Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

15115125145165171580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    One way or another, another lockdown won't work. We know the primary spread occurs in close quarters; within households, in busy indoor spaces.

    The fact of the matter is that there has always been an 80/20 issue with covid. That is, 80% of the infections are caused by 20% of the people. Those who take the least caution, who have the most close contacts. Those who held parties in their homes, who went to lock-ins, who ignore the need for covid certs.

    There would also be a significant crossover between this 20%, and people who won't take vaccines.

    So in the event that another lockdown went into force, the ones that we're locking down for - the unvaccinated - are also the ones least likely to bother restricting themselves. How would that message be sold? "You're locking down to protect the health service from the people who are too selfish to do it". Like a lead balloon. The demand would be to push back on the unvaccinated rather than punishing the rest of us for their selfishness.

    There is a considerable surge capacity open to us, and the private hospitals are there too. Even if ICU numbers keep rising, they're not (yet) rising in the familiar exponential ramping curve that signals a loss of control. And they're unlikely to. This will be another jump to a flatline that will be maintained.

    At 92% adult vaccination, to see an exponential surge would be massively out of step with everything we know. Even our current case levels are somewhat inexplicable in the context; most other countries with less vax rates have much lower case loads. The only explanation is our open mixing with the UK, who have similar but level ICU & hospitals numbers as the ones we're approaching. The UK has the equivalent of ~500 people in hospital in 80 in ICU, and has done for about 2 months.

    So we will top-out as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Furthermore the lockdown would have to be permanent because we’d have nothing else beyond the vaccine. Just not going to happen. But i suspect there are posters on here who would be quite happy in a constant lockdown while counting the spiders under their beds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,943 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I don't know why people are talking about lockdowns, it isn't lockdowns that are the problem, it is the far more insidious "restrictions".

    Health service under its annual winter pressure and all the clapping on balconies not curing cancer fast enough, what do you do? Well maybe you bring back in the 11pm pub closing times to protect A+E departments, how could anybody argue against that? Don't you care about our front line heroes?

    Kicking fathers out of hospitals, sending children home from schools, stopping people going to watch music or sports, all these have been done without being in LOCKDOWN, so why couldn't they be done again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    I've a cold at the minute. Will i be going to get a test, eh no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Absolutely. This nonsense has to stop. If you have the sniffles it's more than likely just a head cold, if it's covid so what if you are vaccinated.

    Life has to go on now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red


    I hear the logic of life going on, most of us want that.

    I'm just offering the unpopular alternate reality, "what if it can't"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    The world has never stopped for any pandemic in the past ( only temporary) Life will go on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Well if it can't and i guess you mean by that we find ourselves back in lockdown to protect the health service people will just grumble and get on with it. We are a Joe Duffy country, love complaining but we always doff the cap to our supposed betters in the end. "Keep the head down and don't make a fuss" should be written on our national flag.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Restrictions are still here, they never left.

    Horrendous for a country with such high vaccination rates since early Summer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    It's months, literally months since England has had full stadiums for events and yet here we are the absolute laggards of Europe still weeks away from that if they actually go ahead with it at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We would simply have to address it through our health service and/or accept the fact that people will die.

    The only other option would be to have an annual winter lockdown. How long would it be though? Would people comply? How would we fund it? I can't think of a sustainable approach that wouldn't involve huge tax hikes to continually pay PUP, business supports and to cover the huge economic hit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    England - 19th July, all restrictions eased

    Scotland/Wales - Nightclubs open and physical distancing eased Start of August (if memory serves, open to correction)

    Denmark - September 10th

    Netherlands - September 25th (although they also introduced a pass)

    Think that's it from our nearest neighbours



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Norway have relaxed all restrictions too

    As have the Swedes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Fair point on Norway, I must have missed that, Sweden never really locked down so it's questionable if we should count them or not



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    Yes. Rampant in my school. My kids have it, now I have it too. Went for the PCR test for myself just to be sure since I'd be exposing a lot of people if I were an index case, but the kids' rapid tests came back negative so not too worried. Most parents of children in school using rapid tests too, so you'd kind of wonder a bit if there's not a number of undetected Covid in the lot. I'm vaccinated but immunosuppressed and high risk so can't relax completely about it.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    It's a valid question though as your points are all valid.We are "watching","monitoring"....nobody is advocating lockdowns or restrictions.So the Gov/Health service SHOULD be asking themselves how do we cater for this if it starts to grow in such a way that it seriously impacts our health services?Is there a long term plan other than press the panic button to use private care capacity?Remember they are also looking st private care to clear waiting list backlogs, and I suspect they can't have it both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If they're symptomatic and rapid tests come back negative they should be fine, I know it's hard not to worry though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,222 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Yep vomiting but went through our house last week.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Put a charge on getting a covid test. That will put a stop to the vast majority of pointless testing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,222 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    You should only be tested if you need to go to hospital with pneumonia types symptoms.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Lollipop95


    What’s the point of the vaccines if we need another lockdown? There’s no way another lockdown will happen imo, short of a new catastrophic variant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Some people enjoy the lockdown as they are introvert and don't like people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,618 ✭✭✭Tork


    The people who spend every waking moment on these threads won't know what to do with themselves if it happens. I hope they've stocked up on tissues.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What about testing so that treatment to prevent progression to pneumonia or serious disease can be offered?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They are planning to do that in the UK. It’s a good idea IMO. People just failing to move on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Absolutely. People going for a test because they have a runny nose or whatever is ridiculous. Start charging 100 euro a test that will be refunded if positive result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If you admit to hospital for something else, you absolutely should be tested for covid too.

    Hospitals should not be hotbeds of infection - otherwise you risk immunocompromised or already ill people catching covid and becoming much worse.

    I agree people who have a sniffle and rock up should be told to go and do one though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Irish people now of the view that to be safe and keep others safe, get tested.

    They no longer social distance or do anything to reduce chances of getting covid. They then think they're amazing citizens because they get a free test.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    If we want to stop people getting tested, then we can just...stop testing.

    More than a bit bizarre to say that we want people to come forward because we want to track the infection, but you'll be punished if you do.



Advertisement