Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

19539549569589591580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,295 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    @titan18 wrote

    I don't see why 99% of people should have their lives curtailed

    I think you mean lifestyles, but then it wouldn't be as melodramatic.

    The only lives curtailed are those who die.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The same studies showing that the period of infectiousness and time sick were lower for the vaccinated and that there is an effect at all in the home environment where exposure would be well beyond the 15 minutes and closer than 1/2 metres recommended otherwise as well as the real world R rate being much lower. If you're going to clarify, bring all of the data into it not just cherry picking the bits to try and support your argument as it detracts even from the good points you make, everyone reading will now be thinking what you're leaving out of future posts because they don't match that narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    This was the bit I was replying to, we're adults, rewards are for children, if this is driving behavior during a pandemic (and then it may mostly be on here as public opinion has been very different), then those can't give out when they're treated like children in response.

    But not what we have been doing, the most restricted country in Europe throughout this entire pandemic over all, asking people to limit their movements to drive numbers in hospitals down and reward then by imposing even more restrictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    I disagree. There are plenty of people who have missed cancer screenings cos of this, and people who have developed or worsened mental health conditions.

    Even outside of that, what we did to the construction industry during this will result in more homeless. There are people who've had to hold off on getting married, finding relationships, starting families due to all of this. There are people who are financially ruined through this by what's been done to their jobs or companies. People who might not have been able to travel home to say goodbye to dying family members.

    Its not just we closed some pubs and that's it. All of the above is lives being ruined imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Interesting to see a minister suggest it could be 'more benign'.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You do of course understand then that those in charge can't have a plan of "leave people die".

    Both medically and politically it's absolutely not a path they can take.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I agree, construction should never have shutdown, that was a brain numbingly stupid move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Steveimitation


    Don't they say that in all all walks of life there is always a certain percentage of the population that won't comply? Comply is the wrong word for me anyway as I don't feel vaccines should be mandatory (I personally favour them before someone jumps down my throat).

    People can keep demonising and lambasting those who refuse to be vaccinated but it's ultimately pointless. You won't convince everybody and trying to do so indefinitely is a waste of time. In any case it was never part of the deal for everybody to be vaccinated. The aim was that a vaccinated person would be sufficiently protected so that he or she need not worry if they actually did catch covid. As the vaccines are proving to have a much lesser effect than we all hoped they would, panic and fear is striking. When this happens the worst of people comes to the fore, including imo, the demonisation of these so called anti-vax people.

    The main thing is that it's unrealistic to think that everybody can or will be convinced to get a jab without coercing them. The only way to get close to achieving this would be to push and encroach on personal freedoms to such a degree that a point is reached where there is little choice left for people if they want to have any real quality of life on a day to day basis (we can argue that we are heading that way).

    Personally it's not something I am comfortable with and even in such a scenario there would still be outliers. Plus 94 percent. How much better do we expect to get than that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Well, NPHET seem to have been banished from the airwaves so that's all we're likely to hear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Yes, I'm aware of that. At least they can't say it publicly anyway. I'd rather we had a country designed for young people to thrive rather than old people to survive though myself.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,325 ✭✭✭iLikeWaffles


    No, it's normalising "the mask" to not being something they should be scared of, or seeing someone getting swabbed, or indeed if there ever comes a time when they themselves need to be swabbed to be not something they should be scared of, end of. No one is saying children should be masked and more importantly infants should be. Nobody is saying that full stop, so stop deliberately misinterpreting it. The thing is it was shown to adults, not children! As an adult we have the choice whether or not to show a child anything whether it is normal or not that is our choice as an adult, just like every other choice anyone makes affects what way we interact in the world we all live in that is our responsibility as adults.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Not so sure that’s true. Moving elderly out of hospital and back to nursing homes without testing them for Covid first looks quite like a plan to “leave people die.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,307 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    It would work if everyone got the vaccine. We still have hundreds of thousands of unvaccinated adults who are the biggest risk to the health service, and we now know that fully vaccinated people might need boosters before winter, so next year we'll be better prepared and should have no need for any restrictions

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭Russman


    Any other illnesses you’d opt to let people die from, or just covid ? No government will ever go that route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    How long are HSE PCR Test results taking at the moment?

    And can the result come at any time or do they stop at a set time like 8pm ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    True and that will likely result in an inquiry or tribunal once we're through all this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Just covid. I still think you can do things to live with it (funding covid only treatment centres to keep people out of hospitals and thus not spreading it as much in there, continue buying vaccines for optional use, masks are optional etc, encourage staying at home as much as someone reasonably can when people have symptoms) but closing businesses and restricting travel should be done away with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think we've done as much as we can in getting people vaccinated, the 92% of adults number is unlikely to change much even if it became mandatory.

    That doesn't mean the COVID cert can be dropped as long as the unvaccinated are putting a disproportionate amount of pressure on the health system, when the number is 1:1 (or close) it can be dropped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    I know two people tested during week and results took 27-30 hours. Both got results around 9pm so they seem to go to then at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,777 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Urm what's exponential by its very definition?

    Not that graph anyway



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭The Nu man in town


    Ordinarily NPHET will just pull another rabbit out of the hat to keep themselves in the media.

    Thankfully they have been told to be seen and not heard so this time the government might be able to make decisions a bit quicker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Absolutely terrifying, I don't even need to read the tweets, just looking at those super scary graphs has me under the bed as I type this, I've welded my front door shut too. Can't be too careful with this deadly variant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,236 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Why are we still persisting with 10 day isolation for close contacts? In fact, even for people who test positive 10 days is a very long time. Hasn't it been shown that vaccinated people shed less and for a shorter time frame?

    We need to start updating some of this advice because we can't run a functional society with silly rules like these in place.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    There may not be an awful lot of data on when vaccinated are considered free of the virus so 10 days remains the default.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭fm


    Poster didn't bother reading it obviously,76% of admitted patients didn't even know they had it,less on ventilation than delta and discharged alot faster.more positive news than anything else



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    But de graphs are exponential and de man on de telly said cases will go up



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,283 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Friend tested same time as one of mine, they got theirs back in 24 hours positive, ours 30 hours negative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's very much a case of we know nothing but we are taking no chances whatsoever. It probably won't affect measures already taken as cases are rising anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    Reading this thread in an airport waiting to board my flight to Dublin. Seriously depressing. Pubs nightclubs friends theatre restaurants all normal here, and to be fair almost all places, true some countries also have a lockdown, but it’s temporary, and they all had a normal summer unlike Ireland.

    am I understanding it right; hospitalisation has been falling steadily for 2 weeks and Ireland is going back into its lockdown? (Although we never really got fully out of the last lockdown) and the people are ok with that?



Advertisement