Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cycle infrastructure planned for south Dublin

17273757778119

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 533 ✭✭✭Mr. Cats


    The man is clearly a monster. He tried an innovation on a roundabout and when it didn’t work, the error was admitted, and it was changed.

    Now I see the point about his pattern of behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    I don't recall anyone saying Strand Rd is the "only possible" route; just that it is the safest, most direct and most widely used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,479 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Why do I get the feeling if a senior public official was taking the piss in various ways and wasting public money, all in a manner AGAINST the interests of cycling, we would be having a very different debate here now.

    It does amuse me how many in here would call poor driving near cyclists, "criminal" behaviour, but incompetence in public office, so long as it benefits the cycle lobby, is graaaaaaaaand.

    That's the sort of hypocrisy that will come back to haunt you.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    That's not hypocrisy. Incompetence in public office isn't criminal and poor driving near cyclists very regularly technically is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Trudee


    And after two people hospitalised in two separate incidents due to council being ‘unduly ambitious’



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 533 ✭✭✭Mr. Cats


    No it’s obviously not grand to waste public money.

    However you and a few other posters have written here that the man is arrogant, is always doing this sort of stuff etc. When pushed for examples, one probably poor decision from more than 10 years is dragged up. In the example, the mistake was admitted and rectified. It’s not like the Killiney Towers roundabout hasn’t been changed to this day and is ruining lives. If anything it supports the point that the cycle path is a trial which can be reversed if it doesn’t work.

    Whats your real issue with Keegan? It seems to be personal with a few of you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Trudee


    The ‘poor decision from more than 10 yrs is dragged up’ - the reason it is historical is because Owen Keegan was in DLR from 2006 to Sept 2013 ergo any reference to DLR/OK will be 8yrs or older.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 533 ✭✭✭Mr. Cats


    DLR was the response when it was questioned when has he used this modus operandi before? There is still no example provided of him using a trial as cover to make something permanent. In fact the example you provided shows the opposite - changing something supposed to be permanent because it didn’t work.

    Why don’t you respond to the substance of my post rather than picking on one phrase? What’s your issue with Keegan? Unless there isn’t one and you’re just attacking him because you don’t want the cycle lane?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,479 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It's not personal at all with me (though it is with quite a few of the City Councillors at this stage).

    My whole angle on this is; I have to comply with the law, with regulations, with full transparency on everything I do professionally. I have to guarantee that on my clients behalf too.

    All I want is a level playing field, one where the goal posts don't move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Trudee


    I want a cycle lane just not a bargain basement cycle lane; have never attacked Owen Keegan, my issue is with the way OK and others in DCC have attempted to rush through under the banner of ‘COVID mobility’ a badly thought out cycleway that could never be accused of being ‘unduly ambitious’ and that would negatively affect surrounding areas.

    Dept of Transport has €360m for walking/cycling investment, Strand Road budget was €250,000, spend the money and do it right or don’t do it at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Keegan's form is well known where it matters. He has spent long enough cultivating his reputation so he can deal with any consequences.

    Strand Rd will be decided on its own merits which is how it should be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    Cycling and walking infrastructure is necessary for Ireland's health. We have a major obesity problem. Our population health is going to crash because of the effects of this.

    Finland used to be as we are now, then a national strategy formed by a group of young doctors started with the North Karelia Project, which weaned the dairy area off its addiction to salt and full-fat milk and fatty meat, and built walking and cycling infrastructure. The effects of this were so breathtakingly successful in cutting heart attacks and other effects of obesity that it was spread countrywide, and then taken up by Finland's Scandinavian neighbours.

    Sitting in cars is bad for us, and it's especially bad for our children. When we build safe and separated cycling and walking infrastructure, we'll stop seeing fat as normal. (Look at the RTÉ News any day, and count the number of fat people interviewed. Especially in terms of class, it's noticeable how fat Irish people have become.)

    Hunt out the video of the closing minutes of the 1960s film Rocky Road to Dublin and look at the Dublin kids chasing the camera car down the road. Compare it with the kids you see staring out of cars, soft and flabby. Compare the people interviewed with the pudgy people interviewed on today's documentaries. We've become a nation of pudge. This has to be rolled back. Cycling infrastructure and walking trails are health infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    All good points, none of which have anything to do with the consequences of closing Strand Rd to traffic heading for the East Link .



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I didnt cycle much as a child we were never taken out cycling.

    My Dad was allergic to walking so drove everywhere.

    He smoked until we made him give it up, drank a little, wasnt overweight and lived till he was eighty.

    None of us were overweight growing up and being fat is more to do with children stuffing their faces than how long they spend in a car.

    You make it all sound so simplistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭yascaoimhin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭yascaoimhin


    It's your personal view that money is being wasted. The rest of us believe the judgement is fundamentally flawed and oxymoronic. You believe the Judge to be correct because you've been against this project from the very beginning.

    You're very much like Cllr. Lacey and Mannix. Absolutely convinced of your own magnanimity, that you are being fair minded and level headed when you're being anything but.

    Drives people up the wall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,479 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No Caoimhín, I knew the CC were on dangerous ground from the off, I said so here and I believe the Judge to be correct because he's a bleedin Judge!

    I don't give a monkeys who it drives up the wall (should you not be cycling up the wall?), I said last night that when I see local authorities bending the rules to suit themselves when the rest of us have to have every i and t perfect in our projects, it's drives me mad. I never said I was magnanimous about that.

    There is simply what is right and what is wrong and I believe very strongly that the judgement will hold up and any appeal will be rejected, for all the reasons I thought the whole thing was bogus in the first place.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What would be the expected timeline for an appeal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,479 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I'm hearing from learned Counsel of my acquaintance that the pandemic has increased the backlog in the Court of Appeal (Civil) to between 18 and 24 months.

    Lawyers for the CC could apply for a public interest priority, but given the minor nature, relatively speaking, of this matter, I don't see it being successful. Even an accelerated process would be at least 12 months away.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Thanks. If they go after all the other pandemic measures I don't think it would be all that minor anymore.

    Does Flynn plan on going after all the outdoor eating areas too or does he just have a specific issue with cyclists?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,479 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    He's just spoofing really (imagine!).

    You have to evaluate things on their own merits to see whats likely. Mannix Flynn doesn't have sufficient interest (legally speaking) in areas outside the City Council's territory.

    Yes, other residents groups in Dun Laoghaire /Blackrock, Glasnevin, Malahide etc may be emboldened by the Strand Road decision and take their own cases, but they'll have to resource them. I suspect each of those projects may well be more of an even split of opinion locally, so raising 20k in the blink of an eye like STC did might be a next level challenge.

    One scheme Mannix may well go after himself is the City Quays.

    As for the eating areas and parking spaces cordoned off, well they're a different animal to the Strand Road proposals, both in terms of scale and impact. In my opinion they could be provided for under a few different Acts and various local bye-laws in different Counties, so I don't see them being challenged. They'll probably just gradually disappear as full indoor reopenings roll out and winter closes in, maybe to become a summer only phenomenon in the years to come, as demand dictates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    He doesn't have an issue with cyclists. He has an issue with traffic being forced onto roads and streets that are not able to handle it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Oh he has already said he is going after the quays. I don't really understand how the pedestrianisation of Capel street for example is fundamentally different from that though, or the restriction of traffic on Merrion Street.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He's already said he is going to go after the cycling infrastructure on the quays. That is not forcing traffic anywhere.



  • Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You are still, as much as ever, unfit to be a Moderator. The Strand is lovely on a good day and as is the case with any coastal area the wind will cut you on a wintery day. You don't even feign a semblance of impartiality or fairness and you should not be a Moderator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,912 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Mannix Flynn doesn't have an issue with cyclists is one of the more unlikely statements here so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Flynn can speak for himself about cyclists. All I have seen him say about Strand Rd is about how the plan to close it will be to the detriment of the people who live there.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,598 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He has also said he is pro-cycling infrastructure. He is full of ****.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,912 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    He turned up in the aftermath of a rave-like gathering at Oliver Bond flats at the start of the pandemic and almost immediately started complaining about cycling infrastructure. The gathering had, of course, nothing to do with cycling infrastructure.


    I think in psychology, it's what they used to call an idée fixe.



Advertisement