Buffalo mass shooting - Great Replacement Theory & the long trail of blood

Again though, this seems like over-simplification.

Why have humans always migrated to centres of commerce or places with greater freedoms over history? Is that driven by fears of their hosts of pension crises? This assertion seems to me to be by the need to find simple singular motivations which can then be translated into simple singular solutions. In this case, migration you say is driven by several countries fearing a pension crisis and thus this is the primary motivation — and so the answer is simple — avoid the pension crisis a different way and you can just drop the need for migration. Or to out it even more simply, pop out more native babies and we won’t need foreigners.

Ultimately, if someone is concerned about “replacement migration” it seems to me that the best solution is to take away the things that make Ireland an attractive place to come to. Run the place in to the ground, ditch the EU, reject globalism and establish economic autarky, foster intolerance — make Ireland a place absolutely nobody would want to go and congratulations, the Irish have been saved from replacement (well, the ones that don’t emigrate....).

Theres nothing leading about it. Replacement migration is a real thing. Its not a shadowy conspiracy, its a policy pursued for primarily economic reasons. I never acknowledged any plot to turn us all into muslims? In fact I repeatedly stated on this thread that such conspiracies are nonsense.

To correct the apple analogy, the number of granny smiths is decreasing not increasing. European birthrates are declining and are already below replacement levels, so European populations are decreasing over time. At the same time, numbers of immigrants to EU is increasing to make up the deficit and try to stop the population from dropping. i.e, a replacement for the otherwise natural population decline.

Low skilled workers, paying 8% tax, are not going to be paying for anyone's pensions in Ireland.

They'll need more in supports than they pay in. And let's not forget remittances.

Yeah but this is my point — you are oversimplifying the factors which drive migration and boiling it down to some idea that simply by addressing the pension crisis (i.e. having more babies), this will end the ‘need’ for migration and thus effectively end migration. Simple solution.

But if we look at a place like Hungary — we get an idea of the conundrum. Here is a country with strict immigration rules and also lacking in economic vibrancy — meaning it’s not hugely attractive to migrants versus other European countries nor indeed is it attractive for its young people who emigrate. It also is a country that has made its ill-feeling towards immigration somewhat clear. So they avoid immigration and the dreaded replacement of Hungarians. But the downside to making things sh*t enough for migrants to not want to come is that you make things also kinda sh*t for Hungarians. Cue emigration, stagnation and population decline when it transpires that you can’t just throw money at women to bang out 4 kids in modern Europe when they have ambitions of their own that go beyond being a baby maker in Mr Orbans Hungarian People Factory.

So there’s the rub. If you want to end the “replacement” — then you have to hit and maintain perpetually that lovely little sweet spot between Ireland being just OK enough and Ireland being just sh*t enough.

Again, the only person who mentioned the Kalergi plan in this thread is you. it was not even being discussed until you brought it up, and I still fail to see any relevance to it.

If the posts are from yesterday evening you are well capable of finding them and pointing them out, in the time its taken you to type out multiple posts today telling all and sundry that its all been debunked you could have actually linked the reply you are referring to.

Can you point out where I have defending an anti-semetic, neo-Nazi conspiracy theory? Or where I have tried to aggravate racial hatred? Because I am not seeing that in this thread. Despite the subject matter this thread has been mostly civil in tone with the exception of yourself trying to belittle 3rd parties as being 'drug addicts' and 'getting hit in the head for fun'.

The US records hispanic white and non-hispanic white population information - based on that it is reasonable to infer that hispanic people can be "white".

Unless you believe in that US position that if you arent a god fearing WASP you aren't white? Racist opinion to hold imo