Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

15705715735755763690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    NATO 'expanding' simply means countries actively wanting to join it and applying for membership. Expanding makes it sound like it has a deliberate policy of becoming bigger and goes around begging countries to join (the line being pushed by Putin apologists and supporters).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The guy across the table has jumped on it it and is coming at you with a knife. 'Understanding' isn't going to do you much good.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is no justification for the invasion.

    But it is true that Bush and Cheney needlessly poked the bear with a sharp stick in 2008 when Bush said in a speech that Georgia and Ukraine would ultimately join NATO. NATO members were aghast at the comments…..smarter people than Bush (which wasnt hard) knew the implications of what he said. Bush was flying completely solo. Lo and behold, shortly afterwards Putin carried out his Georgia incursion.

    Bush does bear some of the responsibility for NATO / Russia tensions over the last decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Delegations from Russia and Ukraine are set to meet for a second round of talks in Belarus today, after a Ukrainian presidential adviser confirmed that their representatives were on the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    It would act as a 'motivator' for Russian troops who seem demoralised. Would also rally the home front. It's so utterly ruthless. Something a Bond villain would do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Someone who advocates for not defending yourself when you're being physically attacked, does not have your best interests at heart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    Yes, it would fit in with the story about a declaration of martial law also. God I hope they don't do that to their own people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭The tax man


    He said they can maintain their fleet from within Russia, but with the proposed sanctions on parts how long can they keep the fleet air worthy? He only stated the German base was one of their larger maintenance bases that they may not be able to access.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 286 ✭✭purplefields


    Why are people phoning the Russian embassy, and want the ambassador to leave?

    Surely we should be keeping all lines of negotiation open?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Absolutely Wibb's.

    Another thing I will add is that referring to the Ukraine as a democratic country (which many online commentators are doing), is misleading.

    Considering the Ukraine a democracy is a very generous outlook on its very recent history.

    To state that doesn't mean I'm pro Putin or a Putin bot, and make no mistake Russia and Putin is the aggressor, but its another relevant branch in the discussion of the crisis.

    Ukraine isn't in the EU or the NATO for valid reasons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,428 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I have no idea of the content of your 17,000 posts nor do I care, I am talking solely about your posts in this thread.

    But I'll tell you what is actually poor form, fabricated conversations with X who assures you it's nothing to do with you and the users of boards are just too thick for your intellect.

    I was chatting with my wife about it yesterday, asking why people might be so defensive. I explained what I thought and she made a good point. Firstly , not all people on these threads are balanced , objective individuals. And secondly a small piece of text. Can easily be misinterpreted and considered hostile

    😕



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭CB19Kevo


    So is there pressure we can apply to private business to cease trading in Russia.

    Any petitions to sign?

    Let's apply a little bit of pressure here, maybe another thread could be created with links to petitions?

    Maybe one big push might put enough pressure on Putin to either be ousted or a Russian revolt.

    If we let this drag on the momentum will decrease so now is the time to hit hard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21


    Putin isn’t getting scared or worried about your plan. The man is untouchable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Why create this silly strawman?

    Ukraine is a sovereign nation, they can choose to join NATO if they want. Russia only sees NATO as a "threat" because it gets in the way of it's imperialistic designs on other nations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Just because Ukraine comes with the "baggage" of an aggressive neighbour endlessly trying to turn it into a vassal state doesn't mean it isn't a democracy. That's ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭josip



    Clarification from Ciarán Cuffe about the IT article. I was annoyed when I read the IT article, but in fairness to him, I don't think he should be included in that list.

    Dear Josip,


    Thank you for writing to me, and apologies for my delay in responding. As I’m sure you can imagine, these last few days have been unusually busy for my office. I of course agree that there is urgent need to condemn Vladimir Putin’s hostile invasion of Ukraine. If democratic nations are to flourish around the world, they must be secure from attacks by hostile powers such as Russia.


    In this instance, there may be some confusion at play. I voted in favour of yesterday's European Parliament resolution condemning Russia's latest act of aggression. Two weeks ago, I also voted in favour of the European Commission’s proposed €1.2 billion aid package to Ukraine. However, this weekend The Irish Times published a story about my abstention on a similar resolution back in December.


    As you acknowledge, there was some reasoning underlying both my previous abstention and my more recent vote in favour of these resolutions.

    The text of last December's vote, which you can find here, expressed solidarity with Ukraine, condemned Russia’s aggression and called for economic and financial sanctions against Russia – all of which I support. However, the text also contained language calling for increased co-operation with NATO, which I felt was in conflict with Ireland’s and the Green Party’s policy of military neutrality. I wrote about these conflicting feelings in my Written Explanation of Vote, which you can find here.


    However, clearly the situation has evolved since December, and I now believe that the European Parliament must be unified and unambiguous in our stance. Accordingly, I voted in favour of yesterday’s resolution, despite it containing similar language regarding NATO co-operation. Although I may disagree with the letter of some of the commitments included in the resolution, I wholeheartedly support the spirit in which those commitments were made. You can read the full text of the resolution, which has much to recommend it, here.

    I hope I have been able to clarify my position here, though of course the situation at hand is rapidly evolving, and I will continue to reflect on and adapt my position as new developments emerge. You can read more about my stance on yesterday’s resolution in the press release attached to this email.


    Don’t hesitate to write again with any further comments or questions you may have.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What organization a sovereign country joins is their own business and no-one else's.

    Wrong. It is also the business of the pre-existing member states of the organization they want to join. It is blindingly, tragically obvious that Ukraine has been led down the primrose path with regard to NATO. It cannot join. It must not join. People talk about how we should call Putin's bluff. What has actually happened is that he has called the west's bluff, at Ukraine's expense. Ukrainian membership of NATO will lead to a nuclear war and it's clear that western governments don't want that - yet. I don't see the sanctions as sustainable or conducive to peace. Crushing sanctions is what caused the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. If you don't think that they will lead, at the very least, to a crippling cyber attack on western infrastructure leading to unparalleled chaos and escalation, just wait and see.

    At this point, western utopianism is going to get us all killed, because it has ignored the fact that there are other, lethal powers out there who won't allow liberal democracy to encroach into what they see as their back yards (and yes, this is the soft bigotry of low expectations on my part - I don't think much of the Russian and Chinese people. I expect them to act like beasts). It turns out that Russia has a Monroe Doctrine of its own. It is willing to bleed and suffer. And it is willing to incinerate us. When Putin threatens nuclear war and we say he's bluffing, or that it's all optics, are we seriously going to take that bet? Because we cannot afford to get that assessment wrong. Are we willing to give him the excuse he needs to end the world for Ukraine?

    At this point, I would be perfectly content for the world to revert to a sphere of influence model, for the simple fact that there is no alternative at this point. If the Russo-Ukraine war doesn't cause WW3 (and I think it's 70:30 that it will), the inevitable Chinese takeover of Taiwan will cause it. Ukraine and Taiwan are not worth burning the planet to a crisp, and the deaths of our wives and children, and wives and children all across the globe. This is the most dangerous moment in history. It is more dangerous than anything that has ever happened before, because the stakes are higher than they have ever been. We are no more than 30 minutes away from a nuclear holocaust and we have a callous egomaniac in the Kremlin with ice in his veins, a dotard in the White House and an affirmative action hire waiting in the wings, and an utter buffoon in No. 10.

    Let Putin have Ukraine and Georgia. Let China have Taiwan. Let the West hunker down, bolster its defenses, agree a new security architecture with the other Great Powers, consolidate what we have, and let life continue on this planet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I find it pretty hard to believe that the Russians

    A) Hadn't the intelligence operation to know if Bush was flying solo or not; to put out some feelers in Washington whether this was to be America's policy going forward.

    B) Weren't going to at least sit back and see what the next U.S. president did or said.

    Now, you might say that the Russians saw a window of opportunity to invade Georgia with the South Ossetia conflict going on and decided that time was as good as any to use it as a pretext, but here's the problem with trying to invade countries - they don't generally like being invaded or enjoy the threat of it. The more neighbours you invade, the more neighbours you make think, 'Hmmm, perhaps we'd be better off throwing our lot in with someone else...'



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,312 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    How ridiculously cowardly and self-centred of you. Let the bullies win because it might affect me. Jesus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    And here we go again with this kind of sh**t.

    Ukraine expressing a desire to join NATO does not equal NATO being in the Ukraine.

    On the other hand Russia is very much in the Ukraine right now invading and killing people.

    To be honest why on earth would Ukraine not want to be in NATO right now? Their citizens are being killed with Russian bombs while they can look across the border to countries like Poland and see how they are protected against this kind of aggression.

    Their are many countries in Nato in Eastern europe that do not host nuclear weapons and only wish to have the security of not being invaded.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Ukraine's last presedential election was rated free and fair by the OSCE, which by the way, would have included Irish elections monitors as part of the mission btw.

    You are free to read the report if you wish.

    There was noted instances of vote buying from the Poroschenko camp but Zelensky won in spite of this.

    The administration of the election was described as free and fair. Zelensky was elected, and power was transmitted to him in a completely democratic manner.

    If you have evidence to the contrary you're welcome to furnish it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Name every country you want to give Russia absolute power on their alliances.


    Noting that Finland and Sweden have already been threatened if they join Nato. You can say Ukraine today but then Putin will want power over any country Russia borders if he can get away with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    The absolute disconnect from reality is staggering:


    Russia's negotiating position - according to the country's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov - is that:

    • Ukraine must "demilitarise" and "deNazify"
    • Crimea - Ukraine's southern peninsula annexed by Moscow in 2014 - is recognised by Kyiv as part of Russia
    • Two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine - self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic - are formally recognised




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭CB19Kevo


    One sanction might not have an impact, 100 might not have an impact but as more and more pile on it applies pressure. Will it stop Putin-I doubt it, Might it make everyday Russians demand answers - Maybe, Does it give moral support to Ukraine - Yes.

    Many of us have donated already and continue to do either in supporting humanitarian aid or weaponry but i'm sure i am not the only one who wants to do more. Short of leaving for Ukraine and fighting.

    I believe in the cause but admittedly not enough to sacrifice my life... Maybe a pussy for not fighting for what i believe in or maybe being realistic in what level of support i can offer. Will let you judge me if you so wish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    All absolutely irreleavnt. There are many nukes on subs closer to the US than if they were in Canada, probably, just as there are nukes on US, French and British submarines in close proximity to Russia. It's all pretext and nonsense. The west could have behaved very differently when the soviet union collapsed, but it took no advantage of the situation; but now it threatens Russia at every turn? Spare me the BS.

    It's all just the same old USSR/Russian con job of assembling a string of random words and claiming they justify what it is doing or wants to do. There is no truth other than Putin wanting to do something and is doing it. The words are just meant to cosnfuse and distract while he gets on with his plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    That would entirely depend on how much money and how many jobs they offered.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In the real world, sovereign nations can not do whatever they want. Cuba were a sovereign nation, should they have been allowed to put nukes on their soil? No. USA perceived it as an existential threat and were willing to go to nuclear war to prevent it.

    There are a great many "sovereign nations" persuing nuclear weapons and other sovereign nations are actively stopping them.

    In the real world sovereign nations have to consider the consequences of their actions. That is not the same as condoning the consequences, it is accepting that they will occur and deciding if it is worth it. Russia had been shouting from the rooftops that they perceived NATO expansion as an existential threat. Anyone with half a brain knows how a superpower will eventually respond to an existential threat. What did the West do? Goad Russia, topple the Ukrainian government, funnel arms into the region, spend tax payer money on fomenting anti-Russian sentiment. Every analyst knew what would happen. There are those in the West who intended for this to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    I was somewhat sceptical of that story but know it’s clear that Putin very much capable of such an action



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Sanctions are already doing that as the ability to deliver goods and get paid for them is already severely curtailed. Big companies are pulling out and smaller entities will do it more quietly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The last one is an impossibility for starters. The only reason there are Russian troops there right now is because they illegally invaded.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement