Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

1166167169171172279

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I think it could still evolve into a bigger enterprise and could be an insidious threat. I don't think it's definitely going to do so.

    If it has backers who are willing to keep throwing money at it then it doesn't need enough viewers to be financially. It just needs enough viewers to have an impact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,961 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Bit those same older people don't like new things and probably watch BBC/ITV like they have always done despite not being completely aligned with it's politics.

    The only station GBnews is in competition with in it's current Farage form is Russia Today watching conspiracy nuts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,218 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    How? It would make just as much sense for the backers to literally burn their money. There's nothing GB News can do to draw an audience at this rate. A pathogen needs a host in which to replicate and mutate. This is what GB News does not have.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,218 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The thing with BBC and ITV is that while they do show news and political commentary, they also do sports, music and other entertainment so one can segue from BBC News into Eastenders and then into something else, ie they've reason to watch the same channel for a stretch. With GB News, it's just "Here's another reason why woke is bad" on repeat and it gets old.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,096 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I have to agree, and it's why Andrew Neil leaving is a big moment even though he hasn't been on the channel in months. He lended the channel a credibility and recognition it needed, and could possibly have attracted some of the BBC News audience. His name also could have attracted a decent level of guests. But with the channel's launch going so poorly, Neil going off-air, Farage coming on board (which attracts some viewers, but will likely put others off), and now Neil leaving completely, it's hard to see what any further relaunches will change, or who they could attract to join the channel that might turn things around.

    The biggest question facing GB News right now is; what can they now offer to bring in new viewers that they haven't already tried? Relaunches at this stage is rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. The pool of new presenters they can likely attract will most likely only come from the same pool as their existing presenters and offer the same thing. They can't try to appeal to more centrist viewers as, with the Guto Harri situation, they face losing some of their existing viewers for trying to appeal to the "woke" side. And there's only so far more to the right they can go without coming in for heavy criticism and losing whatever advertisers they have left (as well as those involved with the channel who may decide it'll be too damaging to their career to stay).

    Looking at it as objectively and unbiased as possible, I genuinely don't see what they can do to turn things around in any kind of substantial way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    How? By growing its audience over time. You seem to rule out the possibility that it can grow its audience to the point that it has an impact and I don't rule that out. I don't claim to know it will happen either but I think the people who wrote it off before it even started were doing so out of desire.

    If it has backers who are willing to support it financially then it doesn't need to make money. A poster above claimed GB News has a viewership of one sixth of Sky News. That's significant already and it can't be written off as a few conspiracy nutters.

    I'll wait and see how it goes. I wouldn't relish it gaining popularity but i wouldn't write it off either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,218 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    That's a massive assumption for a channel with no viewers. How does it grow? Who does it try and get on board given how far right it's already gone? Tommy Robinson? Farage allegedly left UKIP because Robinson was allowed to join.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,096 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I don't completely rule it out either, but it's hard to know how they can achieve it, especially as they're not holding on to the viewers they currently have. Even if their backers kept them financially stable for another year (or even threw a bit more money into it), I can't see what they can try do to grow that audience.

    At a push, Piers Morgan might get the ball rolling. Would he join? I think the odds of that have only decreased over time, especially with Andrew Neil leaving and the ratings currently where they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Those defending the status quo, by definition, are conservative. And the status quo is where the power it. Folks trying to change things are generally outsiders. So you have reactionaries trying to drag us back to the old days when blacks knew their place etc. and you have other folks trying to shift society to be accepting of things that are not widely accepted yet (and may never be). As someone has pointed out, not being homophobic isn't really a progessive position anymore as it's widely accepted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Isn't this the interesting point though? That poster said the left is Golliath now, but Ireland doesn't have a left wing government nor has it ever had a government that isn't headed by either FF or FG. Likewise the UK has had a Conservative government for a decade and increased its majority the last time around.

    If parliaments took place in twitter then the left would be in charge. Out here in the real world the uk governments are centre right- right wing givrrned country and, as you say, the news is overwhelmingly right leaning. But they've convinced the country they're under the boot of the left and if they don't like the way things are being run by the right then they need to turn harder to the right.

    It's an impressive con trick and it's worked really well over the last decade.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    The Jersey of the sitting minister is often irrelevant, the power and influence often unelected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,561 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Did this thread just circle right back to where is started despite the numbers the drop out of staff and presenters and zero evidence of growth.


    Absolute bizarre. I stand by my statement it won't see the year out. Plug will be pulled. No one's throwing more bad money after good. Depsite the absolute polar opposite expectations of reality from individual posters who are continually railing against 'the establishment man'. Ironically or not... Can't decide.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think in reality if the UK had PR-STV like us , you'd have had loads more coalitions and the Tories (and Labour tbf) would have drifted closer to the centre as offering a little something to everyone is what is required to win Elections when it's not FPTP.

    The UK system allows political parties to focus almost exclusively on their "core support" as usually it'll be enough to get them over the line in FPTP single seat constituencies. You see the same taken to even greater extremes in the US.

    That leads to the entrenched positions you increasingly see and the marketplace that GB News hoped existed for them.

    What you really end up with is a whole load of people that actually live in and around the center that aren't really catered for politically , but have voted one way or the other not because they are all in on supporting said party , but because they don't have a viable alternative.

    This gives someone like the Tories a feeling that they have much greater support than they really do - Remember , their "thumping majority" came from just a little over 40% of the vote.

    So GB News think there's this huge market for their brand , but in reality most people really couldn't give a damn one way or the other and really and truly aren't energised by "Anti-woke" etc. etc. etc.

    It's that flawed market analysis that has GB News in the hole they currently find themselves in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    OK. Do you really think the left is in charge of the Tory party at the moment?

    Then poster above characterised the left as Golliath, which I presume necessary the rest of society the David. If you look at the Tory party and think they're the Golliath left, then it sums up perfectly what I said in the last post.

    "If you don't like how things are beibg run by the right, then you need to turn harder to the right".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,218 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You mean like the almost entirely right wing media, hedge funds, banks, corporate lobby groups, fossil fuel firms and arms manufacturers? Or is this just another conservatives are the real victims narrative?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Generic said at the start that the status quo was the conservative position, went on to refer to different social changes.

    Concludes post by saying acceptance of gay marriage is the acceptable position now ,in other words The status quo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    You're speaking about the UK, I'm referring to Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,136 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The average middle aged/old aged conservative voter probably wouldn't have a clue what "a woke" was. And anti-woke is the raison d'etre of the channel. Plus older people are extremely reluctant to be early adapters of anything. But I'm sure if they tuned in, GBeebies wouldn't object though. But this whole thing is built on tenuous internet concepts, birthed from a US culture war mentality of binary, school yard, politics. Not exactly the realm of your average Alf Garnet type in England even if that type would be pretty one note in their political views. However, I don't know what the actual age breakdown of the tiny viewership is and, in any case, my "what the kids are talking about these days..." was more of a parlance than an actual comment on who GB News is aimed at.

    As for the channel working, it hasn't shown any signs of that as of yet. I've said it before a few times on the thread that the only honest assessment here is that it has been a complete disaster and an absolute failure in every regard. Andrew Neil abandoning ship early, and staying in the water, has clearly demonstrated that. The lead guy doing a runner doesn't display any kind of success factor, or even a hope for any future success. It may try to lumber on into next year, but the forecast for the time ahead certainly doesn't look that good.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,966 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Doesn't affect me at all because I've never once posted about immigration in Sweden or the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, I thought you were referring to my post. My mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    You seem to have found a contradiction there somehow? Progressive views become conservative views once established, just as you point out. Where is the contradiction?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx



    Surely that would mean support for gay marriage is then a conservative view ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,566 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    They have stopped making an issue out of it. That's much is clear. Whether they think equal treatment for guys is a good thing is a different matter, but they don't campaign on getting rid of gay marriage or anything like that.

    Trans skepticism is all the rage now instead so they still get to have their moral panic issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    I'm trying to get clarity on what Generic said.

    If support for gay marriage is now a conservative position?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I'd be inclined to agree with your statement that GB News probably won't last the year, especially with Andrew Neil officially out. Unless they get the likes of Piers Morgen on there, the entire channel will lean on Farage, which is a crap situation for any organisation to find itself in, let alone a TV Channel.

    My guess is that at some point during November or December the channel will be reduced to a placeholder screen image for a couple of a days before closure, or maybe even one morning the GB News' viewer will get up, expect to switch on "The Great British Breakfast" and find that the channel is just suddenly gone from their encoder list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,218 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I see two major problems with the Piers Morgan argument.

    Firstly, he's not about to just jump onto a clearly sinking ship which is haemorrhaging staff. Even if he was, he wouldn't come cheap and would probably have a lot of demands for autonomy and creative control over any programme he'd be inclined to present.

    Secondly, things like BBC Breakfast and Good Morning Britain seem like the sorts of shows with dedicated viewerbases, even if it's just on for background noise. People aren't just going to switch to GB News for this. 

    I agree with @listermint in that it seems unlikely that the channel will see out the year.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    It seems to me that some are conflating "Conservative" with "Mainstream".

    Yes , technically speaking Conservative means resistance to change and a preference for status quo or perhaps even stasis.

    There are lots of things that were once considered fringe or "outside the norm" that are now normalised and considered typical mainstream viewpoints.

    That's always been the way - Whether we are talking about Womens Suffrage 100+ years ago or Gay Marriage in recent times.

    It doesn't mean that support those things is now "Conservative" it just means that they have become normalised and mainstream so they are no longer points of friction/disagreement politically.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement