Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

13623633653673681855

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    🤷‍♂️

    Yeah cause lads never get selected because of character or personality. how in the name of **** is that a criticism.

    Jesus some of you lads on here need a perspective check.

    Wasn that the exact reason some gave for both Zebo and Cooney´s exclusions? that the latter didn´t fit it and the former was too much for the craic.

    It has a huge part to play.

    but sure latch on to the word banter. lack the imagination. banter, character, voice, aura whatever. POM has it. Hence why the Lions selected him as skipper. but he couldn abck it up as heś not as good a player as that side of it. Zebo mainly has a bit of banter with some skill but at the top level its not enough.

    again people think Sexton is a dour bastard. he´s not off the sports field he can have a laugh but people excuse his hyper focus because he backs it up and isn´t a dour bastard off the field.

    POM is the perfect squad player.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,375 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    if you think "banter" and "character" are the same thing when it comes to rugby players then you havent got a clue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    sure Syd, sure.

    You seem to be latching and focusing onto to the word banter. have a read into the infamous Munster slagging which defines the word ´banter¨. POM is old school Munster and has a great rapport with people. I know because i know people who know him.

    i´ve no idea what has got you so fixated on the word.

    Again iḿ defending him here so i have no idea what is happening. He has great character which is why he got chosen as Lions captain.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,375 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    im not latching onto anything


    you posted it.. .(twice now) .... are you going to own it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    You think POM was selected as a Lions test captain because of his character and voice?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    eh yeah i am. banter doesn have the meaning you think it does. Unless you are equating banter with some other sort of thing?

    I meant banter as in heś able to take it and give it, he is ar elatively good laugh despite media appearances (as was Roy Keane). thats all i meant. sorry if it somehow offended your sensibilities. I didn´t mean that other type of banter.

    theres a Peter Smyth story about Sexton in MArys that shows what i mean. but eventually people realised Sexton was only like that when he entered any sort of rugby facility.

    Iḿ a club mate of Sexton and am well aware of how perceptions happen. SO i get why you think i was slagging POM as i can be harsh on his play. But as a person he seems a top notch human being.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,375 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    oh.. you mean the banter = being a "good laugh"

    as opposed to the other kind of 'banter' which is ????



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,375 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    seeming its cos hes a good laugh

    always requirement number 1 for lions captains



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    eh...yeah? it was a huge part of it as well as lineout ability. and then when his play could not match it he was dropped altogether. you do realise thats a massive part of rugby right? again its been posited on here thats why Cooney was bombed out. i know it was an issue with Cronin say. Zebo as well.

    Hes a very good rugby player on his day. But what makes him stand out is his other stuff. But i still wouldn have him starting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    bravo Syd. whatever, you clearly lack the imagination to envision the part this plays in a squad. Its weird cause i am fairly certain i´ve seen you say that selection is far more than form and is full of other intangibles?

    Jesus Christ. POM is of great character and leadership then. which is a huge part of where and who he is. IS that better? Despite the big angry head on him, heś a very decent chap that his team mates and coaches find very relatable and easy to get along with.

    Christ this forum sometimes. i had completely blanked out why i stopped posting. now i remember.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,375 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    unlike you ive never claimed players are selected cos of their bantz form 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    i have no idea how to reply to this? i presumed cause you were so hung up on the word banter out of 6 or 7 that i used that you are equating the word banter with boys will be boys banter. but no its the way i meant it. Heś a good laugh. Shoot me now what a terrible thing to say about a man. ffs

    anyhoo. POM on balance deserves to be in the 22...as alot of what he brings is in the intangibles of squad based sport. being a decent person normally equates with being well respected. and an out and out dour bastard rarely gets that. People will tell you Roy Keane is actually very funny. Ditto Sexton is a madman on a pitch but off it heś quite funny and in Mary´s at least was a bit of a jokester.

    But the prime reason he´s there isn just that. He´s very good in the lineout, he can bring aggression when he wants.

    as you often say its more than just what goes on between the lines. theres loads to it and im more than guilty of forgetting that at times. i have no idea why you are focusing on it as its all well known that its part and parcel of sport.

    Lowe is a prime example of it. People in Leinster absolutely love his personality. Its a massive part of who he is. Its referenced all the time.

    Unreal gaslighting here to make it out that iḿ talking some sort of crazy ****.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,783 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    A good win at the weekend, some very good skills on display, we keep that mentality for the NZ game and we will be tough opposition for them. An important win considering we only barely beat them back in July



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,014 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm not exactly sure I should ask but... what exactly so you mean by "hopefully not in a CJ stander sort of way."?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,323 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I think he was referring to CJ Stander nearly taking Pat Lambie's head off in his first game against his county of birth

    and hoping James Lowe doesn't do something similar on Saturday

    Edit: And holy sh*t Bundee Aki did it v Samoa aswell. So James Lowe is guaranteed to get sent off this weekend

    Might stick a tenner on it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Am I the only person who has gone from thinking we had a very low chance of beating NZ to now thinking it's practically a 50/50 game?

    Damn expectations and hope. I prefer it when I have neither!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Luckycharm


    Controversial opinion, one of the best things for Catt/Farrells game plan was CJ retiring.

    Absolutely ZERO to do with him being a project player or being from Munster. He gave his all and had a high workrate but was so limited. This always got found out against the better teams who knew you stopped Stander ball was never going to get past him, Sarries/England neutralised him so often. We wouldn't have scored that try against England, Lowes 1st try or Akis try is CJ had been in the same position.

    I always much preferred a player who could do both a Billy V who created alot of tries by subtle offloads, a Picamoles. That is why I much prefer a ball playing backrow like Conan who can run over you just as quick as draw and pass to create a try for another player. Doris also is a much better ball player.

    My abiding memory of CJ was him getting the ball I think against Scotland in our 22 with loads of space and a 3 on 1. The panic on his face as he had no idea what to do rather than draw and pass threw a wild miss pass to no one!!! That is why I think Coombes puts more fear into me than CJ as he can do both.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This coming weekend is going to be a bellwether for Farrell's Ireland IMO. We'll see what progress is being made, what we're building.

    We were excellent at the weekend, but Japan were rubbish and that is important to take into account. I know we need to celebrate the good stuff while we can but that was a glorified exhibition match in parts. We can't get too far ahead of ourselves.

    I'd pick the same 23, but this is going to be night and day in terms of difficulty. I think we'll lose a close game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I agree Japan were poor, and their lineout sort of epitomised that a bit, even when we didn't compete we still won their lineout.

    At the same time Japan got within 11 points of Australia two weeks ago, I haven't compared the teams, but the point I'm making is were Japan so poor because they were shaken by the way we played, expecially in that first 30 minutes, or were they just generally s***?



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    They were all over the place IMO. We were able to generate overlaps at will.

    I don't remember them even threatening to score, outside of the try they got.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,323 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I'm not getting carried away with the result of the match. But it is worth noting that we've played against crap teams before under Farrell, but we've never played like that.

    What has me excited is that over the last 12 months, we've been seeing that kind of rugby with gradually increasing regularity and consistency. We saw a bit v Scotland in the ANC. We saw a bit more v Italy. The England game was a big stepping stone. And in the Japan game we just took it to an all new level.

    So it's clearly something that's been worked on and we've been gradually improving and becoming more comfortable with.

    The result v NZ is secondary for me. I want to see us play exactly the same way we did v Japan and not revert to type.

    With the skillset and mobility of our forward pack, if we can perfect that style and play it against every team, we're going to be a seriously tough team to play against.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Yeah, all true but the main thing is the rugby we played. We've played s*** teams before and not played that style of rugby. No matter the opposition, our game seems to have evolved.

    I think we can hurt NZ playing that way.

    The question is how much they hurt us



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    I don't think there's any need to stick the boot into a guy who is retired and gone but I think it's fair to say he wouldn't be the most suited to the current approach, if it is to continue. And there's also always a fair bit to be said for a guy who will make double figures carries and tackles every game. He should have played 6 more for Ireland.



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    Obviously I am delighted with the way we played but it's very hard to tell where we are or what it would have looked like against a better (on the day) side. I still think they are heavy, heavy favourites.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Blue4u


    I think everyone's hope has increased after the weekend. Personally I think at the moment Ireland will lose but we will give a good account of ourselves, maybe it is the pessimistic side of me but that's what I think. I do hope that out of the game we get some real learning's in terms of the team and how to move forward.



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    Coombes ruled out through illness. Wouldn't really have expected him to make the 23 but hope we see him against Argentina.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Japan made 3 changes to the side that faced Australia so it was a very, very similar side. And Australia had a few of the guys who were missing in the game against Scotland, e.g. Quade Cooper.

    I have almost no idea at all what to expect from this weekend. And I’m all the better for it I reckon. NZ will be the favourites but just how much we can trouble them is the big thing for me. We know what they can do. We know that if we’re focused we can deal with their threats as well as anyone. But what can we bring to the party on our ball? That’s what I don’t know.

    Will this new style give us better platforms to attack from or will we be dependent on quick ruck ball, time and space that we won’t be able to get? Will we need to tie players down to the rucks and limit our attacking options? And if so (because let’s face it, that will happen) how does that affect how we approach the game overall? We will almost certainly need to be somewhat more conservative. But how much so and what happens if things don’t work? Do we retreat into our shells and revert to type? What about how we’re equipped to deal with counter attack if our attack breaks down? We know NZ can be ruthless there. Are we prepared for that?

    I don’t actually care about the result tbh. I’m just fascinated to see how the whole thing pans out and where it leaves us going into next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Ireland will loose, but that's not really important.

    It's clear now what Farrell wants - Leinster centric continuity to enable offloading (reduce rucks) game. All aided and abetted by Sexton and the veterans - Healy, Earls, Murray, O'Mahony - for more continuity.

    Very impressed with how Beirne played and how pivotal he is in Leinster focused selection. Its Ryan v Henderson for Farrell I think.

    Benefits of Porter and Furlong in the loose were there to see. Porter looked uncomfortable in the scrum. Still think he should be kept at TH.

    Since Porters debut season at LH (1 starting appearance v Zebre) he has played 4 seasons (69 appearances 2621 mins for Leinster – 37 caps 1330mins for Ireland). I think it's a waste to throw that experience away and reduce the strength in depth at TH to Beahlam or O'Toole.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭FoFo1254122


    If you are New Zealand you are going to after Ireland at 9 and 10 channel and down lowes wing if he starts

    sexton is 36 and they know Lowes weaknesses.

    I am not saying they will have any joy but they will send the big boys right at sexton, it makes sense to target the 36 year out half and the kiwi.



Advertisement
Advertisement