Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1121212131215121712183690

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's a good analysis. I think Zelensky would give up the breakaway regions to stop the horrors Putin is inflicting on Ukraine. The problem is that Putin has his own hideous agenda. Putin is swaying between thinking 'the breakaway republics are enough to consider victory' to thinking, 'maybe the Ukraine is at breaking point and will cave and I can have it all as my legacy'.

    Zelensky knows Ukraine is facing an existential crisis, but knows he cannot rely on any in the West to allow him to bring it to a swiftish end. In the mean time his citizens are being treated barbarically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,741 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Yes I agree it will mean they will unleash their next set of almighty sanctions that may irratate the Russians a tiny bit more...

    All this talk of threat of nuclear weapons is utter nonsense.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    There is no real cohesion or impetus within Nato which is a cobbled together mishmash of nations that clearly lacks any worthwhile or definitive central guidance and leadership. It's a sort of dog's already up the road situation before you remember to bolt your garden gate.

    NATO's job is to be a defensive partnership, that if required can prosecute a war mostly overseas and with maximmum impact on potential enemies. If putin had no nukes how long do you think Russia would last against NATO going in? If such a war lasted a month before Russia surrendered I'd be shocked.

    NATO is not in the business of indirectly supplying portable weaponry and Soviet era weaponry into an active war zone. The Americans have some experience in this alright and Ukraine has been getting weapons and intel.

    If we take the tragedy out of it, it would suit NATO and the West to bankrupt putin and Russia with sanctions and the funding of a long unwinnable war, rather than one that's over next week. The Soviet screwup in Afghanistan was one of the main reasons for the fall of that empire. A period putin has talked about which seems to show he may have read about it but hasn't learned from it.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Of course it's possible they are doing things without announcing them; but the language out of NATO as a whole and Germany in particular suggests they're just not willing to transfer what they keep calling "offensive" weapons.

    Individual nations seem to have leeway to make transfers unilaterally but it also seems that NATO is making it very clear that those transfers should only be of equipment Ukraine currently operates. Or at the very least must be equivalent to capabilities Ukraine already has.

    I also believe a large part of supplying these weapons will be as political pressure on Russia and as political support for Ukraine; both things which are best served by being fairly open about equipment that might be sent.

    And the other thing is that NATO absolutely does not want some piece of NATO equipment being spotted in Ukraine out of the blue and for Russia to assess it as a direct NATO involvement or to use it for propaganda purposes; so I would expect any NATO equipment transfers to be announced widely before they make their way into Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    My feeling is that NATO is afraid of it supplying weapons which could hit Russian infrastructure outside Ukraine; and which Russia can then leverage as more anti-NATO propaganda domestically which might soften the blow of widespread conscription efforts.

    And they're also worried about Russian military escalation as a direct response to NATO military supplies; but also things like reducing gas supplies which we know Germany in particular just will not accept.

    I suspect their strategy is to maximise the amount that Russia will be weakened militarily, economically, and politically whilst avoiding further escalation which might impact the West and/or global economy. Which, it has to be said, is perfectly consistent with NATO's stated purpose and charter; whilst also being not very satisfactory for people who support Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,801 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Well spoken sir. From the country whose economy is based on being a safe haven for war loot and other ill-gotten gains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Outside of the West how the likes of India and China in particular covering/not covering the findings coming out of Bucha?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick



    Morality play? You're never going to understand?

    What a pathetic statement. I simply said they need to be given weapons that will make a difference.

    Who voted you as the analytical genius of Boards? Obviously just yourself.

    Your kind represent all that's worst about Boards... you cant post a decent response without including sarcastic, barbed comments and implying others are not at your mastermind level of understanding. Pretty sad really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    One of the problems at the moment is that with the UK and USA prominently announcing the supply of heavier military equipment to Ukraine, that it encourages the PR that this is really just another proxy war between the USA/UK and Russia. If Europe and the EU are really as exercised as the rhetoric suggests, then Europe & the EU need to be more proactive in order to avoid this narrative developing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    I think we've gone past that stage as I'm sure that Putin and his Kremlin cronies already view this as a proxy war, and it's already being portrayed as such to the Russian populace.

    I can see nothing but serious escalation from hereon in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Well if serious escalation is on the cards, the EU would be better getting stuck in sooner rather than later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,023 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Unfortunately these things happen in war. Russian soldiers are quite brutal, and sadly this wasn't unexpected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Putin on sky news-the soviet union landed probes on venus, no other country has managed to do this, seems to have other things on his mind this morning

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    I’m not defending Switzerland. I’m saying people on this forum keep going on about the impotent west. Meanwhile Ireland offers nothing. Would the Irish population accept a 10% Ukraine tax to help fund western military intervention? Because war is not cheap unlike posting on a forum. It’s easy to give out about France, Germany, NATO etc when Ireland had nothing to lose but more expensive petrol prices etc.

    you’re poorly educated if you think that is how the Swiss economy is funded by the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,094 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Ukraine performing raids into Russia on their railway network.

    Balls of steel these lads have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Yes but nobody is prescient; nobody knows what the end result of any decision is likely to be.

    And even worse the so-called intelligence apparatuses badly misread Putin and Russia on this conflict and at multiple points in the past: why would the politicians let alone Johnny Public trust their assessments now?

    I can only see escalation happening after clear verification of some concrete change on the ground rather than the other way around; and those escalations from the West are likely to be the same as they have been until this point: economic sanctions, political rebukes, and additional military aid which keeps Ukraine fighting but doesn’t give them the ability to reach into Russia or threaten their air or sea assets in a meaningful way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,140 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    They already claimed Venus as a "Russian planet" last year. They seem to have a thing for inhospitable hell-holes.




  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The AKs were also easier to maintain and repair than the American equivalent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    It mightn't be Ukrainians, it could be Russians after all the Belarusians sabotaged their own railways to prevent the RuSSians moving equipment on them. Maybe its the sign that there is a fifth column in Russia?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    How about the rest of the world has earth and putin and his fellow country men can head off to Venus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,036 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well for one thing, it would be something Vlada could not cover up under the "acceptable Losses " banner. And it will also rattle the cage of Russians who still believe in the invincibility of the Russian Military. Yes they still exist in large Nrs within Russia (even if there are cracks starting to appear). A Russian friend of mine for many years ( and a completely brainwashed example of Putin propagandas') told me that after Ukraine has been rightfully restored to Russian control, next will be the "Traitor" ex-USSR country's, and after that, another historical mistake will be corrected, namely Siberia. And they are going to teach a hard lesson to everyone who poked the Russian Bear, forcing it to defend itself against American and European aggression.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Outside of Europe and North America virtually nobody in the rest of the world cares one iota about the war in Ukraine,it is to them just a small conflict amongst whites thousands of miles away and no concern of theirs.

    Similar to what the conflict in say for example Yemen or Sudan is to us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,036 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, the US armed the Mujahideen via Pakistan with hand held rocket launchers, and with these they were able to destroy the air superiority held by the Russians...once the HIND helicopters were gone, it was game over for the Russians. But after they had left, a civil war started, which also caused massive destruction and death. I remember an Afghan colleague telling me that it was not unusual for as many as 1'000 + rockets to fall in Kabul in a single night. And then the Taliban arrived, and as they said themselves, to restore the peace. And the rest is history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,818 ✭✭✭threeball


    Anyone driving around Irish, British or European roads with a Russian flag should have a brick fcuked through their window by anyone that can lay their hands on one. No better than the raping pedophiles they call an army.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭tigger123


    That puts an end to any hope Venus had of joining NATO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ahh FFS

    I am not fine with Russians killing women, kids, the old or raping women and girls.

    My point, which you completely failed to notice, is if it was possible for Russia to be bombed or even invaded, I would have no problem with the Ukrainians leveling their towns and cities.

    And if civilians died then tough shyte.

    Tough luck, they are part of a country that has brought war and destruction to others and you can't not be attacking them because some of them might not be in favour of the war or the regime in charge.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Not true. 50% of world wheat supplies come from Ukraine and Russia. They are not 3rd world countries. Considerably higher up the human development and more advanced countries than Yemen or Sudan. That’s why it’s such a dangerous conflict. For the non politically engaged people around the world it may be distant and abstract .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    I went looking a little bit anyway and found this. Not related to Ukraine but concerning a Russian ally.


    Media and military experts said Sunday that six Chinese Air Force Y-20 transport planes landed at Belgrade's civilian airport early Saturday, reportedly carrying HQ-22 surface-to-air missile systems for the Serbian military.

    The Chinese cargo planes with military markings were pictured at Belgrade's Nikola Tesla airport. Serbia's defense ministry did not immediately respond to AP’s request for comment.

    The arms delivery over the territory of at least two NATO member states, Turkey and Bulgaria, was seen by experts as a demonstration of China’s growing global reach.

    “The Y-20s’ appearance raised eyebrows because they flew en masse as opposed to a series of single-aircraft flights,” wrote The Warzone online magazine. “The Y-20′s presence in Europe in any numbers is also still a fairly new development.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,818 ✭✭✭threeball


    Its highly likely that he will turn to widespread chemical weapons now in order to have some sort of semblance of victory by May 9th. Just like the nazis symbolism and displays of power are extremely important to Putin (and ego maniacs in general, remember when trump wanted his military parade).

    This psycho he brought in to finish the job obviously has no problem with poisoning women and children by the thousands then sitting down to lunch. Hes there for one reason and one reason only and that's to ensure May 9th is associated with a win not a loss.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Of course we all know how worried you are for the Russians 🙄

    You can't defeat a country without killing people.

    FFS I didn't know there were so many devout followers of Christ around here with the love of turning the other cheek.

    As I keep saying you can't defeat an enemy if you aren't willing to kill the enemy.

    And don't give me this shyte that the enemy is Putin.

    Ukrainians have to consider every Russian to be their enemy, just like British, French, indeed Russians themselves had to consider every German to be their enemy in WW2.

    There is a fooking reason Putin has done this and it is precisely because he sees the West as weak because the way a huge chunk of people are not willing to countenance hard actions.

    I am not allowed discuss …



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement