Buffalo mass shooting - Great Replacement Theory & the long trail of blood

What’s interesting about the Great Replacement Theory garbage is that it seems obsessed with finding the “design” in migration — rather than looking at the complex socioeconomic factors that drive migration and indeed the relatively non-complex factor that the countries where people are being “replaced” are relatively wealthy, tolerant and safe. Disregard all that however, because the real reason they are coming is because of decisions made at the Project Great Replacement AGM, held in an underground cavern, attended by the usual Liberal dignitaries like George Soros, an Islamic State fighter posing as a 19 year old Syrian refugee and a mysterious blue-haired, black non-binary snowflake known only to the Right as The Woke Liberal Elite Person.

Great Replacement Theory is, in essence, an intellectually vacuous argument that tries to find an easy answer for a complex phenomenon — i.e. it’s all due to design and therefore there must be a designer and therefore by overcoming the designer you end the design. It’s simplistic rubbish.

No they most certainly are not - thats worthy of a thread of its own though I reckon

People are "removed" when they die, naturally or otherwise. If group A are not having enough children to maintain population level, then the population of A is declining over time. If group B immigrate and are having more children, over time group B will replace group A at the total population level of that particular place.

If group B did not arrive then of course group A would still be in decline, but not replaced. That's irrelevant though. The semantic point you are trying to argue is whether it constitutes replacement, as I've just shown, it does.

He reportedly boasted online about the illegal modifications he was making to the weapon - some controversy as to whether the FBI should have gone after him on it

I seem to remember if was ok for the white supremacists to replace the original population of America

European birthrates are sub-replacement level, so populations will decline unless immigrants are brought in. How is that not "replacing"?

Not even a conspiracy, its just the definition of the word. Those who die are replaced by immigrants instead of through native births at the macro level. Arguing "there is no replacement unless people are killed" is semantics in the extreme, but also incorrect.