Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1136313641366136813693690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭ronivek


    This is nonsense: the choice to fight is 100% down to Ukraine and Ukrainians. It doesn't matter how many weapons NATO supply if Ukraine don't have the will to fight: and it's clear they have that in spades.

    The only decision NATO and the US have is to what extent they help Ukraine to enforce its own will and determine its own future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I’ve already said diplomacy and/or concessions like nato agreees to leave Ukraine out.


    Any other concessions you'd like for Russia to be able to dictate? Suppose they decided that they didn't want Ireland to be in the EU anymore. Should the EU "make concessions" and give us the boot?



    The irony is that if things had gone Russia's way, it would have had new borders with NATO by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Do you actually read posts? Or do you just make things up in your head so you can poke at people?

    "A certain poster" said that the mythical NATO MLRS systems you claimed were "already in Ukraine" would be much more difficult to supply than 155mm howitzers. You're now posting pictures of 155mm howitzer propellant being flown to Ukraine and trying to prove... what exactly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭Field east


    by the way there is a very very serious war on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You don't seem to be able to acknowledge that is a war on the edge of Europe, that has the capacity to have long running impacts on all other European states, including little wee Ireland here. Last time we saw war on this scale in Europe was in 1939 & 1914 before that.

    You seem to suggest that giving Ukraine some weapons is OK but giving them too many weapons is a bad idea as that will prolong things. This is very woolly thinking, the worst of both outcomes for Ukrainian citizens. Enough to salve 'your' conscience but not enough that they can drive the invading army out. A recipe for misery & death.

    As we know, war is polarising. There is less room for vacillating and having an opinion this way and that. That's the way of it.

    So you either support Ukraine fully and advocate that they should get as much assistance as possible, even though it impacts on us. Or you go and get a job working for the Russian embassy running their line of propaganda. To be caught in the middle, neither one nor another is to be useless and ineffectual.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Edit: please dont respond to this post, I’ve said it all before, not repeating again. You disagree , I’m fine with that and am happy to move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Give it a rest with the psycho analysing.

    Ive said my piece, let’s let this thread move on and it can go back to the harmonious echos of agreement…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    The don't seem to understand that their infantile propaganda doesn't work with western people.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    If that happens Ukraine must join NATO and we are all at war. I'm ok with that because anything less means the destruction of Ukraine and we can't back down from the bully. Make your will and shine up your bullets, we're off to war.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,766 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Simple question, as obviously it needs to be: Which of the two countries has the 2nd largest military on the planet, and therefore a large advantage in number of weapons?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭dybbuk


    That's BBC.

    In reality the empire and several other parties have been steering the V(o)ladimirs towards this war pretty much since the USSR was dissolved. Very much like it was done with Iran to end up in a war against Iraq.

    One must know nothing about Russia's history and be really very gullible to believe that the Russians just want to kill Ukrainians. It is effectively a civil war.

    It would be very difficult to isolate and identify the most important stakeholders benefiting from this. But, if one thinks about it, it would be the same parties who are responsible for climate change and other unsustainable business. But some entities are obviously responsible: NATO, USA, UK, entities controlling Western media, space exploration or requiring new resources and territory.

    Historically Russia has been more of a peacemaker and less of an invader than any major European nation. Had the USA and/or other NATO members agreed to just stop encroaching on the Russian Federation in February, they would not have been a war. Now nearly 3/4 or Russians support it. AND: thats is also what many Ukranians, Ukranians fleeing to the West think as well.

    The West wants more from Russia than Russia wants from the West. Look at the map! Russia can live happily without you. It is true they don't make iPohnes there. But they have everything else.

    The West, the members of the NATO (!) supply weapons to the Ukraine but keep financing Russia buying fuels of them. It's in your face. If you are blind to that, it is because you chose to be. As you chose the empire versus versatility, Hollywood vs culture a planet filled with garbage over Nature. You chose death over life and you did so d e m o c r a t i c a l l y. Suddenly Russia and China don't look so bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I’m done in here, so you can all rest peacefully that I will try not to post stuff that challenges your strongly held absolute beliefs. I will make a statement that hopefully closes off this session:

    Flooding Ukraine with weapons is absolutely the only game in town and will Yield the best results . There’s no other way to manage the war cause Putin is a sociopath and everybody else is doing everything right and should not be questioned.

    Anybody who suggests ANYTHING otherwise is daly , Wallace , too left, too right; pro Putin , likes Putin , hates USA or is blaming USA , possibly a hitler fan , probably a trump supporter , hates Ukraine , doesn’t want Ukraine independence and probably wants general Zod to beat superman.

    We all good now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,852 ✭✭✭zv2


    There's too much whataboutery in that article for my liking, even if it is factual. The overriding fact is that Russia has engaged in mass murder in Ukraine and they need to be burned out of it. They can talk politics another time. Also, the fear of NATO expansion is a psychological artifact of the cold war, which is understandable. But all these issues can be solved without raping children. And those countries that don't condemn the war on moral grounds are being a bit too smug and cowardly for my liking.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,117 ✭✭✭✭Discodog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Im not being contrarian, tried to PM you to answer your question. The problem is one of you asks a question , I answer, then another asks a question, in the meantime another person accuses me of being contrarian or left or Daly or Wallace and to be frank I don’t want to engage people who insult me by constantly guessing my motives for being on here and then write them almost matter of fact.


    I can tell people are enjoying some of you having a go at me and that sort of says it all. I didn’t come here to offend people or with an agenda. Just to talk. Why do I ask questions? Because there is a lot I don’t know. That’s not a contrarian view its a pragmatic and realistic view and acceptance my own limited knowledge and understanding of the gravity of this war.

    I think some of you are so entrenched in your views you can only see posters as an ally or a hostile. And that’s how you respond , not with interest to discuss but hostility or sarcasm to knock down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Mick Wallace and Claire Daly want to say hello...

    Along with a bunch of other useful idiots who parrot their sh**te



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭Crocodile Booze


    Their "Victory" parade will be a bit like when the losing Irish football team would parade around College Green in an open top bus, cheered on by thousands of frenzied fans.

    Altogether now comrades : "Give it a lash, Vlad. Give it a lash Vlad, never never never say no. Russia, Russia dictatorship of Russia, round em up and watch em blow......" 🎶 ☢️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    This is pure and unbridled propaganda. I think you're pasting from the wrong script, nobody here will buy this.

    You should follow the lead of the other concern trolls, they go along the lines of " Yeah, Putin's a dick but Ukraine should have just rolled over and NATO is only prolonging the inevitable".

    This is just so out there, you won't even get an argument out of anyone, because it's too far out there.

    2/10, must try harder.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "Historically Russia has been more of a peacemaker and less of an invader than any major European nation."

    Do you think the Russian Empire ended up with territory from the Pacific to the Baltic and Central Europe; from the Arctic to the Central Asian steppe all with flower power and peace pipes?

    That's the biggest naive chump take on Russian history I've heard in a long time. You have some serious reading to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    Historically Russia has been more of a peacemaker and less of an invader than any major European nation.

    You must be kidding. And where such a statement is in the article you linked to?

    The West wants more from Russia than Russia wants from the West. Look at the map! Russia can live happily without you. It is true they don't make iPohnes there. But they have everything else.

    Yeah, they have everything, even Iskanders have US made parts in them. They need west much more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,427 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, the Russian empire was a huge colonial power like all the others. But as soon as the Soviets came to power a century ago, they made sure to hold onto all the imperial territories, often using brute force.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    It only has to work with their subjects, or enough of them. For the most part those over 30, where putin gets most of his support base.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Example: Circassian genocide. Probably the largest genocide of the 19th century and a template for the horrors or the 20th.

    Haven't heard of the Circassian people of the North Caucuses? That's because they were all either murdered or exiled (mostly to the Ottoman Empire) by the advancing Russian army. As a people, they more or less don't exist any longer. Toltsoy wrote about their destruction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Is there a pro Ukraine rally or Irish rally to protest against the planned pro Russian rally in dublin on may the 9th?

    was having a look to see if there was and I came accords this.

    another motorcade of Russian support planned ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    I wouldn't go so far, Trump's followers are falling for propaganda every bit as crude and clumsy (and worse). It doesn't matter that it's patently nothing but lies, they gobble that up like it's manna from heaven.

    They don't care about the content, they only care about the hate. It's a new type of human to me, a few steps back from the rest of us, but also more advanced. Whilst going along with nonsense that no six year old would fall for, they also can entirely switch off any higher brain function, leaving only enough capacity to breathe through their mouth, but also manage to square away several completely contradictory arguments at the same time. They just activate the one they need at this precise moment. If they need a completely contradictory argument to their previous one five minutes alter, their brain just swaps them out in memory without even a pause.

    Remarkable step in evolution. No thoughts or principles besides what is the prescribed notion at this very moment and just let yourself drift with the general mass. It must be wonderful. No fears or doubts, just herd instinct. I do envy them that.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    While this war is the bastard son of many fathers, you're just as gullible to paint the above picture.

    Historically Russia has been more of a peacemaker and less of an invader than any major European nation.

    What.... oh wait, you're serious? Bit of a history lesson seeing as you reckon others know nothing. Though not a history lesson too many Russians hear in their schooling.

    1) Unlike many other European nations(and Russia most certainly is European), Russia didn't need to go off and build overseas empires, it was one already. Peter the Great literally named it as such; the Russian empire. An empire 9000 kms wide ruling over provinces through governors and migration from the west, with money and power concentrated in the west lording over indentured slaves. It has nearly 200 ethnic groups, who had and still has the power and money? Russia is one of the largest empires in world history. Just because they didn't carve up the New World with the rest doesn't make them any less so. This is a major point missed and lack of understanding shown by supporters in places like India and African nations.

    2) The Soviet Union, basically Russia under new management, expanded Russian lands from the get go. Her foundation was predicated on invasion and expansion. As WW2 loomed they claimed neutrality but got into bed with the actual nazis to carve up Europe between them, annexing parts of Poland, Lithunaia, Estonia, Romania and tried it on with Finland and got some of their lands too. Until the Austrian corporal hoodwinked them. When he did and they crapped themselves under the onslaught, they looked to the Allies and fought back with their help and millions of their own men and women, but were already going back to the original plan of carving up Europe. They actually got more of it in the aftermath than they would have done with the Germans even if the latter had stuck to the deal. Poland was going to be roughly half and half, Russia got all of it. They also grabbed Czechoslovakia, Albania, Romania, Hungary and half of Germany. Vassal provinces all to Moscow. Maybe you missed how quickly all of those states legged it away from Moscow as fast as they could when the USSR edifice crumbled? How quickly they looked west to protect their futures from Moscow? They saw them as the invaders they were.

    Other than Rome I can't think of any other European entity that has invaded and ruled over more lands, nations and people in Europe(and Asia) than Russia, and Rome was never as big. Peacemakers eh? Not invaders? Horse manure.


    EDIT: just looked it up there and the British Empire at its peak, by a long way the largest empire the world has ever seen, covered an area of 35 million square kilometres. Russia today covers an area of 17 milllion square kilometres. The Soviet Union covered an area of 23 milllon kilometres. They didn't get and keep that big by smiles and flowers.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement