Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

Options
1113114116118119147

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    If Aston Martin do get to be a top team then Lance doesn't need to be a top driver. He just needs to be a good number two which is the level he is already at. Vettel was brought in for his experience to build the team. His best day's are behind him. Aston Martin will bring in a better number 1 driver when the time comes. That way Lance keeps his drive and his father won't have to sack him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,485 ✭✭✭✭klose


    I wonder how Aston Martin will fair with the new regs, seeing as their best results came in a clone car from the 2019 Merc it will be interesting to see if they can make a competitive car from "scratch".



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd say them becoming seriously competitive it's a medium term project. They're building a new factory which will add loads of potential to the team, but they have to recruit and staff the factory to realise that potential. They have a culture as a small team with modest resources who punches above its weight, but they will need to build a new culture as a team with money and facilities and lives up to their hype. And I think that will take time to come to fruition.

    Everyone in F1 has a 3 year plan to be world champions/championship contenders, but I think it would be much more realistic to have a 5 year plan to be contenders. Even that might be ambitious if they are still a customer team as customer teams rarely win races let alone compete for championships. They probably need to attract Audi or VW to supply them with engines AND they need the engine to be really good. And that will take several years to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,273 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt



    F1 have conducted a survey (interesting read) about a variety of things, including the most popular drivers.

    Max is the most popular, followed by Lando and then Lewis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    [Autosport Podcast - F1 and More] 532: 2021 F1 Global Fan Survey Results Revealed #autosportPodcastF1AndMore


    https://podcastaddict.com/episode/130169999 via @PodcastAddict

    Interesting discussion on the survey and what has changed since the 2017 survey.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,639 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Alonso helmet this weekend:




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah damn, practice at 5.30 this evening. I look forward to listening to practice on the radio in work on a Friday.

    Is the Austin race usually good? I know there's loads of hype but I can't remember if the racing is good or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Yes, it's got some good corners. What'll be interesting is the bumps at the end of the straight. They seem to be getting worse every year!

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Yes it's a great track and the racing there is normally great too. It has the hills too and corners on them so the drivers can not see the apex untill they are at the corner.


    There has been some great races there. Who can forget Vettel getting spinning around and then driving the car backwards somehow not crashing and still getting into the points or Kimi winning his last race there with Ferrari in 2018.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭quokula


    Of the ten races Schumacher finished in 94, he won 8 and came second in 2. He never finished a race outside the top 2. For one of those second places he was stuck in 5th gear for most of the race by the way. The FIA disqualified / excluded him from one quarter of the races that year, for extremely spurious reasons. They hounded Benetton as Williams were the big money works team of the time while Benetton were a clothing company who had little political clout in the paddock (strong parallels with the influence of Mercedes over the FIA versus the drinks company these days) - despite all their best efforts to pin the spurious claims of traction control that you're making, no evidence could ever be found. The fact is that Schumacher's car control was just so good that to lesser drivers it looked like traction control, and rumours got out of hand, which the xenophobic British media were always happy to play up. There was a good BBC piece on Schumacher's incredible throttle control in 1995 where they compared Herbert's telemetry to Schumacher's, you should check it out on youtube.

    If not for the FIA's interference Schumacher would have run away with the title that year and the collision at Adelaide never would have been relevant. And you are correct, Verstappen did score two podiums across the whole season, both in races when there were multiple retirements from Williams, Ferrari, McLaren and Jordan, all of whom were generally ahead of the second Benetton which was barely in the top the rest of the year. Schumacher scored 92 of the team's 103 points that season. Despite missing an entire quarter of the season's races. That's unheard of.

    I never said the 95 Benetton was as poor, yes it was a lot closer to the front and was the clear second best car to the point where a solid driver was usually 4th place in it and could pick up a win here and there when there were retirements. Which was good enough for Schumacher to dominate that season winning the title with races to spare and matching what was at the time a record number of race wins in one year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭quokula


    There's a cost cap coming in and they have for a decade or more been the team that's most consistently delivered the most performance per dollar spent. Not just in 2019 with the pink Mercedes but going back years with many of their own designs, they frequently punched above their weight relative to the likes of McLaren and Renault. With Stroll's injection of resources and a blank slate you'd think it's not beyond the realm of possibility, and they've a new factory coming online for the seasons beyond too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 706 ✭✭✭barryribs


    The world and his wife knows that Benneton had traction control, launch control (option 13) and the illegal fuel valve in 94. It was confirmed by the FIA who said that the system existed but couldn't prove Benneton had used it. Herbert himself commented how hard it was to spin the wheels on the benneton after the first test in it vs the lotus.

    Verstappen and Herbert are hardly benchmarks of the pace of car. Verstappen in his first year and no one rates Herbert more than Johnny Herbert, who never beat a single team mate he had, when they had a full season in the car.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,571 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Is it a coincidence that Mercedes teams have been going through engines like crazy since Red Bull made an enquiry to the FIA about some suspected trick they were using?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I did not know about that bit am delighted they did. Only right. Mercedes complained about Ferrari in 2017 and 18 when they were competitive and then about Red Bull this year so only right they Mercedes that is receive some back if they were cheating.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,258 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Does anyone think that Haas are more of a liability this season than the chirpy underdog.


    Mazepin seems to cause nothing but havoc on the track, and Mick Schumacher nearly cost Max the race by not getting out of the way (although he did give max DRS for the last lap)



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,151 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Haas are worse than the 2019 Williams



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Keyzer


    Haas are a joke at this stage, I look at them on the track, scratch my head and wonder why? Why even bother...

    Anyroads, really enjoyed the race last night, its going down to the wire, super exciting and great racing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    must be tough for haas himself, he entered into f1 with major fanfare, only to find out, its really a big boys game, with deep deep pockets



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,810 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    It should have been a big weekend for Haas, the "American" team in an American race. But aside from one off helmets (which nearly all the grid were doing) they barely featured even a mention. I would have thought they might have adjusted the livery to make it a bit less Russian, maybe throw some stars into the blue, but no.

    Was Gene even in attendance?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    They were pretty clear that they didn't do any development on this year's car. So everyone else developed it from half way through last year and brought lots of upgrades to the car through out the season. That means that Haas has fallen further and further behind all year and they're now the furthest point behind everyone else. But that's not surprising as this is what they were telling us when they said they weren't going to develop this year's car.

    Bad and all as they are, they're nowhere near the 107% quali limit. There was a time when teams were very poor and were never sure of making the 107% cut-off. The rest of the teams are so close and competitive that it makes Haas look terrible by contrast. Next year will really need to show the fruits of their sacrifice this year.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,088 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Did Schumacher get a black flag warning for that? Raikkonen did for not getting out of Verstappen's way promptly enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,485 ✭✭✭✭klose



    I think to publicly punt a season for the sake of new regs coming in next year they must be somewhat confident of being back into the midfield but we will see, hard to imagine they will be as bad again next year. Mazepin is so far off the pace on top of that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,409 ✭✭✭Harika


    F1 is as stable as not seen for a long time now. No teams in danger of leaving or collapsing. 8 of the teams are looking into becoming a winning team, exception Sauber and Haas who seem to focus on midfield. Calendar is growing and stable. New regulations seem to be expected from the existing teams and attract interest from outside parties.

    Liberty is doing a great job at promoting the series globally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    True. They're trying new things out like the sprint race format and Drive to Survive. The Fan Survey suggests they're growing the fanbase and it's moving away from being old, white and wealthy, the average fan is 4 years younger and more likely to be a woman than ever before. Things are changing and diversifying which can only be good. More change in fanbase will lead to more change in the race format, but that's not a problem.

    It's definitely interesting that the high fan numbers coincide with a good championship battle for the first time since 2016. Another year or 2 of Hamilton domination might have seen a different story in the Fan Survey.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    No to mention, despite what others might attest, the gap between the pole sitter and last on the grid is actually the least it's been for many years



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,842 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    It's a shame this increased viability of running a team hasn't translated into new entrants. 20 cars is just too low to give enough opportunities to young talent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,948 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The FIA or FOM oer whoever makes the rules around this stuff, has set the number at 10. Setting the $200m entry fee is designed to discourage anyone else from entering (unless they're laden down with money, in which case they're welcome to join. But if they had that much money they would just buy an existing team)



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,571 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    I don’t think new teams are necessarily needed. A field of 20 cars should give enough competition and interest. Focus should be on increasing the quality and diversity of those teams — more manufacturers, fewer satellite/sister teams.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement