So UFOs aren't a theory anymore - but we still don't know what they are

Sure, but you comment on what you think anyway and add that it was a dubious source. My evidence was derived from the Warren Commission, is that questionable? It is not hard to discern that debunkers are lying when reading a statement from Dr Shaw. In addition, Nal uploaded an image showing that Connally bullet hit his right shoulder/back, tumbled sideways, and caused a 3cm wound. This is a debunker image, not a conspiracy image

Can you make out the writing in the middle? Too difficult for Shifty? What is the length of the bullet? Is that difficult to decipher. 

According to the debunkers, the entry wound measured 3 centimeters, or 1.25 inches. As this is the narrative used to support the theory that the bullet hit something before impacting Connally 's right shoulder/back, and the Carcano bullet measured 3cm in length also hit sideways. The case is closed, 

Dr Shaw Connally stated that the entry wound was 1.5 cm but was enlarged to 3 cm on the operating table. Then how can the entry wound be 3cm in size and caused by a tumbling sideways Carcano bullet?

Do not bother with the rest of your nonsense regarding my knowledge and understanding of the subject. Due to the fact that it may not have occurred to you yet that the narrative is false, it is a pretty big deal to mess up something so important about the magic bullet.  

..

"I don't get it/buy it, therefore some conspiracy occurred I can't detail" according to you in all your conspiracies, according to the flat-earther who was in here before, according to the poster who thinks satellites are fake, according to every single Covid conspiracy theorist we've had in here for two years

It's one hell of a coincidence how you all think the same way..

In agreement with my position on question 4. 

quote "Yep. Objects, which are moving through the arir which have yet to be identified.That's why we call them UFOs. For a person who is obsessed with spelling, what does arir mean? 

It is difficult for one to argue with someone who accepts my theory that there are objects that defy physics but has a problem with the possibility that they could be aliens.

Most of your questions have already been answered in other posts, I am only repeating myself. 

*Thinks*... This looks like an interesting post to drop in on.

Oops, big bloody mistake. @Cheerful S is posting on here.

*Thinks*... Hit return button quickly and get the fcuk out of here.

Can't do that. If they start questioning or challenging one, they might start thinking about their own. They might start seeing the similarities and realise how the other conspiracy theorist got scammed in the same way they did.

I give you the short version. I have written three postings over last three weeks about your objections to the term UFOs and craft as well as why I believe craft displays unique signs makes them likely non terrestrial. I even listed the five obseravables that you completely decided to ignore. The five observables are why the UAPs are not human-made things. 

Reiterating the same lines of logic and thinking in your posts, nothing new in any of your questions. Previously I addressed your complaints, denying I have. Additional discussion is not required until something new is brought to the table.  

Have a listen to this. The pilot of an American fighter aircraft who was present during the Nimitz ufo incident was also involved in another separate encounter with an unidentified flying object. Listen and open your ears and internalize what the cockpit controls and defense systems aboard his aircraft were telling him about the object/craft, whatever you want to call it.. If you have questions regarding that encounter, try to answer. The problem arises when you repeat the same thing and do not even notice it. You probably find lot of questions answered in around 8,9 10 of the thread page. Insulting me again shows your character, not mine.  

Probably just other jets, a weather balloon and unintended optical camera effects

For one of the "sightings"

“Just because I’m saying that we saw this unusual thing in 2004 I am in no way implying that it was extraterrestrial or alien technology or anything like that,” Dietrich said.

Again, it's always the same blurry and "just out of focus" footage

Aliens, Bigfoot, fairies, Loch Ness Monster: "We want them to see us, but always just out of focus"

So are orbs and rods extinct now?