Prince Andrew in jep?

You can ask "why hasn't that come out yet?" about any of the details of this case and the answer will always be the same. The trial hasn't happened yet. The evidence has not been presented yet.

On the question of how Epstein compelled Giuffre to do what she did, he certainly doesn't have to have forced her at gunpoint. Very few people who are the victims in underage sex cases are forced at gunpoint; sometimes they are enthusiastic participants (in many cases, after long grooming and manipulation); sometimes they are more ambivalent. But their willingness or lack of willingness is irrelevant; all that matters is that they are under age. I haven't looked for it, but as there have been previous legal proceedings relating to Epstein and his behaviour, I imagine that there is plenty of evidence on the record about Epstein's manner of procuring, grooming, manipulating and where necessary coercing underage victims.

As for trafficking "in the traditional sense", I'm not sure what you think the traditional sense of trafficking is. But so far as a trafficking charge is concerned it makes no difference at all whether she went willingly or not, or whether her parents consented or cared or even knew that she was going. The essence of human trafficking is bringing someone into the country, or out of the country, or from A to B within the country, in order to exploit them — exploitation being understood as the commission of any of a range of offences covering slavery, involuntary servitude, sexual offences, etc. Obviously willingness is relevant to some of these offences - slavery, for example - but not to others. However willing, even enthusiastic, a 17-year old is, it is unlawful for them to do any kind of sex work, so if you bring them into the country to do sex work you are trafficking them. And if you are the recipient of their sexual services you are exploiting a trafficked child sex worker, Your Royal Highness.

(Despite what right-wing politicians and the right-wing press would have you believe, bringing people into the country so that they can seek protection as refugees is not a trafficking offence; it is not against the law either to seek protection or to enter the country for that purpose, so there is no exploitation offence committed, and therefore no trafficking.)

I was looking at you tube documentaries where Roberts was describing her relationship with Epstein/Maxwell...she said most of the time it was just the 3 of them on the island and she described it they acted like a real family.... snorkeling... swimming...hiking...and they wanted her to have a baby....her words...and they'd set her up with all the care..... maybe they were setting her up for a royal baby...who knows....

Which all ties in with how a 17 year old could be groomed and acting as a willing participant without resistance. How she could happily pose for a photo with Andrew and still be trafficked out to him. How she could help recruit more girls. She was groomed and conditioned as someone under the age of consent to act in a particular way.

She didn't see it as abuse at the time. She didn't see how she was being manipulated.

You couldn't infer that photo is anything but a photo opportunity with a royal...a rarity for anyone even moreso for a American where they seem to be obsessed with the royal family...

Prince Andrew was the father of 2 girls himself .. Epstein wasn't in the same position...both of these men would have completely different agendas based on that alone...I would think he would have visited Maxwell's house maybe on her invitation for another dinner party again as I'm sure they would be leaving again for the US...

London was the last leg of the of a 6 week worldwide holiday that the 3 had taken before flying back to the US from London at that time.... so they certainly took the scenic route to supposedly traffic Roberts to London especially for prince andrew

What I'm saying is Andrew may have not known Roberts was in London with them when he called to the house in London...he may not have even known that they had all been on a 6 week holiday .... he may have got a phone call to call over to the house to meet for catch up before they head off...but Roberts was there...he could do nothing bout her being there...

.

I wouldn't be surprised if Maxwell was also his advisor on how to handle this explosive connection as they seemed to be in email communication about Roberts between them and look where she is now herself

They might not even be friends now ... but your right she certainly knows...any help from her now could implicate him in a trafficking allegation that may have been part of her and Epstein collaboration together.