Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

RTÉ journalist found guilty of sexually assaulting woman as she slept

Options
191012141523

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,152 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Im starting to think many posters here have never been involved in any form of sexual relationship, either a one night stand or a long term one. The amount of time you'd have to waste explaining to each one the context for every scenario with their silly hypothetical, it's like they've never had any normal sexual relationship ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    That's not what I said, and you know that. I said it wasn't rape, and I left that remark at the end, which had nothing to do with my judgment about the status of the situation as a whole. It was simply something that made no sense that had no relevance to the rape part. Putting words in peoples mouth is the work of the desperate, the minute you do it you've lost the argument.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A jury of 12 convicted- if it were a hung jury then this would indicate that the issues and facts at stake wasn’t so straightforward and possibly that it should never have come to trial in the first place -but this isn’t the case.

    The man’s own testimony of what he did essentially gave the jury the means to convict- he essentially demonstrated sexual assault without consent, even though he didn’t believe that’s what he did.

    If you think the law on sexual assault is not right, then I guess lobbying your TD to change it is one option but it’s clear from the jury verdict this was very much an open and shut case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,149 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Yes its no suprise that IT types with an obsession with cycling and posting online have a hard time meeting women



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’d actually beg to differ on your first points above- SOME people, maybe MANY people, but not necessarily all or indeed most, would agree that normative behaviours in the past were “innocent” or “acceptable” - while they may not have complained openly in the way we see today, the concept of wrong and right didn’t start with the creation of Twitter, social media and the metoo movement- it’s been long before that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,075 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    I would doubt that it does.

    It's not just an issue of whether consent exists, it's also an issue of whether somebody can make a case that they had reasonable belief that consent exists.

    If somebody kisses their partner good night or gives them a snuggle, as they've been doing for years, it will be possible for them to argue that they had a reasonable belief that consent existed. If they went further and started doing what this guy was convicted for, as they'd been doing similar without issue in the past, they could make the same defence.

    The issue here is that this guy couldn't make the argument that he had reasonable grounds to believe that consent existed. If the argument was advanced in court that her getting into bed with him and engaging in consensual 'foreplay-style activity' before saying no to penetrative sex and going to sleep constituted reasonable grounds for belief that he had consent to lie on top of her and grope her breasts while she slept, then the jury didn't buy it.



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You’ve over simplified things in your above scenario meaning that we’re now not talking about the same situation- it’s pointless engaging with you if you’re going to bring in scenarios totally unrelated to what ACTUally occurred.

    There’s a big difference between people in a long term relationship who have established sexual activity norms and a stranger lying on top of a woman who is asleep attempting sexual activity when she previously said no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭Amenhotep



    Well that's not a f*ckin surprise!!!

    On your way out to buy your purple hair dye, say hello to your 12 cats...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Well thank you for that well considered and informed in-depth responce!

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    If somebody kisses their partner good night or gives them a snuggle, as they've been doing for years, it will be possible for them to argue that they had a reasonable belief that consent existed. If they went further and started doing what this guy was convicted for, as they'd been doing similar without issue in the past, they could make the same defence.

    We'll be in real trouble as a society if partners cannot resolve personal issues like this and resort to clogging up the courts and allowing convictions, in the public eye at the very least, to be assigned to their life partners.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,213 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I think the bringing up the married couple to explain/compare is pointless. They are not really comparable

    Even if the physical acts are comparable.......

    But I guess it is worth thinking on

    Had a husband did that exact same thing to his wife, 99.9999 percent time they'd probably have a joke about it next morning.

    Yet, in this case, a female was in her evidence to the point of suicide.....these are the possible emotional complexities of human intimacy, and why I do have sympathy for him, and for her!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    Gender-less cats who've fought against all of societies toxic gender stereotypes, in the name of pure feline liberation

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    No? I don't see the difference. Consent is consent after all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭Pussyhands




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    So a married woman should have less of a right to consent?

    Thats exactly what you have said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    Imagine if all the drunken hugs that you've given to people through the years on nights out, could be considered sexual assault, simply because you didn't get a verbal or written agreement

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 33,664 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    You really don't see the difference?

    Or you're arguing for the sake of arguing?

    In any case, the behaviour needs to be such that it would prompt a complaint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Excuse me, but explain exactly what is the legal difference. And exactly when & where any difference arises in terms of length of relationship or nature of it. Is it after second date, a week, a month, marriage or what? Otherwise your POV doesn't stand up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    He knew her friend after meeting them on night out ...not exactly stranger and obviously felt comfortable with him asking her back



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The concept of consent still stands for married couples- I think that’s worth pointing out; there may well be many women out there who have had experiences of non consensual sexual activity with their long term partners who haven’t made a complaint - I’m hoping these numbers are small but they’re likely bigger than we might imagine them to be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭thefallingman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The point of a married couple is that they would deal with an incident like this particular one in another way on account of the very different relationship. This is two strangers negotiating the limits of consent and he ending up not doing that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    I was watching Eastenders the other week and Janine and Danny Dyers character were staring at each other and next thing he went and kissed her.

    How come you never hear about any complaints being made about consent on tv shows? She didn't give consent for him to kiss her.

    The reality is this type of thing is done by men and women across the country every single day and both parties are perfectly fine and understand even if they are not in the mood. These batsh!t crazy women are dangerous.



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh totally - like there’s huge similarity between a fully clothed hug with someone who’s awake and a naked straddling of someone who’s asleep who previously said no to such activity- in fact I can’t see any difference whatsoever



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Your views on this clearly state any physical contact without prior verbal consent is an assault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Why, consent is consent? If a husband does the exact same thing to a sleeping wife, she cannot have consented.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,689 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    There isn't really. Just because you have consented to things in the past doesn't mean people can take liberties with you.

    Isn't that what is thought in those consent classes, never assume?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Technically speaking it would actually not be "rape". But it would be considered to be "rape under section 4" which is a sexual assault offence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,971 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement