Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Star Trek: Picard - Amazon Prime [** POSSIBLE SPOILERS **]

17677798182121

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,961 ✭✭✭Evade


    It looks like they're leaning more towards Human a supremacist state like the Terran Empire in Enterprise. Given the timeframe it looks like the change could be altering how or even if the events of WWIII unfold.

    Depending on the exact date Picard an co. travel back to there could be 3 other Starfleet officers running around San Francisco at that time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Enterprise E and the Cerritos both had buggies.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Why not a hover buggy? I never understood that scene. Unless the planet had some magic anti hover mode minerals

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,961 ✭✭✭Evade


    It's weird alright. It can't even have been about budget because there's a very similar sequence later on in a hovering vehicle. A throw away line would have done a lot to justify it, it's not like Starfleet hasn't ever looked back to solve technical issues, the TR-116 being a prime example.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,852 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That looks real bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    IIRC the buggy was Patrick Stewart's own idea, who wanted to muck about with a dune buggy and had it worked into the script as a set piece. Given nemesis's director had never watched Trek before, it was probably an easy sell and got no pushback over the contradiction of character.

    That story alone has told me that the actors themselves are often the worst people to be gatekeepers for fictional characters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,144 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Move futuristic scifi series to contemporary Earth to 'save the future' \ 'save the budget'

    *Flashbacks to Galactica 1980*

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Oh it's 100% a budget thing. But you know, that's not necessarily a bad thing either. Runaway budgets can often mean no self-reflection or examination in the writer's room. Being forced to focus on the characters might bring some much-needed structure to the show.

    I'm the eternal optimist, I know 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,961 ✭✭✭Evade


    Is it cheaper though? There's a lot of location shots in the trailer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    On balance, I'd say so. Location shooting is only as expensive as the tax credits on offer there: otherwise, there are is no need for custom set dressing; the myriad of costumes for the extra; all CGI to fix background detail; and so on. Even episodic shows like TNG, predominantly taking place in the same 4, 5 sets would have still incurred more cost for all those once-off costumes, sets and FX.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    My logic would be, why waste energy fighting the planet's gravity if you don't have to.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,961 ✭✭✭Evade


    Starfleet use hover technology for almost eveything else. If they were worried about wasting energy why spend energy making an artificial gravity field on a ship/station then more energy on an anti gravity trolley? Without roads or set paths hovering gets around a lot of obstacles too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I guess you might have some situations where the anti-grav tech couldn't be counted on, and having a wheeled car might be needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,961 ✭✭✭Evade


    You might but the hovering shuttle near the end of the sequence kind of ruled that out in that case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,268 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Ye that whole scene did not make any sense. I think they just done it because they thought it would be cool and young me did think it was cool. Maybe Patrick Stewart did not think the director would take what he said seriously bit as soon as the director heard it he said ye let's go for that it would be coolvespwcially with him having no Star Trek experience or knowledge.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,268 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I only just looked at the trailer on You-Tube today and all I can say is I like it. Yes it might be a way of saving money but I look forward too seeing what they do and how they do it and we have Patrick Stewart, John De Lancie and the Borg Queen all in one show. What more could you ask for. I for one am looking forward to season 2 of Picard.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭jakiah


    So they are introducing a fascist Federation and having the cast travel back to the 21st century? This can only mean one thing - they want to enable their diverse writing team of non-star trek fans to tackle their favourite subject - woke politics. None of your pesky utopian Roddenberry stuff required.

    Think ill give it a miss.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Not this nonsense again. Roddenberry created a socially progressive Utopia. TOS had the first ever mixed race kiss on TV. TNG was full of social commentary.


    If Star Trek isn’t woke, nothing is.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭jakiah


    Woke isnt progressive, its regressive. The politics of the victim, with Picard flagellating himself for the crime of being a successful white male, all set against a fascist dystopia. This isnt Star Trek.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Ah give over with this.


    It’s a thread about Star Trek not Jordan Peterson.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,354 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    "and still too many wimmin in modern Trek.

    PS: I am not a virgin"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,719 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Keep it friendly please folks and enough of the culture war stuff, thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,719 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I am throughly underwhelmed by that trailer. They seem to be doubling down on everything I disliked about the first season (pretty much everything). Once again they are actively avoiding the continuity while sprinkling in references to the half a dozen episodes of the show they watched. It makes me sad that they wasted the opportunity to give Picard and the TNG crew one last adventure together. Like Discovery I think I am done with this show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,144 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I thought Enterprise already battled Space Nazis to save the future...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    Question, do you think it will be a realistic portrait of the 24th century that EVERY top scientist , leader, admiral etc is a woman ?

    I mean, It's the 24th utopian century sure, but wouldn't a closer 50/50 model be more accurate ?

    It seems they are trying to make up for past sexism in the show with sexism in the other direction ...

    Also would the Picard we know from TNG allow himself to be spoken to like that ?

    To be cursed at and told to "Shut the f*ck up" ?

    Would he just meekly accept it like this new 'modern' Picard does ?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭jakiah


    Its impossible to believe its the same character. At least with Discovery you can ignore the show, this series has ruined one of the best loved characters in ST. Awful stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Id ask maybe people wait til the show airs before judging it but it's also obvious some have decided their bias.

    In more fun news, the show runner shared Picard's food choices from his replicator: minus points for "french fries" which IIRC in France are just called "frites" (fries lol)




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭jakiah


    The first season already aired. They turned one of the greatest heroes of the ST universe into a doddery old gobshite whose sole purpose appears to be harangued and abused by appallingly written, obnoxious angry women. For what? Its pathetic.

    RedLetterMedia cover it perfectly here.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfQdf93e63I&t=1065s



Advertisement
Advertisement