Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART coming to Maynooth line in 2024

Options
11112131517

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,499 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    What will it take to get people out of their cars? How much gridlock will people endure before thinking that there must be a better way?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Ashtown is a wonderful example of the absolute balls IE have made of this process.

    The original proposal was very well received by locals.

    But then IE came out with the second round of proposals which involved building a road through the stables. They didn't give the riding school any advance notice that they would be gone. You say you can just move the stables... to where, exactly? IE certainly didn't bother their holes coming up with any suggestions and they very much aren't providing any land.

    And people are surprised that this hasn't gone down well?

    IE have made a complete horse's ass of this. Their basic competence is hugely questionable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭Polar101


    685 metres extra driving to get to a huge bridge doesn't sound like much. Maybe there are alternatives to sitting in a potential gridlock, such as taking the train or the bus.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,353 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Dont see the road closing at the crossing. Huge local opposition to it.

    All Eyes On Rafah



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭The Dark Knight


    Yea.... Get a bus when you're dropping kids to school with limited time to get to work (where public transport doesn't go). Then get home to drop kids to training (where public transport doesn't go).

    Get off your high horse!!

    The issue isn't the distance between crossings, it's the capacity of the bridge and the feeder roads around it.

    You'll be stuck in traffic yourself sitting on a bus, on a bridge, that doesn't even have a bus lane!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,948 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Doesn't matter, a Railway Order is a very powerful instrument and it has zero political involvement.

    The electrification of this railway is one of the key bits of infrastructure for the intensification of development in this City, ideally inside the M50. Its gonna happen, whatever short term local pain is required.



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭Chrisam


    Having attended 3 of the Irish Rail webinars (one for each of the areas from Ashtown/ Castleknock-Coolmine/Clonsilla - Maynooth), plus a number of the local politicians webinars, what came through very clearly was how many trips - across and back the rail line - communities make in their daily lives.

    Not everyone is going to/from city centre and closing 6 crossing points will cause a lot of traffic disruption. When you look at the demographic along the Navan Rd, Castleknock and Coolmine etc, people have lived in these areas 30-40 years, so a bit trite to throw active travel policies their way.

    Irish Rail aren't going to be putting on trains at night, they don't have clarity on off-peak train numbers and they don't have safety concerns with the level crossings, in the greater Dublin area. There hasn't been any assessment of the impact hybrid working will have on passenger numbers either.

    Even if the barriers need to be down for peak commuter hours, Irish Rail should install fast lift gates, which can be used off-peak, to alleviate pinch points on the traffic bridges on the line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,948 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Living in an area for a few decades gives you no particular right to decide what policies do and do not affect that area, not beyond the normal statutory input into public projects that any person can have.

    Active travel and deliberate disincentivisation of car use will be felt in D15 as much as anywhere else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Active travel and deliberate disincentivisation of car use will be felt in D15 as much as anywhere else.

    Not really. The electrification of the Maynooth line won't impact any motorists in any other postcode. If I'm living in D9, D7 or Kildare, I'll be able to drive every bit as freely as I can right now.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Firstly by improving the public transport offerings, you reduce the number of drivers on the road which has a positive benefit across the board.

    However, many of those who won't be able to use this crossing will use alternative routes in the area, many of which have seen a reduction in the number of commuting drivers due to the increased train frequency.

    Lastly, you can still drive "freely": you just need to take a short detour. It's not a life changing experience!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    That's all fair enough. That wasn't the point I was replying to though.

    I'm skeptical enough about reductions in traffic. And depending on your route, the detour might not be "short" at all. Making people drive for longer seems to be counter productive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,499 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    I would hope that some would choose not to drive and walk or cycle instead. Doing this will allow them to continue to cross at Coolmine. If the level crossing is closed then Coolmine Road will have a lot less vehicles and therefore be a lot safer and less intimidating to cycle on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,948 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    In Kildare, probably, once you stay there.

    In D7 and D9 just like the rest of the City, you'll see more and more blockages to private traffic to enable Bus Connects, Metro construction, quietways, mobility routes. Thats inevitable now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,492 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    In D7 and D9, streets built for bicycles and drays will be returned to having bicycles and cargo bikes. Circle completes, with no horse dung this time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭knockoutned


    This whole discussion seems very black and white. The gates will close, oh no they won’t, oh yes they will!

    It seems some posters think that most people living in the D15 area work in the city and will simply get the train. Trains are brilliant at moving large quantities of people in one direction, but they are not a panacea for all commuters.

    A quick google search says the population of the Greater Blanchardstown area is 120,000 people. That’s larger than Galway and Limerick and just shy of Cork. Unfortunately, the DART line is not an option for most due to the location of the line and the larger populated areas and the current lack of supporting infrastructure, in addition to alternative options being available (the bus).  

    Blanchardstown is also a massive employment centre, (Blanchardstown Town Centre, Industrial estates surrounding Ballycoolin, Damastown etc). These will also not be served by the DART extension, with the BTC 2km from Coolmine and the others about 4km. Castleknock station would be similar. (I appreciate you can both cycle and potentially walk to these, but there are restrictions).

    People who work in these locations do not all live in the area, with commuters travelling from all directions, including some who will be south of the railway line. As was mentioned in another thread, currently a lot of commuters get off the M50 at Lucan and travel up through Chapelizod to avoid the toll (this could be fixed if they sorted out the tolling so everyone pays for using the M50, but this seems to be a long way off). Obviously, there are people living in the greater Blanchardstown area who will be doing the opposite commute. Added to that, you have people living in Carpenterstown who potentially will have one way to cross the rail line, by passing multiple school campuses at rush hour. That is not going to end well.

    For those who remember the nonsensical one way system between the roundabout at the Dr Troy Bridge and Coolmine cross, I would imagine that with the closures this would be as bad if not worse traffic in that area. At that time, it took 45 minutes to travel that distance at peak.

    So, the next question is how do you propose “feeding” the DART if there are restrictions in getting to the stations? In an ideal situation, proper cycling infrastructure would be proposed and built in the surrounding areas in conjunction with the upgrade, so both kids and commuters could cycle, with proper secure facilities installed at all stations to hold 100’s of bikes, but there is no mention of this. The car park at Coolmine could be repurposed as a bike park, as it will now be redundant for a lot of commuters who previously may have parked there. Feeder buses would also be required, but good luck turning a bus at Coolmine station on Coolmine Road.

    Look, I think everyone would agree that the Coolmine crossing should have been closed when they were building the Riverwood and Station Court estates, with the road at the fire station extended. But there is no forward thinking in this country. And now they are forcing this closure, without it appears addressing the other issues that will be directly impacted by the closure.

    Finally, being completely facetious, for all those proposing active travel for those people impacted by the closures, surely everyone who currently gets the train will cycle into town once the canal cycleway is built, making the upgrade redundant and allowing for the savings to be used instead to install proper cycling infrastructure throughout D15! It is after all only about 12km to the city from Coolmine and it follows the same route.  



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,948 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    In two words, Bus Connects.



  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭knockoutned


    And! Busconnect will be great for getting people onto a bus and getting them into town. None of the orbital routes differ from current ones and none directly go to a train station. And if built correctly as proposed, why would you change from a bus to a train when the travel times would be similar with the bus bringing you closer to the city centre.

    So the proposed DART upgrade still does not serve the majority of the D15 catchment area.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,887 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The problem is not the train.

    Its not possible to build road capacity to meet all the demands placed on it. Even if you concrete over everything including the Liffey. For sure whats there is badly planned and laid out. But even if there were no trains. Traffic would still be bad. More cars = more traffic. Removing a level crossing won't change that reality. They built Dr Troy, and traffic as grown to fill that capacity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,887 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Travelling by train is much nicer and gives you mutlimodal options. Which the Bus doesn't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭thomasj


    That's not true. The 3 orbital routes will be

    - Spencer Dock : will run as 17a as far as Ballymun. Then at ballymun will go straight down Collins avenue as far as Howth Road. Then clontarf station, onto east wall road , terminating In Spencer Dock luas stop area

    - clongriffin : this is a new route that will go straight down the M50 to the Airport and then on to Malahide Road and Clongriffin

    - Tallaght : will be pretty much 76a but will operate every 30 minutes all day , 15 minutes during peak hours

    There will also be a local service that will run to Adamstown using most of the existing 239 route . It will not go to liffey valley though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer



    Firstly, you are incorrect to say that none of the orbital routes differ.

    BusConnects is all about developing orbital and local routes, and they certainly DO differ, primarily in terms of frequency, but also in days of operation, and where they go, from what is on offer currently.

    The increase in frequency will make them a viable alternative to using the car for some local journeys. I accept not all, but it's a big improvement.

    Specifically in Dublin 15:

    • The N4 will follow the current 17a route as far as DCU, but will then go directly along the length of Collins Avenue to Docklands. It will operate every 10 mins all day. It will connect with the N6 in Finglas which will serve Charlestown, Ballymun and the points along the rest of the eastern half of the current 17a every 10 minutes.
    • The N8 will offer a direct connection from Blanchardstown to Dublin Airport and Clongriffin every 30 minutes.
    • The W4 will operate throughout the day and offer a direct connection to Liffey Valley, South Lucan, Clondalkin and Tallaght via the M50 toll bridge, serving Grange Castle and the eastern side of Citywest. It will operate every minutes in the morning and evening peak, and every 30 minutes off-peak.
    • The L61 will be a new circular route linking Blanchardstown SC, Hartstown/Huntstown, Clonsilla Road, Blanchardstown Village, Blanchardstown Hospital, Ballycoolin and TUD Blanchardstown. It will operate every 15 minutes all day.
    • The L62 will link Blanchardstown SC with Tyrrelstown, Finglas West and Broombridge every 15 minutes at peak and every 30 minutes off-peak. It will connect with another new orbital route N2 at Broombridge,
    • The L63 will link Damastown, Ladyswell and Mulhuddart with Blanchardstown SC every 15 minutes.
    • The L64 will operate from Blanchardstown SC to Dunboyne via Littlepace every 15 minutes via a more direct route than the 270.
    • The L52 will continue to link Blanchardstown SC and Clonsilla with Lucan as per the 239, but will be re-routed to Adamstown Station. It will operate hourly.

    The four constituent routes that form the B Spine (B1, B2, B3 and B4) will each operate every 15 minutes all day. Three of these offer local connections around D15 from Blanchardstown SC:

    • The B1 to Ongar via the Ongar Distributor Road
    • The B2 to Ongar and Littlepace via Huntstown, Hartstown and Clonsilla
    • The B3 to Tyrrelstown via Ladyswell

    The three radial routes that will serve Blanchardstown SC to/from the city via Castleknock (not integrated from a timetable perspective with the B Spine), and which all offer different local connections within D15 will all have increased frequencies too.

    Finally the 36 which serves Rathborne in Ashtown will operate every 15 minutes throughout the day to/from Ballsbridge.

    Blanchardstown SC will have a proper bus station developed to offer a hub for the local bus network.

    As for serving the DART, by the time DART+ actually happens in D15, some of the routes will probably change to feed into the DART line, or more may be added. There wasn't much point developing large numbers of feeder routes into the existing rail service while the loadings on the trains were over-capacity. But in the meantime the B2 will serve Clonsilla Station every 15 minutes all day.

    Here is the revised network for Blanchardstown - https://busconnects.ie/media/2005/blanchardstown-area-map.pdf

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭knockoutned


    Thanks for clarifying, but I thought we were discussing the DART upgrade and the closing of the coolmine crossing . And to my point, none of the orbital busconnect routes in D15 serve Coolmine or Castleknock station directly and one goes to Clonsilla.

    So where is the demand going to come from to run so many trains continuously throughout the day that requires the closure of the crossing permanently. It’s not going to come from further out on the line as the population isn’t there and though Blanchardstiwn does, with busconnect, People who get the bus are not going to switch to the train



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well I wanted to correct the statement that you made which was factually incorrect about the bus routes. There are significant changes in frequency and routes.

    Also, stop fixating on just orbital routes. All of the bus routes, be they orbitals, locals, radials or spine routes offer the ability to use the bus within Blanchardstown for local journeys, and virtually all of them will be more frequent than currently.

    The expansion in frequency of all of the bus routes in Blanchardstown as part of BusConnects will make the bus an option for local journeys where people may currently use a car, which is relevant in terms of traffic.

    As I already posted DART+ West will be delivered after BusConnects happens. It is quite likely that new local routes may be redeveloped further to feed into the DART when that happens. It doesn’t form part of the current proposals because the trains were already jammed full at peak times.

    With the launch of the 90 minute fare, There will no longer be a fare penalty for using a bus and a train for one journey - that will facilitate greater use of local buses in time and switching between the two. Right now people have to pay two fares.

    Some people might use the B2 to Clonsilla from Ongar or indeed around Shelerin Road and then a train, or others from Diswellstown take a 34 to Coolmine and then a train rather than using the bus all the way.

    If buses around Blanchardstown are frequent enough then there will be modal shifting of some degree.

    It is likely that DART will operate every 10 minutes throughout the day between Clonsilla and the city (every 20 mins from Maynooth and M3 Parkway) as the existing DART does between Howth Junction and Bray, with extra journeys at peak times. That will make it more attractive to use for people travelling longer distances.

    There is also an element of planning for the future here and not making the same mistake as the planners did with the LUAS Green Line. As more development happens the railway is going to become busier and increased frequency will be needed.

    That is not compatible with having level crossings.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭The Dark Knight


    Well said @knockoutned

    Finally someone who can articulate the issue for local residents where public transport is not an option whether it's for logistical or timing reasons.

    The proposal of closing the level crossings without providing an alternative crossing options is not an runner. Can you imagine if they proposed to cut Galway or Limerick down the middle. Close every bridge but one across the Shannon!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,887 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Local traffic isn't a problem using Dr Troy off peak.

    The problem at peak, isn't Dr Troy bridge, or Coolmine Crossing. Its the traffic.

    IMO the vast major of which isn't local, its through traffic rat running.

    The solution to that isn't more traffic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭knockoutned


    Just a couple of things on this. Firstly for someone who used to get on the mail carriage when getting the train to school due to the over crowding in the regular carriages, the DART coming to this line cannot come quickly enough. Also, the fact that there is only one train every 30 minutes in the evening into the city is beyond upsetting. It needs to be done asap.

    This is a thread discussing the impact of DART WEST on D15, so if its ok with you, I will fixate on the proposed Busconnect routes. There is only one route that will serve residents south of the railway line which will link them to the main Blanchardstown spine route and other proposed orbital routes. This route will share space with cars on the Dr Troy Bridge, as for some reason, it was not built wide enough to accommodate bus lanes in both directions. I also don't believe that there is room to widen this bridge, as there are houses / apartments too close to it, so it will remain like this, though I am open to correction. That's really going to entice car users to get the bus. The other bridge at Castleknock also isn't wide enough for bus lanes, so again not going to help people switch modes of transport. Both will be stuck in the same traffic, going nowhere fast. And as I mentioned above, due to earlier unnecessary poor road planning, we have experience with delays on the Clonsilla road very quickly mixing with Town Centre traffic which lead to gridlock in the whole area.

    Look, for the greater Blanchardstown area, Busconnect has the potential to be a massive came changer. Hopefully, when implementing the routes, proper cycling infrastructure will be included (I know there are plans for this on the main spine routes into the city, but I don't know if this will happen on other routes. Obviously, this cannot happen on the M50). This will allow people who want to, to cycle safely to most areas within D15 and will have a real impact in getting cars of the road. But this will also require proper cycling parking infrastructure at commuters final destination, which just isn't there at moment.

    I agree that the 90 minute fare being a great introduction, but again, I don't see this being used much in the Blanchardstown area to switch from bus to train, as the proposed Busconnect routes do not really serve the train stations. I would also imagine most commuters will, once on the bus, stay there, unless they need to transfer to the existing DART line to get to their final destination.

    To your point, if Busconnect will be delivered before DART WEST, then what is the rush in closing the crossing now as part of planning. If operations will be similar to the existing DART outside of peak, where there are electronically controlled crossings, why not wait to see the full impact of Busconnect and how commuters actually commute and if additional trains are actually required. This allows to see if there is any impact in commuting patterns and if the result of the pandemic actual sees less people commuting regularly or in part, as they continue to work from home. Planning for the future can also take place now, so if required, the necessary infrastructure can be put in place so if the crossing does in fact need to close, this can happen smoothly. But infrastructure cannot be developed independently of each other. Proper joint up thinking is required for the whole area to transition to alternative modes of transport successfully.

    Finally, as I said before, Blanchardstown is a city. While the majority of residents will not be impacted by this proposed closure on a regular basis, a significant number will, and in my opinion, much more than will use the DART at off peak times. As noted, local delays can very quickly impact a much larger area, if bottlenecks are allowed to be developed. Two crossing of the railline, without room for separate lanes for alternative transport, will lead to this and unfortunately due to the ridiculous lack of planning for the future in the past, we are where we are now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,887 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The buses are only bottlenecked in certain pinch points. Everywhere they hit a bus lane, they will be a lot quicker than a car. On some routes. That said you can drive a difference route in the car, a more direct route, so it can be quicker. On some routes.

    You can't fix the bottlenecks in Castleknock, or Chapelizod. You could build a hundred bridges over the canal and they will still be gridlock on the other side. There is no where for all this traffic to go. There is very little you can do to improve the capacity of the car network in D15. Expect it to get worse.

    There is potential to improve the buses and the trains. Why not do it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    Buses are not the answer to City traffic problems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭VonLuck




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    I would've thought it's fairly obvious. People are not going to leave their cars to sit on a bus that they perceive they will be sitting on stuck in the same traffic they would be in, in their car. Where at least in their car they are taking the most direct route, the bus will be taking a roundabout journey and still getting stuck in traffic.


    Trains / trams / cycle lanes would be a much better focus. Only if / when the trains / trams / cycle lanes are adequate to tempt people not to take the car should the buses be considered to as an additional option.



Advertisement