Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

1200201203205206279

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Oh so we're not so desperate for GB News to be considered a Big Successful Boy, we're intentionally misunderstanding the concept of a euphemism now? (alongside the usual wilful ignorance of stats?).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,858 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Shaun Bailey is a former mayoral candidate. Not a former black conservative candidate. He is to be clear, still Black and still Tory 😉

    As far as I am aware, of all the types of trans you get so jittery about? Transitioning from Black to anything else? Is something that not even MJ managed so rather than he being former those descriptors you used?

    Monty Panesar is an English cricketer, born in Luton. His being brown, or of Indian parentage is probably what you were aiming for in your tokenism?

    Candace Owens is American. Unless you are implying that as she is Black? It's the same as all the other blacks? Even the former black Shaun Bailey?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,207 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    And, as has been pointed out, social media views are worthless. You'll need to provide better evidence than that.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What does this post even mean? It's like you're trying to attach your own meaning to words while (perhaps unintentionally?) being dismissive of others who hold opposite viewpoints.

    Celebrating British culture does not make you culturally conservative, nor is cultural conservatism a sign that someone is a right winger. The whole point of CC is to preserve your culture (not celebrate or promote it). You can promote aspects of your culture while still being a filthy liberal, you know? Similarly, you can be proud to be British while not being an out and out racist, like some of the pond scum he has on the show.

    Farage isn't attaching himself to CC.....he tries to attach himself to whatever populist issue he thinks will improve his lot. He's a one trick pony with a slick tongue who got famous off the back of populist nonsense that he himself doesn't even subscribe to. So he kept doing the same thing. Even now, he's like a dog chasing a car who's finally caught up with it....he doesn't know what to do with himself because he never thought he'd get this far, so has turned into a broken record, a caricature of himself.

    He broke his bollocks on the Brexit campaign; lying, cheating and manipulating gullible idiots into voting for a fox in the henhouse. All that blood, sweat and tears to get it over the line and then what did he do almost instantaneously? Jumped ship like the proverbial rat that he is, claiming it was because UKIP were too anti-muslim.

    He doesn't care about the poor or the downtrodden or the common British person on the street. He only cares about numero uno and would use anything as a tool to further his own cause. The facade of him drinking pints on his show (like the great unwashed in their shanties) is the perfect metaphor for how false and surface-level his faux concern is. He doesn't give a fcuk about any of them. Hell, he probably doesn't really give a fcuk about the Germans, French fishing rights or EU economic migrants either. It's probably all just a tool which he can use to improve his own stock in life.

    A despicable, hateful human being and the fact that there are Irish people on here, regularly sucking his flute is disgraceful.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That poster kept referring to "white" old guests on GB News Farage show. I was merely providing some semblance of balance, as it seems he intentionally ignored the black guests to make a totally unfounded and disingenuous racial dig about Farage.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why are social media and YouTube views etc. "worthless" for a TV channel?

    Are BBC social media posts "worthless"? Are they simply wasting their time sharing these posts?

    Are GMB wasting their time growing their YouTube and social media platforms?

    Sounds like dismissive nonsense to me, but I'm open-minded as to why you dismiss an important chunk of the viewing market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,950 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Because they contribute not one red cent (or Glorious Sterling Penny, if we must) to the costs of running a broadcaster. Costs are something GBNews has a lot of, income is something they don't - virtually no advertisers.

    TV ad sales are made on BARB viewership figures - and very occasionally, commission deals but these are for the lowest quality/lowest audience channels possible - not social media reach.

    BARB figures are collated to the highest practical statistical accuracy. Social media viewing figures can be made up out of thin air by paying for a botfarm. Nobody trusts them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,858 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    But what you did was display your own ignorance and race to label people according to your prejudice.

    Also, what's a former black conservative? When does an English cricketer become English? Rather than their skin colour? Apart from skin tone? What commonality does American Candace Owens have with the rest of your examples?

    Perhaps you have heard of "tokenism" if not? Have a read

    Can you explain how the strategies outlined in the article, are not exactly what GBnews is at with its framing of people of colour and minorities?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,078 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I didn't ignore, I was pointing out that the vast majority of Farage's guests come from a very small pool of people with generally similar views.

    You seem to have a problem differentiating between absolute ststaments and relative statements, as QD posted above. Of course, this seems to be selective, given how you can easily do so when it comes to offensive statements by GB News contributors, or selective use of numbers when trying to claim how great GB News' viewing or social media numbers are.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You are using a different value system to me, then.

    It may well be true that social media does not earn TV channels a red cent. I'm willing to grant that, though I'm of the opinion that social media is an enormously powerful tool to facilitate growth for a TV channel - reaching out to a much wider audience. That may not be direct financial value, but it is indirect value nonetheless for any business. Otherwise, there would be no purpose whatsoever for businesses to establish a solid and growing social media presence.

    And to that extent, yes, GB News is reaching out to much more than 1.8 million TV views. When you chuck in social media views and YouTube views and so on, that value mushrooms to perhaps 3-4 million views per month across all platforms.

    Now you can dispute the financial value of these views and so on, but they do exist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,252 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    1.8M views over 4 weeks. so that is about 60K a day? and most of those seem to be watching farage's show so that leaves an audience of practically zero for the rest of their shows. how is that impressive?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    "Hoovered up" ??

    That figure is a rolling cumulative average for the last 4 weeks - It does not tell a story of "Hoovering"

    This is their performance since the beginning of July , with a trendline out to the end of the year.

    Capture.JPG

    Tell me , do you see a pattern or trend there in terms of the number of views gained each week?

    Does this tell the story of a successful business , hoovering up viewers??

    At their current run rate , by the end of the year they will have lost 87% of their "views" in just 6 months. They've already lost almost 50%.

    From a high point of ~3.7M views in July to a year end exit of ~500k is nothing like success.

    It's an absolutely epic failure of monumental proportions and no amount of spin and cheerleading can alter that fact.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To put this in context, Sky News - over the same period - harvested 7.5 million TV views.

    That means GB News is currently attracting 25% of the figure that Sky News attracts.

    For a channel only a couple of months old, that's not bad. When you throw in millions of social media views each month, we see that the situation for GB News is not as dire as is made out here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,950 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If the social media viewership is driving TV viewership, why is the TV viewership circling the drain then?

    TV views are the only thing that earns them anything. And they're falling, despite relaunches and tweaks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,946 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ya but if Eskimo just needs to keep this thread trending long enough for the silent majority to awake from it's slumber and come validate his genius and follow GBNews into the glorious Albion forged by Brexit and the opinions of some old darts fella



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That slope is misleading - because the early phase of GB News launch / plus Farage's announcement in July, is always going to artificially elevated the figures.

    That principle applies to any new TV channel. Curiosity is piqued at the outset launch etc. and then the dust settles - as the graph shows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,207 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    What tangible worth do they add? Be specific, please.

    BBC News isn't a fair comparison. People watch BBC News.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    We see that the situation for GB News is not as dire as is made out here

    No - It absolutely categorically is.

    Sky News is pretty stable at that level sitting in and around 7.5M views per 4 weeks , similarly BBC News sits around the 11.5M views, again pretty stable.

    GBNews has not managed to show one iota of growth (or even stability) since it's launch - It has been downhill each and every week since the day they went live.

    No one expects a new channel to take the lead over an incumbent right from the off , but what you should see from them is growth and momentum.

    There is absolutely none of that with GB News.

    We got an initial "Hey, what's this all about then?" high point of views followed by a steady continuous decline where each and every week about 5% of people that viewed the channel the previous week simply stop doing so ever again.

    To coin a phrase , it is a dead TV channel walking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,078 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Farage joined in late July. Allowing a 4-week bump to "let the dust settle", the figures are still sloping downwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,252 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    how can a reduction of 50% since July be described as "not bad"?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,136 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    He's a glass half full kinda guy 🤷‍♂️🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,207 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I mean, if your social media is doing better than your broadcast TV why do the latter? Surely it couldn't be because bots are inflating the figures.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,136 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Ah stop, he's still banging on about "online viewers" weekend after it's been explained to him many times that these numbers mean nothing 🤣



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Just on that - The GB News numbers bumped up about 30% when Farage joined - Going from ~2.8M up to the ~3.6M for his 1st week or two on air.

    They are now at ~1.8M ,so he has had a net negative impact to the overall viewing numbers - Well actually , he might have slowed the rate of decline but that is nearly impossible to tell for sure

    All we do know is that they were declining before he joined , they then blipped up for a few weeks and then the decline continued apace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,207 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mad that the 17.4 million people who voted for Brexit and the 14 million who voted Tory in 2019 have no interest in their own bespoke anti-woke echo chamber.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Could that be because they are already more than ably served by the rest of the UK Media landscape?

    And with better Guests and production values to boot.



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So what are you gonna say when they're down to 1.4 million in a few weeks? You're claiming indirect value from their social media but that should reflect in some increase in viewers....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,207 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    That's what I thought but I was wondering what common sense conservatives thought.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Far from it.

    Only 12% of Britons consider themselves to be woke or sympathetic to it.

    Interesting to see that Labour voters are similarly not enamoured to the ideology; with only 42pc believing it to be a good thing.

    The audience for Brexit, controlled migration, anti-woke, pro-women etc. is enormous.

    The existence of GB News does not nullify these statistics.

    At best, it simply means that GB News needs to up their game and do a better job.

    image_2021-11-02_133158.png




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,252 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    that massive potential audience just makes the GBnews viewing figures look even worse.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement