Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Climate Bolloxolgy.

1202123252682

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,792 ✭✭✭green daries


    Now your just trolling if they had a job it was because they were going to starve otherwise and the jobs weren't there for people 🙄🙄🙄🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    If this is true, I for one am flabbergasted

    https://twitter.com/boucherhayes/status/1455437490639319040?s=20



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    just goes to show the misleading bullshit the media and government a peddling. Irish livestock farming has to be the most carbon efficient food production in the world. The grass that they consume absorbs massive amounts of carbon. A truly circular process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 657 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    Absolute nonsense. You besmirch our ancestors which even for a fool is a stupid thing to do . No family that I knew of when growing up had an off farm job or any other off farm income . They didn’t need to . They could make a comfortable living exclusively from farming relatively small farms .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    Dont forget about the poor people working in foreign countries with their families scattered all over the world who they might like to visit and have visit them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    What age are you, you must be in your 80's or 90's to make statements like that based on growing up in the countryside.

    I'm a lot younger than that and born well after Ireland joined the EC in 1973 and I might be able to make a statement like that about growing up but I can't remember pre 1990 so it wouldn't support your point. I also suspect you are no older than I am.

    The state was founded in 1922, I find it hard to believe there was that much employment in the West and North West 100 years ago seeing as even now these areas have less jobs than other areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    And I thought I was banging on about it too much.

    Cutting to the chase, what do you think is the actual point? Do you think Ciaran Fitzgerald is correct to say output is the "equivalent" of feeding 40 million?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    If they're genuinely unaware that they are asking for the slaughter of existing stock without replacement, how do you think they'd react to the news?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    I haven't any figures, but I don't find it hard to believe that farmers made a reasonable income in the early decades of EU membership. It was an important reason for joining at that time, and (IIRC) our national income was only about half of the (then EEC) average.

    In you go back to 1922, of course, the one thing you find is far more farmers. There were about 360,000 farms in 1915 - which fell to about 140,000 by 2010.

    Put another way, that's 200,000 farms that didn't survive as independent viable units.

    Make of that what you will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    I think what said was

    No mention of Ireland producing food for the equivalent of 40 million people

    Based on your figures of being able to give 2 quarter pounders to 30 million people I would have to say yes.

    If I went to your house and you gave 2 quarter pounders for dinner I couldn't say I wasn't fed.

    At no point did he say all the food for them people was produced and equivalent means it's not necessarily 40 million different people consuming the food. Unless you felt he was lumping dog food in there I'm not sure how you could interpret equivalent as meaning the entire nutritional requirements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Thank you, you're supporting my point.

    Most farmers in the first 50 years of the state probably made a living off the land and weren't hobby farmers with off farm jobs based on those figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    My father tells of a clergyman that came into the parish here would have been back in the sixties I think. An army man where it was his way or no way. He decided the rectories and land with them should be sold off and money go back to central funds and that a new age rectory be built on a couple of acres retained at one of the rectories. Parish meetings were called and of course the majority being farmers knew this was a ridiculous idea being that the land and rectories were only going to be appreciable assets to the parishes. The rector walked out of the meeting leaving the parishioners not knowing what to do and discuss it amongst themselves.

    The feeling changed then as you couldn't go against the rector and the fear was the parishes closing. The rectories and land were sold for a pittance and it all went into an ugly looking three bedroom modern house on two acres. That rector left when his time was up. A new rector came in and proclaimed how he would have loved to have lived in any of the sold off rectories.

    During the boom those same rectories were worth over a million while the modern rectory would be worth 350 at most. Then the land on top of that and income lost.

    People are born, come and go. Nature, pigheadedness, stupidity stays forever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Farmers shouldnt worry about or waste their time with the nutter trolls on here, just wait for the upcoming food shortages and have the last laugh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,491 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    Our parish sold our rectory and land and used some of the money to build houses to rent as well as a new rectory., ... but for that our parish would be bankrupt, but it's only putting off the evil day really. churches will be defunct very soon



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Replaced by the cult of climatetology. More dangerous than its cousin Scientology



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    interesting tweet on hypocrisy of of US president cavalcade leaving COP climate change in following link https://twitter.com/NicholaKane_/status/1455132416385892352?fbclid=IwAR2IFmfx-CcPEEmXtDpwM1kK30vohuwKhzwPIURFJNIKwPnF0lTcu8QEH8s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,491 ✭✭✭✭wrangler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,491 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    While the dairy posters on here are planning how much compensation to charge for reducing the delegates in glasgow are planning a dairy tax and penalties for production 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Indeed, although in a context where national income per head was very low - maybe half the UK level - and emigration was rampant. The equivalent of 80% of people born in the 1930s emigrated in the 1950s, many from rural areas (because Ireland was mostly rural at that time). So it would be wrong to see the first fifty years as years of great farming prosperity.

    Consider the full point. 60% of farms did not survive as independent units, which is highly suggestive of a viability problem. Put another way, if most farms ceased as independent units, then it looks like most farms in the 1920s were not able to sustain a living and most young people emigrated.

    Run forward to today, and folk find they don't have to emigrate to find jobs with reasonable incomes. That obviously changes the context.

    But I think the main point is you can't think about the first 50 years of the State without noticing the emigration and consolidation of farms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    Your figures are wrong by a huge factor, but you got plenty thanks for them which is good.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭alps


    The grass is the only source of Carbon that the cow emits..

    The grass took its Carbon out of the atmosphere, over the previous 21 days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,534 ✭✭✭Deub


    It all depends of the grain and supplements used as they are not CO2 free and the same on the fertilisers used on the fields. If you add the plastic use for bale and silage, it may not be the cleanest food production.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,379 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    I clearly remember studying the Carbon Cycle in science class and our book had an animation of a cow eating grass and dunging on the ground. There were all sorts of arrows involving fungi bung beatles etc. Cycle of life and has being for millenia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Were they not viable? All of them? When I was young there was land for sale all the time. It wasn't because the farm wasn't viable. It was because the farmer was too old to farm it and sold up, or died and their estate sold it to pocket the cash. In fact, I can't think of any farm sold because the farmer decided it wasn't viable. Even my own land was losing money but it was never sold, or even considered. What are 2 people in their 60s going to do without it? Hardly going to start writing Java.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo



    Do you seriously think that you are paying for all the costs of production when you buy food ?

    And if farms in Ireland are not financially viable and so then closed, are you happy that production is moved to say Brazil ?

    In the real world you pay a price that factors in production costs, transportation, margins for resellers, distributors, etc.

    According to BordBia latest report Irish meat factories are offering producers a base price of between €4.20 and 4.25/kg for steers.

    Do you think that covers the cost of insiminating the cow and the ongoing costs like vets bills, antibiotics for disease, doses for fluke/worms/scour, feed production costs (diesel, tractor & machinery maintenance, fertiliser or slurry storage, plastic to cover silage or bale wrap/bale net/twine) over the roughly two years that farm had the animal ?

    Even so called massive farms factor in income from subsidies to help with their profitability.

    The option to subsidisation is wholesale industrialised farming in things like feedlots and/or the consumer paying much greater prices for their products.


    Earlier this year head of National Dairy Council Zoe Kavanagh came up with this interesting detail the NDC had found out about consumers.

    Having tracked trends via annual consumer sentiment surveys – and most recently during the Covid-19 lockdown – the NDC boss explained that while the majority of consumers “want action” on climate change, price and nutritional issues still outweigh climate concerns for purchasing food – with the carbon footprint of food only an issue for one in 10 consumers.

    Ms Kavanagh said: “As it stands, when the consumer walks into a shop to purchase food in general the key driver is price – 46pc say ‘price is the key driver’; while 34pc say ‘nutrition and health is the driver’.

    “Only 28pc say ‘provenance is a driver’ and actually just 10pc say they think about carbon footprint.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Nothing in the modern world is co2 free.in the main and tonnage basis grass forms 95 %of irish cows diet.just read up that dairy accounts for 4 % of world emissions,doesn't it seem strange that in country like Ireland where most animals are predominantly grazed and not indoors that they are being blamed for such a high proportion of irelands greenhouse gases .I accept that irelands economy is different but there has been much comment on here stating how small agri is importance to the Irish economy yet the figures for emissions don't add up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    This methane map is interesting (https://pulse.ghgsat.com/)

    image.png

    I didn't know there were so many cows in the Sahara

    And this too:

    image.png

    What I find interesting here is 30% of Methane comes from wetlands, and it's government policy to rewet vast area of land here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten



    Darragh McCullough: Nowhere else has a more sustainable Daisy, so why should we reduce the national herd?

    Who is daisy? :p



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Okay, but it would still indicate that these were not hobby farms with off farm work for most of the last 100 years which was the point I refuted originally.

    The history of emigration is another subject probably for a different forum as I'm sure it impacted urban areas also and is still happening up until today.



Advertisement