Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1207208210212213913

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭SmokyMo


    when you look on daft rental, for complexes under kennedy wilson and the likes you will only see 1 ad per apartmnt type... in reality they have a number of these apartments for lease. so the total number of lets you see available is not correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    How?

    Well, to put it another way, how is it sustainable for the State to support 1/3 of all leases, putting a floor of at least 1250 pm on rents in Dublin, but not expect salaries to continue to go up? Effectively, since 2015/2016, the average worker who is renting is worse off today than they were back then.

    And as I said watch the big companies pause further growth in the country and make announcements post-covid restrictions (whenever that time finally happens) that actually staff can relocate to other EU countries where they have an office.

    Populism is the last nail that will hammer the coffin shut.

    That's how it ends, slowly the momentum of economic growth ends and then suddenly its flat.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well the only payment my mother gets is a pension, that she paid into for years. All her neighbours are also eligible

    Edit, she gets fuel allowance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭SmokyMo


    on tapering topic, FED said they are planning 3 hikes next year. In sept they were saying there wont be any till 2023. Clearly they are concerned. I remember there were a number of smooth brain operators arguing we will never see rates go up coz people are juiced up on leverage.. ask your parents what rates they were paying on their mortgage.

    Wallstreet saying they are banking on non aggressive hikes.. but the market have been sliding downhill for the past two months. Usually they are a good counter indicator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Everywhere I look, experts, like architects, note there is a higher cost to building to passive standards and then justify it on the energy savings. Who are these experts claiming there is not additional cost?

    "The research project CEPHUS, in partnership with the European Commission, published a study and conducted a comparison on architecturally identical houses built to the lowest legal standards and the required material cost increase to facilitate the Passive House standard.

    ​The results ranged from a 2% to 17% increase with an average of an 8% increase in build costs." https://www.nparchitects.co.uk/uncategorised/much-passive-house-cost/

    Come get your free lunch here, no limit per customer...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Ozark707


    Do you mean that Main Street banks will increase IR's on any new loans now? I have heard this said before I was just wondering how it manifested itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    3 rate hikes bringing the fed rate to 0.75-1.00% in 2022 with the long term rate post 2024 being 2% assuming economy remains strong. That is still a low rate environment and nothing like the rates of the 70/80’s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    so you are saying supply will increase because of an increase in emigration once covid ends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    1) you wasn't able to answer the question.

    2) you got it wrong on the salaries. Salaries/labor costs in fact it is going up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The fed is buying less government bonds and mortgage backed securities. This means the supply available increases. If you Assume demand stays the same then the price will fall.

    As yields (rates) move inversely to price the yield (interest rate) on risk free bonds increases and results in all other rates repricing according. (including retail bank rates)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A development in Dublin. Pricing is often dictated by the motive if the resarcher


    Taking up that challenge, Stuart sat down and designed a new detail that would overcome this weakness. He had it tested to ensure it delivered optimal performance, and then took it to Durkan to find out what kind of premium would be required to deliver that specification. The answer was zero. "A little bit of thinking costs nothing," says Stuart, "Good detailing is not expensive."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    It has always been like that and still the number of rentals available is at an all time low compared to prior periods.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭The Student


    If you bothered to read my post you would have seen I asked about those in the middle. But sure interpret my post to suit your agenda.

    Property tax should be paid by the people living in the not the owners as its those who inhabit the property who are availing of the local services. Those in social housing are benefiting from the local services. But no lets go after those in the middle they are the easy targets, take the tax from their wages and they can't do anything about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭The Student


    But this is Ireland and it will never work like that. Any "savings" disappear into other charges. I would see "standing charges" increase or carbon tax increase etc. We don't do incentives good.

    Look at low carbon vehicles and reduced car tax. People bought into this and low and behold the "lower car tax" increased.

    We aren't fair, those who shout the loudest normally get better treatment than those who don't, and those who don't just don't have the time or energy to complain because we are busy working, commuting and everything else that goes with day to day working and personal life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    'Good detailing is not expensive'

    Argon filled double glazing is 5% more expensive and is not a detail - same goes for large quantities of thick insulation and heat recovery ventilation systems.

    If you have a high airtightness, you absolutely need an HVAC system again, not cheap. That advertisment posing as an article implies their better sealed than passive - (bulldust) - units dont have a heat recovery ventilation system.

    "Passive House buildingsWith the Passive House concept the heat loss that typically takes place in buildings through the walls, roof and windows is drastically reduced. With the five basic principles –high-quality thermal insulation, windows with triple glazing, avoidance of thermal bridges, an airtight building envelope, and a ventilation system with heat recovery"

    And the Irish lads take on passive:

    "With great airtightness comes great ventilation - or at least it should. In phase two of Silken Park, the decision was taken to go with an Aereco demand controlled mechanical extract ventilation system. There are two major advantages to this system - it's maintenance free and has exceptionally low running costs. It does tend to be less efficient than heat recovery ventilation, says Jay Stuart, but tests have suggested that the shortfall is only in the order of 8 to 12 per cent."

    And 'And nor will you see the words 'green' or even 'passive' - I'm not surprised, as they might be held liable for false advertising.

    You might be happy with that as evidence of 'professional' opinion on passive not adding to build costs, but it doesn't pass my sniff test.

    Would you like to buy a large, slightly used bridge - one careful owner?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭SmokyMo


    Do these large landlord publish their occupancy rate somewhere? I mean if it always been like then clearly the total is incorrect and we can not say that the number is at all time low ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    you need to look at the trends. It's all relative, you never will get exact number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭SmokyMo


    how can you determine a trend unless you account/estimate for hidden variables?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Go to the investors relations part of their website and you will see occupancy rates.

    its an indicator of availability and comparing to prior years shows supply is low



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The survey you posted put the cost differential between 2 and 17% with the average at 8%

    Ive seen another survey that puts it between - 4 and 15%

    The survey from reading it covered all home types including those glass boxes you see on room to improve. For the purpose of the relatively small houses we build in Ireland and the need for 1 and 2 bed units the cost would be closer to the lower end of that scale.

    One gets the impression from those surveys that costs come down as more adopt the technology. This may offset the inflation and may push construction to less labour intensive practices



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    Majority of properties on daft are not from REITs. And majority of adds links to particular house/apartment. Reduction of those properties tells a lot about trends. How else you can better identify the trends?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Wrong about what with respect to salaries?

    I am saying that salaries would need to go up to justify the current housing situation but the overall cost of living must stay down at the same time (this obviously won't happen). I have said that those renting and working are ending up worse off financially each year since 2015/16 due to the rise in housing costs and general cost of living while salaries are not climbing as swiftly.

    We are going to see salaries increase, and it looks like it is already starting to happen (anecdotal observation), but we won't have a clear picture until into next year as people typically have annual salary reviews that won't have been undertaken as of yet. This will fuel more inflation into next year in housing and cost of living, undoubtedly. At the same time, the State can only justify the current level of public spending (which of course is contributing to fuelling demand for housing) because of the pandemic. But the pandemic will end and there is nothing to replace the State at the same level. That's where it all cools down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    If you are letting a 1 bed apartment at more than 2k pm or a 2 bed at more than 2.5k pm, then you are effectively holding it vacant as this isn't affordable unless corporates take the leases and in that case then they are hardly what would be considered "available". As such, I would even run daft searches filtering out 1 beds at 2.1k+ pm, 2 beds at 2.6k+ pm and 3 beds at 3.1k pm to show a more realistic number as to what is actually available to rent. Even at that many would debate whether those thresholds are too high. But that will show the number of realistically available rentals is far under what the headline figure shows, even factoring in there could be multiple dwellings under one ad.

    Effectively you have KW, Greystar etc. setting rents so high in order to keep them vacant as they know there is little demand for the places at those prices. It is wild west stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭Villa05


    1 why would there be no revenue? I recall back in the early 00's families paying more in rent on a council house than what it would cost to rent a better private house in a percieved better area. Security of tenure being far more valuable to them

    Revenue positive might be a stretch, but the situation would be markedly better than forking out billions to foreign investors every year. With social affordable the money stays in our economy to be recycled

    2. Do you think the private sector would reduce output pro rata if the state ramped up building their own supply. Initially I suspect the private sector would ramp up their output so that they could get theirs built and sold before the states supply comes on stream.

    State and private developers would be serving separate markets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Of the state starts to build it will suck construction workers from private developers. Sub contractors into private developers will price both and take a he most profitable. There may be some extra labour diverted from commercial building, but in the he main you have a fixed size construction industry. They either build for private developers or build state getto's

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We are pulling workers from many different countries for many different sectors. We are not the first country in the world to suffer a lack of required skills. There are tried and testedsolutions

    We are hopeless at teaching foreign language yet jobs requiring such skills are created all the time

    Many countries in Europe are struggling and would have spare capacity we could tap into

    There are also more methods and materials used to build housing that require less labour



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    In respect to salary, I only commented about your wrong assumption about actual salary in itself: "but not expect salaries to continue to go up"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    1. Rents are already high, are you saying council houses will be able to prop-up even more? What's the point than, to get more from middle class that pay high rents already. Do you have any link showing that families paid more for council housing, than for private? It's abit difficult to believe, although I was not living here in Ireland back than, so have no idea about council rental back than.
    2. Private builders are chasing the profits, and who provides better conditions. If public sector will provide better profits/conditions they would move to public sector projects. "State and private developers would be serving separate markets" - this will not happen, and if it would start quickly to move that way further from Market economy, I would expect a total disaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭Villa05


    1 was in response to your claim that there would be no revenue from social housing. Most people in social housing do work and pay, the payment was linked to there earnings.

    The cases where families were paying more to the council than private rental were in Limerick and personal observations, I do believe it was highlighted in the media but can't source it now. Far more likely to occur in lower cost locations. This thread can be a bit Dublin centric

    The cases I was familiar with, the houses were 30/40 years old so were built for a pittance. Therefore social/affordable housing has moved from being a national asset to being an ongoing liability under ffg governments in the period of the nation's greatest wealth. That is some own goal

    2 you now as well as I do that there are less labour intensive methods of building homes.

    Upto September this year there were 10,000 construction workers on pup. This was 6 months into full reopening of construction.

    Did you expect the total disaster of the Celtic tiger housing market and would it be pure luck that there was no such disaster when the state was developing its own housing prior to Celtic tiger policies.

    Health/housing and education need state intervention as the market economy cannot meet demand. The intervention should be positive by increasing supply rather than demand side policies that increase price



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    what was the reason for 10,000 construction workers on PUP payments in September?

    Did they have covid or were they a close contact or was it that there work needed to be undertaken indoors where they were unable to social distance?

    can’t help to think that there was a % of pup recipients that were claiming PUP at the same time as working for cash. No idea how big an issue this was but it did result in Garda setting up check points to target this fraud.



Advertisement