Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

19889899919939943690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,142 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I imagine it would feel terrible.

    However if NATO gets involved this would cause WW3.

    We are only a short hop to nuclear war at that stage.

    I would urge you to watch the 1984 film threads, I will warn you though it’s pretty horrific but shows what would happen in the event of a nuclear war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    See theres the problem, we have started the habit of accommodating putins bullshit, we need to remember and remind putin we have nukes too, otherwise putin can essentially invade anyone that isnt NATO and no one can stop him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I would be more inclined he might go the nuke option in Ukraine then invading another country. I can agree on that, but no I can't see him invading another country. I suppose with the nuke option it would be more I think if his army was in a complete route and Ukraine was advancing on every front and even going back into crime then I definitely could see him using them then. At the moment I'm not 100% sure as his forces are still doing major damage in Ukraine. More of there was a total retreat by Russia then yeah I could see him using them then or possibly in the west of Ukraine to show his complete anger with NATO weapons etc. Coming across from there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    Nato is ran by the US, France and UK. None will suffer if Ukraine falls and none of them have the political stomach to bring their country to war. The Eastern block would go to war in the morning if they thought the big boys would back them. Which they won't



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,174 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    My bad, I was completely wrong footed by the way Biden would bring it up, juxtaposed with talking about US casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I agree completely. It's possible that us would have more appetite because they feel relatively safe even in an all out war but western Europe will never agree to a war unless they are forced kicking and screaming into it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,138 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It wouldn't be millions dead in conventional warfare. We've seen that Russia can barely even manage an effective invasion of Ukraine. NATO's move against Russia would indeed be swift, but to be specific, I wouldn't see a NATO intervention going any further than pushing Russian forces back inside their own friendly borders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as to say to 44 million human beings now being massacred by Russia, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your enemy. Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one."


    Ronald Regan's speech is fairly applicable in these times!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    Apparently, in an intercepted conversation of a Russian soldier with his girlfriend, 8 Russian soldiers have died in a special baking operation after a Ukrainian babushka treated them with some lovely pirozhki (little pies/pastries). They turned out to be poisonous. Babushka would have access to and could have used mushrooms, rat poison(fitting), pesticides, or leaves from poisonous shrubs that come from that part of Central Europe. The Russians obviously don't fear Baba Yaga but at least they were loved to death by the babushka





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I think Russia would consider it an invasion of Russia, they would mobilize the entire country and even when pushed back, you would be dealing with years of fighting and missile launches and naval battles with submarines, assainations on NATO soil etc, everything would come into play as the Russian propaganda would be a fight for Russian freedom.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    I've posted this on the Ukraine thread but I'm posting it here as well, because a few hard nosed posters on here don't seem to comprehend the level of suffering of the Ukrainian children.

    There are doubtless thousands more horror tales much worse than this account. But for all those on this thread who keep pushing the rhetoric that we should not intervene, just stop and think for just a moment - instead of believing at least you and your family would be safe if we sit back. You ignore it at your peril... it could be a child of yours that suffers in the future in this way if we let butchers terrorise the world unchallenged.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Russian stock market is set to open tomorrow. I don't think it will be the Armageddon people think. There will be nobody to buy the stock for it to be sold. If the stock drops so much in value, it wouldn't be worth selling right now either. The people that will suffer will be folks who are due to retire soon. The wealthy folk can hang onto it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    NATO would make clean **** of the russian military they are an embarrassment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    Like I said, Russia won't leave its borders to attack nato so essentially you'll have to attack Russia which leaves you with a much greater chance of escalating to the level everyone wants to avoid. Do it now. Fcuk him up on Ukrainian soil and we'll reduce alot of hardship on all sides , including reducing the risk of nuclear reaction



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,174 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    He is near guranteed to take at least Moldova if he gets Ukraine. There are Russian troops currently in the Moldovan breakaway region of Transnistria, fomenting trouble to serve as a pretext the same way Donbass and Luhansk have. There are Russian speakers in the eastern parts of Finland that I'm sure could come under attack from the not Russian Finns, and who obviously would need to be protected also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    Thats just it, theirs alot of picking and choosing who's worth saving and who's not it is sick and we should be threatening Russia with a full force response and the destruction of everything russian within ukraines boarders not pandering to appease Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    If that isnt worth going to war for we may as well scrap NATO, wheres the line drawn at this point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭zv2


    I don't think Russia calls all the shots. Hundreds of casualties every day and difficult logistics will erode their fighting ability. Also, Ukraine would have an endless supply of weapons from the west.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    Isn't NATO's role to intervene in non NATO countries. Where does intervention end? what other wars do you want to get involved in? some of the African ones? Azeri-Armenian? Israel-Gaza? Yemen? have you seen the state of children in Yemen?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    If Ukraine had of capitulated after a few days then possibly but not now. Look at what Russia has lost so far, imagine if this drags on for another few months. Like soldiers they can replace faster then vehicles, there loosing so much they won't be able to. Plus if Ukraine does fall tons and tons of weapons will be given to the Finnish and Moldova. I would of said Moldova for sure if Ukraine had of been out of the fight after a few days and not much losses on Russian side, but that didn't happen. Finland I say thats a long off pipe dream for any Russian invasion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    They realise. They just don't care. Straight out of the I'm alright Jack brigade. And if war came to our shores you wouldn't see them for dust. High tailing it to south America with their tail between their legs so they can assess the war from the safety of an Internet cafe in Buenos aires is the most likely course of action.



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    No, they can still lose as well as win.

    Savagery is their only winning option.



  • Posts: 25,917 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In your scenario do you think the average Ukrainian would give much of a ****? Like it or not, the reality is that it's over there, not here. When it comes down to it politicians are to act in the best interests of their people and for the last while I've really enjoyed that feeling. It's the first time in quite a while it's been the case for me in the West.

    Also, I really don't think people realise what neutrality means. If the Russians actually were a super power and invaded Ireland to get to the UK and looked like any threat there wouldn't be a port, harbour or jetty left on the Eastern Seaboard of the country within days and any airstrip anyone in the UK military had ever heard of would be cratered. The Brits will fight for themselves. That tends to lead to some protection for us in some ways but make no mistake, they'd be defending themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,138 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Russians in Finland are a tiny minority. Well, the ones who actually lived there, I mean. There have obviously been Russians heading across that border since the last few weeks to escape Russia. It would be interesting mental gymnastics, if nothing else, from Putin to try and justify an invasion on the basis of protecting people who actively wanted to get away from him and the country as it exists under him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    What is the purpose then? i also dont think your examples are the same as what's being done in the Ukraine, to flip the script for you... would you be ok with putin taking more non NATO countries and for NATO to stay out of it? how would you feel say if he decided he liked Ireland and bombed it into dust we arent in NATO either should they stand by and watch it happen?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    If some of the clips I've seen on twitter are correct it looks like they are bringing vehicles that were mothballed out of retirement. Can't wait to see them raiding the museum's for T34s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,138 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Lavrov talking that other day about it being a uni-polar world shows a certain entitlement in Russian thinking. It also shows a plain denial about their place in the world. Firstly, the world is not 'uni-polar'. It may only seem that way to a Russian who cannot comprehend one of the poles not being Russia. Clearly, the other pole in the world is China and has been for quite some time. It is they who will dominate the east, not Russia.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement