Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MLSA are a disgrace

  • 24-05-2022 12:23pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    The Irish medical laboratory scientists association are on their second day of strike in the last week or so, over pay issues.

    however when I hear that some cancer services are being affected by this strike, then this should be called out as a thundering disgrace and tbh the MLSA, will win zilch sympathy with the general public.

    I know that the HSE and the dept of health don’t come out of this well, but this provocative decision by the MLSA is taken industrial relations disputes to an all new low.

    What are other posters thoughts on this?



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If the state paid them the same as their peers there would have been no disruption to cancer services



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No, they're not. They standing up for themselves and have shown great forbearance in waiting this long. Fair play to them.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Utterly selfish.

    No worker should be allowed to strike if they impact on essential services, such as healthcare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 865 ✭✭✭Icemancometh


    Doesn't that mean employers could treat healthcare workers any way they like, knowing they have no recourse?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Employees voluntarily enter into a contract with their employer.

    To enter that contract, then withdraw labour, should be considered a breach of that contract - and looked down upon accordingly.

    Because that's what strikes are: organized breach of contract.

    The employee has a choice to remain or to leave. But to hold the proverbial gun to the head of an employer, and then for that to have knock-on consequences for healthcare, is a double insult.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,546 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,267 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The HSE took advantage of junior doctor's queasiness over strike action for, frankly, decades to treat them like absolute ****. Eventually everyone reaches a breaking point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    These disputes have been going on for over 20 years. No medical scientist wants to be on strike. This was completely and utterly the last resort due to the HSE and DOH ignoring an entire profession until it reached breaking point.

    This could and should have been avoided a long time ago but the HSE have failed to follow through on a commitment they made in 2001.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    During covid Chicken little policies left cancer services affected for nearly 2 years with barely a word said. Now we have to be concerned about a one day strike?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    The first strike day was last Wednesday. Today was the second but tomorrow's is postponed due to talks with the Labour court. There's 3 days pencilled in next week.

    This is much bigger deal than asking for pay parity. The profession has had chronic staff retention issues for years and the HSE have ignored it.

    If medical laboratory science falls apart, so will the healthcare of the entire country.

    More cancelled appointments, surgeries, curtailed GP testing, missed cancer diagnosis.

    Laboratory testing is critical to healthcare. It's in the nations interest that these issues are resolved properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Corben Dallas


    They are a total disgrace. This dispute is about HSE (public sector) wanting the same rate of pay as private sector MLS workers ie the old chestnut ...Benchmarking.

    Heard one of the strikers on the news say something along the lines of " I did my four years of training and then took pay cut...!!!" WRONG!!!!!!. You did 4 years of training and then joined the HSE knowing full well the pay deal u signed up for, if you wanted to get the 8% gap you should have joined the private sector. The entitlement of these people... if you want private sector rates then join the private sector Medical Labs!!!! 😡



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    As far as I know essential cancer services weren't affected?

    I work in a hospital and they ran an on-call service with all urgent/ED/ICU/HDU samples processed with all other samples processed by process of derogation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    A report from the HSE is 2001 found that there was no difference to the work that a biochemist and medical scientists do. Benchmarking was ridiculous. They agreed both professionals should be paid the same. And they didn't honour it.

    Biochemists only work in one department of a laboratory. You can't have a functioning hospital without all the other departments.

    Private hospital labs also have medical scientists who are not paid the same as biochemists.

    This is probably the first time a lot of people who have even heard the name medical scientists and people think this happened suddenly or on a whim.

    You don't realise how long so many issues have gone on completely ignored. Industrial action is a last resort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Yes every hospital negotiated a list of derogations prior to the strike days.

    Any emergency sample that wasn't included in derrogations can be processed through a chain of communication from consultant to strike committee to laboratory.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As a person with a chronic illness that has to regularly avail of our health service. The staff deserve to be paid their worth. I feel pretty overpaid when I hear of the absolutely horrifying low salaries of a lot people in our health service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,546 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    waited 20years to strike, entitle to strike for a month straight if they want.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's brutally hard to get into. They tightened the entry criteria to the profession as I was doing my MSc to get into it. I wasn't happy but sometimes things don't work out. It looks like this is the end result but that's not the staff's fault.

    I hope they have their demands met. It shouldn't have come to this but the HSE has left them no other option. I don't know why anyone would want a health service which haemorrhages staff due to low pay and retention anyway.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    I 100% agree, I think we should reduce socail welfare for people that can work and give that money to the scientists!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭Jellybaby_1


    I'm reading this thread because I want to know exactly what the strike is all about. I read their placard that said 'equal pay for equal work' and I would support that in any area but I don't know much about this type of work. I am curious though, what are the low salaries biochemists and medical scientists are on?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Biochemist is from 36k to circa 100k depending on level. No idea what payment is like in private but on top of that they will get HSE pension which is far more than any private one.

    The only other one i found was analytical chemist, 45k to 76k ranging on experience etc and then pension on top.

    Again no idea if this is comparable to the private sector

    I am not saying this is low/high/medium just providing the information based on HSE pay scales



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    They've waited 20 years and successive governments of sitting on their hands.

    They had to do something.

    I don't believe for one second some of the usual anti-union types actually give a shite about cancer appointments etc either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Biochemists starting salary is 37,307

    Medical scientists start on 34,420


    Other health and social care professionals for comparison are: speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, dieticians, physios: 37,552

    Physiologists (vascular, cardiac, neuro, respiratory) 37,258

    Radiographers 36,058



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Medical Scientists couldn't get the points for Biochemistry so ended up studying in DIT or whatever rather than the universities. Now, they want to be paid the same as someone with better academic achievements.

    Maybe medical scientists should have studied harder so that they to could be biochemists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,450 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Not paying decent wages does vastly more harm to the viability of essential services than a couple of protests days in the long term. MLSA are continuing to provide essential services throughout the dispute, even though they’re not paid to do so.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Or maybe people could refrain from posting absurd nonsense like this. DIT is an excellent institution. It takes years of training to become an MLS. They've every right to strike and the fact that the best argument that you can muster is sneering and drivel helps to prove it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Also when you're resorting to leaving cert points to justify underpaying critical parts of society.. I'm pretty sure they don't do a different quality of work to biochemists...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I support the strike however med lab science is one of the best (of a bad lot) science careers.

    a) There are hospitals in most counties

    b) Many positions are in the PS i.e. are unionised and secure if permanent

    c) There is a semblance of a career path (scientist, senior, chief)

    d) They have the power to seriously impact the health service if they withdraw their labour. The general public is completely ignorant about scientific work, it's as though they expect hospital lab tests to be done by robots or "someone just presses a button and out pops a result"

    e) Crucially, there are only a limited number of degrees which allow a person to legally work as a medical scientist

    Anyway, LOL at some of the posters in this thread supporting the strike but also refuting my thread about science being a poor career choice. Maybe you should talk to some of the people I know with degrees in chemistry, biochemistry etc. who went back to college to study med lab science because they couldn't get a job with their first degree.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    As said at the start, this has been going on for a long time, these scientists put industrial action on the backburner for two years in the best interests of public health, stuck with their sh1tty pay and conditions because they were needed in a pandemic.

    Now they're looking for improvements, the least the public can do is support them.

    Donnelly and the HSE had a long warning that this was coming and they did nothing. They could very easily have cut this off by talking improvements 3 months ago, but they didn't.

    The MLSA's willingness to call off strike action on the basis of talks being started goes to show how seriously they take their role and how little effort Donnelly needed to put in to avoid this.

    The man is a complete joke.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's good but it's not as good as you portray it.

    Most people I know in the sector had to do MSc's after getting their AMLS-recognised degrees. On top of that they had to go and work in the NHS for years and had to take jobs in Ireland wherever they could be found. One lad I know wants to live in Cork but it stuck in Donegal. Competition is fierce and the entry requirements are arguably higher than necessary. This is all just for Scientist roles. Seniors and Chief roles tend to only become available when one retires or climbs the latter so competition is fiercer there.

    I recall your thread about science being a poor career choice. It was absolute scutter with no evidence or cogency in it whatsoever. It's weird that you've brought this dead horse here to flog.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Complete and utter nonsense.

    Medical science in TUD (formerly DIT) was 576 points this year.

    CIT/UCC course was 590

    ATU galway (formerly GMIT) was 517

    Most Medical scientists also have a masters as its needed for promotion.

    This is a highly educated profession.

    Biochemists can only work in one department. How can you have specialities like Haematology, Blood transfusion, Histopathology Etc without medical scientists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Just going to pick up on your point about senior and chief posts. When someone gains promotion this doesn't mean they retain that status when they move to a job in a different hospital.

    Over the last few years 3 of our staff left senior positions in Dublin hospitals to move down the country to raise their families and went back to basic grade. One of these people has since secured a senior post again, one of the ladies who didn't get the job will have to wait another 8-10 years for a shot at promotion when the next person is due to retire.

    Another issue is the lack of permanent contracts that hospitals offer. A lot of contracts are temporary which are hard to fill. People are reluctant move cross country for a temporary position in case it falls through.

    Our Haematology department is without a senior for over 2 years. Previous person retired and job was advertised as temporary.

    Our histology dept didn't have a senior or a chief for over a year. Staff shortages are in every grade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    "Absolute scutter" again, LOL. Coming from the poster who had to emigrate and now is waxing lyrical about how he has a good job in a great university.

    Plenty of discussion on the issues faced by actual scientists in that other thread.

    Sounds like you are suffering from a type of Stockholm Syndrome or have a vested interest. As you work for a university, likely a combination of both.

    The career prospects for med lab scientists are better than those for scientists with majors in chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, environmental science and others. The fact that med lab scientists are now striking doesn't say much for science as a career choice.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You are literally regurgitating the silly, fact free drivel from the other thread. Since it's irrelevant here, I won't bother responding.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I've noticed this with you in other threads. telling people they're talking sh*te and denying their experiences/shutting down discussion by demanding evidence that you know can't be provided. Then fecking off. I wonder what evidence would suffice for you in this case? Payslips or lists of names of those who had to do a second degree because they couldn't get a job with their science degree. Including names of those who went back to study med lab science because their first science major was a mistake. Then managed to get a job and are now on strike.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I always give people a fair chance to substantiate their arguments. Instead, as you've done they double down as if repetition increases accuracy.

    I'm not rehashing that nonsense thread with your weird hatred of science here.

    Evidence is evidence. I suggest you google it if you require clarification.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭circadian


    I can't understand how anyone wouldn't support our healthcare system (or other emergency services like fire and gardai) being well funded including fair and equal pay.


    100% back strike action when people have been fobbed off, especially to this length. The HSE itself is a shitshow that requires an overhaul, funding and a massive recruitment drive. 4 day weeks for the staff and ensuring they are working set hours and not being run into the ground.


    I don't give a **** how much it costs because when I'm on a hospital bed I'd prefer to be treated by people who are happy with their working conditions than people who are overworked and underpaid.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Same here. You'd essentially turn the HSE into a glorified training ground for the private sector with incredibly low standards for the staff who remain.

    They waited until the pandemic had largely receded and fair play to them for that. I hope they succeed.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,903 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    absolutely, workers should never be allowed strike, ever, they should just suck it up, and get on with their lives, and be grateful in life!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    As usual, a condescending snark. I'm well aware of Google, thanks, and there are many articles, discussions, letters to newspapers etc. to be found regarding poor job prospects for scientists

    As I said to you in the other thread, go back and read your OWN posts on this site about difficulty in finding a job and emigrating. I suppose that's all forgotten now that you have a "good job in a great university" and science is great. Meanwhile ,you support striking med lab scientists who have union representation and legal recognition that non medical scientists can only dream of.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭rock22


    Salaries in private match the rates agreed in the public hospitals.

    This disputes predates the creation of the HSE



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The other thread is irrelevant.

    I'd rather non MLS's got better pay and conditions as opposed to MLS's getting even less. You're just spouting divisive guff here.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Point out where I said that MLS should earn less. I already said I support their strike.

    Lack of recognition of scientific work and 18 year olds being misled by vested interests, the clueless and those with short memories regarding the career prospects in science - that is relevant here.

    The medical scientists have had a valid gripe for 20 years yet only now are striking, why is that. A "nothing to see here, shut up and keep the head down" type attitude from some? Like in the other thread where you refused outright to take on board anything negative about science job prospects despite your own posted history of emigration and difficulty getting a job.

    Scientific work is regarded as nonproductive, it isn't patient facing and the general public doesn't understand it. It's already an uphill battle without people talking rubbish about all the "great opportunities" in science. I've come across several scientists who complain regularly about their career path yet have agreed to do presentations to secondary school kids on scientific careers and only a positive spin was allowed. I'm seeing a pattern here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Medical scientists have considered industrial action many times in the past.

    Public service agreements, meetings with various branches of the government always kicked the can down the road. Promises after promises.

    The croke park agreement brought the extended working day. A routine day went from 9-5 to 8-8. More routine hours for the labs to cover but no increase in staff or pay.

    People obviously opposed but the profession was threatened with outsourcing, redundancies and further pay cuts. We know cervical check was outsourced and how badly that turned out.

    We were told big satellite labs will be set up around the country where all GP samples will be processed. The hospital labs will be downsized and people will be out of a job.

    This was of course a load of sh*t. Fear and intimidation are persuasive tools to get people to cave.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I suggest you do your own research instead of expecting to be spoonfed.

    Again, your other thread and amount of unproven nonsense therein is completely irrelevant.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    True to form, another short snipe without addressing any of the points raised.

    Just looking at the other thread I'm laughing at one of your worthless, condescending rebuttals

    "there are pharma plants and research groups in Ireland"

    No sh1t.

    Seeing as we are making "suggestions" now, I'd suggest you leave discussion of career paths and Irish IR issues to those who have a clue and actually work in Ireland.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You didn't make any points. You just posted deranged insults and then played the victim card when called out.

    Martina1991 clearly has insight here but you're ignoring that so you can exhume your dead thread from before the site rework and use it to attack me.

    I can post where I want. If you can't handle your narrative being questioned, I suggest you avoid discussion forums.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Poor you. Telling people that they are talking scutter and how you're not going to spoonfeed them and making condescending remarks is your idea of addressing a post and calling something out?

    I don't care how long ago the other thread was posted. Anything that anyone posts on this site is public information that can be referred to at any time.

    It is comical how you won't accept that there are poor career prospects in science yet support strikes by scientists who have some of the best T&Cs (for the list of reasons I posted) of any of us. And I'll leave it at that so you can have the last word if you want.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Perhaps you could provide some evidence instead of insulting people.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,167 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    AMLS stop several over qualified scientists getting into their jobs just because their undergrad was not an AMLS one. As someone who has hired several, they are no better than any one else coming out of a general biochemistry or related degree, in fact experience in one company would tell me they are much worse until they gain experience. Even getting in after the fact puts most in a financial position that simply isn't worth it. They have also started swaying some private companies into thinking having all their lab staff as AMLS is beneficial. The medical scientists are great but the AMLS union is a pain in the hole and keeps several people out of jobs not only in the HSE but a few other companies who have started looking for AMLS

    If they didn't close shop to suitably qualified scientists then they wouldn't have that issue. It tops out at 58k for a basic med lab scientist, many would call that a decent living wage. Go and do a Masters and get a promotion and you're on 70k +. Thousands of scientists would jump at that salary and a state job. Also still get overtime unlike most state employees, €40 an hour at the low end.

    Its not low pay that haemmorages staff, it was the tightening of criteria. There are tons of scientists who would take that pay in a heartbeat, I certainly would have straight out of college. It is a well paid job that with attention to detail, punctuality and not taking the piss will see you have a decent wage and good working conditions for life.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement