What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Do you not understand what ? means?

What percentage of the population of the USA watch it?

Well I wasn’t expecting an answer from him.

If you are only appealing to a tiny minority then you are not a juggernaut.

Well well well.

This is interesting....

Numbers 3 and 4 on that list never happened.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/yet-another-media-tale-trump-tear?utm_source=url

I get all my news from the most reliable sources like...greenwald.substack.com....

It's basically a blog....lol

Yes and you just proved my point, if i was to support haley which i would, you would claim she is a trump supporter which in turn would make me a trump supporter in your eyes. Believe it or not you can agree with some of what trump did and still dislike the man and not be a trump supporter, i believe haley fell into that category and condemned him on certain things. But its all in or out with many on the left and right too tbf. You fall into that category like many on here who can support just 1 side no matter what. Childish but many many like that these days.

You have near 19000 posts here, you are constantly justifying your tunnel minded vison and tbh i think some times you need a break from boards as you come across as irritable at the best of times. Im at work on the night shift i post infrequently as you can tell. Worry about your own sub-conscious maybe and not others. You form a group opinion , you are always on the lft side of arguments, i on other other hand agree with both sides on different matters. In good form at work tonight so not getting dragged into a never ending a debate, and ill let you enjoy have the last reply as im sure you wouldn't sleep well if you didn't get that last word in. Goodevening.

Former US presidents on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine:

Clinton: “Brazen violation”

GWB: “The gravest security crisis on the European continent since World War II”

Obama: “A brazen attack on the people of Ukraine, in violation of international law” 

Trump: “That’s pretty smart”

Read for yourself. He explicitly says he's not talking about neo-Nazis/white supremacists when he says "fine people on both sides...":

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/

Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."

Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."

Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"

Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."

Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?

"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.

To think that with all the torrent of outrageous behaviour from yer man when he was president, I'd almost forgotten that the first impeachment was for illegally withholding military aid cash for Ukraine. I'd like to think that would get a mention when the GOP senators who voted to say that was grand no problem there are up for election next.