Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1148014811483148514863690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,446 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So the Russians planned this war to benefit from high grain prices at the potential cost of loosing billions in sales of fossil fuels?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    I don't think perfection is reducing your armed capabilities to that of a 3rd rate power. The loss of thousands of your forces and elites. The complete isolation of your country and helped expand the border of NATO.

    It's perfect alright. A perfect way to fcuk up your own country.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Yes, there isn't much of a master-plan there beyond war (with initial goal to take the whole country) and general destruction and pillage (the objective failed, so we'll get as much of Ukraine as we can, and devastate the rest).

    What has Ukraine got to loot for would be occupiers? From what I understand an important part of its wealth is very good agricultural land, farm machinery + infrastructure, the grain stores from previous harvests it would like to export.

    How do you wreck Ukraine's economy (and perhaps cause some chaos elsewhere in the world as a side "benefit")? Ruin the above, blockade Ukraine's ports, kill the farmers or drive them off the land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,388 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    They haven't lost those sales yet. Back a month ago even US news sites were saying there's no replacement for the likes of Hungary and southeast Europe. Germany and Italy now willing to pay in Rubles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,446 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    What has it got to loot? As in the reason why or benefits to Russia occupying Ukraine?

    Well they would have the entire south coast for ports. Ukraine also has untapped oil/gas reserves in the west which would be easier to extract than in north Russia. Russia Expected a quick regime change in Ukraine with soft sanctions, they were not thinking about holding the world hostage to hunger as a reason for invading. TBH, I don't think many know why Russia invaded, it certainly was not to seize farm machinery or grain stockpiles.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,446 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Not yet, it's hard to see a true effect as with worldwide prices being so high and potentially EU countries stockpiling or filling their reserves, it could lead to an abrupt cutoff from Russia. All we hear is people spewing out random numbers like 1bil a day or 10bil a week going to Russia, or something crazy like that.

    Russia have cut off I think Poland, Bulgaria and Finland, I highly doubt they will be coming back as a customer. More and more Eu countries are reducing their reliance on Russian Gas and Oil and Russia is selling it's excess for a discount on the open market (I believe Russian oil is one of the most expensive to extract also, possibly down to the Kleptocracy)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,850 ✭✭✭threeball


    Russias greatest allies since the invasion began has not been Belarus, China or India as many would suggest but rather Germany, France, and to a lesser degree, Italy. No one has done more to keep the Russian war machine trundling on. The blood of up to 50,000 Ukrainians is on their hands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,388 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    They look at things long term, 10, 20, 50 years from now.

    Finland, Sweden joining Nato didn't come into their plans. The threat of nuclear weapons was supposed to keep them cowering and out.

    The losses are supposed to be martyrs to be celebrated and avenged. Nothing to government.

    The way they look at it get to next winter, heck just in a few months in Africa with famine on the TV and next winter in Europe with people dying from cold if they don't buy Russian gas and they'll have won. Even the UN is trying to get countries to deal with Russia again at this point in time and even with what is proven war crimes in Ukraine.

    I'm as anti Russian as they come but unless we see a full scale operation and relief of Ukraine by UK and US forces in the air and on the ground then I fear Putin has played this well long term for ground gained. All the Russians have to do is let the cards fall, famine in the world, dying from cold in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I was agreeing with your post and asking those questions rhetorically. Probably not expressing myself very clearly and should go to sleep.

    I think at this stage there is slim hope for Russia of achieving "regime change" or ever occupying most of the country or imposing Russian control on it.

    So my point was the aim now appears to be take as much as they can, and wreck the rest. They may not even be confident now of holding on to some of the parts in the East/South they occupy at present longer term.

    So soldiers looting machinery etc. (i.e. being permitted to), the robbing of, or bombing of grain silos and blockading Ukraine's exports is all part of that project of destroying the country.

    As you say, I think the possible effects of it on global food supplies are somewhat incidental, and a consequence of Russia's failure to achieve what they wanted initially.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,446 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I sure hope none of those countries who face famine didn't vote against or abstain the various UN resolutions condemning the war.

    You will find EU countries are filling their reserves to see them over the winter. Even before the war, it makes sense to buy cheap during summer to stockpile for winter. Obviously it's not that simple, but it's incomparable to a famine.

    Where has the UN been trying to get countries to deal with Russia again?

    Are they asking countries to export arms to Russia again or buy more Russian Oil & Gas?

    I think we've seen how useless the UN is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,160 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,487 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Putin hasn't played anything well. Geopolitically, he is a hundred of times worse off than before February 24th.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,734 ✭✭✭seenitall




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭Polar101


    The plan was to take Ukraine quickly. That didn't work, at all. It doesn't really look like there was a grand strategic plan behind it - Russia is now a pariah state, and Ukraine is in ruins. It's an absurd notion that this was Putin's plan all along.

    Russia doesn't really manufacture anything, and they need western imports for pretty much anything beyond basic goods and possibly weapons. They have a lot of natural resources, but they either refuse to sell them or are unable to. Russia needs the rest of the world more than the rest of the world needs Russia, even if there will be a shortage of Russian/Belarussian/Ukrainian grain, fertiliser and whatnot.

    Even if Russia gains some territory from the war, then what? They will be worse off, and then have new territories that are in ruins and have a hostile population. They played all their cards already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,484 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,484 ✭✭✭zv2


    There must be thousands of Russians phoning home and telling it like it is. The truth will have to seep in eventually, especially with all this talk from the courts about war crimes.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    Daughter Of Russian President, Maria Vorontsova, Defends Russia's Actions (extra.ie)

    Crookes telling the world they are not crooks and then playing the victim. Putins family remind me of a bunch of 5-year-olds. Hopefully, most of, if not all of their money will be found and taken from them.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Field east


    reason for invading was to get back to the good old USSR days for starters and as collateral damage weaken the west/democracy’s while he is at it. He has said so himself in very clear language



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Field east


    I would give the UN credit for the evacuation of the Mariupol steel plant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    They will also still have full sanctions against them and the likelihood of their energy pot shrinking as the EU unwinds its exposure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Putin is the one prolonging the war with ever reducing objectives. TBH I don't get this continuing condemnation of countries who are not starting wars in another country. Even if they did tomorrow whatever it is people demand of them, and it seems to be many things, Putin would still push on with his lunacy to the end. The solution is a Russian recognition that they will not win this and to deal with the world on that basis. That will not happen under Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    This sounds a lot more like your own personal frustrations. They are doing these things even if you think you know better. The oil and gas moves take time. Ukraine has stated they don't plan to apply for NATO and if you understood the requirements of the EU accession process you'd be aware just how far off the criteria they are. As Macron said probably decades. Ukrainian intelligence in recent weeks have suggested August will be a key month and a likely end to all of this by year end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    How does promising fast tracked entry to either Nato or the EU help the war end faster? You can't be at war and join the EU or Nato, so it's in Russia's interest not to end the war until all their objectives are achieved. (If they even can be achieved)

    Also, if you include the cost of hosting refugees, I doubt American aid is actually anywhere near what Europe is spending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Russia got 12bn for its Wheat last year, food is deeply undervalued.


    There would be a good argument to suggest that EU food policy for the last 20 years has been driven by Russia for its own strategic interests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    China taking Taiwan would be the de-facto end of Pax Americana in the far-East and Pacific, one of the great strategic and foreign policy achievements - and something that actually benefits us all.

    Just as there are blood hatreds and scabs in Eastern Europe that Putin wants to pick at, so too there is in Asia.

    The US has long had a strategic ambiguity about Taiwan. But they may as well say what they mean at this stage, they won't allow Taiwan to fall and the Pacific Ocean to be a contested theatre with China causing havoc undoing all the gains for the region since WW2.

    People may bristle at Team America World Police, but wait until you get a taste of People's Republic of China, Pacific Troublemakers. Bad news for us all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Just on appeasement and I mentioned it here before the biggest and most egregious appeasers of world war 2 were Churchill, Roosevelt and Clement atlee. The way they abandoned Eastern Europe to Stalin and deported people in mass population transfers from Western Europe to a life in the gulags in the aftermath of world war 2 far outweighs the appeasement of chamberlain. Of course it was airbrushed from history. But we are paying for the actions of those men in the current war today. Appeasement never goes away it is ever present in time of war. And there will be major appeasement in the final settlement of this war you can be sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,825 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Can NATO accept an application from a country that has a territorial dispute or does not fully control its borders?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The leader of the pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk has said that all prisoners of war from the Azovstal steel plant will be tried by a tribunal in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic.

    With a very fair "legal" process of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Russian troops shelled Apostolove district of Dnipropetrovsk region with MLRS Uragan

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    That's a balanced post.

    Another way to look at it is to wind the clock back to late 2021 and consider how the political, energy and security universe has changed in ways that would have been truly unfathomable at the time.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement