderful pedestal of ultimate virtue signalling.

What a rush!

20Cent, you're more than welcome to prove me wrong on this, but I don't think you can. You did misrepresent the posts on this thread.

Ok. Give us some direct quotes of posters calling Trans sexual predators. You did say there were plenty.. so.. let's see 3 different posters saying that.

haha... no. I couldn't give a crap about your patience or goodwill. Nor are these disingenuous questions/requests.

You have made statements/claims about posts (and by extension the posters) on this thread... and I have asked you, more than once, to back up your claims. You haven't. You've danced around them, deflected, and now.. sought to play the victim.

So, drop the victim play, and back up your claims. Surely that's easy enough? No?

There was a point to the list, including the multiples and the duplications. They do help demonstrate that when someone rants about NGOs, they might imagine in their happy slacktivist fantasy land that they're striking a blow for freedom against the wokey wokey Soros mob, or some such guff. But they're not really. Oooh, the government pays out grants to bodies. Well, you coulda knocked me over with a feather when I heard. Or not.

So what?

What has anything of that got to do with "leftism"? The list of "NGOs" who get government money isn't some kind of looney woke conspiracy. The list is, for the most part, made up of organisations who do stuff that is probably really worthy and interesting to them and their members, and not of much consequence to anyone who isn't involved. Charities, sports clubs, schools, yadda yadda.

If you want to start a thread about the efficiencies and inefficiencies of the public service, be my guest. But that's not what the stuff in this thread is about. It's fuelled by people who can't tell the difference between their local GAA club and Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride (or somesuch), and who feel some need to get mad about something.