Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

1132133135137138279

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    It wasn't a news show? They would also be fired for giving their opinions like Farage does.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Whether you define GB News as a news channel is neither here nor there; GB News had protocols in place on how staff should conduct themselves.

    That journalist clearly breached these protocols by making an overtly political gesture. It would be the same if a member of staff suddenly performed a Nazi salute in the middle of a show. Same principle, different circumstances of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Firstly, it's not a news channel, and the programme in particular was an opinion programme.

    Secondly, you avoided the question about what ethos was broken considering the ethos of the channel is about free speech and he ran it past his producers before the show.

    Thirdly, as I stated if you believe that a political gesture is a breach of the ethos, then outright saying that you refuse to kneel is an equally political gesture, it's just not one which has a physical representation attached to it. Farage didn't have to say he'd never kneel or refuses to kneel, he outright stated his position, just like Harri did. Harri just carried out the physical representation of it.



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nope, Farage saying he wouldn't is equally an overt political gesture. You said the channel stands for the freedom of speech but it's pretty clear they oppose certain kinds of free speech.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If Nigel Farage stated that he would never perform a Nazi salute, would you argue that just uttering these words is still a "political gesture"?

    Seriously!?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Are you comparing the act of taking a knee to a Nazi salute?

    Farage's words were in response to Guto Harri being suspended/fired for taking the knee. Farage was outright and explicitly making a (verbal) gesture in opposition. If Guto Harri's act is a breach of the ethos of the channel (and you're once again ignoring he was given the okay by the producers and that the channel's ethos is centered around free speech and differing opinions), then so is Farage's, unless the ethos of the channel is "free speech that most of our viewers already agree with".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    GB news were entitled to sack the presenter. But let's stop the hypocrisy that they are the arbiters of free speech and cancel culture.

    When someone did something they don't like they were sacked. Simple as that.

    GB news don't want free speech, they want to promote a very specific message.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Surely that is obviously a political gesture to say you will never do a Nazi salute? I mean it is a very popular political gesture and I would agree with anyone saying it but political all the same. It would be taking an anti Nazi stance. However the main difference is that the vast majority of people have doing Nazi salutes as wrong while kneeling is a bit more varied in opinion. This makes it an awkward example since all mainstream stations will have an anti Nazi opinion. This is closer to saying you will never support a Labour candidate which you would be against given your previous statements.


    Obviously GB news has a stance on kneeling and has made it clear it does not support it and will ensure its employees follow this.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So to work your way out of the problem, you have unilaterally redefined a "political gesture" to be either physical or a verbal statement.

    That's quite some acrobatics at work.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,650 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Nobody at GB News is a journalist. They're there to shove this anti-woke drivel down people's throats and for some demented reason they opted to do so via a TV news channel of all things.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    You've again ignored the points about the ethos of the channel and Harri being given the okay by his producers, so don't try to claim I'm the one "working my way out of the problem".

    Regardless, there is no physical gesture tied to not taking the knee. However the point remains that Farage's comments were a clear intention to demonstrate that he opposes taking the knee. It is the polar opposite of what Harri did (which was demonstrating that he supports taking the knee).

    The physical act is not in question. It's how does one person taking the knee to show support for the gesture breach the ethos of the channel, while another person stating opposition for taking the knee doesn't?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    Wearing a Poppy in November is a political gesture. Refusing to wear one is also a political gesture as James McClean knows only to well.

    If GB news is still about then the Poppy wearing will be in over drive. So much for no political gestures.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That journalist performed a physical political gesture. Whether it's a Nazi salute, or taking the knee, or any other form of physical political gesture, he acted inappropriately and in violation of the ethos of the channel.

    This is almost circular reasoning: you're arguing that stating you won't perform a political gesture is the same as performing a political gesture.

    You can't get to redefine language like that.

    Hence my analogy with Nazi salutes. You are arguing that my saying I won't perform a Nazi salute, to you means I'm performing a political gesture.

    Gestures are physical acts.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,650 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Taking the knee = Nazi salutes. I'm not even surprised at this point.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    By the way, in case anybody missed it, the Conservatives in USA are busy scrubbing all records (or at least trying to) of Trump's involvement in the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Never mind that he orchestrated it last year, or that he purposely chose the date for the withdrawal to be after the 2020 election.......so, it would take place either a) after he was re-elected (meaning the backlash didn't affect his re-election chances) or b) when his successor had to deal with the backlash.

    What was that about 1984, again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Nazi salute is a symbol/gesture of hate, not a "political gesture". It's not comparable with taking the knee.

    And again (until you answer it), it was okayed by his producers. And you still haven't pointed out how it's a breach of the ethos of the channel, something not even GB News claimed.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You were called out on inappropriately redefining language, and have now decided to shift the goalposts to the ethos and his producers having okayed it.

    To answer your first point, GB News get to decide the ethos of the channel - and staff were aware of this when they signed their contracts on what was permissible and what was not permissible. All channels have protocols and editorial standards in place that staff are obliged to follow. Indeed, this applies to pretty much all forms of paid employment.

    To answer your second point, there is no evidence that producers okayed the decision. That journalist can make the claim, but GB News deemed otherwise. It's hearsay.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I thought I'd pop back into this thread, see how the conversation is going. I see the answer is swimmingly. There's some spectacular attempt at specious reasoning going on here. Whether or not one agrees with "taking the knee" (and as usual, the smallest gesture enrages those broadly right-aligned), the attempt to draw any kind of equivalence with the Nazis is a spectacularly Bad Faith take.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,650 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I've stepped back. This is perfectly par for the course sadly.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    The ethos and the producers okaying it were in my first response to you. Those goalposts have remained entirely in place.

    GB News also didn't deny that Harri okayed it with the producers, so what are you basing the idea that he's lying on?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    It has already been said that GBNews can define their own ethos but lets not pretend that it has anything to do with free speech.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm not suggesting that he's a liar. Perhaps he misunderstood what his producers suggested? I simply don't know. Neither do you.

    What we do know is that that journalist breached editorial standards as set out by GB News. The same standards that would apply to any other news channel re: political gestures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Again, not a News channel, which means different rules apply to GB News than actual news channels. Comparisons to BBC or Channel 4 are invalid.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,650 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    GB News can operate however it wants and clearly can given the lax enforcement of broadcast regulations. The "ethos" can be whatever they want and they've clearly opted for a safe space for trolling and spoonfeeding right wing snowflakes exactly what they want to hear. Hari committed thoughtcrime by dissenting and had to go and we saw the hysterical overreaction from said snowflakes more or less immediately.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Freedom of speech / expression does not mean you can do whatever you like, whenever you like; it's not some laissez-faire theory where anything goes.

    Where there are standards in employment, those standards must be complied with.

    If, in your paid employment, you breach standards as set out in the employment contract, you cannot argue that it's your right to freedom of speech / expression to breach those conditions. If you verbally or sexually abuse another member of staff, you cannot resort to your inalienable right to freedom of expression / speech. Freedom of speech has always had limits, and these limits are spelled out in employment contracts.

    That journalist agreed to those conditions, and breached those conditions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,027 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Also, Guto Harri said in his letter to the CEO "Before I took the knee on air I discussed it with my producer, director, co-presenters and head of newsroom. After I did it, GB News captured the moment and proactively cascaded it on social media."

    He was also only suspended two days later, after there was a backlash from viewers.

    You're right, neither of us know what happened there. But Guto Harri does, and his is the only account of those events we have. So unless someone else who was there comes forward to give an alternative account (and no one has this far), then Harri's account should be accepted.

    So if he knew in his contract and the guidelines he signed up what he was and wasn't allowed to say, and he ran it past producers, directors etc and was given the okay, and they took no action against him for two days until viewers started complaining, then what part of the guidelines did he breach?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,694 ✭✭✭KildareP



    (1) GB News promoted the clip in question for several hours, without comment, before it became clear it wasn't positively received amongst their audience. It was only at this point they suddenly swivelled to the line that it was against "ethos" and that Harri should subsequently be suspended (almost 48 hours after going to air). Strange it took them so long to establish something was against their ethos and only after they were receiving a fairly hostile reception?

    (2) Two senior members of staff, one a senior producer, each with a wealth of experience amongst established and respected broadcasters, departed the channel very quickly after it all blew up. They wouldn't have resigned because they agreed all along it was against ethos?

    Further to your points, if you want to make the somewhat off-taste comparison of taking the knee and doing a nazi salute:

    • Not taking the knee and not performing a nazi salute, in and of themselves, are not political statements
    • Explicitly stating, unprompted, "I will never perform a Nazi salute" does then make it a political statement, just as explicitly stating, unprompted, "I will never take the knee" does. Why would you feel you have to explicitly state something if not to make a point?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,945 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    The whole raison d'être of the channel, is making an overtly political gesture!

    Implying that they have an ethos suggests they have principles, integrity or some moral code they adhere to. That’s clearly bollocks 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    What conditions did he breach. Did you see his employment contract.

    He did something and was sacked "cancelled if you like" as a result of uproar on social media.

    Exactly the sort of thing GB news claim to oppose.

    They can sack whoever they want but less of the hypocrisy that they support "free speech" they're promoting a very specific agenda not unbiased news.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's worth noting that Harri was not "cancelled" by GB News.

    It was Harri who chose to resign.

    Harri cancelled himself.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement