Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cities around the world that are reducing car access

1373840424373

Comments

  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Have you not seem combined multistorey parking houses and apartment blocks? They are very common.

    I can think of one particularly large development in the rejuvanated quarter of my City which is a combined parking, retail and resendential development.

    I figure they get a few million in revenue in the retail levels from the residents above some of whom would be renting car spaces below.

    One particular car park I visit has differnt levels for residents and customers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Untrue. Car free spaces equal more vibrant spaces. That's the case around the world. Oslo has seen a big increase in footfall after going car free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    There's a thread on that already



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Dublin has far too much private traffic, it is not a pleasant place to be for pedestrians or cyclists. This is what sends people to suburban shopping centres.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Agreed. The suburban shopping arguement is good if you are from one of the circles of hell that is worse than suburban shopping centres. For regular humans, city centres are more attractive shopping, eating and drinking venues. The suburban centres offer convenient access to the big brands for people who are forced to live out there for economic reasons. They certainly aren't places you choose to go to or remain in after you've obtained your goods.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Well you cam Google Oslo like. On the other hand, your claim that removing parking kills city centres is completely and utterly baseless and contrary to observable facts the world over.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I don't have far to go to visit a vibrant city that is welcoming to those who chose to visit it by private transport. It is just around the bend in the river.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Which part leaves you incredulous. Most cities are to be found on Rivers... or that it is vibrant and welcoming to private transportation?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    The poster gave an example of a city that discourages car use and has seen a big increase in footfall. You tell them that it is a baseless claim and use a city that you wont name as an example. How can that be taken seriously?

    I live in the Netherlands and while cars are allowed in the city it is made more difficult for them with one way streets, reduced speed limits, priority access for pedestrians/bikes. It leaves the city centre a nicer place to be. To get into the centre for me would take about 8 minutes by bike with free city centre parking, to drive could take anywhere from 5 minutes to 30 minutes depending on traffic and would cost at least 2 euro an hour. I never drive into the city centre. And the car free streets in the city centre are definitely the more vibrant streets with on street seats for restaurants, and the pedestrian shopping street seeming to be a lot busier than the shopping street that allows cars.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I won't name my City or provide information about myself because the Activists on this sub-forum are raving lunatics and doxxing would not be beneath some of them.

    you may not have seen that I have provided the names of multiple Cities in the locality which remain car friendly.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,194 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    So what you're saying is that cars aren't actually banned from the city centers in the Netherlands then? (And I know they're not because I've driven along the canals and through Dam square down towards Centraal Station in Amsterdam).

    I doubt anybody has an issue with what occurs in the Netherlands and it's an ideal that Ireland should strive towards. There are many on here however who want to to even further and have a total ban on cars. It's not realistic and shows them to be anti car zealots IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I havent read every post but i havent read anyone calling for a complete ban on cars from a city centre, maybe a ban in certain areas to create pedestrian areas, or a severe reduction on parking to discourage driving. But that is pretty much what happens in the Netherlands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I'd say there is a big difference between car friendly and car tolerant. The cities you mentioned would be more car tolerant. They have large pedestrian areas where cars aren't allowed. Cities in the Netherlands are car tolerant whereas you can drive into the city if you want, but it is almost always easier/quicker to cycle or take public transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Oslo doesn't have a car ban per say, it just has no through roads and no parking, it's an access only situation for cars and a big increase in pedestrian space.

    Could be easily done in Dublin but you'd have to remove most of the multi storeys, they are so numerous that their access routes cover the entire city centre.

    There's a lot of rumblings about congestion charging but the results from the Oslo approach are far superior to what any congestion charge can produce.

    Post edited by cgcsb on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,869 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Grafton St used to have two way traffic - including buses. It was always jammed. Then it went one way and then it went pedestrian only, with restricted delivery time for the businesses. Hmm - what happened to all those cars and buses?

    If the traffic (specifically cars) are restricted in the city centre such that their use is reduced and people who were used to going by car choose either not to go or to go by other ways, then those who need to use the car just put up with the restrictions. Those restrictions are either harder to find parking, or higher parking fees, or a congestion charge, or whatever, then with those enforced, the pedestrians and cyclists and bus users will find the city a more pleasant place.

    Now if a new motorway is built, and a toll is imposed, then the motorist either pays the toll, or goes another way, or does not go. Apply the same logic to cities, and you have the view put forward by those who favour a more pleasant city centre.

    It is not anti car, it is anti congestion, anti pollution, and anti thoughtless parking.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Pollution? Euro6 cars are clean at point of use. Electric cars are clean, full stop. fines for not displaying environmental green discs on windscreens and bad parking take care of those other points.

    People do not abandon cars anywhere they choose in my city as the likelihood of their car having a fine or not being there when they return are so high as to be bordering on a certainty.

    IrishRover has given us the basis of a new mental illness: car intolerance which is the state of being irrationally disturbed when observing a car within a Streetscape. Debilitating and Incurable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Irrationally disturbed? Car intolerant?

    Firstly I am not disturbed by by cars. I own a car, I just realise that there are places that are better without cars. Do you think this would be as pleasant a place to be if there was a two lane road down the middle of all the tables?

    Also I'd brush up on your reading skills. I said car tolerant, not intolerant. I would like an explanation from you how your city is car friendly rather than tolerant, do they encourage driving into the city or is it just one of the options? Do they provide free parking?

    And its Irelandrover, not IrishRover.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    The open spaces turned over to outside dining here would put that city to shame if that is the best example you can post.

    It is car friendly in that parking is plentiful accessible and affordable.

    If the bar and cafe owners heard that parking was going to be restricted they would be rioting as they are highly dependent on their patrons being able to access the city otherwise they go out of business. Locals generally go home as they do not want to pay 3 to 4 euro for an espresso or apfelschorle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,555 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Bar owners haven't been dependent on their patrons having car parking spaces since drink drive limits were brought down in the 1990s! City centre bar owners have been nothing but entirely supportive of reducing car access.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Have you heard of Cafe Society? I didn't say anything about Weißbier or Steinkrugs. Also. Consumption of Alcohol is not prohibted, it is controlled. It is possible to consume a glass of Wine or Beer and later return to your car without fear of losing your licence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,555 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    People drinking coffee in to the night in nice cafe bars are also not likely to be driving anywhere.

    Your post was and remains completely wrong.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Your view of how people socialize on the Continent may not actually be current.

    Some people choose to leave their cars in the multi-storeys overnight as the prices per hour between 19:00 and 09:00 are usually very low or a flat rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Again I didn't state that was the best, I asked if it would be improved by a two lane road. You seem to have trouble stating that some places are better if cars are forbidden. Are those outdoor dining areas in your city in pedestrian areas or do cars drive by as you eat?

    So car friendly to you means that you can park your car?

    See that sounds like my city but I'd describe mine as car tolerant, they have a lot of one way streets and even a lot of pedestrian only streets. Id say my city is bike friendly, priority bike lanes going through the city centre, multiple covered, supervised free bike parking, prioritizing bike lanes over the car lanes, bike lanes are both directions when car lanes are one directional.

    Im not actually sure what your point is here, you just seem to be here to tell everyone how great your city is without telling anyone where your city is. The fact is that transport isnt a zero sum game, in a lot of cities widening bike lanes means that footpaths or traffic lanes get smaller, turning over a street to pedestrians means that it is harder to cross the city for drivers. Prioirtizing bus lanes means cars wait longer at traffic lights, bike lanes have to have traffic lights installed.

    My preference is to make cycling the most commonly used option, it takes up the least amount of space, creates the least pollution, is the healthiest option and allows the most useable space for people, greenery and shops in the city centre rather than car parking spaces.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,304 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The emissions from cars in only one issue with them in a city. Having cars moving around a city centre means that there is less room for other means of travel including walking. In addition, ther eis also the safety risk from having cars move relatively freely around a city.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Life is not without danger but you would like to use it a reason for prohibition. Vehicles are equipped with ADAS and AEB by law these days to mitigate these risks. Cars will be forced by regulation to observe and comply with speed limits in demarkated zones in the next year.

    Frankly, I have more fear of the cyclists going to and from the University nowadays than cars in the City.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    @IrelandRover, I'm balance against the fanatics who were proposing total prohibition of cars by fair means or foul not so many pages ago in this thread.

    When challenged upon it they'd now say " but you misunderstand, we never proposed that". There is a striking degree of mendacity on this thread from certain quarters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I mean this genuinely, can you show someone proposing a complete ban of cars from a city centre. I haven't seen it. Id disagree with a complete ban on cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Go back a couple of pages. There is a black sheep who said "but they should be demonised, they've ruined cities".

    What seperates him from some others is that he speaks what others on the forum think but avoid stating so baldly. Perhaps they have received media training along the way.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,304 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Where did I mention prohibition? You are imagining things being said here which have not been said. Whilst there is undoubtedly a need to reduce the dominance cars have been given in cities all across the world, nobody has mentioned banning them from cities apart from the possibility of having core areas of a city being made car free for some if not all periods of the day - this is something people all around the world are seeking, not just a few on here. Have you an issue with that?

    As for your claim that cars will be equipped with ADAS and AEB, are you serious? There are still issues with these systems and sole reliance on them is not a prudent approach to safety within a city centre. Plus you're forgetting about the 2.2 million os so cars that already exist in Ireland which won't have these electronic tools.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Feel free to spend five minutes reviewing death and injury statistics for your country or city if your confusion about who you should fear on the road persists.



  • Registered Users Posts: 792 ✭✭✭Alias G


    In other words you cannot back up your baseless claim. Unsurprising.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I could just as easily say electric bikes exist to save the bike industry. I must join twitter to correct him because obviously everything said on Twitter is believed by everyone.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Hmmm. get back to the schoolyard which is where your level of debate belongs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I'd guess that if you said that about the bike industry, others might point out that the bike industry isn't the industry suffering a huge global backlash over their pollution practices and their lies about pollution.




  • Registered Users Posts: 792 ✭✭✭Alias G


    You made the claim and are unable to sunstansiate it. Which level do your debating skills belong to. On the evidence of this thread you are more crank than skilled debater.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    You seem to hold others to a posting standard that you don't meet yourself.

    I have looked and i don't see anyone wanting an outright ban on cars in a city. You aren't so much offering an alternative to fanatics here as you claim, but rather you seem to be making up things people say and then argue against that.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]



    You are making this too easy for me:

    Stick that in your translator of choice.

    "Beliebte Argumente, dass in die meisten Radunfälle Autos involviert sind, weist Schäfer zurück: "Das gilt nur für 40 Prozent aller Radunfälle und auch für die dabei Verletzten - in diesen Fällen sind ganz überwiegend die Autofahrer schuld. Aber bei 60 Prozent handelt es sich um Unfälle der Radler untereinander oder mit Fußgängern." Und wenn man bedenkt, dass davon die wenigsten gemeldet werden (aber gleichzeitig fast alle Unfälle zwischen Radlern und Autos), dann sieht der Verkehrspolizist das größere Problem bei den Radlern selbst: "Das ist vor allem einer fehlenden Regeltreue, aber auch zu geringer Aufmerksamkeit zuzuschreiben. Mittlerweile gehen wir davon aus, dass 20 Prozent aller Unfälle auf die Ablenkung durchs Smartphone zurückgehen." Sein Tipp: "Das Handy auf Vibrieren stellen, und wenn man nachschauen will, immer rechts ranfahren.""



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,304 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What is that from? Is it a newspaper article or a scientific study?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    OK, so you've skulked away from that avenue of attack and moved on to SUVs in your whataboutery. I'm not going to defend SUVs. I don't like them and can just about tolerate compact crossovers. The closer they are to 4metres in the length the more tolerable they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    To easy for you to change the subject? Once again, feel free to spend five minutes reviewing death and injury statistics for your country or city if your confusion about who you should fear on the road persists.

    You can start by telling us how many people are killed by motorists in your city vs number killed by cyclists?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    A report quoting a senior traffice police officer from a regional newspaper...but what would he know and sure don't they all drive powerful E-klass kombis so they must be biased.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    SUVs are the tip of the iceberg. Cars cause huge pollution in manufacturing, in daily operation, in disposal. EVs may reduce the pollution from daily operation a bit, but they are a long way off clean.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    AndrewJRenko, I'm not trying to win you over. Your reputation precedes you. You are infamous beyond these locales and very much a reason why boards.ie struggles to keep participants engaged.

    My reasonable commentary and posting of useful genuine information is for the benefit of impartial observers seeking balance who may stray in to this thread.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement