Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1134613471349135113521580

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Under 39s can still book a test simply by clicking on the book a pcr test link



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Stop testing those not at risk and the problem goes away

    Who would have thought it!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    It's still not got through to many that those in authority imposing restrictions are wealthy, middle aged men with families and wives.

    They are affected in no way whatsoever by the restrictions imposed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Sure, but if you go through the process as normal people would do, then you wouldn't know it's there.

    Google it, and you'll be brought here: https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/covid19/testing/get-tested/

    Then to book a PCR test you have to pretend you're over 40 or under 3. Most people won't, they'll just assume it won't work for them.

    I remember when the vaccine rollout was happening and they opened the portal for a new cohort but didn't yet update the text for who was allowed to book in, about 90% of the people I told, would come back and say, "It's not open for me yet".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Penny for the thoughts of the South African doctors and experts. A scandalous over reaction from the EU when they had data to go by. They were Africans though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Their data was very early days. The travel bans were absolutely an over-reaction. But at the time all we had was very solid data on how insanely infectious it was, but only loose data on how virulent it was. Plenty of people quite correctly point out that SA had some unique features compared to the EU, such as a population with recently very high Delta infections and low vaccination rates.

    Some things you can't just take a risk on. You can certainly understand when your modelling is predicting a wave 3 times the height of January 2021 and you don't have solid data on the virulence of the data, how you might be inclined to take a more cautious approach.

    I'm loath to say what we did was over-reacting; not because I think they had good reason for it, but because I think it was pointless bullsh1t. If they wanted to actually react they should have closed everything like the Dutch did. That was an over-reaction, but one with good intentions. Instead we just did "something" for the sake of reacting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,126 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    There are at least 14 women on Nphet of which there are 32 members in total. There is also good gender balance in government too.

    Why bring gender into it?

    The restrictions have impacted everyone. Even the current ones, though not that imposing, ask the same from rich and poor alike. In fact, it is the wealthier that would be frequenting pubs and restaurants in January.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    A scandalous over reaction from the EU when they had data to go by

    Personal freedom has never been afforded such lack of consideration.

    Certaintly in Ireland where we had record numbers vaccinated

    It's a precedent that's set for the rest of our lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭Timmy O Toole


    How many days before someone tests positive are you a close contact? Example, someone tests positive this morning on antigen, how many days previous would interactions be considered close contacts ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 587 ✭✭✭eastie17




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    48 hours before their symptoms started if they're symptomatic. 24 hours before the positive antigen if they're asymptomatic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,401 ✭✭✭corkie


    @Timmy O Toole


    Anything from 2 to 5 days beforehand, depends on how far into infection the person has gone when tested.

    Untitled Image

    When someone tests positive for COVID-19, their close contacts include people they were in close contact with in the: 48-hour period before they developed symptoms. 24-hour period before their test, if they did not have symptoms.

    ⓘ "At some point something inside me just clicked and I realized that I didn't have to deal with anyone's bullshit ever again."
    » “mundus sine caesaribus” «



  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And now we are beginning to understand why country to country comparisons on raw test numbers, without any controlled, randomised testing for baseline comparison made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

    We switch testing criteria and 📉⬇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Agree that high cases numbers made them take a cautious approach . But it should have been monitored on a bi-weekly basis. Restrictions can be imposed on the drop of a hat here anyway .


    We had the SA data then a couple of weeks later we had London data .

    Instead they went for the lowest hanging fruit .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,376 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Reports on RTE that the 8pm over reaction time for pubs to close may even be changed before the end of January.

    Presumably these restrictions are just costing the state a fortune and for no reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,376 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's important to remember Tony wanted the pubs, restaurants and cinemas closed at 5pm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    That is fair when it was a big unknown but we knew three weeks ago that a) it was more benign than Delta and b) that it was the dominant variant yet they are very slow to reverse restrictions - always a need for more time to evaluate.

    the politicians are now ahead of the experts. Useful to recall that the Taoiseach 12 months ago highlighted that the Alpha variant was a major factor in the December 2020 surge is high was disputed by NPHET.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    He wanted 8pm but used 5pm as an "opening gambit" - he bids low, government bid high, they meet in the middle. That kind of thing.

    As soon as the 5pm reports leaked to the media it was as clear as day what was going to happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,376 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    So Chief Medical Officers gambit with their advice?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,152 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    That'll happen again.


    Whenever the next variant is announced, testing-upon-entering will be introduced in loads of countries and flights will be cancelled from that place. It's inevitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    What other advice is bullshit I wonder?

    If games like that are being played I would doubt the credibility of other advice



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    David Nabarro answering questions he'd never considered giving an opinion on before, hospitality rules in Ireland, but it's The COVID Show! Interesting that his views on boosters go against the general commentary of the WHO on them.





  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,650 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Theres a whole swathe of the Irish population now not being PCR tested and as a result no surveillance on this group. Hardly a characteristic of a “public health emergency”.

    There needs to be serious debate about the emergency laws around Covid and proper scrutiny on their apparent benefits. There’s a very limited proportion of TDs calling for this mainly Catherine Connolly and the rural independents.

    As it stands, a group of public health officials with one subset of societal issues within their scope is dictating policy to a weak Government unwilling to contradict them. It’s currently illegal to sit in a cinema at 8pm in order to contract the spread of a virus that under no definition would meet the requirements of being a “public health emergency” any longer. The only emergency here is the threat to the stability of the hospital system, something that before 2019 happened every year without the need for “emergency powers” to mitigate it. That is down to years of gross mismanagement and unwillingness to tackle issue head on and instead try and solve the issue with endless blank cheques. The country has been the recipient of numerous windfalls from corporation tax in recent years, which in countries led by competent governance would have been used for one off payments such as capital investment in projects such as MetroLink or a new hospital. Instead they have been unsustainably used to plug HSE budget overruns.

    The most worrying thing of all is the almost unanimous support for the status quo among TDs. There is no serious opposition to the continuing madness. We’re told to trust the science when it comes to introducing lockdowns but facts and science seem to go out the window when it comes to loosening them.

    I say this as someone in my mid 20s who will have to suffer the consequences, like all other young people, for the rest of my life. The country is now nearly a quarter of a trillion euro in debt from Covid and the absolute mess after the banking collapse. This aspect of all of this seems to be completely ignored. Racking up endless debt now despite the coming pensions squeeze, healthcare demands for an aging population, our rubbish infrastructure, reliance on foreign direct investment, rising interest rates, climate change mitigation etc.

    Here’s hoping it’ll come to an end sooner than the current atmosphere would have you believe.



  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Solving the long term health system issues has to be a priority after this. The IT meltdown mid pandemic sums up the systemic mess that is our health "system."

    It can't just limp on and on.

    It's already seen by many as a significant disincentive for basing themselves here. I know lots of people who've been happy in Ireland working in some high flying IT role, then end up in the Mater or CUH for 17 hours to deal with some minor emergency and decide that maybe it's time to pack the bags and go back to France or Germany or whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Exactly the click-baity bull that I mentioned above.

    What David Nabarro actually said was

    restrictions on hospitality should not be eased because the sector was facing difficulty. Any decisions should be made on the basis of the health risk.

    Which goes without saying. But it doesn't sound quite as good as, "The WHO says Ireland should keep its restrictions" even though it's a completely inaccurate headline.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭bloopy


    ..

    Nevermind this comment.

    Accidentally clicked on something and can't figure out how to delete.

    Stupid new boards.



Advertisement