Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

for someone so pedantic, you like twisting words to suit your argument.... so using my correct quote- "near eradication", yes I do think it was a great success and numerous scientific studies back this up along with the removal of the Alpha variant as a variant of concern from pretty much all health organisations as of early this year,

addressing the legislation side, it wasn't a case of no data, it was a case of limited data to get it to phase 3 trials... when it hit phase 3 it hit all the benchmarks including required sample sizes for it to be allowed into mass production... the only thing that was missing was long term studies ,which most like to think are in depth, but usually are just a of " is x still alive and not developed any major issues since vaccination", taken at either 3 or 5 years.

The vast majority of any issue actually show up during phase 3 trials...

So yes, it was approved formally, minus a layer of safeguarding for obvious reasons.

Another brainless statement stole from twitter.

Buzz, have you given up your claims that the vaccine is dangerous and makes people magnetic cause the cool kids aren't supporting that nonsense?

but not so much when trying to skew someone else's argument in your favour?

selective quoting

Proposed definition for Confirmed Vaccination Failure with AZD1222: The occurrence of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in a person who is appropriately and fully vaccinated following an incubation period of ≥ 15 days following the second dose of the vaccine. A COVID-19 diagnosis is defined as: Virologically-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (eg, RT-PCR) and at least 1 symptom of COVID-19 disease (eg, objective fever [defined as ≥ 37.8 °C], cough, shortness of breath, anosmia, or ageusia) or COVID-19 diagnosis stated/provided by the Physician

so a failed PCR along with symptoms.... i.e. asymptomatic doesn't count...

unfortunately you need to be infected with a virus, for your body to combat it, and yes, this would result in a positive test in some cases....

if you're unhappy with the COVID vaccine, the measles vaccine will blow your mind as to how inefficient it is.

In the unvaccinated? BTW, are you vaccinated?

and that includes all the subsequent variants which the vaccine wasn't designed to fully tackle, even though the version it was designed to tackle has been pretty much eradicated... and you feel this is mis-information and there has been no reporting at all on the potential reduction in efficacy of the vaccine against the numerous variants?

so near eradication of the variant it was designed for is not prevention?

How poor is poor? Not 100%? 90%? 20%? Data?

Page 208:

Vaccines are safe and effective. Still no conspiracy.

The conspiracy seems to be that someone (hometruths won't say who or why) coordinated a plot to make the EMA only approve the vaccines for one thing and one thing only and to lie and say that the vaccines were approved to do another thing that they actually did do.

And there's the conspiracy that Scottish health officials (again, who? Why? Hometruths doesn't say) are covering up the fact that the vaccines are making people more likely to catch the virus after a few weeks. And this is an issue for some reason despite the fact that Hometruths et al are claiming that the virus isn't dangerous.

They've given up all their previous claims because hometruths doesn't believe them and they want to pretend to be in agreement with each other.