Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1140414051407140914103690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,391 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    When the soviet union fell, a lot of their military plans became public. I saw the plans they had for the invasion of Ireland. They were on display in the college I went to. Full maps of Dublin with the different areas they should take. Some of them actually correlated with the sites of the 1916 rebellion. I believe the Phoenix park was going to to be a big runway. And I'm not 100% certain of this but there might have been a contingency plan to nuke killybegs, because it's a deepwater port and it would deny it's use to the US.

    The germans prepared guides and plans for an invasion.

    I saw stuff about the guides they were going to hand out to troops. Very basic stuff like "the locals drink guinness". :)

    I tried finding it again but couldn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,391 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    If only armies had engineers that could build ports quickly. Or build and repair landing strips. That sort of thing would have been handy in the past. I bet they would have loved it at d-day for example. It would have prevented them from having to just dump stuff off shore after the original invasion and just hope it floated in.

    Editing to add: I don't think we have to worry about the Russians invading at the moment. Not after their abysmal performance in Ukraine. But a genuine superpower could. And that was the point. Because of their strategic locations, countries like ireland and iceland are worth targeting. The chances are slim that the situation would arise where it would happen, it would have to be a truly global conflict, but it's not beyond reason to think it might.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The fact that such a plan existed doesn't mean it was ever likely to be actioned. It's just one of those things to have on file, ready, if it ever needs to be actioned. I'd be completely surprised if the USA doesn't/didn't have one either. The UK certainly has one.

    Officers and generals have a lot of free time when not on active duty. It's quite possible, likely even, that the Soviets had invasion plans prepared for nearly every country in Europe, if not on earth.



  • Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What Gulag did these creatures spend their childhood in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,391 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I think it would only have been actioned in the case of a third world war, between the USSR and NATO, which thankfully never happened. Even then I'd imagine it would have been a war where nukes hadn't been used yet. Because otherwise I doubt anyone would have enough living soldiers left to invade anywhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To be able to provide live target coordinates for a moving target at sea to a missile,you need something close to the target,like a drone with datalink to verify and identify before launching a missile.

    Neptune missiles doesnt have datalink for midcourse updates,so that makes it even more important to verify and identify before launching,since there is a lot of civilian traffic in the area.

    Neptune missiles uses active radar seeker that cant verify the target like many other NATO missiles can NSM and LRASM,and uses datalinks for midcourse updates.

    Using satellittes and orion surveillance planes will only give location,not target coordinates



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How quickly? Because like I said, if anyone thinks that while we're outside of NATO the Brits wouldn't have everything wiped at speed only constrained by how long it took to turn their missile launchers they're incredibly naive. Again, all assuming they somehow got here unmolested and untracked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Fully agree. We could easily specialise in something like logistics, medical support, naval support etc and make a decent contribution. It’s the selfish free loading that I find objectionable . Building up the army and defence to deal with all hypothetical threats is unnecessary. Contributing something to the wider defence of Europe and the western world is necessary.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I find it a bit depressing that the thread about Ukrainian refugees seems more active than the thread about the conflict.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    If world politics gets to such a position that the UK has left NATO then maybe. But if things get to that point then NATO likely doesn't exist anymore. If the UK and France leave then its a fairly pointless cooperation as you have only the US as a nuclear state and although they currently provide the vast majority of NATO capabilities, if they are also then the only nuclear power its not really much of an alliance.


    Being part of NATO isn't going to help if NATO doesn't exist anymore, and the UK invading Ireland isn't going to be happening, even though the UK is clearly the biggest military threat to Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If the Brits were invading who would they be fighting? And if it's about controlling the Eastern Atlantic then whoever they're fighting will just launch 50 missiles to **** our **** up instead.

    For some people it's still unthinkable that Russia would invade Ukraine. For some they wouldn't believe it til it happened. The only reason 25 years ago it would be unthinkable for Russia to invade Ukraine was because they were completely under Russia's thumb so they had no call to invade. Was it unthinkable they'd invade Poland/Hungary/Estonia/Bulgaria/Lithuania/Latvia? Because those countries seemed worried enough to jump into NATO ASAP. They were invading and **** around in places in the 90s even before Putin came to power, only the naive expected them to stop acting like an empire all of a sudden.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,308 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    There's not as much to discuss. The conflict has "slowed" quite a bit. New developments have also decreased.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This is still the busiest of the three threads currently relating to Ukraine,

    It's not exactly dieing now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,308 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,505 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I hope that the guy in Russia with the jerrycan and box of matches sets fire to somewhere oily in Moscow, directly in Putin's line of sight on the 9th. Doesn't have to be too close, just as long as Putin sees the plume while reviewing his parade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,308 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,443 ✭✭✭Cordell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Off to bikini bottom....


    Still waiting on news of the other 400 missing sailors from the Moskva



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Well it's a hypothetical future but at this moment in time absolutely I would expect the US to intervene on our behalf if we were being invaded. It's one of the reasons we let things like transport of prisoners slide in Shannon but also historically the us has always supported Irish independence



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,854 ✭✭✭zv2


    Maybe that's because the Russians have reached a special military stalemate. All downhill for them now?

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,808 ✭✭✭threeball


    Right now with Biden in power its pretty much a forgone conclusion that the US back Ireland if we're invaded. You get Trump or someone of his ilk in charge and we'll be left swinging. Then again, with Trump in charge, Putin could probably have annexed the Baltics and they wouldn't have got backing such was his distain for NATO.

    I think we need to join NATO, get their input on what they want to see on the Island. I'm guessing it will be upgraded radar, anti ship missiles and possibly a mobile SAM launcher or two. It won't be huge but it would be a deterrent to anyone with designs on attacking us just because its so easy as it stands.



  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's because a lot of the thread banned from here and those saying Ukraine should fight to the death but their families aren't welcome here are venting their usual sh1te



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Tsk tsk.

    Towing from the top link. Driver will be fired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,574 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    It a bad day for the Russians it seems.


    Delighted.


    Edit: wrong word!!!!

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭eire4


    At the very least as a member of the EU we need to stop behaving so selfishly and being free loaders when it comes to defense and upgrade our military and overall security capabilities until we have a legitimate defense capability and are carrying our weight in terms of overall European security. Our current selfishness is not just about not spending enough on defense it is also the mentality that well its highly unlikely that we will be attacked so feck it no need to spend on defense let other countries do that. We are part of the EU and better off for it overall as being part of the collective gives us so much more then just been out there on our own. We need to pull our weight as well on defense with the mentality of being part of a bigger overall picture and stop being so selfish.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    The EU is a trading block. What's it got to do with defense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    The EU was a trading block. It has been much much more for at least three decades now.

    The hint is in the name.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭Slava_Ukraine


    "Love this account"


    Me too. It really brightens what are otherwise dark days.

    Post edited by Slava_Ukraine on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭Ceramic


    There’s a realistic balance to be struck. We aren’t strategically all that significant but we aren’t entirely irrelevant either. I think we have been naive about our position and our defence, particularly in areas like cyber security, being abused as a weak spot for espionage and having an inability to use active radar to protect flight paths.

    We need to improve our defence infrastructure but we also don’t need to totally lose the run of ourselves either. We are absolutely not in the high risk position Ukraine is in nor that Finland, Sweden, Poland, Estonia etc all find themselves in.

    We are too close to the UK, US and also France to be at significant risk.

    I think that Russian missile test in the Atlantic however is a bit of a wake up call and so is the weird infrastructure that Russia was trying to build at the embassy.

    We can’t just take things absolutely for granted either and I think we do need to formalise our defence relationships with the neighbouring countries, even if that doesn’t involve joining NATO.

    I would see a future for Ireland investing in high tech, coast effective defence of the island, mostly focused on advanced radar, maybe some drone capabilities and a lot of cyber security, which probably should draw on support from some of the mega IT companies with a lot of infrastructure here.

    I would also think it’s quite urgent that we wind down the scale of the embassy. There’s ludicrously oversized diplomatic operations relative to scale of trade and population. Either just end diplomatic relationships or reduce it to just the ambassador and a couple of support staff. We didn’t even have a USSR embassy here until the early 70s and we frankly don’t need that level of diplomacy. The prospects for normal relations between anywhere and Russia are dim at this stage.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement