Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

FF/FG/Green Government - Part 3

1228229231233234747

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It should be an immediate expulsion. The ambassador of any country who invades a sovereign country should be out of the country with his diplomats as soon as boots hit the ground.

    They should have responded long long ago to the known fact that billions of dodgy Russian money was washing around the IFSC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    Darragh O'Brien in one of the papers begins an article talking about Sinn Féin. This is the minister who didn't deliver one "affordable" home last year. But but Sinn Féin...

    Interestingly in the same article he says that "we have effectively banned big investment funds from bulk buying traditional family homes".

    They've done no such thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Is this the full article or is there a paywall or something blocking this?

    I am not seeing any paywall block, and it doesn't seem like the fill article... https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/sinn-fein-is-long-on-pipe-dreams-but-short-on-solutions-when-it-comes-to-the-housing-crisis-41389268.html

    Two paragraphs, first one stating the Sinn Fein do the same thing as FFG when they are in opposition, and the 2nd paragraph asking Sinn Fein how are they going to implement any of their claims.

    ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    From a procedural aspect it means that the ambassador in that country also gets ejected which would leave any Irish in Moscow by themselves. Keeping embassies up and running is an essential part of ending any conflict and isn't to be done on a whim regardless of what has happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They are waiting to hide behind the coat tails of the rest of the EU.

    What do you think Vlad is going to do when other countries expel the Russian delegate?

    Where the Germans tawdry about sending arms to Ukraine or other countries in closing their airspace?

    You bought the excuse.

    They should also have advised the Irish in Russia to leave BTW.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    I couldn't tell from the picture what paper it was in but I guess it must be. You can see the article on his twitter account...

    https://twitter.com/DarraghOBrienTD/status/1497939912733171718?t=jJTuJYiny7MxT_4YXlyVww&s=19



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You completely and utterly have a misunderstanding of how international diplomacy works. If we expel, they expel and there is now 1 less way for conflicts to end (which is the aim, I hope you realise).

    And of course we won't go first, we're a neutral country, we're also a location where talks can occur if needed.

    There is no positive aspect to being the first to expel except satisfy those looking for a reaction.

    This can be a hard place to be, it's like getting hit in the face and standing there and doing nothing.

    It's a pretty shtty thing to attack a government for as the easier choice is of course to expel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    But but but Putin calls it a peacekeeping operation, surely that gives him a pass in your eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Oh and I fully expect a "come on now" reply to this post, maybe I'll be surprised and get a lecture about how international diplomacy works and showing how expelling would advance the path to peace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Putin is bombing the place to kingdom come blanch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So countries wait for others to expel a diplomat on principle? Really?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    I wouldn't criticise them for not expelling the ambasassor. As you say there is protocol to follow.

    The bit I'd criticise them for is that they are running around the media and social media saying the ambassador should be expelled. Yesterday Fianna Fáil elected/nominated representatives were circulating a petition demanding the expulsion of the ambassador. There was talk of Fine Gael doing similar today but I haven't seen it. Several of their TDs have called for the ambassador to be expelled.

    Are they just trying to be popular? People see through members of government parties, that constantly vote along government lines, calling on the government to do something. And they should be criticised for it.

    Plenty of them outside the embassy for a photo op over the weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Patrick O'Donovan on TWIP

    SF were wrong not to back expelling diplomats in Britain

    We (the Gov) are right not to expel diplomats because of Irish people living in Russia.

    😁😁

    Was there no British people living in Russia when they expelled diplomats?

    Fecking bizarre reasoning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Pretty much the expected response, 0 nuance there 😀. 0 for effort as well, come on and contribute some critical thinking instead of just stalking all the government threads with pantomime replies.

    The FF and FG (if true) messing about there is pretty stupid, luckily the cabinet won't just follow, expelling an ambassador has real consequences for people (including Irish people), it shouldn't be done on a popularity vote. Diplomacy is taught for a reason.

    No problem to be outside an embassy in protest, its visible and can be broadcast, but someone needs to be inside the embassy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    See my post before this, Were they thinking about Irish people when they were gung ho to do that? Were the British thinking about British people.

    Lame excuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Again, no nuance, no critical thought.

    Why might it make sense to maintain diplomatic relations when a war is going on? Let's start from the very basics and see where we get to, as much fun as "government trying to take advantage of a war" narrative might be. Why would a military(legitimate or not) ensure there was diplomatic channels to facilitate contact? Why would a country not expel or imprison that contact? (I know, worms everywhere).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We are told the EU will move to expel this week. If you are critically thinking correctly, why would they do that if 'maintaining diplomatic relations' is the important consideration? The EU has also just committed to arming the Ukraine army . closed down airspace, and shut down the Russian economy.

    Please address my previous point, why was it right to do it over the poisonings and not now? The same Irish people where living in Russia as now. I was not aware of the government worrying about them then. Can you link to them doing it?

    Don't get all patronising now, just answer the question



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    The photo ops outside the embassy were part of the same "messing" you refer to. Billy Kelleher MEP even went to the bother of making a sign calling for the ambassador to leave. Tweeted that he was driving all the way from Cork and would drop the ambassador to the airport. Beyond childish.

    Just did the maths. 32 signatures to the FF petition. More than half the PP. Who decides party policy in this area? The minority? Or some unelected party officials? If that were another party it would probably be described as "chilling".

    Again I don't think we should expel the ambassador due to the implications it would have for our embassy and our citizens that rely on it. Just here to call out this shite from people who should know better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Because the poisonings happened and stopped (i.e. were not ongoing), the war is in progress and needs to come to an end thus needs negotiation (in simple terms, will be interesting if this is taken too simplisitically and needs more explanation).

    The fact you don't see the difference and are trying to score points is amazing.

    The FF politicians taking votes on it are idiots. Protest, yes, let the diplomats work on expulsion as we work the world back from the brink.

    All conflicts end at a table (metaphorically for those who take everything literally).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    More of the patronising but still avoiding the difficult question

    The EU will probably take action on diplomats this week, whither your theory on negotiations then?

    Quite a self serving sidestep on the poisonings conundrum too. NOBODY knew that they had stopped and NOBODY had recieved assurances they would stop.

    So once again, stop patronising people your protestations have evidently run out of road.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,096 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    That's a pretty childish way of looking at maintaining collective action. Ireland doesn't "hide behind the coat tails" of the rest of the EU, it is part of the decision making process of the EU.

    Personally, I'm all for expelling the Russian ambassador, but there are equally valid reasons for not doing so.

    Also I would like to think anyone commenting in a current affairs thread would understand the difference between a parliamentary party and a government. Backbench TDs have only marginally more say in whether an ambassador gets expelled than you or I.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I never said anything about backbenchers/parliamentary party's.

    There were also valid reasons for not trusting British intelligence that you had even been given and for expelling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭malk518


    Saudi Arabia leaning in on the side of the Russians. Leo's November junket there will look terrible now. Mind you the bombing of innocents in Yemen should have given FG supporters pause for thought anyway. Should have!

    https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1498060310959243269?t=qyK-unBiSV2NkZYs8vTaug&s=19



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,063 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    I mean if we're going to start expelling diplomats, it shouldn't just be the Russians. Saudi and US can go just as easily



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's patronizing because if the explanations were left out that is inevitably what you'd jump onto.

    Prove me wrong in a future exchange.

    Anyway, Coveney has come out and said the same thing I've said, let's see what happens this week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,521 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Because more hot heads like yourself are what's needed...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Sure wait until he levels Kyiv, or fires a nuke, then do it. Brilliant.

    I'm sure it will mean as much to Ukrainians as that time the Gov sent the Saudi ambassador home for Yemen and the British one for Derry and collusion etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,509 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Sure wait until he levels Kyiv, or fires a nuke, then do it. Brilliant.

    Just on a point of order, but how would expelling a diplomat stop that?

    You and I know it won't and cant.

    Would you be in favour of joining NATO or sending lethal aid to Ukraine?



Advertisement