Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1202203205207208913

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,904 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm a bit split on that. House prices are dictated on what's the absolute maximum one can extract out of a tennant/purchaser rather than the actual cost of provision. Its like a mafia business

    If purchasers and especially tennants have to pay more for other essentials, less is available for rent

    One may argue that if inflation is at 5% wages will rise by 5% however a 5% rise in wages only amounts to 2.5% when the tax man is finished with it

    Also wage inflation may be lower in the low to middle income range and this is where the majority of renters are pulled from

    Escalating rents and low interest rates are the key drivers of our house prices

    High General inflation could impact heavily on those key drivers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If you have high inflation people will use property as a hedge against inflation instead of leaving money in the bank which is an increase in demand.

    Wage inflation is another story and if we do see it it will push up house prices because people will be able to borrow more.

    rent should be protected by inflation because of the new rules 2% or inflation if lower.

    The cost of building will rise which will mean a reduction in supply as certain projects become less profitable.

    All of these factors = higher prices for property



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Do you think inflation is likely to run at 5% for a few years? Surely that would not be transitory?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    No I don't expect it to run at 5% for a few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,904 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Maybe your right

    Maybe this lady has stumbled across the future. A lotto show where the star prize will be the opportunity to win an affordable home.

    Wealth preservation must be achieved by bleeding the next generation dry. It will be interesting to see how that particular model works out sustainability wise.

    Slavery was sustainable for a long time, I suppose



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Don't know what you are trying to say all that I am pointing out is that high inflation for a sustained period will result in higher property prices. It has noting to do with different generations, wealth preservation, politics.... it's simple economics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,904 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Nothing personal, just simple economics also

    When they were unaffordable 4/5 years ago and the solution appears to make them more expensive, then, we need to think outside the box to get affordable homes for the fortunate few.

    Either that or we are in for a major crash to achieve equilibrium pursuing current policy (globally}

    Apple hit a valuation of 3 trillion this week. It took its entire life - 2years to reach 1 trillion and during a pandemic it trebles in value

    I'm not skilled enough to explain that anomaly but it is the season for the magic of Santa



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Let me get this right.... you are saying that high inflation for a few years would not be a bad thing..... I highlight that high inflation for a sustain period would increase house prices and you start talking about Wealth preservation and Slavery...... I then try and explain that it is simple economics that houses prices will rise if we experience high inflation for a few years and you start talking about apple share price. What is the point you are trying to make?

    Is it that the as a country we have problems with affordable housing.... Everyone knows that but its not as simple as get SF in and they will be able to fix it over night.

    And just for clarification I don't expect that we will see high inflation for a few years because either the drivers of inflation fall away or if it does persist then the central banks will tap the brakes on the economy.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Re inflation I think the drivers of inflation will increase and central banks will have no choice but to increase interest rates. If this coincides with a new SF government, or the mass realisation of the inevitability of an SF govt, things may get very ugly indeed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The main driver of inflation in the EU is oil and Gas at the moment and Oil has dropped 30% in the past few weeks. We have not seen wide spread inflation like the US is currently experiencing..... Who know's we may see this in time as the public's expectation of inflation drives prices and wages higher. I agree that if inflation is around for longer and becomes wide spread and not just in energy the central banks will have no option but to taper QE and then eventually raise rates. We are in a low interest rate environment and this will continue even if the EU increased the base rates because the ECB rate will still be negative as two or three 10bps rise over a year would be enough to slow down the economy and kill inflation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I do agree price rises, (and falls), in the various commodities, goods, services etc that make up CPI baskets can be transitory; by drivers I meant bigger picture factors like supply chains and velocity of money.

    We have been in a deflationary trending environment for over 20 years thanks not only to technology but also globalisation, JIT inventory etc.

    I think the deflationary impact of technology is likely to level off, but the lasting effects of the pandemic will be a change in business practices that will represent a complete reversal of trend. This combined with increasing velocity is likely to be inflationary IMO. It won't take much for it to become self fulfilling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The velocity of money is falling not increasing because QE increases the money supply and as a result it takes longer for money to circulate in the economy. For this reason it has become less of an important indicator in recent years.

    I agree that supply chain issues will contribute to inflation. For me the real risk is China because inflation there will feed into world wide inflation.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think the falling velocity trend will reverse too. If it is rising it will very quickly become an important indicator again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    585FD0D1-1C01-4282-BEE4-E66EA094CF94.jpeg

    The above graph shows the USA velocity of money and because of the liquidity trap it is unlikely to increase significantly because a lot of the money supply is locked into the banking system and financial markets so is not in circulation in the wider economy.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yes, I am aware of the trend to date, as that chart shows. That's why I said the trend will reverse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I'm just surprised that on one hand you are saying things could get messy very quickly and on the other hand you are saying that economy will be so strong that we will see the trend of a declining velocity of money will reverse.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I said things will get messy if central banks raise rates. If they have to raise rates it will because of non transitory inflation. One of the reasons I think inflation will not be transitory is I think velocity of money will rise.

    None of the above is contradictory on the one hand but on the other stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    For velocity of money to increase and reverse its trend it would be because of a strong economy resulting in the GDP growing or because of a reduction in money supply when people pay off debt. As a reduction in money supply would not be inflationary I can only assume you expect GDP to grow strongly Quarter by Quarter to reverse the trend.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    For velocity of money to increase and reverse its trend it would be because of a strong economy resulting in the GDP growing

    Is that not a bit of a chicken and egg situation - i.e which came first?

    Sure velocity can increase because an economy is strong with rising GDP, but are you saying an economy and GDP cannot grow because money velocity increases?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The only way that the velocity of money can increase without the GDP growing is for the money supply to shrink (which would be caused by people paying off debt) and this would not be inflationary.

    The velocity of money is calculated as the GDP divided by the money supply. So you need the GDP to increase or the money supply to shrink to see an increase in velocity of money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Let me put it another way. Could GDP and an economy grow as a result of increased spending?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I get what you are saying.... The economy is going to be stronger than it has for the past 10 years for at least a few quarters to reverse the trend. If we will have such a strong economy for a year or two then it would be reasonable to expect house prices to increase and for the economy to be able to withstand a increase in rates without crashing the economy as companies would be making more money. Maybe that is why the markets are valued so high because the world economy is going to enter a period of strong growth. Personally I don't see this scenario playing out as I think the EU economies are more shaky than they were before covid hit but that's just my opinion.... Time will tell



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think markets valued highly since a lot of the money supply over last ten years has gone straight into them, there is no alternative etc etc.

    You said earlier that velocity is unlikely to increase significantly because "a lot of the money supply is locked into the banking system and financial markets so is not in circulation in the wider economy".

    The money flowed into the markets without much trouble, so I would have thought it could flow out just as easily. What makes you say it is locked in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The money I was talking about is the money in M2 supply so it excludes the money that has flown into the stock market.... What I meant by the money supply being locked into the banking system is the liquidity trap that exists due to the low rate environment. The specific element that relates to the financial markets is the cash that has been posted as collateral with the banks.

    If the money flowed out of the markets without much trouble then the it would either end up in cash/banks which would lower the velocity of money further or would go into bonds which would lower rates further. (That is unless everyone decided to buy bitcoin or gold)

    So which is it we will see the velocity of money reverse its trend or the money will flow out of the markets and lower the velocity of money further?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So which is it we will see the velocity of money reverse its trend or the money will flow out of the markets and lower the velocity of money further?

    Trillions worldwide will flow out of the markets and start circulating in the wider economies - it will be spent on goods and services, increasing velocity of money and will be inflationary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    So you are saying the money supply will increase by trillions and yet the velocity of money will increase and reverse trends.. for the velocity of money to increase by enough to change the velocity of money trend with the money supply increasing by trillions we would need hyper inflation. which means that houses prices are undervalued as they will be worth 1000's times more in a year.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    If somebody had 50k in their bank account, used it to buy 50k of Apple shares in their stock broking account, now worth 75k today, then decides tomorrow to sell that 75k in shares and move it back to their bank account, and then spends that 75k on goods and services on Tuesday, how much has these transactions increased the money supply by between today and Tuesday?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Once they sell the 75k and move it back into their bank account the M2 money supply increases by 75k... if they then use that money to buy good or services the money is still in circulation..... So the money supply has increased by 75k which lowers the velocity of money unless the GDP grows by a greater amount (either via inflation or real growth)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Not only raise rates but also stop supporting assets. The ECB bond buying is phenomenal and has involved creating money from nothing in order to directly purchase the bonds of private entities. The current balance sheet stands at €307 trillion! Our markets are already socialised and reintroducing capitalism is what we need to get proper valuations out of them (housing included). ECB corporate asset purchase programme home page;

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/implement/app/html/index.en.html

    For the first time I decided to actually try to find out specific information on the corporates which the ECB is choosing to prop up, available in this file;

    Two very disturbing features of the list of bonds which the ECB holds are that there are huge real estate asset managers and employers of tens of thousands of emoyees within the list. There is no orderly unwinding of the capital "S" State from private markets.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,683 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Ok fair enough, my theory is hampered by the precise calculation of velocity of money. So let’s agree your earlier comment that is not a useful indicator is correct.

    if larger amounts of individuals than normal were to withdraw their 75k out of financial markets, and circulate into economy, would that be inflationary?



Advertisement