Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1136213631365136713683690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Never said that and never said a country should Not defend itself. In these situations the general consensus is war or diplomacy. All the talk is constantly about how arming Ukraine more is the only solution.

    Granted we don’t know what’s going on in background but we are only discussing things here, it’s not like it makes any difference to things if we hypothesise different strategy’s or situations so I don’t know why people get so angry so quickly. There really is a toxic element to this thread where people make false accusations without trying to understand or even tease out an idea in advance of attacking a poster.

    Two months into this, why can’t Nato put “neutrality” or Ukraine not ever joining if Russia leaves on the table? Not ideal, but better then oblivion. Maybe Russia is ready to do a deal or maybe they are gonna fall, I am just spitballing.

    I see why Biden doesn’t want to try to get involved in brokering a peace deal but think it’s still a plausible option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,411 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    I'll deal with your points as you are making them


    Two months into this the Russians have moved away from pretending NATO or EU membership was ever the Problem. They are openly saying Ukraine isn't a country, it never was it is ours and Ukrainians are the dirt on their boot.

    For clarity this isn't their TV this is their foreign office and ambassadors.

    So to circle back. NATO and EU membership off the table doesn't matter.


    It never did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,444 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    More of a comment, but you again stated you never said something, but still haven't said that it is right for the Ukraine to defend itself.

    Of course this will end in talks, for that to happen you need both parties involved, russia are not getting involved at all and haven't laid out what their position is (which I really take to mean that they, i.e. putin, don't have any). Any talks so far have been used as a military tactic for repositioning and more shelling. Anyone thinking the US can force talks is incredibly incredibly naiive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I always take what Putin says to his people to be that he will say whatever nonsense he needs to say to do what he wants and get the support. Like riding a pony bareback.

    In terms of Ukraine not being a country , he’s been saying that for awhile (not just recently I believe) but I’m not completely clear on the NATO- Ukraine dynamic.

    Some people say that NATO has nothing to do with it and it’s a smokescreen to invade. Others say it was all about NATO expansion and NATO didn’t listen or negotiate.

    The argument then goes that Ukraine should of been made a member of Nato quickly and this doesn’t happen.

    The extreme footage of tv in Russia has been shocking. I know they are usually subjected to propaganda but has it always been that extreme about nuclear war and world war 3? Has it always been that anti west?

    For the record I was in Russia once , in 2002, hated it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Ok, well to clear up any ambiguity I fully support Ukraines right to fight, right to be free and defend themselves. I fully support any country offering support (including weapons) to help them against their aggressors.

    I am just asking if filling up the country with weapons will be the right thing for the best outcome for Ukrainians (whatever that is or how that looks).

    The optimist in me hopes Russia wants this over by May 9th and the support and supply to Ukraine has worked.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    And in that summary you have contradicted yourself.

    This is the thing: in times of relative peace we can be a bit of this and a bit of that. The luxury of sitting on the fence. In times of strife and war, it's more black & white. You're either for 'us' or against 'us'. Because there is little middle ground when an aggressive state like Russia just fancies that it will take over neighbouring states forcefully. Making excuses for them and/or offering 'what aboutery' just doesn't wash. Otherwise you might as well just well tell the invaded neighbours to roll over and suck it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    This footage was posted many times here yesterday, but this version is just disgusting. How dying people can be used for fun (irrespective, who they are)?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,411 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The reality . The basic reality is.

    If the country isn't given the means to defend itself then more citizens die. Not military. Actual people. More kids more adults more homes destroyed.

    Ukraine ceases to exist. Russia is already stealing people from Ukraine and spiriting them off to Russia . Literally taking kids and issuing new Russian passports. Issuing Russian birth certs in occupied areas.


    Let's not play around here . It's eradication. That is what the goal is here. Eradication of the Ukrainian identity. I'd always like to ask people . What if someone decided to take away your irishness, stamp it into the ground and educate your kids and remove their language and identity. Those that don't comply are tortured raped and murdered.

    Is that not worth standing up against?


    It doesn't stop at Ukraine btw. It's the doorway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭Ceramic


    Given the way Russia is behaving, I think we're heading into a situation of probably Cold War II rather than World War III.

    Forgetting about the US/Russia history of conflict and standoffs for a moment, the problem is that the EU and Europe in a broader sense has to live next-door to Russia, a country that has just invaded another country and in an extremely brutal and irrational way. It's also a country that is continuously making nuclear threats against Western European countries and has made open threats against Finland, Sweden and several others either directly through governmental sources or through state controlled, state owned television.

    It has spent years flying bombers and other heavy weapons into or right next to European airspace for no particular reason other than to be threatening and pinging radar systems and regularly carries out cyber attacks, political destabilising operations and so on. It's even killed enemies on UK soil using chemical weapons ffs.

    Then you add the gas issues. How exactly are you supposed to interact with a country as a major energy supplier if it keeps behaving like this and using access to gas as an economic weapon too.

    A lot of Europe, and I think particularly Germany, has been very optimistic about Russia and there was always a sense that the door was open and that it was welcome to become a friendly neighbour. That was always the aim of the European institutions at least. There was cooperation across a broad range of areas and loads of flow of investment and interaction in general. The whole focus has always been to create a friendly, safe, peaceful, prosperous post WWII and post Cold War Europe without stepping on anyone's toes and through trade and development.

    The hand was reached out and all that's been returned is being repeatedly slapped in the face.

    So, I think realistically we're now looking at bridges having been burned and decades of a cautious containment approach to dealing with Russia - effectively Cold War II.

    There isn't going to be any attempt to 'defeat' Russia - just contain it for everyone else's safety. I think what we're going to see is Russia just being frozen out and it's the one that's doing the freezing to itself. Nobody asked for or wanted this kind of situation, but they seem to continue to live in some kind of 19th century parallel universe of empires that nobody else is living in anymore.

    I think it's a sad waste of life due to the level of hostilities and loss of life this has caused. It's also a enormous waste of potential for peace, prosperity and a much brighter future in Russia itself. Their leadership is throwing a lot away, killing huge numbers of people and destroying lives, livelihoods and people's future prospects by behaving like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves



    ''I am just asking if filling up the country with weapons will be the right thing for the best outcome for Ukrainians (whatever that is or how that looks)''


    If the West did not arm Ukraine, what do you think would have happened during Putin's denazification process.

    Russia of course would not have continued its attack on Kyiv or rolled through Southern and Eastern Ukraine so that it could attack Moldova.

    You and a lot of the Putin Bots line of argument would be hilarious if it was not so deluded

    The best result for Ukraine would have been that Russia never invaded. Next best is we help them to kick seven different colours of sh!t out of the Russian army. Not the best result but the optimal one.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I didn’t contradict myself. I think it’s good people are supporting Ukraine , but it’s not a contradiction to ask if primarily pumping the country with weapons the best way of achieving peace.

    We support Ukraine but Ireland isn’t at war, this is Russia v Ukraine. This is a discussion thread, not a war room that is going to affect the war so there’s acres of middle ground for discussion but there is just no tolerance. There in lies the problem, some people don’t want to engage in discussions , they just want an echo chamber and if there is a disruption a bunch of you jump on posters who may not be completely on the exact same script (even if they share most of the same sentiments/goals).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    On the contrary, analysis seems to show that Russia plans to shift gears and has been working towards selling the conflict as a war rather than an "operation". I wouldn't be surprised to see an escalation around May 9th.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Really? Would that change the dynamic from the west or would it?


    What does Putin gain by this, it really does seem like he has an out by claiming the East regions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    So he claims the east and in 6 months he announces another special operation to prevent genocide in the east again ,

    The Only solution is the total removal of Russian forces from inside Ukraines borders including the east and Crimea



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭JoChervil




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,411 ✭✭✭✭listermint




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ya it will be a rather empty prade review stand.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,440 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Ukrainian sources have said that 29 year old Major Stepan Tarabalka was the rumoured Ghost of Kyiv and that he was shot down and killed on March 13th. At the time Russians had lost 125 aircraft and Maj Tarabalka was credited with 40 of those.

    Whether the Ghost actually existed or they've simply retired a legend and attributed him to a dead pilot probably won't be clear for many years. In the meantime Maj Tarabalka has been awarded Hero of Ukraine and his helmet and goggles are due to be auctioned, with proceeds going towards the war effort




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,441 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    They hate President Zelensky with a vengeance. I think they believe their own propaganda of him being a "drug addict" and a "state terrorist".

    It actually tells us far more about them than about Zelensky. The President seems a warm man, high on empathy, emotionally intelligent, caring and thoughtful (everything their own cold blooded psychopath in the Kremlin isn't).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    Screenshot 2022-04-30 at 13.29.36.png

    The US government is offering $ 10 million.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I was listening to a BBC report about Putin building some palace with golden toilet brushes. He locked up a political rival for exposing him. In a weird way, western decadence makes him weak and puny and vulnerable. It also probably adds to his delusions of grandeur on his and Russias status in the world.

    Zelelesnki being a comedian is fantastic for so many reasons, the joke is literally on Putin. Comedians , I think , are good at reading rooms and their audience. The good ones aswell can be highly empathetic to their audience. But the good ones can act the part and be what they need to be on camera. He looks the part but walks the walk aswell and not in a shiny suit but as an Everyman.

    In many ways he’s shown up Putin and most of the other Western leaders , for what a truly remarkable leader will do for their country. His use of media/tv his own propaganda (he has every right to use this tool) has been extraordinary. Equally the pressure he’s put on the west and Russia has been strategically impressive.

    It would of been easy for him to take the easy plane out of Ukraine and lead from a safe place but look at him on the ground leading by example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You either support the war effort of Ukraine to defend itself and drive out the invading Russian army or you don't.

    There is no middle ground when the level of destruction, death & misery is plainly evident.

    People who sit on the fence and waft on about the USA/ NATO/ EU meddling are at nothing, you might as well sign up and fight for the Russian army.

    It's as simple as that.

    War is polarising.

    And yes Ireland should be sending troops and weapons to assist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    This is a war of conquest and annihilation, Putin will just never settle "for the East" any more than he was going to just settle for Crimea, he wants all of Ukraine (and more). At the moment he has more territory than he did before the war, so Russia is up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,441 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Clip from Estonian PM Kaja Kallas's interview on CNN yesterday. She totally has Putin's number, she can read the dictator like a book and is not afraid of him :





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭Ceramic


    But they clearly really like cold blooded, vicious, Doctor Evil style leaders and see anyone who’s warm, empathetic and friendly as weak.

    That is fundamentally one of the enormous problems in Russia. They’re constantly looking for a battle ready medieval king type of character instead of a modern political leader.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    Who wants a wider war?

    Hardly Russia, they'll be spread too thin and will lose in all contested areas. Also, they're hardly going to go nuclear against an alliance of other states.

    So, a wider war might suit opponents of Russia PROVIDED THAT other *rogue states aren't **attracted to the fray.

    * Yes, I know, they're only rogue from our Western perspective.

    ** By "attracted" I'm including supply of military aid in ANY form.

    In essence, I guess I'm saying that a wider war would take pressure off Ukraine and invite wrath upon Putin's finite forces.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement