"Green" policies are destroying this country

I would be strongly suspicious that the proportion of rental properties below C is way above the number of Owner Occupied properties below C

The landlords usually don't have to pay the heating bills so they don't care

"An elderly person living in an old damp house has options " what a condescending reply, kind of sums up why the greens will be out the door soon enough sure let them eat cake !.

go and reference the orieactas report in to fuel poverty as the ceo of alone isnt good enough for you or maybe ask st vincent de paul

Incorrect. You said and I quote

"The keyboard warrior act on every post in this thread is confusing."

Not the first time you've thrown that type of abuse at everyone on this thread you disagree with.

And many posters have already called you out for that type of rubbish. Attempting to paint that as "having a pop" doesn’t wash eitherway.

That map is simply a geographical record of potential hydro electric sites

So you say you haven't clicked on any of the sites detailed, but you can tell what the output of hydro electric generation would be?

How's that work? Clairvoyance maybe?

Hydro electricity generation

A sufficient quantity of falling water must be available.

Determine the amount of power that you can obtain from the flowing water on your site. The power available at any instant is the product of what is called flow volume and what is called head*. The best sites have a reliable water supply year round and a large vertical drop in a short distance. A rough estimateof the power available at a specific micro-scale site can be calculated from the following equation:

Power (kW) = 6 X head (m) X flow (m3/sec) 

Head = the vertical flow of the water, essential for hydropower generation.

Flow = volume of water passing per second.

The good news is that the Head* can be increased with some fairly basic changes to the existing water flow in order to generate sufficient electricity for micro and small scale hydro electric installations.

Do you know what's really boring? Reading all of your constant whining posts.

Energy prices would be much much higher without the renewables

Afaik you've accused many here of being "climate change deniers" and also hillariously as being "climate deniers"

And that regardless of what anyone actually believes. You've accused myself and others of the same- even where it was clearly stated that climate change is indeed something that needs to be tackled.

That your own beliefs are often not supported by current findings of the IPCC really doesn’t make it an even playing field for you to be reminding anyone of what others beliefs may or may not be.

...once again, we re still heavily reliant on fossil fuels for our energy needs.....

With a sense of humour that finds 'climate denier' hilarious, I'm guessing you have all of the Mrs Browns Boys box sets on blue ray

Danno said on this thread that CO2 is a trace gas that is beneficial and not harmful

That is almost the definition of a climate change denier

You have linked to articles that say the same thing, so you have been spreading climate change denial propaganda. If you're doing this by accident, then you're what's called a 'Useful Idiot' for the fossil fuel industry

And my 'beliefs' are 100% supported by the IPCC findings

We need to keep warming as close to as possible to 2c. The only way we can do this, is get carbon neutral as soon as possible

The Head of the UN made a speech launching the latest IPCC report that echos exactly what I believe

And the science supports everything he says, and there are highly respected climate scientists saying those exact same things (Peter Kalmus, a climate scientist who works for NASA's JPL as 1 example) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxDzx9p8UP4

Ah that old piece of green disinformation lol.

And we know thanks to the EU green marginal price structure - electricity prices are set using the most expensive/ most taxed fuel in any generation mix, regardless of whether 0.1% or 99.9% renewables are used

Lol. Yeah I linked to one 'article' for its humour about greens that you had an absolute hissy fit over.

And your personal end of civilisation declarations are certainly not consistent with IPCC findings and would likley find a better home with the millennial church believers that the end of the civilisation will happen anytime now

The carreer politician speech you referenced has already been widely criticised and debunked. Interesting that you referenced him and not actual IPCC scientists.

And theres you going around referring to others as 'useful idiots" lol

Again incorrect.

The EU marginal price mechanism set the price regardless of how much or how little renewable enegy is used.

Unused wind energy generated at night makes feq all difference regardless of what wholesale electricity prices are

And because wind generation is unreliable we are dependent on gas. Which means the consumer gets permanently screwed.

A normal person would hold their hands up, apologise for spreading lies on the internet, and then we'd be able to forget it and move on.

Show me where i made a 'personal end of civilisation' comment that is inconsistent with the latest IPCC reports

And show me where Guterres' speech has been 'Debunked'

Who has been doing the criticising and debunking?