Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

First olympic transgender athlete to compete at Tokyo 2020 **MOD NOTE IN OP**

Options
1373840424345

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well that was an interesting press conference with the 3 medalists. Fair play to them for having no time for that journalist and his historic moment question.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,959 ✭✭✭archfi


    I'm surprised the question even with the framing ('historic', as in good) was even allowed to be asked - the press had been bombarded with 20 page dossiers from evangelical* activists from the corporatist LGB<insert rubbish here> establishment NGOs who were incomprehensibly given the nod to do so by the IWF.

    Included in the dossiers were rants about a grassroots UK women's group Fair Play for Women - obviously 'fascistic, far-right backed blah blah blah'. And no, I am not one bit interested in 'Pink News said they were' garbage.

    *Evangelical = because that's what they are - no different from crazy Christian Evangelists.

    The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the revolution.

    The Entryism process: 1) Demand access; 2) Demand accommodation; 3) Demand a seat at the table; 4) Demand to run the table; 5) Demand to run the institution; 6) Run the institution to produce more activists and policy until they run it into the ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,192 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    I'm not at all shocked that you can't answer.

    As I said, looks like you misunderstand how the event works.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,402 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Tom Daly wins Gold and announces

    'I feel incredibly proud to say I am a gay man and also an Olympic champion.”  Gold medal winner Tom Daley says he hopes his performance will inspire young LGBT people to realise “you can achieve anything”. 

    The International Olympic Committee has admitted that its current guidelines for transgender athletes are not fit for purpose

    In a notable shift, the IOC’s medical and science director, Dr Richard Budgett, said the science had moved on – and stressed that a new framework for sports would also focus on safety as well as fairness.


    LGBT? one of these things is not like the others...



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Are you referring to the fact that Tom Daley is neither lesbian, bisexual nor transgender? 😏

    Seriously though, much as I think the acronym and what it claims to represent has always been nonsense, it refers to a political, social and cultural movement and their common objectives in terms of social and political representation and participation in society. Sports are just one aspect of that. Tom Daley sees himself and other people as part of the same community of people with shared goals and objectives and that’s who he’s speaking about in saying he hopes his performance will inspire young LGBT people to realise they can achieve anything, in much the same way as he was inspired by Greg Louganis -



    Laurel Hubbard’s post-event interview is also worth a watch IMO -





  • Registered Users Posts: 383 ✭✭ampleforth


    The comment at the beginning says it all -- you better accept the gender pronoun hypothesis or freedom of speech goes where it used to be in the middle ages.


    I hope all transgender people will win from now on, and preferably gold throughout, so that the world can learn how ironic it is to do one thing well, and at the same time systematically disadvantage women.


    Happy discussing this non-news.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,915 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Puts on tin-foil hat:

    Maybe this was all planned, to show that transgender women don't necessarily have an advantage over biological women...

    Removes tin-foil hat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,915 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Jaysus, this thread went very quiet soon after she lost. Suppose the thread has run its course.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The media and their supporters had to go quiet when the female medalists refused to endorse their agenda.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A) The event in question is over

    B) The IOC have admitted they were wrong



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,192 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Turns out they were far worse than just wrong: they changed the rules for all sports based on a single study of eight people, none of whom were elite athletes or weight lifters and one of whom was the trans woman who led the study! What sort of science is that?

    That study should have been laughed out of the IOC. Instead they all stroked their beards wisely and went ahead with this madness.

    Compare that to Ross Tucker and World Rugby where they did actual research and found that reducing testosterone levels post-puberty just couldn’t even up the field sufficiently because many differences are permanent.

    Everyone knows that really - that’s why none of the media took much interest in the two trans men taking part in - wait for it - women's sport.

    If anyone believed that testosterone levelled the field, why didn’t those two trans men move into the men’s teams?

    Ans: because they wouldn’t have had a hope in hell of being selected and everyone knows it.

    So why did the IOC and the media and everyone else go along with the fiction that it was fair for women’s sports? Is it just more misogyny such as the IOC has already demonstrated in many ways in the past?

    I’ve come to the conclusion that it probably is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,763 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    I'd feel pi55ed off if I was a female soccer player at the Olympics seeing as Canada won a gold medal in the Women's Football with a trans athlete on the team.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,861 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    I'd agree that it's mostly misogyny that's behind it. A lot of the people who pretend to "care" about women suddenly grow quiet when this type of topic comes up. It's shows them up for what they really are.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The problem now is that self identification is still on the agenda in many countries. Biden pushed it in the US.

    One if his first executive orders in fact. Why so important?



    anyway I can’t see how any sports body in the US can act like world rugby has done. And New Zealand is about to legalise self identification.

    since NZ is very much a rugby country there has to be a conflict sometime with world rugby.

    (of course there may be other ways for rugby organisations to stop male athletes from competing in female sports using weight criteria but it still might run afoul of the law).



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    You raise an interesting point about NZ and rugby. Weight restrictions would definitely be no use as some of the Pacific Island and Maori women are huge. Look at the kiwi shot putter Valarie Adams and former discus thrower Beatrice Faumaina.

    Also the islands have a tradition of raising boys as girls going back centuries. Some of them are massive individuals and could do a lot of damage on a rugby pitch.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    World Rugby ruling only affects international sport. NZ are welcome to have whatever rule they want for domestic rugby but if there did happen to be a transwoman they would not be allowed play in any international event.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    https://equalityinsport.org/resources/index.html

    The UK Sports Council Equality Group have now come out with a wide ranging review and ultimately fallen on the recommendation of an "open" and "female" categorisation of sport and have declared that it is basically impossible to balance inclusion and competitive fairness.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,402 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    haven't read it, just from the FAQ's

    What did the review of published studies find?

    Long-term evidence indicates that males have numerous physical advantages in sport compared with females, and this is recognised in law in ‘gender-affected sport’. Current research indicates that testosterone suppression does not negate this physical advantage over females and so cannot guarantee competitive fairness and/or safety. This information is explained further in the Guidance and in full in the documents on Scientific Research and Policy.

    What did the Review Conclude?

    The Review concluded that transgender inclusion, fairness and safety cannot be balanced in gender-affected sport, but rather need to be prioritised across different options available to each sport. These options are explained in the Guidance Document.

    Is this for grassroots or elite?

    This guidance is intended to support domestic UK sport, which we determine as any sport where there is meaningful competition at a community to national level, and not at an international or elite level, where guidance or regulations are covered by international federations or other bodies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,915 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    So, are we back to believing science over feelings?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,402 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    well, I certainly didn't see this coming...

    Transgender women should no longer be required to reduce their testosterone levels to compete in the women’s sport category, new International Olympic Committee guidelines have suggested.

    The new IOC framework, which replaces its 2015 guidelines, also concludes there should be no presumption that trans women have an automatic advantage over natal women – a controversial view that reverses the IOC’s previous position.


    However the IOC says ultimately it is up to individual sports to decide their rules – and they can still impose restrictions on trans women entering the female category if needed to ensure fair and safe competition.

    or have they just washed their hands of the situation, and passed the buck?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its worse than before!



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,989 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    It's absolutely passing the buck, and leaves the individual sporting bodies open to lawsuits for discrimination.

    Absolutely cowardly act from the IOC. From what I've read, those with DSDs will still have to show testosterone levels below a certain threshold. Complete double standards against people who have no choice in the matter.

    Just more accepted misogyny brought on by lobbyists.

    It will take a trans woman winning a sport with huge viewing numbers like Wimbledon for there to finally be proper backlash against this.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is great for women's sport. Records are going to get smashed. Maybe some male records will be beaten by women.


    Does this apply to Football also? Ronaldo could change codes and play professionally unti he is 60.

    It's a smaller step from this, imo, that trans women without any surgery will be eligible to compete as women.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's a smaller step from this, imo, that trans women without any surgery will be eligible to compete as women.

    Don't follow. This was already the case, they are now saying there needs to be absolutely zero steps beyond that unless there is definitive scientific evidence of a specific unfair advantage. Because the incontrovertible evidence that male bodied people have a massive advantage is apparently not enough.

    They are telling ISFs to start from the basis of absolutely no difference between natal women and transwomen (a scientific fallacy to begin with) and only changing this if there is significant scientific evidence in their specific sport related specifically to athletes that they have an "unfair" advantage, without even determining what is unfair.

    It's a disgrace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,915 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Well, we had about a month of believing science had rightly won. The world never fails to amaze me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Women athletes and governing bodies should withdraw from future Olympics and encourage men to follow,

    If they athletes aren't going to show up the sponsorships will be massively effected , but considering how they acted when they caught Russia's state sponsored doping system ,the only way things will change is if the female athletes withdraw from all events until this is sorted

    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Depressing disregard for women. Exclusion - but in the name of progressiveness so it's the good kind of exclusion.



Advertisement