Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1126312641266126812693690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,469 ✭✭✭zv2


    I guess in calmer moments, away from the screen, most reasonable people will admit that many Russians are decent people, but their official war policy is mass murder, rape and absolute barbarity. Their behavior in Ukraine is monstrous and I can certainly forgive people for calling them Orcs. No doubt there are war crimes in every war but Russia has a reputation for being especially nasty.

    Post edited by zv2 on

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Posts: 7,946 [Deleted User]


    Interesting. Separists might be thinking... go with the suddenly not so mighty Russia or stay with the frigging €€€€€ EU bound Ukraine and had an about turn on the whole Mother Russia thing.

    Also, can imagine Russian troops lording it over locals and may even get a bit rapey. Careful what you wish for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I beg your pardon. I'll have you know it was a serious analysis of the intersection between tech, propaganda, and political power.

    The Putster is all about "the likes". Why else do you think he does be so mad for getting the photos of himself shirtless on horseback etc? Clicks = dollars money cash baby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,037 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No its not a cop-out. From birth, they are indoctrinated into the system, step out of line, and you will pay the price. Any , ( even perceived ) deviation, never mind full blown protests, are met head on with brute force. You will have seen it before, when there were protests about Putin rigging elections etc. What else do you expect when the country is ruled by thug? Maybe at some point it will reach critical mass ( especially if the military mutiny ) but we are not there yet. Would not surprise me if Putin sent his police / military to shoot his own people if the protests threatened him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,897 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    he only problem I have with those calling the latter 'orcs' is it's too weak a word

    Yeah surely uruk-hai at least

    Untitled Image




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    "There is new evidence of the atrocities of the occupiers against the civilian population, the Rashists admit that they are shooting Ukrainian women closely. They do this with special cynicism, releasing several bullets even in the breathless body of their victims.

    The SBU intercepts such conversations of the invaders and documents their crimes – so that in the future no one guilty will go unpunished.

    This "hero", who was mobilized by the Russians in the so-called "LNR", tells his friend about the brutal murder of a Ukrainian woman by his colleagues: "...there is some woman lying there, ...her head shot out, lying there, twitching. There was a hole in her head... They called for more, he shot her again, she was still twitching, he shot her again... That's it, I said, she was fucked".

    As it turned out, the wife's only fault was that "...she had, like, a brother in Azov, and she started talking some bullsh*t.

    The soldier allegedly resents the behavior of his fellow soldiers, but in no way prevented this war crime. Only advised at least to bury the murdered.

    This is what Russian "mastery" really looks like!"


    Due to sovereignty issues, it's seems clear that all these war crimes will go unpunished, despite all the toothless blather about being held to account, brought to justice and trials. I'ts all a load of impotent nonsense as Russia will never hand anyone over.

    It was suggested a countries funds, if frozen, are legally immune from later seizure. Whatever international law that enables that immunity needs to be changed so that all Russia's foreign assets are fair game for reparations and to be held hostage to be used as incentive for the handover of individuals wanted for war crimes prossecution. Something like a €100m fine from frozen funds for each person not extradited when asked for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    When Russia get control of Maurupiol who’s going to rebuild and pay for it???



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Yes Russia was different in being an empire rather than a country like say Holland and because of that her development was different, but it most certainly developed. It was ruled like an empire with an emperor at the top, a layer of lords, religious clerics and regional governors below them and it was ruled pretty effectively, or effectively enough to funnel taxes back to Moscow and to get at least some of that back out to the provinces. Soviet times just continued that trend, though far more effectively and across a much larger area.

    As for innovation they had enough. They were the early leaders in the space race for a start and were able to do so with a significantly smaller team and very little outside tech and help. America had the whole Free World resources and relied far more on nazi German scientists. The USSR did initially but got shot of them pretty quickly, either by throwing them into prison or sending them back to Germany and didn't turn them into national heroes with a whitewashed past like the Americans did.

    They also turned what had been an agrarian society with little infrastructure beyond the cities in the west and importing most of it's tech into a far more industrialised nation developing it internally. Enough to get an atomic weapons programme off the drawing board. Again it's easy to forget that unlike nations in the West they were essentially "on their own", an internal state. They had to make their own pretty much everything. They developed and expanded the largest rail network on the planet and did it remarkably quickly and it was all built within their borders. The BAM line which is over 4000kms across all sorts of terrain including permafrost and perpetual swamp much of it completed in a decade and fully completed in two was an incredible feat of engineering. The clothes you wore, the car you drove(if you were lucky) the telly, the films you watched, all your household items, pretty much everything you interacted with as a Soviet citizen was made by other Soviet citizens. Same for their internal and external air travel. They built a "world" within their borders. Was it always of the best quality? No, but it tended to be reliable and a lot cheaper. Regardless that's impressive by any measure.

    BTW if you're reading this on a phone, pad or laptop, the LED was invented by a Russian/Soviet scientist.

    Post edited by Wibbs on

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,469 ✭✭✭zv2


    If I remember correctly the Oligarch's money is being set aside for that...

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Common sense .

    And add the fact Nato assets have been operating with transponders off which try don't appear on any publicly available app ,

    But , but ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ukrainians have been reporting that in those areas, the Russians have been forcibly conscripting all males they can find, including children, the over 65, invalids and handicapped, and sticking AK-47s in their hands, and one presumes, another in their backs.

    I have been rather wondering why some of these don't frag their Russian overlords. Perhaps this might be related to unhappy conscripts.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    It's unlikely the Russian military will. Autocrats are always paranoid about the military(even when they come from them) as they're the only force that can effectively take over a country, or their OK is required if someone else does. The Tsar was a dead man walking the moment his military stopped backing him. Since Stalin every subsequent Russian leader has on the one hand thrown lots of cash at the military, on the other chopped the heads off any generals that stood out above the rest and became popular and blaming the military for screwups. It's why Stalin was in trouble when Germany invaded. He had few good generals left as they'd been bumped off and replaced by loyal political appointees. Zhukov was one of those few left who saved the day and was lauded as a hero, until after the war when he was sent to the provinces, stripped of his commands and accused of anti Soviet stuff on trumped up charges. Too popular to kill, too popular to have too close to the throne.

    Putin will have done similar. Even in this war he's been arresting generals. Putting the blame on them for the military's failures and keeping the stink from hime. Failures which are built in from the ground up, failures that in peacetime are seen as positives for the rulling class and the autocrat at the top. So it's not great wonder that they've been shown up as decidely lacklustre.

    Democracies generally have much better militaries, because democracies don't fear them to nearly the same degree. I suspect if China's military were tested in a real world conflict against anything like a decent force they'd be shown to be just as lacking as the Russians. China's emperors have taken a very similar tack to Russian Czars with their military and for similar reasons.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Have you known any Russians or Soviet bloc citizens who grew up in the 60's and 70's? I think they'd have issue with your 'reliable and a lot cheaper.' Ladas were junk as were Pobodas. My old friends are always amused to see photos of them in use in places like Cuba (old ones), held together with spit and bailing wire, like in Russia. Also, there were bread lines and extreme privation by western standards (e.g., 1 toilet base in an apartment building with everyone having their own family seats that they brought with them.)

    And, you do have to ask exactly how the laborers on the Soviet-era public projects were compensated and how many were compelled to labor.

    A good friend who was from Moldova told me the first time they got to leave and go to the Czech republic, they were stunned by the availability of food, clothing, basic staples like toilet paper. They really did use copies of Pravda in the loo. To this day, he can't stand the smell of coconut because of cheap Cuban laundry soap scented with coconuts that was all that was available growing up. It's also obvious he was malnourished as a kid, too.

    Out of choice, the Soviet union compelled this onto their population. They were isolated because their leadership was happy with it. Their people suffered by design, just like under the Tsars. "Animal Farm" is a pretty accurate allegory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's likely down to the fear of what happens when they do kill one of their masters from Moscow, there's been a few who's cars exploded with them in it when they disagreed with Moscow ,if you followed this since they first turned up in eastern Ukraine,the first things they did was Park command and control vehicles along with artillery and tanks beside apartment blocks and densely populated areas,and they don't have a clear majority of the population on their side either,

    If they stand up the Russians will massacre them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    I regularly see black Hawks fly into the Ukraine.

    They never show up on flight radar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    In the normal course of events the public can and will jump on one bandwagon or another. The current situation is somewhat different in that it's a particularly singular event that threatens the peace and stability of Europe, has & will have an impact on every citizens life.

    It's why the likes of my grandfathers and uncles found themselves enlisting in previous European conflicts. To do what they believed needed to be done.

    So don't belittle the public reaction to this. There is little doubt in my mind that if Putin were not waving his Nuke threat around, that this war would have dragged in other states already. There is something fundamentally amiss with European and world geo politics when one major player just decides to invade a large neighbouring state. The whole rationale for the UN is drawn into question. The order of things as understood since 1945 is up in the air.

    Ultimately Europe has a choice, to vacillate and throw sympathy to Ukraine and keep Russia sweet at a distance or throw itself into full backing for the right of Ukraine to exist as an independent democratic state. There appears to be a lack of real leadership and decision making in the EU. Leaving Ukraine in some sort of half way limbo with partial sanctions and lower grade weapon supplies is morally corrupt. Europe needs to jump one way or another - facilitate a full takeover by Russia or drive them out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,897 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    They really did use copies of Pravda in the loo.


    An average Soviet citizen having a copy of pravda pressed on him by the local commisar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    "Military medic Olena Kushnir has died in Mariupol"

    Untitled Image


    Extremely sad. She was a doctor. RIP



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I don't disagree. I was merely pointing out the notion that Russia and the USSR were innovation free zones is a nonsense.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,469 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,822 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    I thought we lived in a time where wars were waged in text on paper, in legally binding treaties. Why on earth hasn't Nato and Russia, who are suppose to be on the same team, wanting peace, come together and put it down in text that Nato has no intention in attacking Russian, and that security peace and prosperity is the goal.

    If this was the 1940's Russia would have been nuked on day 2, yet not one bullet has been fired by the West or Nato at Russian. Does Putin still not get it, that no one has any intention of attacking Russian, and never fcking did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,108 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    "Production of Russian air defense systems on pause, factory workers are sent on vacation or to war

    📌 The production facilities of the Ulyanovsk Mechanical Plant (JSC UMZ, Ulyanovsk) have actually been stopped. UMZ" is a manufacturer of radars and air defense equipment of the RF Armed Forces (Buk, Kub, Tunguska ZGRK).

    📌 The reasons for the critical state of production are the use of a large number of components and electronic components in the manufacture of military products.

    According to employees, the plant is not able to continue production on its own.

    Currently, the plant's management is looking for opportunities to bypass sanctions and establish supplies through third countries (in particular, Kazakhstan). But such schemes lead to a significant increase in the price of components due to the need to pay for services to intermediary countries.

    Employees are given a choice: go on unpaid leave or sign a contract with the armed forces to participate in the war in Ukraine."


    Good to see sanctions are working and will eventually have an effect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,450 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Our friend Vladimir Solovyov is not happy about the sinking of the Moskva, strongly blaming the Russian Ministry of Defence today:



    image.png




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    And yet watch how the headlines of this conflict and the public interest around it will start to fade remarkably quickly. Covid generated far more public interest and for longer. Hell, even on this site we had an entire forum dedicated to it and a boost in numbers not seen in years. Ukraine gets a couple of threads and maybe twenty posters.

    If putin were not waving his nuke threat around is the biggest if involved. It quite simply can't be ignored and he knows it, we know it, or should and he knows we know it. Keyboard warriors can shout for war all they like, one they won't have to fight, but if the nukes start arcing through the air it's game over. This is a 24 carat fact and cooler heads know it.

    Europe and the EU have already backed Ukraine's right to exist as an independent state. As have the US, UN and most of the rest of the world, but again cooler heads realise that going in full gung ho is a very dangerous road indeed and one with no roadmap. The stark reality is if a power has nuclear weapons they have to be approached very differently. However they're all ploughing tonnes of cash, arms, intel and support at Ukraine and cash and support for her refugees. Sanctions are ongoing and will grip tighter. Russia and putin have already lost, but Ukraine will lose too and has already lost too much and too many people.

    However when the guns fall silent Russia and putin will still be losing, Ukraine will be winning. It's almost certainly going to become an EU member in time and before that time an associate member with a huge chunk of financing and other help aimed their way. Any of Ukraine's political class, coruption and yes right wing shenanigans will have the beady eye pointed at it and that nonsense will not be welcome in the new better Ukraine for Ukrainians that arises from these ashes. If putins BS aim of "denazifying" Ukraine was true, it turns out that by his criminal actions he's assured it, but not in the way he thought and certainly not in the way he wanted. Ukraine will never look north and east again. Russia is stuck in the north and east. Sweden and Finland are likely to join NATO. That's putin's legacy and that legacy will have to be lived by Russians for the foreseeable future.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,584 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Henry Round wasn't Russian. Losev implemented a green LED based on Round's theory 20 years later but the red ones invented by the Americans in the 60s were the first useful ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,808 ✭✭✭✭josip


    People can and do act in hundreds of thousands. France would be a good example of a nation with a history of organised mass protesting.

    A closer, albeit not identical, example to Russia would be Serbia in the 90s.

    There were constant protests against Milosevic in the 10s of thousands in Belgrade, but these were ignored and never reported on by the state controlled media; the minister of information at the time being none other than Aleksandar Vucic, now Leader for Life in Serbia.

    It was only when the numbers reached 200,000 in 1996 that Milosevic came under enough pressure to make some concessions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996%E2%80%931997_protests_in_Serbia

    He was finally overthrown in 2000 when between 500,000 and 1 million people marched on the capital.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_Slobodan_Milo%C5%A1evi%C4%87

    By then, Milosevic had lost the support of rural Serbia which was his power base for 10 years and who had limited access to outside information.

    There are many parallels between Serbia then and Russia now.

    Sanctions had a crippling effect on Serbia and still do to this day. Corruption increased massively and people who could source stuff across the borders became important and rich very quickly. The 'work hard and work for each other' socialist ideology of two post war generations went out the window almost overnight and it was everyone for themselves. Those who had connections to the ruling class did well. This had always been the case, ever since WWII, but nearly everyone was a member of the party then, so things were more equal. The sanctions in the 90s meant that a much smaller group of people did well. But sanctions didn't turn the masses against Milosevic; sanctions turned the people against the West.

    Bombing Belgrade very effectively stopped the atrocities in Kosovo in 1999. But that didn't turn the masses against Milosevic, bombing turned the people against NATO.

    What turned the masses against Milosevic was the clandestine funding by the US of media outlets such as B92 and protest organisations like Otpor (Gotov je) such that a sufficient percentage of the population finally turned against him. Unfortunately for Russia, and as already said by others, Putin has clamped down harder and earlier on any form of protest. There is little chance of the US funding a viable media/protest organisation. There also doesn't seem to the be the same appetite for protesting in Russia as there was in Serbia. Students in many countries are often among the first to protest, but that doesn't seem to be the case in Russia.

    I don't see a way out of this for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Forgot to post this last night.

    Let them dezazifiy by themselves





  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,326 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Few inventions have a single father. However yes Round spotted the phenomenon but devoted little time to it and only mentioned it as an aside in an electrical periodical. Losev put far more effort into it, developed the theory in how the effect works, did years of research into it, published studies on the specific phenomena and considered how it could be used in practical applications. His other experiments into soild state amplification predated the transister by decades. Round was an innovator, but Losev was a far greater one. Indeed part of his problem was that he was living in the Soviet Union and his research wasn't favoured. He'd quite likely have been a more household name if he hadn't been.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement