Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Second Captains Part II

1110111113115116326

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,581 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I mean, it should… having a pause for thought about how our small actions may in small ways support bigger social behaviours is not a bad thing. So so many destructive little behaviours are baked into us, and it’s entirely healthy to check ourselves every so often on the root causes of our choices, and if we can do better.

    I don’t think he’s saying “you are the cause”, I think he’s saying “you can be part of a solution” in at least some cases.


    Just spotted your own name is a reference to casual misogyny from Richard Keyes…

    https://youtu.be/zQ4FqjqCIEk

    out of curiosity, why did you choose it? And do you think maybe choosing it - even just cause you thought it was funny - might just be yet another little reinforcing buttress for misogynistic behaviour? Another little statement to the world that ‘yeah, this is fine/funny/bantz.’?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Sorry for the name, it’s infantile. Feel free to report it.


    I just find it insulting that ciaran can make a connection between one action by one individual member of my gender and that should make the entire gender look within.

    should the Irish of the 1970-90s look within because of the actions of the IRA, should the actions of ISIS make all Arab Muslims look within? I think they are/were free to if they want but I don’t think they should be guilted into it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,083 Mod ✭✭✭✭GoldFour4


    Personally it's made me more cognisant of how I walk on the footpath at night in particular. Small things like moving over to the edge of the path when you come across someone (of either gender) can put their mind a bit more at ease then just moving over when they are a few yards from you. Similarly I try keep my hands out of my pockets when someone is walking against me.

    Little actions like that which make next to no impact to me but could be putting someone else out for a walk or run a bit more at ease.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭Smell the glove


    Good they were back to what they're supposed to be talking about today.....sport. Long may it continue, if I want to listen to discussion about a murder I'd rather listen to the people who do it better on other podcasts or shows where that's what they specialise in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,313 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    The reason they left newstalk was to give them the freedom to discuss things like current affairs. Their take is interesting..



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    I thougt the reason they left was because they wanted the show to start at 6.30 and wanted more money and Newstalk wasn't willing to budge on either. No?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Wanted more money, less hours and an input into current affairs drive time show



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the lads made fairly trite points on the back of the conversation with the guy about ahmad aubery the day before, which tbh i also thought was a fairly trite piece given how much it promised (neither the lads nor the writer had any great insight or point to make throughout, generally)


    Personally, and not that hes always great at letting the expert guest speak, id always rather ken in that type of topic because he will tend to ask more piercing questions or at least take a position and not accept statements that someone just throws out unchallenged. But of course he also in the teeth of a discussion tends to excitedly follow the argument and this was not a topic to treat in that fashion

    That said, it was an acknowledgement of a big and difficult story which was still very much at the stage where we were all just reacting to such a horrible event. Im not sure what youd expect from the lads.


    Richie will no doubt do the topic justice in a special at some stage- his work on the rugby players trial and aftermath was for me the best coverage in the country at the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭cmac2009


    Eoin mentioned on yesterdays pod they will be covering the topic in more detail later in the week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,132 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Skip through it if you don't want to listen. Basically what I do the second I hear Shane Horgan



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭dog_pig


    I hope they discuss that disturbing drink 'spiking' crisis that occurred before Christmas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Salvation Tambourine


    Safe to say I won't be listening to Sinead O'Carroll lecture me on how I can "do better" after she and her website slandered the teachers in Carlow without an apology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    Murph struggling to articulate his point midway through todays pod. He says a lot with saying anything sometimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Trying to make out that some crass language amongst friends is a gateway to murder is possibly the biggest jump I have ever seen, and unless you have a study to support the fact that this leads to increased commonality of murder then it's a complete nonsense point. This works both ways too, and this attempt to say that only men should police their 'banter', while women are free to have all the banter about the likes of 'cock size' (which I have seen in female whatsapp groups) is absolutely hilarous. Even in work - being the youngest man by a distance in an office of older people - the amount of comments I get about my muscles or arms is absolutely outrageous. Imagine if I started quipping back about their tits. I'd be fired on the spot.

    That men as a whole need to be responsible for the actions of other men is quite unbelievable. If somebody is murdered on the streets it is more likely to be men. Regardless of how safe women 'feel' - that is a fact. If men try to get involved as some sort of vigilantes then they will most likely be the recipent of violence themselves.

    The issue here is with the justice system, sentencing, detterents and a visible policing system. Just a few weeks ago there was an incident in Carrigaline where 3 female gardai were sent to deal with 20+ teens and got easily overwhelmed and embarassed. They looked like complete idiots and amateurs and were set up to look that way by the higher ups. You wouldn't see it in Spain - the police over there would have sorted out that mess pronto with no fcuking around. Increased visibility, harsher sentencing.

    The media have been allowed to push this downright bigoted agenda for over a week now. It is absolutely sickening. Just yesterday McConkey said men should need to complete 12 lessons before being allowed out. Imagine that said about black people or muslims?

    And Sinead O Carroll of all people? Cannot believe they got her on. Really disappointed in the lads for getting in on this populist anti-male shite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Do you also not drive given the fact women are more likely to die in a car accident than be murdered out for a walk? So they 'feel' safer?

    This pushing of a fear agenda is not based in any sort of reality. Regardless of how women 'feel' - they have never been safer in society and are murdered at a rate far lower than that of men (acnowledging one murder of either gender is one more than we would like).

    That men are now supposed to cross the street when they see a women or keep their hands out of their pockets (what is that about ffs?) to make people who have an irrational fear 'feel' safer is absolute codswallop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭Smell the glove


    Pass for me today as well. As I said before, other proper current affairs podcasts do this better. If I want to listen to chat about a murder I'll do it there. Boys should be talking about Chelsea dropping points again.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I wouldnt have gone with murph and i wouldnt have rushed this one out.


    Richie, in a few weeks, with a bit of time to breathe, would have been the choice


    The issue is topical now but that brings pros and cons



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Salvation Tambourine


    I usually don't mind when the lads venture out of sport and enjoy it most of the time but I just don't want to listen another rehashing of all the think pieces that have been churned out lately.

    The only reason I'd listen to confirm my prejudice on what will be said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭Ivefoundgod


    Disappointing to see the usual boards straw man arguments usually reserved for AH appearing in this thread. Do wonder why some of the posters are even listening to the podcasts, they were always going to cover this. Sinead O' Caroll is a regular contributor and those who are surprised by this have either wilfully ignored the SC crews fairly obvious political leanings or haven't been paying attention. Those who are spouting the idiotic 'stick to sports' opinions would be better served elsewhere I suspect, OTB, FW or wherever else they want to go but this is who SC have always been and will likely always be so I would suggest either accepting that or finding a different podcast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    The lads have decided to pile in on some of the most bigoted, offensive coverage of any individual group I can recall in the last 20 years.

    Men are fair game though. All men are now responsible for the actions of a sick psycho and if you didn't tell a mate he was wrong for using crass language some time then you are part of the problem. The problem in this instance being a sick murder. Therefore men are now responsible for enabling murder.

    We have people trying to hijack a murder to promote their own fears, insecurities and attempt to perpetuate stereotypes.

    People are presumably listening to the podcasts for sport - given that it makes up 95 percent of their output? Christ.

    Ireland is one of the safest countries in the world and women are murdered at 1/5th the rate of men in this country. Just a few weeks ago an innocent man was shot and killed. Where was the taoiseach? Where was RTE at his funeral? Where was this then? Kevin Lunneys attacker had 180 previous convictions. That is the issue here. Not men, 99+ percent of whom are good people.

    What having on one of the most hateful, anti-male, vermin spewing zealots on the show telling everyone how bad men are achieves, after listening to a week of the exact same **** from every media show around, is beyond me. Gutter journalism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭Ivefoundgod


    Oh I have no interest in engaging with your absolute nonsense. You're not a regular poster here and as far as I can see your first post in this thread was earlier today, back to AH with your absolute rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Couldn't care less what you engage with.

    Don't think I've ever posted in After Hours in my life.

    Keep up the assumptions though - par for the course with this disgusting commentary and the likes of you who bandwagon behind it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Ireland presses the hysteria button very readily. We see it with COVID restrictions.

    ireland is a stable politically, socially dull country where not a whole lot happens but we like to talk and communicate so when something happens that strikes a chord then the media machine can go into overdrive.

    when you see the danger that other countries live with like the Ukraine is experiencing right now then it should give people a bit of perspective of the true level of danger they live in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    Should I not be angry that people have hijacked a terrible event to push a dangerous and sexist narrative?

    And that such a narrative would not be allowed if it were about any other group of people in the world? Black people, Muslims, LGBQ, Jews, Asians - you name it. Ascribing responsibility for an evil murder to an entire group is bigoted. Telling an entire group that they need to change and are responsible when someone else in their group (pick your poison from above) does something horrific is bigoted.

    Ireland is statistically, provably one of the safest countries in the world, and even in that safety - on the rare occasion a murder happens it is 80% likely for it to be a male victim. Whatever is going on in the media right now is certainly not reflective of reality and I thought the lads would be better than to get involved in the bile.

    Acting like harrassment is a female only experience. Everybody gets harrassed. We have an issue in this country with sentencing and policing. We need stricter sentences and more visible policing. Until those issues are sorted, the rest is performative virtue signalling nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭elefant


    I'm part of that group and I haven't felt at all offended. You'd think I would be if I was being targeted by the most bigoted, offensive coverage of the millennium.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,313 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Safe to say the people falling over themselves giving out about todays pod didn't actually listen to it... They explicitly mentioned in the pod that they're not saying that if people control what they say and do that women won't still get murdered, but they did say that is there any harm in controlling your behaviour?


    As others have said, if ye could decamp to AH please, that'd be sound.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    So are they saying themselves that what they are talking about/ the discussion is unrelated to anything to do with the woman’s murder?

    So why talk about issues unrelated to the murder now if that’s the case?

    Would it not be better to respect the victim’s memory to talk about issues that did cause the woman’s murder?


    what’s the point of …this murder has happened..now we intend to use it to discuss things that didn’t cause it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Repo101


    While all of this sounds nice, it is a patent misrepresentation of what is objectively true. The people discussing these topics in public are not the kind of people who are going to bring about material change. Violence against LGBT persons is actually increasing, particularly gay men and this has been known for some time. It is also facetious to suggest the root cause of these issues are cultural when that is clearly not the case as evidenced by statistics, if it was a cultural issue it would be far more prevalent and common in society, which it is not and you're just gaslighting people into believing common buzzwords people are picking up on social media.

    The cultural argument essentially believes that if we force change, in terms of language and education, then these crimes will taper off over time. That is a fanciful argument as men have drastically changed their behaviour towards women yet sexual crimes and violence against women are still increasing. The majority of people who believe in the cultural argument also believe in restorative justice, which just trivialises sexual crime and allows devious people to convince the probation services they have been rehabilitated.

    If we want to make society safer for women then we need to have a real discussion instead of faux-altruism and buzzwords, that are untrue and are devoid of reality. The crux of suggestions on Irish media over the past few days has been for mothers to stop saying boys will be boys and lots of talk about toxic masculinity. Its useless discussion that unqualified people attempt to gaslight the public when the statistics and causes of these crimes have been known and studied for a long time.

    Education is important, but not nearly as important as a deterrence and a system that can start identifying people who are engaging in behaviours that will eventually lead to violence/sexual crimes. Crime is trivialised in this country, the criminal justice system is a joke, yet nobody is talking about the things we can change with legislation. It's also worth pointing out that people are individuals, perhaps teaching people personal responsibility might help instead of demonising groups of people which likely just makes the extreme ends of those groups more reclusive and angry.

    Telling a rapist not to rape just doesn't work. If someone is a danger to society then they should be removed from society. Very rarely does someone wake up one day and commit murder/rape. It's a serious of crimes, escalating, each time the offender is able to detach themselves further from responsibility as the punishment is almost always trivial in comparison to the crime.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,608 ✭✭✭jaykay74



    Did you listen to todays show ? Just curious. I have no opinion yet as I havent heard it.



Advertisement