Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Climate Bolloxolgy.

1151618202182

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The real cost to Farming in Ireland.

    It’s an absolute travesty that this is allowed to happen and the government should never see another day in power because of it.

    The waterways of a once great country have been totally decimated


    Shame on every individual involved



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭alps


    It's regurgitated rubbish from a paper that can't lie flat.

    Ireland has the second most pristine rivers in Europe. Latest EPA reports have shown improvements. The spend by farmers, and the improvements have been enormous, and continue.

    The Courtmacsherry pollution is touted over and over avoids the admission that Timoleage, Courtmacsherry and surrounding serviced housing has been pumping completly untreated raw sewage into that harbour with the last 200 years.

    Its a typical bullshit article, the type touted by the unreasonable to piss on a debate and add nothing to its substance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,492 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    It'll have to be reined in alright, It's amusing to see Courtmacsherry being highlighted as it's where our poster boy Harold Kingston farms.

    China and Russia didn't attend COP 26. I was going to post this next sentence earlier in the week btu I'll post it now.

    I believe if all the major countries don't buy in to this climate bolloxology, there won't be a word about it in ten years.

    The environment won't/has never bothered me, but just saying as I see it.

    Ireland of course will buy into every environment sh... and even add to the restrictions and it won't make any differnce to Climate Change



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭alps


    A lack of investment in managing sewage is part of the story: half of urban wastewater treatment plants don’t meet minimum EU standards, while raw sewage from 77,000 people across Ireland flows into the environment every day. Nutrient runoff from sitka spruce plantations also has a negative impact.

    But it's the cows....🤕🤕

    The human population along the Blackwater has risen by 160% in the last 25 years...sewage treatment plant are totally inadequate and I can take you to towns that have NO treatment, and flow direct to the river.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭alps


    A number of Cork areas were found to have failed EU sewage treatment standards in 2019.

    The damning report by the EPA also showed that five areas in Cork are releasing raw untreated sewage into waters causing big concerns for the local environment.


    Cobh, Cork city, Courtmacsherry-Timoleague, Dunmanway, Mitchelstown, Ringaskiddy, and Skibbereen all failed to meet standards.


    Castkletownbere, Castletownshend, Cobh, Inchigeelagh, and Whitgate-Agada were found to have raw untreated sewage in their waters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Why can't I go back to first post without clicking through individual pages?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Remember the head of Bord Bia complaining about vegan diets? Surely that would help vegetables and grain farmers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,492 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    General population won't buy into these restrictions........ well 90% won't anyway. we've an area on the village by pass at the side of the farm where the general public have a dump and empty the litter out of their car, before they go on to the motorway. County Councl took 20mtrs too much off me along the side of the road for trees etc, perfect secluded place for illegal dumping etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,425 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    Is going back to more traditional farm practices a complete no-no... Personally i think Governments should encourage and grant aid farmers who produce as far as possible as much as possible of our daily food. I think there is alot of stuff being imported that can be produced here... I have this notion in my head for years that each nation should in regard to food production produce as much as possible it consumes...

    Post edited by maestroamado on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Fair question, and the answer isn't exactly that, but not a billion miles away.

    I'd boil it down to two things. Firstly, that the current value of agriculture is significantly overvalued. That's what I've said here:

    That does mean the cost of change (for Ireland) is much less than its presented - and comparisons to the FDI sector, which actually pays the bills, is pointless.

    Moving on to the second point, I'm not particularly beating an environmental drum (but not denying those concerns either). There's other reasons why farmers are and should be thinking of changing their products; profits are not there, Brexit won't improve matters and tastes are changing. Would you go on producing pigmeat as your customers all convert to Islam, spouting fire and brimstone about the Quran being a fairy tale?

    So, indeed, I'd suggest the sector should be more open to change than its presenting. And, no, I wouldn't rush to subsidising that change, as it should be a natural outcome.

    And if anyone wants to repeat the line of "you know nothing, Ireland can only efficient produce grass for livestock", can I point you in the direction of others claiming farming knowledge who do allow that there's no technical reason preventing more veg being produced here.

    So folk can tell them they are D4 Avocado-importing Heineken drinking Greens. Maybe then the penny will start to drop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Hook head 1933. Note land use.

    Screenshot_20211101-091901_Twitter.jpg

    Hook head 2018. Notice same. And it ain't grass.

    Screenshot_20211101-092042_Twitter.jpg

    Tesco van calls into the cafe and lighthouse supplying groceries these years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭Gillespy


    Guardian readers turn a blind eye to the most blatant pollution there is in the land as it would get in the way of their desire to pack all them towns and villages with even more houses, even more migrants if proper sewage treatment had to be in place. I do not understand how it isn't a huge deal, I haven't met a person from any part of the country than has said it's any different in their area. Shocking levels of corruption going on to keep it off the news as much as they do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Its amazing why people who have no connection to farming think they have a right to dictate how farmers should run their business. A touch of "Gestapo" politics about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭farmertipp


    according to ciaran fitzgerald , irish agriculture supports 260000 jobs and generates a spend of 16 billion in the Irish economy and exports of 13 billion. all multinationals combined generate 27 billion spend. pretty major part of economy to mess up in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,689 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    You're right! And people who own industry should decide what discharges should be allowed from their factories, and fishermen should decide how much, and when and where they can catch fish, and food producers should decide what quality regulations should be applied. Such a lot of areas where imposed rules and regulations cause inconvenience and costs to manufacturers. Let people make their own decisions on how to run their businesses.

    I don't think so. I for one am very happy to know that there are regulations to make sure my food is safe, I can confidently take medication and factories are no longer allowed to discharge toxic chemicals into the atmosphere. We still have a way to go, but we have been going in the right direction for a good while now, throwing irrelevant and emotive words like 'Gestapo' into the discussion doesn't progress it at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭techman1


    another issue is that the EPA is unfairly classifying all pollution in rivers in rural areas as "agricultural" they are not able to distinguish between village sewage plants, septic tanks and agricultural pollution. So they have areas classified as agricultural, urban and industrial. Because of our one off housing in the country all their waste gets classified as "agricultural".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭farmertipp


    it's to fit an agenda. iv seen human excrement and toilet paper in courtmacsherry Bay up to this yr.again its to fit an agenda to blame agriculture so they can suppress it even more. they know dam well what they are doing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    What's more surprising is how people react to any form of discussion as being dictated to by the Gestapo. All I've really pointed out is farmers themselves (in another context on this forum) are talking about reducing livestock numbers. And that's what the Gestapo did, apparently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Yeah, but that was just the usual fake news overstating the benefits of Irish agriculture. For example, the jobs figure includes people working in Tesco Ireland.

    Like, he also said Irish agriculture feeds 40 million people, which is pants. It comes out of a deliberately misleading figure claiming we produce enough beef to feed tens of millions. They work that figure out something like this:

    • Dieticians would recommend you eat no more beef than a couple of quarter pounders a week.
    • Ireland produces enough beef to give 30 million people two quarter pounders a week
    • Therefore Irish agriculture produces enough beef to feed 30 million (and the bauld Ciaran would throw in another ten million people, because who's going to notice

    Fake news. But nothing fake about the 80% of Corporation Tax paid by FDI, or 50% of income taxes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    This is happening already for the ETS sector. When you buy electricity, cement or any industrial product made in the EU you are paying this charge indirectly.

    it’s not really a tax because the generator/factory is buying a scarce resource. It certainly is a measure that results in revenue.

    the euronews article explains the plan to expand this approach to heating and transport.

    he whole point of what I was saying is that data centres are paying their way in CO2 emissions and closing data centres in Ireland will make no difference to overall EU industrial emissions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,083 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    If the global economy crashed in the morning and the tax take from fdi crashed with it, what's the backup plan then, take the begging bowl out again and bring in the imf, we all know what happend here in the 2008 crash, history has a habit of repeating itself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭farmertipp


    I don't agree with you. you are using fake news to dispel what I'm after saying. every 2nd business in rural Ireland is dependent on agricultural activities. I live there so I know. be back later when I have time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    So the two main things that people want to cut in Ireland are air travel and Agriculture.

    Im just wondering how many jobs that will cost, being that we are a small Island on the edge of Europe.

    Imagine how many people working in Ireland who are citizens of other countries might feel about that.

    Google, facebook, paypal and the like would never be able to get staff. Just have to move to cenbter of Europe where staff can cycle from the other countries to work for them.

    I already hear people moaning about the amount of people now living in cities in the world and using up the precious city resources and wasting all that space in the countryside. I wish they would make up their minds.

    Next we will be banning buses and trains as it will be the only transport left that produces carbon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Corporation tax is 80% seemingly so we're all right Jack.

    It's getting ridiculous at this stage.

    How far we're gone we've now an unelected minister for agriculture advising farmers to take a course with someone who's not a farmer and claims there's no rhizomes or nodules on Clover grown in pasture.

    Is there an on off switch somewhere? 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I had a lightbulb moment over the weekend. The government have put into law, or are planning to, reduce emissions by 50% by 2030. To meet this, and you read it here first, there will be unbelievable manipulation of numbers done over the years. I mean - UNBELIEVABLE. You'll see every leaf counted in the country and be told it captures X. Stuff like that.

    To meet a 50% reduction, every man woman and child must reduce everything they do by 50%. Half your food, half your electricity usage, half your water use, half your data usage, half your driving, half your heating, half your clothes spend, half your beer 😱. That's it. It's simple. Halve everything. Are people going to do that? If not, how much will you cut? We're all impacted together by the climate, therefore we must all contribute.

    Farmers are probably the only show in town to try capture carbon. Lots of talk here about selling/trading credits. Who's pocketing that? And the government see a few €€€ in that bull by starting to lay claim to the carbon stored in the soil!

    Farmers will move to different enterprises if that's what the consumer wants. Fact is, consumers still want meat and dairy. We're good at producing it. Why would we change? Farmers will follow the money.

    An example. Lets say we cut our dairy output by half. And we're the world leaders for trying to do something for the planet. And we're lauded and admired. The loss of the 50% of dairy will, 100% be filled by someone else. Most likely somewhere without the sustainability we have here. Do people think that us cutting is not opening the door for someone to take our place? The changes we make on this island will have such a teeny tiny impact, assuming everyone else changes nothing(good or bad) as to make no difference whatsoever. To lead we need to show how to produce in a sustainable way and be able to do it without polluting and making a few euro. Otherwise, our friends across the world will just go "Idiots - here buy our produce". If we can show it can be done others will follow. But no one will voluntarily do it if it means they are going to be poorer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Amazon have announced that they are to build another 2 data centres in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭ginger22


    The hypocrisy of this government is something else



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Deub


    this thread is difficult to read and understand.

    Changing the way agriculture is done currently is nice and well intentioned but the way we consume food need to change first. Eating fresh tomatoes, cucumbers, courgettes in winter should not happen because they have either been imported or grown in heated greenhouses. We should try to eat as much in season vegetables as possible.

    Agriculture is not only farmers. It includes food processors, machine manufacturers, fertilizer and pesticide manufacturers. These groups don't have any incentive of having consumers changing their eating habits. They are big companies with an easy business model: They supply or process goods without carrying the risks. Only the farmers do. Subsidies are a blessing for these multinationals as it means farmers have more money to buy their products or decrease the buying price. They are now so powerful that, for instance, in the US, they can decide if a farmer can survive or not. Until something is done about these groups, it will be baby steps to try and reduce the impact of agriculture on climate change.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    At the moment the government are taking the carbon credits for grant aided forestry but if the forest owner decided to chip the trees and sell for bio mass are those credits still available if the trees are burned.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    Ah cripes get a grip man. This is good news for Ireland, and it will fizzle down to everyone. We have more than enough wind energy here to power a thousand more data centers, we just need to develop it.

    The UK who are hosting this climate change fanfare are about to announce another Oil and Gas field development off Shetland. So it's all just posturing and bullsh1t. In reality we probably are over stocked and too dependent artificial fertilizers. More money from Amazon means more money to pay for these green schemes. If the Government want to cull some of the Suckler herd then they should be paying a very high level of compensation to the farmers. I'm putting a figure of about 5k per cow reduction to be paid to the Suckler farmer, and a green pament into the future. Let them put there money where there mouth is.



Advertisement