Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1140714081410141214131581

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭Croohur1


    Could I ask what in particular about the points she raised do you have the problem with? I don't know anything about this lady, but the points she raised in that thread all seem self evident or sensible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    For me it sits complete wrong that authorities would deliberately minimise and obfuscate the first-hand observation and evidence of a group of eminent scientists, in order to maintain a desirable level of fear/worry.

    This sounds more like you're trying to make data suit your own view of things. It was right to be cautious about it until we saw that Omicron behaved in exactly the same way in a European winter. The huge surge in cases took that all that autonomous decision making right off the table.

    At public level some of the approaches have been extreme, perhaps unnecessary in places but they are looking at a lot more than one individual. As a variant it still had an impact on health systems and the general thinking that it was just a cold for everyone was what they were concerned about because of the sheer numbers of cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    No the data was unequivocal that Omicron is mild. If by ‘how it behaved in a European winter’ you mean what effect it would have on healthcare systems then fair enough.

    But that’s just a spin on what actually happened - Omicron was studied and evidence shared, and that evidence on Omicron virulence was deliberately and publicly maligned for political manipulation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Have you read anymore of here tweets? She’s not balanced at all! herself and Deepti are worse then our lot here!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭Croohur1


    No, I havent, as I said, I dont know anything about this woman. I was just genuinely a bit confused about what issue you had with any of the points she laid out. They seem quite sensible ideas, she specifically says we cant go back to lockdowns etc. She wants more funding for the NHS, better masks ONLY if there is a serious threat, better air quality in buildings, better, more variant specific vaccines, invest in reducing inequalities that lead to certain sections of the population more susceptible to infection and death.

    Anyway, was just curious🤷



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,643 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Question for anyone who's had COVID, have you had COVID but antigen tests came back negative?


    Im in bits but my antigen tests are negative, so im convincing myself its a bad head cold. But thats what people claimed COVID feels like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Steveimitation


    I've tested positive today but had symptoms the past few days. Took tests on Wednesday and Thursday that were negative but third time was a charm today unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,642 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Her mantra is that we shouldn’t have any normality again. She wanted the UK to go back into lockdown at xmas, she was quite upset when the UK lifted restrictions, are you not happy about that either? She thinks pre 2020 will never return. However most people have their normality returned already, i can do most of the things i did in 2019.


    She is either deluded and thinks that we can win the battle with Omicron and a good auld lockdown will get rid of it. Not a hope it’s too transmissable or she’s happy enough to lockdown and restrict society indefinately.

    The above is not viable at this stage. Our best bet at this stage is to build up natural immunity alongside vaccination. It’s our best defence at this stage.Lifting most restrictions was the best call imo so more people can gain immunity and Omicron eventually becomes like most viruses in the background.

    Some people have really lost the plot though. I was talking to a lady who runs a very popular wealthy business. She says to me “ oh i loved the lockdown, it was great! I’d do another one in the morning”. Jesus Christ!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,748 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    You covered it there, it's a headcold, does it matter any more if its a covid headcold or a different one, take measures to minimise exposing others and carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Seemed very sensible to me too. Some of the rhetoric regarding COVID of late reminds me of the Simpsons where the solution to a problem was to "Burn down the astronomy observatory".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    The data suggested Omicron was milder but there was multiple issues.

    It was way more infectious meaning even if it was less severe it could still fill hospitals at a quicker rate.

    Europe's populations demographics are significantly different to South Africa. South Africa only has about 5% of its population over 65. Many countries in Europe have more than 10% of their population over 65. (In Ireland it's around 14%) Both in the cohorts over 65 and under it, Europe has a higher prevalence of people living with comorbidities.

    Many European countries and the U.S were still in the midst of a delta wave. Delta was a more severe variant it was unclear how the two would combine in terms of burden on the health system. The prediction was that Omicron would outcompete delta but how that would play out in the major hospitals was unknown and difficult to predict. Turns out vaccines did exceptionally well. Tiny %s in the vaccine cover of the most vulnerable make a huge difference!

    Despite being milder Omicron may actually poses a greater risk to the most vulnerable. This is because they've simply a greater chance of being infected. Thankfully, vaccination and better understanding how to dose the immunocompromised mitigated those risks somewhat. Though it still sadly remains true. Some people are most at risk from Omicron than they were from other variants. The overall 'harm' inflicted on the population is thankfully much less.

    Omicron was milder yes but it's revisionism to suggest the data was unequivocal. The picture as always is a murky grey. Compared to the original wild type Omicron is not actually that less severe. It's just there's greater immunity in the population now due to previous infections and vaccination. There's also better medical treatments and understanding of the management of the disease leading to better outcomes and shorter hospital stays. Predicting how that would pan out with a newly discovered variant in a different population demographic is incredibly difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭Croohur1


    I'm not on twitter so I cant check her old posts. Again, my question was, what was it about that twitter thread that you so disagreed with? You posted up the twitter thread, I looked at it and was confused, as you seem to be implying she is a total nutter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    As we’ve said she’s independent sage! She’s a afraid of her own shadow! You don’t need to be on twitter to look at her tweets! She doesn’t believe in us going back to normal!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭Croohur1


    Right. Thats a lot of exclamation points. I've tried looking at her old tweets, Twitter keeps asking me to join and stops me. Again, as I keep asking, what was the issue with her Twitter thread? What is it that makes you break out in exclamation points. Yourself and the original poster keep going on about how she is a nutter, yet wont answer what was so crazy about that twitter thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭the corpo


    A friend is currently positive. His mum felt fairly rough but has been testing negative on antigens all week, went for a PCR and it was positive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 650 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    It's so weird to look at covid coverage in other forums with different cultures. If you look at any of the "normal" subs (i.e. ones with an American bias) in reddit like r/news, the most popular comments are the ones advocating an approach where they still think they can control this.

    There's one right now about how states are beginning to drop mask requirements, and most of the top comments are basically calling it crazy. One popular comment is

    Covid isn't going away, but guess what "living with Covid" looks like? It's not going back to how things were in 2019, it's continuing to wear respirators in group settings during periods of high community spread.

    Emphasis is theirs, not mine. So bizarre. This individual thinks that it's reasonable for there to be some kind of permanent "covid alert system" that requires people to wear expensive masks during high season. And the comment is heavily upvoted.

    I've stopped engaging in any COVID conversations on reddit because if you dare suggest even the tiniest bit that the hysteria is unnecessary, they get even more hysterical.

    I wonder did the pandemic become so politicised in the US that people are unwilling to stand near the middle ground lest they appear to be on the wrong side?



  • Posts: 543 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I tried to engage with an American doctor on Twitter last week regarding why they devote so much time and effort to masking young children and so little to addressing poor vaccine uptake in their vulnerable populations. Especially given the latter issue is very clearly having a huge influence on their record hospitalization and death figures.

    I got replies calling me a Covid minimiser, child killer and antivaxxer.

    Think part of the problem is partisanship is so ingrained in their society. Everything is us vs them. They just can't grasp the concept of nuance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,492 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,798 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Reddit is in no way representative of the opinions of the average American. My state just dropped the mandate yesterday and going by posts on reddit, everyone is planning on still wearing them and strongly disagrees with the governor. Still going on like everyone is gonna die.

    Meanwhile, in real life everyone is delighted. I just attended the most packed yoga class ever with everyone extremely happy with the removal of the mandate, and vocal about it. People who weren't going to class because of it, came back. Then I went to the store and the vast majority are unmasked. People are smiling at each other and everything. The feeling of relief is palpable. And yes, I know it's just a mask, but 2 years of it takes a toll.

    They are either bots on reddit pushing a certain narrative, or the most doomer of the doomers given you basically get banned on there for not going along with that mentality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    11065 cases



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,606 ✭✭✭VG31


    It's the same on Reddit Ireland. There was a thread there a few weeks ago where someone was asking if people would still wear masks when they become optional. Close to 90% of posters said they would still wear masks. There is no way that is reflective of the general public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    You’re still missing the point - I’ve acknowledged it’s fair to wait to evaluate effect on healthcare systems wrt specific locations, as there are many variables, lingering Delta, indoor seasonal aspect etc, less or more natural immunity, increased transmission fuelling more short stay hospitalisations - yes all of that.

    However the fact that the much-reduced virulence of Omicron was showcased to the world by SA scientists with robust evidence, and that it was so easily swept aside in favour of maintaining a political upper hand is revolting. This is not revisionism. The data was not murky grey. Omicron is , and was known to be, mild. Vaccines have aided our emergence from an emergency, and therapeutics are welcome and overdue.

    We do ourselves no service by selectively assessing good scientific analysis and dispensing it or not according to vested political determinations.



  • Posts: 895 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see NPHET will look at masks on schoolchildren next week. Be great to have them gone by the time the kids return after midterm. (It’s in an RTE article that doesn’t give much other details).

    Also watching the Late Late there. When will the mask charade end? The audience are well-on to say the least, probably drinking beforehand.. then have to put their masks on to watch the show. But then pull the masks down anytime they’re spoken to etc. It’s such a joke - doing things for the sake of being seen rather than any benefit at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Can anybody give me a logical reason as to why I’d have to wear a mask in a shop but not in a pub?? I’m sick shît of the bastering things! This crap from MM then. Why??? It makes fûck all sense!! I can be in a nightclub with hundreds and with colleagues but will have to wear a mask at work the following Monday in a large open retail space with doors constantly open and air conditioning!!

    I just can’t understand it! People might think I’m stupid or whatever but this is just stupid rhetoric by our “leader”!!!!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale


    Think it's just that shops and work are essential things everyone should be able to do. If people are still trying to protect themselves they probably won't be going pubs and night clubs but should be able to pop the shops etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,912 ✭✭✭Danno


    Yes, on antigen I was shoving out negative test after negative test but my PCR was positive. Even the day after my PCR test I was still showing negative on antigen.

    The OH was shoving out positive antigen after positive antigen but her PCR was negative. Likewise the day after her negative PCR she was still showing positive on antigen. Around 4 days later her PCR came back positive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Again it still makes no sense! You’ll never dwell too long and in reality you’d be social distant from people anyway regardless of pandemic or not! I never liked people invading my space so would naturally move away. I don’t know! It’s all about showing we’re still doing something!

    it’s frustrating as it’ll be retail staff, HCW left with having to wear the mask for 40 plus hours a week!



Advertisement