Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LL to be allowed hike capped rents

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,548 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    "What about LL who sold a capped rental property below market will they be compensated?"

    Not a hope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    Don't think this will have any positive supply effect. Only change is the increases are now compounding rather than just additive compared to the pre inflation link method, and the pure inflation link system was already inherently taking longer rent review times into account.

    Only reason this has to be done is due to the 2% limit, 2 LL with one having their property not having an increase in years could both be limited to the same 2% increase when they do finally review it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    "For example, landlords who have not made rent increases on homes in the past five years would be able to hike rents by up to 5.9pc under the new legislation"

    This is worse than pre July 2021 for Landlords. How would this possibly help increase supply?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭sk8board


    The headline is a bit incendiary too. This isn’t some sort of pro-landlord change, the landlord will simply lose less than previously thought. It’s a 2% pa cap, in a world with 4-6%+ CPI inflation for the next few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Looking closer at this, I dont see how this is any help to landlords at all. What a joke.

    Sure if a landlord couldnt catch up to market rent with 4% per annum hes hardly going to catchup with this. Hes worse off.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,285 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    Its quite remarkable how its being portrayed by the media- this is quite staggering on the part of the Indo.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    “If somebody hasn’t raised it in the preceding five years because they were being sound, they could raise it all in one go,” Ms Moynihan said.


    There's a lesson there for landlords to learn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Yeah last year that landlord, having not increased for 4 years could have increased it 16%.

    This year the same landlord, having not increased it for 5 years now can increase it 5.9%.

    He sure got rewarded for being sound.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,728 ✭✭✭dennyk


    That has always been the rule since the introduction of the RPZ; the cap on rent increases was always annualised, so if you hadn't increased the rent in a few years, you'd be permitted to increase it by 4% per year under the old system. The only difference now is that annualised cap will be limited to the higher of HICP or 2% per year instead of 4%.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭3DataModem


    So many Indo articles seem to read like the journalist just realised something the rest of the world has known, and they just can't help themselves write it down.

    I remember a similar article "Employers under new rules are able to fire staff for being sick" when they could do it under old rules, but the author of the article clearly thought they'd unearthed the 4the secret of fatima.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭rightmove


    article in the indo starts with "The number of landlords cashing in"

    They have to go virtue signalling before the meat of the issue is discussed like as if they just discovered the issue



Advertisement