Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Galway traffic

Options
1174175177179180253

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 544 ✭✭✭cal naughton


    Rule number one when as chief executive you are under pressure always stand up for the Mayor. Politics 101.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,032 ✭✭✭McTigs


    He was talking about cycling infrastructure in general.


    Now that you mention it though, from dangain, his employees could take the path by the river, in to NUIG, across road at Wards, down the canals, across the road at monroes, across the road at raven terace, a short 100m to claddagh path and on to knocknacara cross from there.

    Sounds joined up to me. Your point or do you have one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Yes and he is commenting based on experiences of his many workers, some of whom used to cycle to work but do not anymore due to a lack of safe cycling infrastructure. The same infrastructure that has been turned down in Salthill in favour of more cars.

    Its just the tip of the iceberg as far as poor city management and the lack of sustainable travel options go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    That is a good point... About 70% of people goto work by Car...

    Now lets look at the Knocknacarra to University, Hospital and on to Ballybrit cycle lane... This is under used and rather than figure out what is wrong they want to double down...

    That is why targets and goals matter in projects..

    Maybe we are better investing in Public Transport over cycling?

    Maybe what we allow as E-Bikes could be increased in Power ( to say the US standard)...

    Denmark allow Pedalectrics in there cycle lanes...

    Maybe we should be subsidising tricycles or other electric type motorbikes?

    Thing is, I am saying there is plenty ways of skinning a cat... But this idea of 'build it and they will come' is a plan which really only works in movies and corn fields...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    I know you're being facetious, but obviously we are better off investing in Public Transport over cycling. Cycling, as various groups point out, is particularly popular in Salthill and Taylor's Hill, yet it isn't within an asses roar of making any impact. Even if the current cycle use goes up by factors of 2 or 3, the modal shift will still be insignificant. Further bus lanes, actively used, with high frequency services should be prioritised over wasting time and money on cycling lanes that won't be used. Buses should have priority in those lanes over taxis, bicycles and any other users except emergency services on active shouts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    You don't mention the big elephant in the room. Multi-lane Roundabouts. The N6 section for most of that scenario you mention is a service duct - with a cycle lane put on top of it the past decade, previous 20 years it was just a service duct. The SQR/BOD section is a designed bus and cycle path with two of those big elephants either end of it!! The Council themselves call the City cycle network a "disjointed network."



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Salthill bike lanes came up for discussion today in the Dail

    Article on it


    Dail record showing full content of what was discussed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭thebackbar


    The whole matter reflected very poorly on Galway, the level of debate really sunk to a new level :( I can't help but apportion some of this blame to the civil servants running the city council, the whole matter seems to have been very poorly handled. If this is normal business for how the council goes about its business there is very dim future ahead for the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    well, they have a poor record in road design too. The removal of the Bóthar na dTreabh roundabout is a key example, and they're now repeating it at the Galway Clinic roundabout (whatever that's called).

    I'm old enough to remember that the roundabout was put in to replace a light-controlled junction because....... light controlled doesn't work for such applications.

    All they literally had to do, at a fraction of the price & time, as to put in a much larger diameter roundabout -this could have aborbed and kept moving a greater volume of traffic - like ones over motorway junctions - and it would have a natural rythm to it.

    But oh no, someone thinks a PLC and several million euro is better. It wasn't better back then, it's not better now.

    Galway is going backwards.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Changing the junctions to 4 arm, light controlled, increased the throughput of the junction allowing for more people to pass through it.

    The raw data from traffic measurement is available on the TII site if you want to verify this for yourself. I also posted an analysis completed by the Insight Institute a few pages back which confirmed this too.

    Simply put, a RAB works up to a certain point after which it becomes clogged and ends up actually reducing the throughput.

    Also important to note, while not perfect by any means, the situation has improved immensely for pedestrians and cyclists at these new junctions. Lastly bus priority measures require light controlled junctions to allow for more consistent journey times.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A recent letter appeared in the Irish Times from a Salthill local

    image.png

    And another one

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,606 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    The Headford Road change is a good lesson in how our intuition and observations on things aren't always correct and it's important to look at quantitative data to confirm or deny them. I'm sure there's plenty out there that still think the removal of the roundabout at the Galway Shopping Centre was the worst thing to ever happen to Galway traffic.

    It also shows how big the outrage is to EVERY change in road/transport infrastructure in this city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    The City executive would be bad if they don't come off incompetent most of the time...

    No one is particularly happy with them... We are effectively run by someone from I think Tipperary(Chief Exec) and another from Cork(Transport) who most likely will not be here when we see the results of their work... This to me is one of the root problems



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Some articles in todays Advertiser on the farce that is the councils actions over Salthill

    Lyons wants to take away part of the Prom to provide a bike lane and keep parking.

    I am all in favour of a fully integrated cycle way, off the road.."

    At least that what I guess he means, because there is no other physical way to do what he is talking about given the current layout of Salthill




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    I agree with ya here.

    The CEO does not live here in Galway City/Galway/Connacht right now, never has actually. He confirmed the same with Keith Finnegan yesterday on Galway Talks.


    TII were really responsible for the N6 roundabout removals - City Council had some involvement. It was nothing to do with Pedestrian / Cycling facilities, throughput of vehicles was the NO 1 priority, and as you have shown already in this thread - it has worked in that respect. It has improved life for people of foot and bike, but by European standards it is still poor stuff. Plenty of cycle lane sections on it - are only for the brave and fast. Which confirms really that throughput of vehicles was the main priority.

    This cycle lane here on the N6 approaching the Tuam Road junction is crazy stuff. https://goo.gl/maps/BK9d4MbrcKXHGTvz9



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    The Kirwan Traffic lights initially was Sh*t Show... Everyone in the town knew it.. They screwed up the lights system...

    Thing is the Corp Executive never admitted to that at the time... No matter what it was great..

    https://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/123381/charity-demands-heads-should-roll-for-the-disaster-of-the-kirwan-junction-design

    I can't find where the executive acknowledged the problem and took responsibly and apologised afterwards...



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    Donal Lyons is just paying lip-service... You are not getting parking on the Prom for a long while, that it...

    I said while it was going on that this would create a backlash... You woke a sleeping giant and they were pissed off now...

    People who park on the Prom and go for a walk are contingent of Galway.. It is an institution and the Cycling lobby threatened them...

    Sory but you got nothing and don't think they are going to be humouring you for a good while... Those councillors got burnt and they will remember to not go near this for a while.. Positions have been hardened now...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Terrifyingly so. This design is a sure way to kill somebody. That's why so few people cycle this section.

    So if we want to know why people are NOT using the N6 cycle paths / lanes ............. this and plenty of examples at other sections at the junctions along N6 (like here: https://goo.gl/maps/d4Yk5u6ymNyRBGgP7) are a clear reason why.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The dedication to keeping sliplanes renders the bikes lanes practically useless as their too dangerous for most



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,606 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Teething problems should be expected with any major work. Lights are an easy fix in the grand scheme of things

    It's the same pattern with all these changes though: 1) people moan about how bad traffic is, 2) roads/junctions are upgraded, 3) people go crazy about how it's the worst thing to ever happen to the city and everyone involved should be shot, 4) things settle down and are better than before but people still moan about how things were better the way they were (completely forgetting step 1 above).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    So 24 hours and no response, even though you have posted in this thread since then.

    So do we take it that you just jump to biased conclusions without bothering to check the details? Or are you maliciously trying to falsely malign a group you don't like?

    That you got the Brendan McGrath 'death threat' story so wrong suggests it could be the former, but the fact you let these defamatory statements stand without correction makes me think it's the latter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭Sniipe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,606 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    I've been puzzled by certain peoples paranoia about "lycra brigades" with secret master plans for a while now. It's completely at odds with my experiences of regular people just trying to get to work/school/shop/whatever safely and the occasional grouping of these individuals to try and achieve this. Specially since you only really see lycra wearing cyclists in the country doing long cycles, completely unaffected by cycling lanes in the city limits.

    My theory is it's mental gymnastics to help justify why they prioritise their own convenience over the safety of others.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hopefully GCC take some action on this soon and remove the kissing gates and other barriers in use across the city

    One prime example, the south park bike lane



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    You can’t take it whatever way you want. I couldn’t care less. Reality is I’m not going to discuss it on an open public forum. As to the McGrath comment, you’re only partially right. Yes, there was an incident - the one he mentioned on GB FM. He also dealt with some abuse issues related to the cycleway. Two councillors who were there told me that. No I’m not going to tell you who.

    You do know that people are not obliged to answer you here don’t you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    From what I heard from two Cllr's 1 FF & 1 FG - it was Mayor Collette Connolly got the brunt of the abuse for proposing the scheme. So would be the Status Quo brigade who don't want any change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 886 ✭✭✭klr87


    Well, he also clearly states that any cycle way must take "... into consideration all promenade users, not just cyclists. A lot more people use the promenade than just cyclists". That by definition includes all the people who walk the Prom, regardless of how they get there. I can't see any councilor overtly supporting a proposal to narrow the Prom for a cycle way.

    I am also curious as to what he means by an "integrated" cycle way. That could mean many things, or several of them at once, assuming it's not just a buzzword being thrown out. To me, one meaning of "integrated" would be that the cycle way goes well beyond the Prom in several directions. Even going west as far as the Barna road junction was apparently far too much to swallow. I know well from walking the Barna road that it is most definitely not cyclist-friendly whenever there is any volume of traffic*. There are a lot people living of the Ballymoneen and Cappagh roads, and surely a cycle way would need to facilitate them? Having an isolated cycle way in and around the Prom has never made much sense to me. And why not continue out to Barna Woods, and then to the Silverstrand junction? From there, it's about 1 km to the eastern edge of Barna ...

    *Cue separate discussion about the Ring Road 😐️



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement