Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

16066076096116123690

Comments

  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You got to the 4th line before mentioning America, that's better than most manage!

    The yanks won't want this dragging on. The nonsense of "The Americans will fight til the last Ukrainian" is just what it is, sheer nonsense. The Ukrainians are the ones fighting and choosing to fight. Do you think if the Ukrainians had rolled over that big bad America would have done 10% of the sanctions that they have done?

    See here's a thing that I wish we weren't in such a world that I have to admit; the Yanks were right. Europe has been fostering closer and closer economic integration with Russia, thinking it was the path to peace and prosperity. It has been shown it didn't work. Russia have felt nothing from the EU except kid gloves and look what they've gone and done.

    As for peace, I'll believe it when I see it. It's hard to negotiate with someone who has demands and the upper hand. Why would Russia except anything less than all the territory they gain before fighting ends? And even accepting that, are we to suddenly accept Russia's word on anything? They're going to level the country, chase out masses of the population, kill a smaller mass of the population, take the heavy industries and (best case) strangle what's left of Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Strange though it may seem, but not all regret the fall of communism,,,I know several Russian's who pray for its return. 2nd biggest political part in Russia after Putins United Russia party is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. One colleague was telling me that under the Communists, she was able to take her Family to Sochi twice a year for holidays. Did not cost them a penny, transport, accomodation, food, health care etc. Now she says, under the Capitalist system, she cannot even afford one holiday a year in Sochi. So you can say that there is some mixture in Russian Society, and some are still more equal than others!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,310 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Ukrainian Nazi's look awfully Jewish

    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,978 ✭✭✭rogber


    Just can't see NATO intervening. They'll weigh up the total destruction of Ukraine versus destruction of all of Europe and decide Ukraine isn't worth it.

    Unless things like this mining of atomic power stations proves true (if it's on Fox it probably isn't) as that would suggest Europe is f*cked either way and the only option is to take Russia down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,598 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I dont really know if they have more or less power than 25 years ago. For the first time since the USSR they have a potential challenger and I say potential, like maybe in 50 years? Most of the us focus is now in the far east, even this current Russia thing is not their main focus. But even look at it, the us controls the Pacific all the way to Taiwan. I mean the Chinese may embark on a battle to claim an offshore island, it would be like the us fighting to control Puerto Rico. America projects power globally, reaches everywhere. Can seemingly do things like convince Australia to build nuclear subs or telegraph the entire Russian invasion of Ukraine and convince half the world to ostricize Russia during an energy crisis. Economically China has become powerful but again how stable or robust is their system to economic shock, do you trust the quarterly reports from Chinese listed companies? Do we trust a capitalist system that is so supported by government funding.? Do we trust Chinese rule of law? I feel like they are not as far along as some people think. I mean their property bubble puts 2007 to shame. What they have got is a huge population who are willing to be obedient and not challenge leadership.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,079 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No, it is NOT good for Europe. WTF. I have alot of time for renewable stuff but feck all time for green hitler types who give it all a bad name. "This war is good for Europe" Have a think about what you just wrote please



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,482 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I was reading that senior people within the elite and the military were shocked when Putin decided to go for broke and invade all of Ukraine. They had assumed he would go for a very limited military operation in the Donbass i.e. Crimea 2.0. Very hard to assess what opinion is really like amid all the lies and propaganda - certainly those in the know are aware that Russia is in a dark place and has taken the most almighty gamble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭Bigmac1euro


    did you actually watch this live last night?

    they were shelling the **** out of the plant indiscriminately and then started firing at the camera. They were trying to destroy the place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,978 ✭✭✭rogber


    I thinks it's a mix. There are lots of people against the war and they are justifiably scared of protesting.

    But I spent quite a long time in Russia in more peaceful times during the noughties and even then found particularly Russian men were incredibly chauvinistic and nationalistic and I expect a lot of them are very supportive of Putins war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,310 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I must have watched the power plant stream for an hour, not fun.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭Biscuit80


    .



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sick Russian TV propaganda

    Denis Polunchukov, a TV presenter displaying all of the predatory instincts of a pedophile - hope you’re looking in on this thread Denis, you sick bastard

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10577095/Kremlin-forces-children-watch-propaganda-videos-Russia-limits-access-BBC-website.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,036 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    It would be idiotic for NATO to attack Russia in Ukraine or directly. NATO is a defensive alliance first and foremost. You pick your battles when it comes to a potential nuclear war.

    There are enough countries within NATO in Russia's crosshairs and NATO's resolve/unity will have been strengthened by the Russian invasion. NATO are also learning a huge amount about Russia's military capability. If anything, the invasion of Ukraine has protected Eastern Europe and the Baltic states like never before. Russia knows now that NATO will not be passive when it comes to defending one of it's members. Putin wont dare.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's like when someone asks about something you've not paid much attention to. "Yeah it's all good", "Cool, will you show me it tomorrow?", "Yeeeah, it's totally ready". They probably knew (and knew Putin might not know) that they would be sending lambs to the slaughter in places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭DontHitTheDitch


    IMHO what we learned from Putin's television appearance seems to be:

    1. Troops are demoralised and disillusioned. Putin throwing money at them and saying they will be looked after if they are injured is a clear sign that there is a significant problem in the military. It seems to be pretty rare to see a world leader having to publicly offer pay rises to troops that are achieving their objectives and withstanding attacks.
    2. Things are not going to plan, there was a clear sense of 'protesting too much'.
    3. Putin seems to have an 'out' while saving face. You can't lose a war that never happened. He claims what they are doing is 'regime change', not occupation. Since the ds-Nazification angle is bullshit to begin with, there is no tangible way to show this has or has not been completed. Once the leader of the country is different from the previous one, Putin can claim victory as an operation purely as regime change.
    4. Public opinion and public mood must be managed. There is a real risk of public anger and disobedience legitimising an internal revolt within Putin's government.
    5. There is a very low risk of a nuclear strike. There is no public appetite for it and it would shatter the 'peacekeeping' illusion that they have gone to such massive lengths to enforce.
    6. The discontent in the military is working its way back to Putin. The people around him are not yet so intimidated that they fear bringing bad news and asking for immediate action on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    I did and I stand by it ..... A big change was/is needed regarding dependance on fossil fuels in general and specialy from tin pot dictators. europe's issue is that it is always devided when it comes to impementing significant change .... Brexit forced us to be united and now Putin does ...And all for the greater good. Europe needs to be a super power in their own right and not being dependant on medical supplies from China and oil and gas from Russia. It was fukcing embarassing watching the antics used to get a few facemasks from Beijing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,433 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Yeah, I have heard stories like that too.

    More romantic fondness of the "gold old days" than anything anchored to reality IMO.

    She may get a chance to revisit those days in the next few years, you can ask her then how she getting on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭DontHitTheDitch


    NATO carried out an entirely offensive campaign in the former Yugoslavia, born out of frustration with Russia's veto preventing UN action. There is a precedent on humanitarian grounds and they can absolutely argue that the instability caused by this invasion is a real threat to NATO countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    No they were not ... If they wanted it destroyed the place would have been levelled. Just think about it, what benefit would russia gain from creating Chernobyl x10 so close to Crimea ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,917 ✭✭✭GM228


    Not that they will have many planes to fly soon enough anyway.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    The Russians will certainly survive the current sanctions as we're still buying their oil & gas. As we've seen with Iran, a country can still operate even under full sanctions. Iran still has enough funds to operate dozens of proxies in various countries including operating Hezbollah which costs hundreds of millions of dollars annually. There's a huge black market in Iran with its own currency. They manage to smuggle oil to Syria and other nations. Russia will be no different. Especially given that China will still buy from them. Even if we stop importing their oil & gas, Russia's economy will tank but reach a sustainable rock bottom. Meaning that the country will not enter some sort of dystopian anarchy of hungry people wandering the streets.

    And don't underestimate the Russian people's ability to sustain hardship. They will survive a tanked economy for many years.



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There’s not too many Nazi’s out there that I like but Ukrainian Nazis are the carlsberg beer of Nazis- probably the nicest Nazis in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,917 ✭✭✭GM228




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,517 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    While a regime change in Russia seems the most likely way to remove Putin, it all depends on who comes next. My thoughts are the following:

    Elections under this regime are a joke so it won't be happening that way. Any politician winning an election under this regime (even if Putin is out of the picture) will be a safe choice in their eyes.

    His inner circle are most likely yes men and anyone who showed initiative or ambition has probably been rooted out long ago (see how Venezuela went from the charismatic Chavez to the clueless Maduro) so the 'natural' order of succession wouldn't give me much hope either (Medvedev was probably a taste of this).

    A coup d'etat can go either way. Look at all those African armies in the last few years who ousted the President and formed transitional councils as they prepared new constitutions and free elections: A lot of them are still in the same bother they were before and some are even more fractured and this is if they were lucky enough to get free elections.

    I wouldn't have too much faith in the desires of the upper echelon of the Russian military for anything too drastic. Shoigu, for example, has been in the military since the late 70s; I can't seem him being too interested in letting the plebs rule the roost. At best, they'll remove Putin if they think he's gone too far and push for someone more balanced and easier to control.

    The oligarchs would probably want someone like Putin was previously; not drawing too much attention to the country and just letting them get on with their business interests and luxury lifestyle in the West. So they'd probably go for a similar candidate to the military (less of a warmongerer but one who'll protect their interests in exchange for their support). I can't see the oligarchs being in the mood for any great upheaval, either.

    A popular revolution seems far-fetched. We have some posters claiming that Russians have been brainwashed into thinking that nothing's wrong while others claim there's a lot of apathy and/or acceptance of the way things are while there's also big ethnic and religious divisions. I haven't met many Russians in my life and I can't say that I have a good idea of what they are like, generally, so I can't offer any insight on that. However, I doubt a popular uprising would be a smooth transition.

    What would Kadyrov have to say about a popular movement, for example? I doubt he's the only minority figure who's been empowered by Putin in exchange for support. I can also see it being a fractured election with no outright winner, just a few decent-sized blocks at odds with each other.

    The most realistic way for me is one where Putin is forced to one side and the military and the oligarchs install someone to their liking and with some guarantees that there won't be any repetition of what Putin did towards the end. It might be better than what is currently happening but I can't see any wholesale changes for the time being.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭DontHitTheDitch


    The oil and gas is still flowing, but the astronomical investment already made in building Nordstream 1 and 2 will take a long time to recoup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Troops are demoralised and disillusioned because its going very badly, if that changes then they'll be fine

    All this nonsense of relying on the humanity of Russian Troops and the Russian public to end this needs to be knocked on the head. Demoralize the **** outta them then they might think about ending it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,036 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yes this is true and there were many UN debates on the legitimacy of the NATO air strikes. It's one thing attacking the Yugoslavians to stop mass ethnic cleansing and another attacking a nuclear superpower on humanitarian grounds. It might be one of the reasons why Putin has held back his air force and big bombers. He had no qualms about using them in Syria.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Posts: 9,106 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It’s looking like Putin will use the Syrian playbook and flatten Ukraine - that’s a very clear prospect so I hope European leaders decide what they’re going to do- if Putin progresses further with this approach it’s obvious Europe has said, better Ukrainian falls than Europe - so yet again Putin wins.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement