Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1242243245247248322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    At least the usual populist politicians seem to have steered away from going public in opposing this health measure. But there is no shortage of populist columnists to take their place. They don't care about poor people or pensioners, but it makes for a good read. Why do they think alcohol is so essential to pensioners? Can they not be left to make their own choices about how to spend their money, without being patronised by journalists and online do gooders?

    "This was designed to target the less well-off who dare to drink, but wrapped up in a quasi-health measure.

    Thanks to new age puritans, a pensioner who likes five or six beers a week will be worse off to the tune of around €5 completely wiping out the rise in the State Pension.

    On the other hand, someone who likes to drink a few €20 bottles of wine will not be affected.

    This is in everything but name another tax on the poor".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,429 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    You literally quoted the fact that the fiver is wiped out for a pensioner and you still don't get it.

    Here we go again, say he drinks one can a night the cans he likes to drink have increased by 70 cent due to MUP 7x 70cent = €4.90.

    No cliche, no populism, no patronising, no do-gooding.

    Just a fact if as you suggest he choses to make his own mind up and continue to enjoy a very small pleasure in life .

    And in seven weeks that's €35 he won't have to celebrate our national feast day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    She may have to make the choice between using the fiver to pay her fuel bill, or using it to by drink? Why would drink be so essential to her?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,429 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Because of the MUP, which you support , that choice is forced on her.

    Some of us think that is wrong.

    And as the article says the well off person who drinks expensive wine doesn't have to make that choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    With demographic changes, wealth is gradually transferring to the retired population, and away from the working age. Do you not know any pensioners who are well off?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,541 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i'm sure this has been covered already, but is 100% of the increase (enforced that is) going to the state?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,147 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Not one's that this entire shite is targeted at.

    Its all about removing whatever little luxuries are left. There are types on this thread and they know who they are would prefer everyone was renting shoeboxes and plugged into the borg of work home and work. Up to their eyeballs in debt. Silent and compliant.

    Luxuries no. They're for rich people only. Now eat your porridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,285 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    Only the extra VAT payable



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,764 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    As noted only the VAT.

    But its intended to reduce alcohol consumption... which is already on a downward trajectory.

    Subtract also lost revenue with the people who do booze runs to Newry or further...

    And there may not be any extra revenue at all, a reduction is even possible.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,147 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The only cliche you have is every Irish person is an uncontrollable drunk.


    Its funny how this stuff is pushed by people who were problem drinkers and they self reflect on the rest of the population. Weird that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,429 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Pure deflection but I'll humour you.

    I know a broad range of people both wealthy and not so well off.

    Some are pensioners some not.

    What's your point ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,541 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    so the state will get 19% (23/123) of the increased revenue and the rest getting passed up along the supply chain.

    maybe my initial cynical view that this was a stealth tax was off the mark, and it is a genuine attempt to decrease consumption.

    i dont think it will decrease consumption. the people that can afford to will just swallow the cost, others will prob decrease their food/clothes budget to accommodate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,147 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Its just more on top of the dumpster fire of costs of living here. And we want to attract talent to love and work here. How do we do that if the government put in policies to price everything to death....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,147 ✭✭✭✭listermint





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,429 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Correct.

    And most of that is VAT that would have been paid anyway when people spent the money on something else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The reason MUP was used instead of extra excise, is that previous excise increases have been absorbed by the industry. MUP guarantees a minimun price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Would you give any credit to governments who presided over long term low inflation up until now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Why not simply reinstate the previous ban on below cost selling from the old groceries bill if that is the claimed problem? Any evidence that excise increases were absorbed by the industry?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭BattleCorp1


    I'm not a problem drinker. I could go three months without a drink no problem and more than likely wouldn't average more than one can of beer a week.

    I fancied a few cans at the weekend. Went into the local shop and saw the price and went 'fcuk that' and walked out. Because of this I'm going to be drinking less because I'm not willing to pay €42 for a slab that was €22 a month ago. There are probably ten thousand or more like me. So statistics will show a reduction of tens of thousands of cans a week from people like me, who aren't problem drinkers. The Government will be going around clapping themselves on the back saying that their "MUP is working, look at the reduction in the number of cans sold" all while totally missing the cohort they are aiming at.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,541 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    so the people with drinking problems wont be effected an iota. and i tend to agree.

    i suppose the results will be apparent when the data on alcohol related crimes/hospitalisations/mental breakdown issues (prob not deaths cos they take years to manifest) is released, vs the bottom line alcohol sales which may be down.

    they must have baseline data right now as their reasoning to introduce this



  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why should she have to make that choice???

    Do you think it's fair that she has to make that choice when her wealthy neighbour doesn't?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Was talking to a few female friends and what mup has changed for them is swapping bottled beers for cans, as its better value, so mup is making some people drink more!! 🤣 €11 for 6×330 bottles vs €13.50 for 8×500 cans, so well done that mup....pet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The excise duty on a pint of beer or cider, and on a standard measure of spirits was increased by 10 cent (including VAT) and the duty on a 75cl bottle of wine was increased by 50 cent (including VAT), with effect from midnight on 15 October 2013.

    In Patrick's week 2014 the Booze Deals Megathread started on Boards, and is currently over 14,400 posts. The excise increase did not stop the deals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    The baseline data is they think it will move people out of their homes into pubs. Theres no other data that makes sense for doing this. Consumption is for the last 20 years and continuing to drop while apparently our alcohol has never been cheaper. That circle doesnt square with a need for MUP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    "In Patrick's week 2014 the Booze Deals Megathread started on Boards, and is currently over 14,400 posts. The excise increase did not stop the deals."

    That makes no sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,570 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I was in Aldi recently, post MUP.

    A case of 20 bottles of Bud was €21.

    I was surprised.

    I was expecting something in the €40 range based on posts here.

    Why was it €21 ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Two page spread in today’s Sun with Jonesborough and Newry offies stating that they’ve had a very busy January and they’ll be taking out ads in Irish newspapers just before Paddys Day and Easter. People travelling from as far as Limerick. But yeah, it’s died down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,285 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    Equivalent to 12 cans of lager and the same minimum price - why would you think it would be 40 euro +?


    Don't bother answering as I know what you are trying to do



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,298 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    They're travelling from Limerick to Belfast. But with 6 billion Euro being spent on drink here every year, the bit extra going North is only a drop in the ocean.

    A banned motorist from Limerick caught driving on a Christmas shopping trip to Belfast has been jailed for seven months.

    Police also discovered three of Leeanne McCarthy’s children not wearing seat belts when her car was stopped on the Westlink dual carriageway.



Advertisement