Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Orange order/Linfield FC

Options
145679

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,165 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    You have gone from whataboutery to vindictiveness to making things up and right now you seem to be posting for the sake of posting . Cop yourself on !



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    First, I'm the biggest critic of both SF and think the IRA's civilian killings are deplorable. However, the resurgence of the IRA was very much so a reaction to British policies in the North that were rather bigoted.


    Now, what does this have to do with the topic? Nothing. Sinn Fein don't operate as the Orange Order do, you can have problematic members and they can defend them at times. However it's not comparable to the Orange Order that have a default have a bigoted position on Catholics, it's literally their policy.


    In this case we have their members mocking the murder of a woman. She has no association with SF or the IRA, at a guess she was targeted because her father is very religious. And you have attempted to make the thread about SF and downplayed the actual topic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,882 ✭✭✭Christy42


    This thread has nothing to do with the IRA. You have been an active participant in it and have not made a post that didn't reference the IRA. All it is trying to get off the subject of orange men.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    How is that diluting it?

    Barry McElduff made fun of the victims of Kingsmills. 10 Protestants were dragged out of a van and butchered on the side of the road on a dark January evening.

    Mocking the victims of that massacre is every bit as bad as mocking the murder of Michaela McAreavey.

    If a Unionist politician made fun of, say, the victims of the Miami Showband massacre in a similar manner, would that be OK?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    This is absolutely hilarious, in a very dark way.

    I have throughly condemned the mocking of the McAreaveys as any normal person would.

    Whereas you came on here and blamed victims of IRA terrorism for their own butchering.

    Get off the stage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,296 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Very well put.

    I'm sure it won't find it's target though and this thread will circle the drain for a while yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    How do you square that belief with the fact I despise the Orange Order?

    One cannot be serious about ending hate in Northern Ireland unless one recognises that both sides perpetuate it.

    Again I repeat, both extremes are as bad as each other.

    But there are several posters here who are under the impression that "our side" doesn't have extremism at all. That's the politics of eternal victimhood and the fantasy that "our side" is eternally virtuous. That's the sort of fantasy believed by Vladimir Putin.

    Using a horrible incident such as this to paint the entirety of "themmuns" as barbaric savages and paint your side as eternally virtuous - when the extremists of your side engage in the same thing - is not a good faith attempt to paint an accurate analysis of the state of Northern Ireland society.

    It's base tribalism.

    Call out the **** by all means, but it can't be one sided.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,998 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    you are factually incorrect on all counts.

    i didn't blame anyone for any murder, i stated the sectarian manner in which northern ireland was an lead to the IRA resurging which is fact.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Some Shinner with a long history of pulling daft gags, stuck a sliced pan on his head, the connection is so **** tenous that only in Nordieland would anyone have made it. Why the **** would a SF politician knowingly mocked an atrocity that the Shinners tip toe around and even the Provos refused to acknowledge?

    Big difference to singing about a woman being murdered, but you know that and don't care. No reach is too far when whatabouting for Loyalisms own peculiar brand of hooligan culture



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You are abusing him and his family for your own agenda. You are shameless. There's a SF thread, this isn't the place. Go peddle your hate elsewhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    People can argue about history all they like but it's been a fairly one-way street the last few years. Surely a preacher posting videos saying to kill all people of a certain religion with guns and grenades is inciting murder and violence. How could it not receive a long prison sentence?

    Change his religion to Sunni and he'd handily be talking about Shia or Christian etc.

    “The rats were in the foundation and there’s only one way to deal with rats. It’s not to feed them, it’s not to give them a house, it’s not to give them a feel-good factor of power. The only way... is to go in with the rifle and the grenade and get rid of them, every last one including the young upstarts."



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,882 ✭✭✭Christy42


    No idea. Your disagreement with this issue comes across as the easiest way to try and not generate more discussion about the Orange Order. Do you believe that this was a few bad eggs or that this is more common in Orange halls and we just happened to get a glimpse of it this time? Do you believe the apologies issued were heartfelt or that some were just annoyed at getting caught.


    I don't care what the IRA have done for the purpose of this thread. I hate ISIS and yet I have made posts not referencing them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    OK so you believe it's perfectly fine to mock the victims of the worst sectarian atrocity of the entire Troubles, even when somebody who is a member of the movement that perpetrated it does the mocking.

    People like you are the problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    Where have I abused John McAreavey or done anything remotely resembling such?

    It doesn't say much for you that you have to resort to outright lying?



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,228 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Indeed.

    This kind of sectarian, bigoted supremacy was around long before the IRA became a factor. It predates and outdates them by a longshot.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,714 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Stick to discussing this incident. Highlighting other incidents from the Troubles or indeed other times does not contribute to constructive debate



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,272 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Nobody is trying to dilute anything.

    As you said in post 108, this thread is about sectarian chanting, so the reference to sectarian chanting in the post you quoted is relevant according to you. There is nothing unilateral about sectarian chanting. It happens on both sides, trying to pretend that one side is worse than the other is giving a priority to certain sectarian chants and categorising some victims as more important than others. That is something that Sinn Fein and the PIRA have been guilty of on many occasions.

    Some on this thread have tried to demonise the entire Unionist community for the actions of a few, and that is also despicable.

    However, what is really horrifying is that last paragraph of your post where you effectively say that the other side is more sectarian than your side. What a thing to be arguing about. A plague on all sectarians, including yours.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,272 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You have an exclusionary nationalistic view of what it means to be Irish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,228 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Nobody has tried to demonise all Unionists. That is just a fabrication in a long list of them to dilute what happened with this incident.

    What IS being demonised is belligerent Unionism and Orangism.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,272 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    What you are demonising is belligerent Unionism and Orangism.

    What everyone else is demonising is individuals who engage in sectarian chanting and sectarian activity, no matter their origin. That would include those who demonise whole sections of a community for the actions of a few.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,228 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What you are demonising is belligerent Unionism and Orangism.


    Exactly. Glad you understand that. What 'others' are doing is trying to excuse/dilute with 'whataboutery'. You couldn't make the simple acceptance above without engaging in it, in the rest of your post.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Definitons tend to be exclusionary by their nature, We've had a fairly clear idea of what it means to be Irish for most of the history of the Irish people on this Island, despite the best efforts of the English to destroy that meaning.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I explained. You are using this incident to have a go on completely unrelated issues. What about the victim and her family? They didn't bring this upon themselves. They are not political that we know of. Rather than simply condemning the perpetrators you are only condemning them so you can use the incident as a vehicle to have a go for your selfish agenda. Shameless. Why not go to the shinner thread or the unionist thread? You are abusing the family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    He's allowed his opinion on what it means to be Irish, just as you are. Are you exclusionary because you disagree with him? You must have an idea of what you believe being Irish is, would that make you exclusionary? You have shown yourself to be exclusionary. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is attacked and treated as 'other'. Are the OO not exclusionary? They are literally so by definition. You saw what that group engaged in in Linfield, you saw them all laughing and applauding and you came in here to use the issue to whatabout nationalists you don't agree with, treating them as 'other'. Thats exclusionary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 668 ✭✭✭PeaSea


    "You saw what that group engaged in in Linfield"

    Much as I despise them, Linfield have nothing to do with this. The video was shot in an Orange Hall, not Linfield premises or organisation. One of the singers happened to be a Linfield volunteer youth coach (and was swiftly removed). They are no more involved than any of the various firms that have employed any of these singers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I was using it as a way to distinguish from everyone else. Point taken.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,998 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    again there is no such thing as exclusionary irish nationalism.

    irish nationalism by it's very existence is about inclusion unlike partitionism which is as exclusionary is belligerent unionism.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,272 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is a clear attempt to use a single incident to label a whole community as sectarian, and that post was one example of this.

    The incident is awful, terrible and extremely hurtful, but attributing that incident to a whole community, as some on here have done, is wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,228 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This ^ is just a desparate attempt to be right. There isn't a single word or line in that post labeling an 'entire community'.



Advertisement