Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

13963973994014021580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    As per HSE press conference

    244 patients in hospital with Covid today, 54 in ICU.

    - 52% in hospital aren't fully vaccinated

    - 45% are fully vaccinated

    3% currently unknown

    ICU

    - 62% in ICU aren't vaccinated at all

    - 15% are partially vaccinated

    - 23% are fully vaccinated

    89% of cases in hospital are patients who are being treated for Covid, while 11% are asymptomatic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    You'd have to think hospital numbers and cases are levelling off now.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Remember when people were saying we were just a few weeks behind the UK and we'd have no restrictions left once we got into Autumn? Just had to get more vaccinated.

    Well here we are still severely restricted with no end in sight despite the vast majority of adults being fully vaccinated. I have tickets to a gig in summer 2022 and I really don't see it going ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    If 45% fully vaccinated sounds mad, consider that unvaccinated people are about 20% of the population now. In other words, the unvaccinated are overrepresented in hospital numbers by 250%.

    As we know from previous press conferences, there's a bit of devil in that 89% detail though. "Being treated for covid" doesn't necessarily mean that they were admitted to hospital for symptoms of covid. For some it means they were tested on admission, had covid with symptoms, and are therefore being treated for it. Or that they developed symptomatic covid in hospital. "Being treated for" could mean they're getting paracetemol and antitussives.

    Even if the original reason they were admitted was a broken leg.

    They seem to be. Cases rising ever so slightly, but well within the bounds of a normal statistical drift. Hospital numbers have remained stable or dropped 3 days in a row now.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    62% in ICU not vaccinated at all is surely the headline figure here



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    A whole 3 days?

    3 days ain't a trend.

    And 35% of the population are not vaccinated, not 20%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,235 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    See this is the problem with headlines like that, are those people in ICU with severe pneumonia symptoms and that’s why they’re there or is it they just tested positive and are put in the headline figures?

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So roughly:

    1.7mil unvaccinated / 3.1mil vaccinated (1.82 multiplier)

    127 unvaccinated in hospital (vaccine aside), we would expect to see 231 vaccinated, but we've only seen 110.

    32 unvaccinated in ICU, we would expect to see 58 vaccinated, but there's only been 7.

    Obviously it's very rare for under 12's to need ICU care, so removing them from the unvaccinated population would see an even bigger difference.

    It would be great to see the age's and vaccination status of cases and hospitalizations as it would be needed to really see the impact from vaccinations.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    People with underlying conditions are going to end up in hospital regardless with or without the vacinne.

    With the vaccine hopefully they have less severe symptoms.

    The below are the numbers for the 17/18 flu season with 4700 in hospital, 190 in ICU and 255 deaths.

    We can't protect everyone unfortunately.


    image.png

    I still believe the 5,000 deaths are miscalculated for Covid with people who died from Covid or died with Covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    One day is not a trend. 3 days is a trend, but it's too short to make any longer predictions. On first glance, hospital numbers appear to have stabilised, but you need to have been through a full 7-day cycle because the discharges and admissions themselves peak and trough over the course of the week.

    35% of the whole population are not vaccinated, but there are just four covid-positive children in hospitals. So for the purposes of determining the vaccinated population, we need to exclude the under-18s. Which is kind of hard now. So at best guess, somewhere between 75% and 85% of the adult population are now fully vaccinated. Which means that around 20% of the adult population are not vaccinated, yet represent 52% of the hospital admissions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,619 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    "Being treated" for symptoms just means that they have symptoms tbh

    Thats why the other part of that statement was 11% were asymptomatic. They will treat everyone, even if they dont "need" treatment. If you have any symptoms and are in hospital (for other reasons) you will get "treatment".

    Incredibly dishonest reporting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    It's already clear?

    95% efficacy at preventing infection and 99% preventing hospilisation vaccine for 3,100,000 people

    3,100,000/95/99 = 1,550 max that can go to hospital if we assume vaccine lasts 12 months that's 1550/365 = 4 people a day

    Assume its last 6 months and that's 8 people a day ( 1550/182) that can go to hospital and that's assuming an attack rate of 100% and all 3,100,000 came infront of the virus

    These vaccine's are not 95% efficacous at preventing symptomatic infection and 99% prevent hospilisation with the admissions we are seeing, no where near it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭irishguy1983



    Yeah my thinking also but I am certainly no expert….I suppose you still need for it travelling, but no really point in asking bars, etc to do work in 3/4 weeks when we might have like 92/93% fully vaccinated…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Lyle


    Just in terms of age in hospitals, its vague but this is all they gave:

    Hospitalised Cases

    63% 50+

    31% 19-49

    6% 0-18


    ICU Cases

    58% 50+

    42% 19-49



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    You can't state that without knowing a more detailed breakdown, specifically age ranges. It's a population estimate based on cases the past few weeks being mainly in the 45 and under age range. It takes time for covid to spread into older age groups. Just because based on 1000 cases in the 0-45 age group and half are vaccinated and half are unvaccinated we end up with X and Y hospitalized, does not mean the same rates would apply in 500 vaccinated people aged 65 and over (figures made up, just to give an example) And it's only now that the incidence rate in those aged 65+ is rising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    @godzilla1989 wrote:

    3,100,000/95/99 = 1,550 max that can go to hospital if we assume vaccine lasts 12 months that's 1550/365 = 4 people a day

    The 95% efficacy rate was based on attack rates over 3 months. So you want to divide by 91 instead of 365. Gives 17 people a day.

    Indeed, those values were also calculated on older variants with lower attack rates. Efficacy against Delta is believed to be more like 88% with attack rates in household settings of ~50%. If you take a 50% attack rate and 3 months, then you have a ceiling of about 186,000 vaccinated people who could develop symptoms. Or about 2,000/day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    Agree with that 91, good observation

    That's 2,000 a day with symptoms,but with 99% protection from hospitalisation

    That's 2,000/99 = 20 a day in hospital

    Pandemic should be over if that was true

    Even our HSE can handle 20 a day :)

    We probably get 20 admissions day to sober out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Lyle


    Outbreak info slide here from HSE


    E9KJ_B9VUAwN7PH.jpeg


    Those nursing home numbers aren't great.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Was the 3 months down to how long it took to get X amount of positive cases in the trial or just a fixed time? You would have to imagine if cases were lower during the trial compared to now, it wouldn't take 3 months to achieve the required number of infections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    Also that 186,000 is wrong it should be 93,000

    3,100,000/88 = 372,000/4 ( 3 months ) = 93,000, you divided by 2 for 6 months to get 186,000?

    So only 93,000 possible people can be infected

    1,000 a day and with 99% protection from hospitlisation, that's only 10 a day in hospital



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    The 62% of totally unvaccinated people in ICU they are coming from a small pool of the population. There are less than 10% of adults totally unvaccinated, so that is 376k people.

    Out of these 376k people, how many people left can go in ICU ? There is probably a high number of them that already had covid and built a partial immunity, some of them will never get more than mild symptoms... Do you think that the pool is big enough so that the numbers can continue growing or is it possible that all the easy targets (unvaccinated + underlying conditions + a lot of contacts) have already been infected and gone to ICU and that the vaccine will slow down naturally in this group ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    They all wear masks, PPE etc in there

    Schools are low though

    Wait till they open, disaster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭gral6


    By the look of things, Electric picnic is not going ahead in 2022 either alone with Dublin marathon. Joke of a country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The outbreaks range from 2-47, so one pretty big one

    https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/surveillance/covid-19outbreaksclustersinireland/COVID-19%20Interim%20Weekly%20Outbreak%20Report_Week32_2021_17082021_V1.0.pdf

    With over 500k pfizer doses having being delivered this week and Nursing home residents very close to 8 months post second dose, one would think now is the time to just go in and get them all done pronto!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭revelman


    To be fair, I don’t think it is as straightforward as that. People can be in ICU for many weeks, if not months. We would need to know how long people have been in ICU. They could have caught Covid several weeks or months ago before they were entitled to a vaccination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Focussing on the size of the pool of unvaccinated vs number in ICU is missing the point. Saying "vaccines are x% effective" is also missing the point. The fact is that, even though vaccines do reduce the likelihood of symptoms upon infection (and you should get it if you're an at-risk person), they do not prevent infection adequately overall. It is unknown if they prevent death in people who do become symptomatic (even though this meme is trotted out in media every day). Most importantly, the effectiveness of vaccination wanes quite quickly.

    Here is some very good data released this week that analyses effectiveness during the Delta period vs before, from UK: finalfinalcombinedve20210816.pdf (ox.ac.uk)

    Figure S4 on page 29 shows the way in which efficacy decreases, by age group. E.g. in the 35-64 age group, 75 days after 2nd dose of AZ, it's not effective at all. Vaccines are extremely effective in people who were infected at some point prior to vaccination. Extrapolating each trend line forward does not show promise for any vaccine. It's even worse when you consider that these odds ratios are based on symptomatic cases.

    As such, infections will continue and vaccinated people will continue to have severe outcomes. And this is with restrictions still in place! The only solution is to stop focusing on total vaccination, as this wont work. Booster shots should be prioritised, and given to at-risk people only, and all restrictions removed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,297 ✭✭✭Allinall




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Based on anything in particular, or just your feeling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    It depends on your definition of "adequately". It is reducing infection enough if it guarantees that we don't have exponential increases and that the numbers in hospitals don't go in the thousands. This is why I am mentioning the size of the pool. If your pool is small enough that it is unlikely to have more than 200 people in ICU at the same time, then we can live with it and get back to our lives.

    For a year, we have been putting restrictions to avoid exponential increases that would lead to saturation of the health system in a few weeks. We are beyond that, the pool is small, the increase speed is manageable. What is the new goal of restrictions ? Keeping numbers in ICU under 70 ? under 100 ? Why ?

    As a society, if everybody has a vaccine 50% efficient, it is enough to keep things under control. I was reading that the AZ protection goes down from 68% to 61% after several months: that is not a big issue. Don't believe that your hepatitis vaccines are as effective years after you did them as 2 weeks after. But it is good enough to protect the society.

    As an individual, if you want to have more protection, get a booster, especially if you are vulnerable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    Will Patrick day parades go ahead I wonder?

    Utter disaster if they don't



Advertisement