Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

133343638393690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 Gatling
    ✭✭✭✭


    Libya wasn't bombed back to the stone age ,

    Like ask what Russian forces are doing in Libya ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 MFPM
    ✭✭✭


    You've been watching too much of Mr and Mrs Smith. I'm talking about real events, real situations and the role of the US and the hypocrisy of their actions. As I've mentioned look at the role of the CIA in Chile in recent months trying to sabotage Pinera, did they do the same with Bolsanaro, not a fu@king chance!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,165 MFPM
    ✭✭✭


    How would you describe the destruction that the US and its chums wreaked on Libya?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 Richard Hillman
    ✭✭✭✭


    If Russia only take Luhansk, they roll into Luhansk, people on the streets waving flags, lots of celebrations, lovely images.

    Ukraine gets rid of their problem child and don't have to pretend that they want to fight for it anymore. They'll also get a shitload more military aid, a load of sympathy (cash) and well wishes.

    Joe Biden gets his "minor incursion" and only has to throw a few sanctions out to try and make himself look hard.

    The EU can issue a few strongly worded statements and not have to actually do anything.

    Vlad keeps Donbass there as his future leverage.

    The Ukrainians seems very very calm right now. A deal has been done somewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 Yurt2
    ✭✭✭


    🤣 CIA orchestrating the Chile situation? So they're the black hand backing leftist elements against the billionaire neo-liberal? Would you ever stop. The 1970s called, they want their topsy-turvy political conspiracies back.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 Gatling
    ✭✭✭✭


    I know Russians are fighting Libyans and trying to stop them having a legitimate government ,

    Most of the destruction of Libya came at the hands of Libyans....

    But this is the usual shite of America evil putin good ......


    It's a CIA conspiracy shhhhhhhhh not even the Russians are saying that so keep it really quite



  • Posts: 4,503 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    You're a time sink I won't be investing in further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 sameoldname
    ✭✭✭


    Ha! Facts?! You've claimed that Russia won't invade Ukraine but how about the fact that they invaded years ago and are still there fighting? Ironic claiming other people need to open their eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,329 brickster69
    ✭✭✭


    It never like, it was a memorandum and no countries parliament ratified it.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,263 Kermit.de.frog
    ✭✭✭✭


    The situation is looking increasingly bad by the day. How are we going get off this slope towards war? Let's hope for the best because this could devolve in to something incredibly if not managed really, really carefully.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 Gatling
    ✭✭✭✭


    The Nato response force could see up to 50,000 deployed in under 3 days that includes men , armour, aircraft , surveillance and maritime assets ,

    Putin seriously needs to stop and think before he gets to the point of no option other than to go to war ...

    He's not getting rid of nato,and nobody is going back to the old cold war lines across eastern Europe .

    Choice A pull Russian forces out of and around ukraine .

    Choice B invade Ukraine proper and drag Europe and nato into a war he's not going to win .



  • Posts: 4,503 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    Has the US still got pre positioned equipment in Europe, or had that stuff been pulled out previously?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,997 Manic Moran
    Mod ✭✭✭✭


    It's still there.

    Roughly speaking, there's a Stryker BCT based permanently in Germany (Why a Stryker BCT and not a proper armored one, I will never know), there's usually an armored BCT normally on a rotation in Poland or thereabouts, and there's another brigade's worth of pre-positioned armored BCT stocks in storage scattered around Europe (Italy, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Lithuania) plus additional war stocks (Replacements, ammunition etc). The standard is to get everything out the door within 96 hours of troops landing. There's also the airborne brigade in Italy.

    There's no massive time crunch, though. I would think if any more US units actually do go overseas as Biden has hinted, they'll bring their own gear with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,388 paul71
    ✭✭✭


    China does not, and never has cared 1 damn bit about Russia. In truth China would love to see a complete collapse of Russia and roll in to take over all that Siberian oil just to the north of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,441 listermint
    ✭✭✭✭


    He didn't need to bother he had trump agree to whatever he wanted. He would have loved a trump second term where he could have continued to get whatever he wanted out of trump.

    Its actually pretty amusing how lap dog trump was. But he's portrayed like a strategic genius. Trump went after Europe breaking all sorts of partnerships up because Putin told him to. And various Putin funded stooges plugged into the GOP.

    None of that is rocket science so why does it need to be pointed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 Pussyhands
    ✭✭✭


    You didn't answer my question.

    Putin wanting Ukraine didn't happen overnight.

    If Putin wanted to invade Ukraine and Trump was in his pocket as much as everyone says he was, then it would have been the obvious decision to invade Ukraine during Trumps 4 years. Even better time would be at the height of coronavirus in the US where there focus would have been shifted.

    If Trump was Putins puppet, then he surely wouldn't be sending troops to ukraine or sending ships or planes there. Putin isn't stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 Phil.x
    ✭✭✭


    Talk from the white house of a permanent US navel base in Cork in the coming months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,021 VinLieger
    ✭✭✭✭


    No there is not



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,441 listermint
    ✭✭✭✭


    I did answer your question. Putin could do what he liked undercover in Ukraine whilst trump was in power. He had trump distracting the EU with ridiculous announcements and trade wars. He had trump distracting nato with talks of not pulling their own. He had trump over a barrel and didn't have to do anything whatsoever. Any moves he required didn't need him rolling across Ukraine with troops in open order. Now with trump gone the Ukrainians can actually speak to the US. With trump their they couldn't trust him nor could any EU country.


    But trump is awesome right....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 cheezums
    ✭✭✭




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,773 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    I think contrary to popular opinion Trump was very much anti-war. By contrast, again counter intuitively I read an article analysing the Biden administration being chock full of "Hawks" who had a track record of very aggressive pro-war tendencies.


    A sheep in wolf's clothing, followed by a wolf in sheep's clothing, in other words.



  • Posts: 3,773 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    One thing I don't understand is - Russia had 100k troops by the border for several weeks now. Why, if he wants to invade, does he delay and give NATO so much time to react and send weapons and troops? Surely a rapid fire attack and the element of surprise would be far more effective no?



  • Posts: 4,503 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    I have a vague memory from a few years ago of tanks or armoured vehicles starting to be shipped back across to the US.

    Given Russia can act/move faster, I would be moving equipment sooner rather than later.

    https://www.stripes.com/us-army-s-last-tanks-depart-from-germany-1.214977



  • ✭✭✭


    Trump was too busy flashing armament at Kim Jong Un at the time.

    I think it’s undisputed at this point that Putin & Trump had a.. close relationship. But that did not for one second mean Putin would get away with whatever he wanted. I would suspect their entire arrangement hinged on both of them behaving themselves just enough that neither one had to scold the other.

    Trump would be no more able to leave putin on to do what he wanted as any other president. Had he done it would have been immediately obvious the collusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,441 listermint
    ✭✭✭✭


    That's hilarious trump was anti nothing and pro nothing. He was only ever interested in what would either make him look good on the day or make money for him on a day. That's the extent of the man's worldview.

    Anyway this thread isn't about him. He's gone. Just funny that folks still hold a candle for his nonsense.



  • Posts: 6,775 [Deleted User]
    ✭✭✭


    This morning on GB News, Michael Portillo argued that Russia will not go ahead with an invasion because there is nothing to gain.

    He argued that Russia has already achieved quite a lot - in terms of division within Europe etc., that adding a long-term guerrilla-type war in what is a massive country in Ukraine, has no value, and would only serve to undermine Putin at home.

    In a recent poll, just 12 percent of Ukrainians see Russia as an ally, with 74% considering Russia to be a "hostile state". The idea that Putin can wander in and do as he pleases, simply won't wash. There'll be a substantial Ukrainian backlash, and not just from the military but from guerrilla-style forces for many months, if not years to come.

    I think he may well be right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,021 VinLieger
    ✭✭✭✭


    Ukraine have effectively been on a war footing since 2014 and have have equally been building up their troop and emplacements along the border for months, there was no point where he could have just flipped a switch and walked in and taken everything with ease.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 Pussyhands
    ✭✭✭


    Trump was anti war. He made it clear USA were no longer policemen of the world. Which makes it all the more obvious that if Putin wanted to invade Ukraine, he would have done it during Trumps term where Trump would likely not engage in a war. And if Trump was a putin puppet like so many say, Putin would know this.

    Putin isn't dumb. Why invade now and not a year ago when he would have got in without having to deal with US troops and machines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 Pussyhands
    ✭✭✭


    Read also that the Beijing Olympics are coming up and Russia won't want to upstage China's propaganda during the Olympics.

    Also read that ground conditions are ideal now with it being frozen solid. In a few months it'll be thawed and it'll be muddy making it more difficult.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 sameoldname
    ✭✭✭


    But he invaded back in 2014 when Obama was president? So what are you actually talking about?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement