Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Don't Look Up (Adam McKay) [Netflix]

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 699 ✭✭✭Table Top Joe


    But that’s kind of my point, we get it, who on earth wouldn’t get it? Is it really telling us anything we didn’t know?…..


    Is there an easier target than Trump for Hollywood too? The guy is a moron imo but I think it’s fair to say those who like him, like him and those who don’t….don’t, if nothing changed anyones mind between 2016-2020 then I can’t see a Netflix movie making much of a difference at this point

    Im sure Trump and his supporters are just devastated by it

    The whole thing reeked of a smug Hollywood vanity project imo



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This for me was the film of the year, and McKay is fast becoming my favourite modern director.

    Its a satire in totality, and for me it took aim at the rapid decline of American society overall, highlighting again and again the modern shallow nature of people across the board, and one could say the whole thing was a metaphor for the great power that was once America rapidly declining and ultimately being destroyed.

    For me this didnt take aim at either side, it took aim at everyone, and just showed that the whole place is a sad mockery of what it used to be. Not just the place but the people, the culture has fallen to pieces. This was not an anti republican piece, it relentlessly pinched the shallowness of the liberals while lampooning the conservatives of America. Incisive right to the core of a society breaking down with a media overwhelming in its nonsense and corporate interest. It showed virtue signalling is not a sign of virtue but more a sign of a fake personality while hitching yourself to lying politicians without thought because they fit your narrative is only embarrassing yourself.

    I was amazed one film could sum up the culture of America so expertly, and it felt like a shaking of the head at the whole thing from a highly intelligent director with a Birdseye view of the society and no horse in the race. The humour was painfully funny at times, because we are being forced to watch how dumb and worthless western culture is becoming, while participating in it in our own way.

    10/10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭flasher0030



    Why can't you just watch it as a piece of entertainment. A movie doesn't have to tell you something you don't already know. Watch a nature documentary if you want to be educated. And Netflix movie is not there to sway the public one way or the other towards Donald Trump.

    It's a 2.5 hour piece of entertainment. And a good one at that. I thought it was brilliant. There was constant wit in the film that I was struggling to keep up with the images, satire, metaphors etc. I'm going to read up a bit about it, including spoilers cause it's not going to ruin it for me. And then I'm going to watch it back again, as I 'm sure some of it went over my head the first time.

    Best film I have seen for a while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 699 ✭✭✭Table Top Joe


    I did try and watch it as a piece of entertainment, I went into it fairly blind. I just found the jokes fairly lame tbh (making fun of Trump got old in 2016/17 imo) and then being bludgeoned to death with the message on top of it, didn't make for an interesting movie on any level for me.

    If you feel some of it may have went over your head it explains why you found it so interesting and I didn't tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭santana75


    Saw it earlier and I thought it was great. Very funny and sharp. Can't understand the high numbers of negative reviews on the likes of RT though???? Maybe the people who are slating it are the very ones being lampooned in the film, and they don't even get it. Anyway maybe it's a tad too long but other than that it's solid bet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,654 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    I think Mark Rylance stole the show in every scene he was in. Completely unrecognisable and complete piss-take of the current tech company owners. He should be in the running for best supporting actor. J Law was great too but was under used. The usual solid performance from Leo.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,597 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    A bit of a stinker this one, unfortunately. I’m not a fan of McKay’s direction at all - I find his antsy, busy bombardment of imagery crude and distracting, and alas that is once again the case here. It’s edited to within an inch of its life, buying into that old Oscar cliche that the best editing is the most editing. There’s no sense of comic timing to any of this - it’s a baggy thing that stretches its conceit way too thin.

    There’s a good idea at the heart of the film - a satire of society’s utter failure to take a clear, looming existential threat seriously. But that’s about all the film has to say about it. I was hoping the presence of prominent leftist journalist (or at least leftist by American standards) David Sirotta on the two-person writing team would give this thing a bit of zest. But regrettably I think the whole star-studded thing comes across, perhaps inadvertently, as glib and patronising in the very ‘Hollywood liberal’ sort of way - a sort of ‘look how bad you people are and how fucked the world is’ without really offering any kind of actual substantial solution. There are worthy targets taken to task here (in particular sinister corporate influence over policy and public opinion), but the satire is far too broad and said targets typically pretty easy. The film sets a lot of its cards on the table in the first 15-30 minutes - I don’t think it has much more juice to offer beyond that. While its obviously a satire about America, I found its absolute unwillingness to encompass a global perspective other than scattered references stood out quite a bit. Most of all, though, the film’s just not good.

    I have no **** idea what film Mark Rylance thought he was in - I usually like the guy’s performances but my god this is a bad one.

    There are spots where it might, despite itself, raise a chuckle or two. It starts from a worthwhile place but IMO never finds it feet as either a comedy or a drama despite trying very hard to be both. If you want a film about miserable bureaucratic and government failure to respond to a cataclysm, Shin Godzilla is sharper and funnier about it.

    There’s a subplot here where the film takes aim at a light news show’s unwillingness to take grave news seriously, diluting it with humour and shallow platitudes. At its worst, this film is probably guilty of the same thing.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Posts: 133 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Watched it over 2 nights. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Loved the dig at trump with the caps at the convention. The end scene was telling. Society was doomed even as it sought to save itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Enjoyed it but like most movies these days, too long



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    By no means Oscar worthy, but a hilarious parody of our existence



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Rylance was the amalgamation of the genius billionaires of today, utterly ruthless, utterly fake and self interested, wrapping it up in a neat little package for the good of the human race to end world hunger. The beauty of it being his perceived leftist reasoning combined with his hitching to the conservative right party was the brilliance of the story. A cynical commentary that both teams at the top are as self interested as each other with just a different spin to suit their chosen followers.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,973 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Watched this yesterday.

    The best satire is subtle.

    Yanks can't do subtle satire.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,597 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Oh it’s impossible to miss what they’re going for with Rylance’s character :) The problem is the performance itself - affected to the point of distracting, and comedic without being remotely funny. He sucks the air out of every scene he’s in: a profoundly misjudged performance tonally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    the film is a mess, I was thinking take a great film like Dr Strnagelove and make it to the style of Its Always Sunny

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,768 ✭✭✭✭Encrypted Pigeon


    Thought it was OK, wasn't a waste of 2+ hours. As a satire, I think it got its message across which could probably apply to more than our response to a dangerous near earth object. Any attempt at being a comedy I felt its delivery was very flat, couple of times I wanted to laugh, but felt pushed at best.

    The closing sequence with the family around the table was well done which likely summarizes the outcome of an event of this magnitude.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I can see how it could have that affect alright, I thought it was a bold way to play the character. He was painfully annoying, and I think sucking the air out of the scenes was the point of it. The old Irish insult 'Shleeveen' would be a great way to describe Mr Bash!



  • Posts: 133 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That was the whole point of bash. He takes the stage when he speaks, everyone hears him and he says nothing of importance



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,973 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    His playing the part as a socially awkward stiff didn't really hit the mark though. Probably trying to inflate the musk / Facebook guy

    The Kronos reference was there to be hit with bombast but it was way too flat due to the way he played the character.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭BailMeOut


    It's a modern day version of Dr. Strangelove which is pretty crap but still talked about and remembered 50 years later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,424 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I really enjoyed this movie. Really got me thinking.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Thought he was the best thing in it.

    Obvious cross between Tim Cook , Bill Gates and perhaps Elon Musk and Zuckerberg



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,973 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Definitely going for the Tim Cook look but the performance was cartoonish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    The Rylance character did seem to be an amalgamation of a lot of people, I saw a bit of Jordan Peterson in the voice anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    The voice was Bill Gates, not like Peterson is mega wealthy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,639 ✭✭✭completedit


    Comedy isn't funny if the target is easy. I didn't find much humour in any of this. I loved the final scene though where Chamalet is reciting the prayer. Was very humane and poignant and flipped the overall basic narrative on its head. He was the one character that felt nuanced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I don't get what you mean about target, what's wrong with shining a light on politicians and billionaires that would see this world burn?



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I feel the same way about the people who think this film was particularly good and clever as those people feel about the people the film is lampooning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,705 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I was expecting a satire but this is a broad parody. More Idiocracy than Dr Strangelove. Satire requires discipline which McKay doesn’t have and some grounding in actual human behaviour which the premise of the film seemingly doesn't allow for. All the characters except the leads are bad SNL sketches. It works best when it’s parodying social media culture but its attempts at political satire are trash. It picks easy targets for its scolding and pulls its punches on everyone else. McKay is is trying to combine his straight comedy work with a serious approach that will win him awards but it doesn't work.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,597 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    This tweet from the film’s co-writer is what a character in this film would tweet after the big comet awareness concert. It just reinforces for me that the film is immensely smug and self-satisfied, believing it’s incredibly, ‘holier than thou’ progressive and revolutionary while actually not being remotely progressive or forward-thinking at all.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Gave it a watch. Went in expect a bit of daft. It was a bit daft. It's not surprising where it goes.

    It has some moments and some visuals but nothing kinda standing out.

    I get the idea where they were going with it.

    I'm not sure they'll reach anyone who doesn't already have an awareness of the issues.



Advertisement