Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

1111112114116117143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah they'll always be fighting with one hand behind their back if they always want Lance to be their top driver. They'd want a seriously dominant car to carry Lance to a championship.

    But, as you say, they're pumping in a seriously lot of money and the facilities will surely help them in the years to come. These things take time to bed in though. It will take a few years yet to bring everything together even if things go relatively to plan.

    Lance could always be kicked upstairs to a management role if they become serious title contenders and need a top driver.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,068 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Self made billionaires don't tend to be idiots though. I listened to that Beyond the Grid interview with Lawrence and I'm not convinced this is going to work out the same way as McLaren have in the last 5 years. The interview feels like it was heavily vetted before being allowed to be conducted.

    Lance isn't world champion material but he might have a race win or two in him if he turns up and the circumstances align like they nearly did in Turkey last year.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah he might have been ruthless and efficient in his core business thst made him wealthy, but he's treating F1 as a toy for his son and himself - for now while the investment ramps up. If he were being ruthless with his team then he probably wouldn't have hired Lance, and he certainly wouldn't keep him.

    But this is a building phase, so there's no point getting the best drivers now as they don't have the car to make it worth their while. Instead they have a journeyman and an over-the-hill former world champion. That's fine for now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Motorsport.com: Petronas committed to Mercedes F1 team, Aramco rumours dismissed.


    Petronas issued a statement committing to the long term future with mercedes. We'll just have to wait and see what happens



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,682 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Rumours were strong enough that they had to release a statement!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,183 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Looking back over the years of F1 its strange to see we had a 7time WDC then it went back for a while with Alonso as a two time WDC and then Kimi in 2007 as a 1 time WDC as well as Lewis for a bit and Jenson as a 1 time WDC but then we got Vettel as 4 time WDC in a row as well and then Lewis got back to winning 2 in a row and then 4 after Rosberg broke his run of WDC wins in 2016 thankfully to stop it being 6 in a row. We all thank you Nico Rosberg just wish you would have stayed on in 2017.


    Anyway the reason I brought all that up is just to say that Micheal Schumacher is still the GOAT. Why YOU MAY ASK.

    Well Micheal Schumacher is and always will be the GOAT because he won 5 WDCs in a row and that is where the real Champions excel. Hamilton has done well yes but he has only ever won 4 WDCs in a row and hopefully that's all he will ever win in a row so Micheal Schumacher will remain the GOAT.

    Yes you can quote all the numbers you want about how Lewis has won 100GPs etc but there is more races per season now than there was in Micheals time. I am sure if he had of been in his prime and had as many races as Lewis has had in the best car the Schumachers GP wins would have been over 100 so the target for Lewis would have been higher.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    For me Schumacher is the GOAT! No ifs or buts! Lewis is without doubt a fantastic driver but let’s not escape the fact he won 6 of his 7 in a car so dominant the only question was how far ahead he’d be by the end of lap 1.

    I don’t think I’m alone in thinking any of Vettel/Alonso/Riccardo (and LeC/Max if they’d been around long enough) would have won 4 or 5 of the last 6 if they were in the same car!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    The massive gulf in difference between Schumacher and Hamilton is that Schumacher did win titles in the best car, but he also regularly showed himself to be comfortably the best driver on the grid in some really awful cars too. He won the title in a Benetton that could barely get into the top ten in the hands of other drivers. He fought championship battles in early Ferraris that were nowhere near the podium in the hands of other drivers. Then when Ferrari finally came out with a decent car he dominated, and continued to dominate even as the FIA did everything they could to keep changing up the technical rules to mix things up. He completely destroyed every teammate he ever had, including some great drivers like Massa and Barrichello who later fought for world championships in their own right.

    On the other hand Hamilton didn't stand out without the best car on the grid. He was outscored by Button as teammate. He was beaten to a title by Rosberg as teammate. His mistakes landed him equal on points with Alonso despite Ron Dennis openly admitting the team were trying to stop Alonso beating him. The only teammates he's actually consistently beaten in his whole career are Kovalainen and Bottas, both of whom could do no better than joining back of the grid teams afterwards. When the McLaren was regularly one of the best cars, Hamilton just never got the most out of it the way Vettel did with the Red Bull and Alonso did with the Ferrari, and was in so many incidents with guys like Massa and Webber due to his poor racecraft.

    Then finally he landed the Mercedes drive, who had been lobbying hard behind the scenes for the hybrid formula they'd been preparing an engine for for years. Once that engine was introduced the team had a huge advantage beyond anything Ferrari ever had, yet he still failed to consistently beat an average driver like Rosberg and lost one of the titles, but once Bottas was in place as a subservient teammate it was basically impossible to lose.

    To sum up, Ferrari wouldn't have won those titles without Schumacher. Without him winning races and fighting for titles in some utterly dire cars, they wouldn't have attracted the sponsorship and technical staff to build up a title winning operation. And even in their title winning years, at least a couple of those were not in the clear best car and Schumacher had to work very hard for them. As for Mercedes, they'd have easily won the same number of titles without Hamilton. Their dominance of the hybrid era was already baked in before he joined them. Three quarters of the drivers on the grid would have as many titles as him in the same circumstance, a good few of them would have won more than him as they'd never have lost to Rosberg.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    The Schumacher/Ferrari combo was one of the Goats, but to say Schumacher was the greatest ever driver alone to drive in F1 is very naive



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,682 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Schumachers decision to go to Ferrari when they were in the state they were, over McLaren who were openly approaching him, says it all to me. He wanted the challenge to make Ferrari into the team they should have been. He chose the very tough, unwalled path, and the rest is history.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They've made some nice changes to Abu Dhabi. Stupid chicane before hairpin is gone with hairpin moved up the track away from the grandstand. Had it somewhere in my mind I'd read about it before but they're also widening the last couple of corners and getting rid of the chicaney thing at the end of the 2nd back straight, replacing it with a sweeping banked turn. Can't imagine that'll help overtaking but the change to the hairpin should make it a potential overtaking spot as well as allowing people to close up for DRS down the first back straight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    This is the key one for me. To go to a team who'd gone so far backwards and help build it into what it became stands alone as what separates him from the others. I've no doubt he could have probably picked up two more championships in 96 and 97 had he stayed with Benneton. It's hard to argue that he didn't win any world championship in anything other than the best car, but it's about how he got there.

    The biggest knock I have on Hamilton is that he hasn't won more given the cars he's driven. Arguably should have won in 07 with the full backing of the team, the hijinks that were going on with Alonso's car at the end of the year and that awful mistake in China. I'd give him a pass for this as it was his first year, but that McLaren was much better than the Ferrari that year. And of course 2016.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,183 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms



    How cool is this? Its just a pity its missing Coulthard and Webber too.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,183 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    If Aston Martin do get to be a top team then Lance doesn't need to be a top driver. He just needs to be a good number two which is the level he is already at. Vettel was brought in for his experience to build the team. His best day's are behind him. Aston Martin will bring in a better number 1 driver when the time comes. That way Lance keeps his drive and his father won't have to sack him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,322 ✭✭✭✭klose


    I wonder how Aston Martin will fair with the new regs, seeing as their best results came in a clone car from the 2019 Merc it will be interesting to see if they can make a competitive car from "scratch".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd say them becoming seriously competitive it's a medium term project. They're building a new factory which will add loads of potential to the team, but they have to recruit and staff the factory to realise that potential. They have a culture as a small team with modest resources who punches above its weight, but they will need to build a new culture as a team with money and facilities and lives up to their hype. And I think that will take time to come to fruition.

    Everyone in F1 has a 3 year plan to be world champions/championship contenders, but I think it would be much more realistic to have a 5 year plan to be contenders. Even that might be ambitious if they are still a customer team as customer teams rarely win races let alone compete for championships. They probably need to attract Audi or VW to supply them with engines AND they need the engine to be really good. And that will take several years to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,682 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt



    F1 have conducted a survey (interesting read) about a variety of things, including the most popular drivers.

    Max is the most popular, followed by Lando and then Lewis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    [Autosport Podcast - F1 and More] 532: 2021 F1 Global Fan Survey Results Revealed #autosportPodcastF1AndMore


    https://podcastaddict.com/episode/130169999 via @PodcastAddict

    Interesting discussion on the survey and what has changed since the 2017 survey.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,292 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Alonso helmet this weekend:

    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,648 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah damn, practice at 5.30 this evening. I look forward to listening to practice on the radio in work on a Friday.

    Is the Austin race usually good? I know there's loads of hype but I can't remember if the racing is good or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Yes, it's got some good corners. What'll be interesting is the bumps at the end of the straight. They seem to be getting worse every year!

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,183 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Yes it's a great track and the racing there is normally great too. It has the hills too and corners on them so the drivers can not see the apex untill they are at the corner.


    There has been some great races there. Who can forget Vettel getting spinning around and then driving the car backwards somehow not crashing and still getting into the points or Kimi winning his last race there with Ferrari in 2018.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Of the ten races Schumacher finished in 94, he won 8 and came second in 2. He never finished a race outside the top 2. For one of those second places he was stuck in 5th gear for most of the race by the way. The FIA disqualified / excluded him from one quarter of the races that year, for extremely spurious reasons. They hounded Benetton as Williams were the big money works team of the time while Benetton were a clothing company who had little political clout in the paddock (strong parallels with the influence of Mercedes over the FIA versus the drinks company these days) - despite all their best efforts to pin the spurious claims of traction control that you're making, no evidence could ever be found. The fact is that Schumacher's car control was just so good that to lesser drivers it looked like traction control, and rumours got out of hand, which the xenophobic British media were always happy to play up. There was a good BBC piece on Schumacher's incredible throttle control in 1995 where they compared Herbert's telemetry to Schumacher's, you should check it out on youtube.

    If not for the FIA's interference Schumacher would have run away with the title that year and the collision at Adelaide never would have been relevant. And you are correct, Verstappen did score two podiums across the whole season, both in races when there were multiple retirements from Williams, Ferrari, McLaren and Jordan, all of whom were generally ahead of the second Benetton which was barely in the top the rest of the year. Schumacher scored 92 of the team's 103 points that season. Despite missing an entire quarter of the season's races. That's unheard of.

    I never said the 95 Benetton was as poor, yes it was a lot closer to the front and was the clear second best car to the point where a solid driver was usually 4th place in it and could pick up a win here and there when there were retirements. Which was good enough for Schumacher to dominate that season winning the title with races to spare and matching what was at the time a record number of race wins in one year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    There's a cost cap coming in and they have for a decade or more been the team that's most consistently delivered the most performance per dollar spent. Not just in 2019 with the pink Mercedes but going back years with many of their own designs, they frequently punched above their weight relative to the likes of McLaren and Renault. With Stroll's injection of resources and a blank slate you'd think it's not beyond the realm of possibility, and they've a new factory coming online for the seasons beyond too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    The world and his wife knows that Benneton had traction control, launch control (option 13) and the illegal fuel valve in 94. It was confirmed by the FIA who said that the system existed but couldn't prove Benneton had used it. Herbert himself commented how hard it was to spin the wheels on the benneton after the first test in it vs the lotus.

    Verstappen and Herbert are hardly benchmarks of the pace of car. Verstappen in his first year and no one rates Herbert more than Johnny Herbert, who never beat a single team mate he had, when they had a full season in the car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Is it a coincidence that Mercedes teams have been going through engines like crazy since Red Bull made an enquiry to the FIA about some suspected trick they were using?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,183 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I did not know about that bit am delighted they did. Only right. Mercedes complained about Ferrari in 2017 and 18 when they were competitive and then about Red Bull this year so only right they Mercedes that is receive some back if they were cheating.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,646 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Does anyone think that Haas are more of a liability this season than the chirpy underdog.


    Mazepin seems to cause nothing but havoc on the track, and Mick Schumacher nearly cost Max the race by not getting out of the way (although he did give max DRS for the last lap)



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement