Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

12882892912932941580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,658 ✭✭✭timmyntc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Yeah but our vaccination and case profiles are different. The UK did have some of the older groups unvaccinated through hesitancy and most of our new cases are in the 18-34 age group, those at lowest risk of hospitalisation. With such low numbers too we should be looking at numbers not at percentages that have the potential to present alarming situations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Yes but my point is, these symptoms don't seem so severe. If I have a runny nose I'm not going to immediately think "I have Covid!", in the same way that if I had a sudden cough that won't stop. Perhaps the way they are messaging it is confusing, but we are certainly seeing less / zero stories in the media about people not being able to breathe, or being knocked for six for a week.

    How many of the 700+ are actually sick?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    It would be a mistake to make any assumptions that things would be different/better here unless the vax profiles are way off. What are the proportions of cases in young people here -v- the UK?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,079 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    You would expect all these numbers to increase , then eventually plateau and then start to drop . However , i don't think we have the appetite to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Nothing like being prepared, you never know a pandemic might happen at some point in the future.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Messi19


    Their hospital numbers are not running away. They also have 1200+ hospitals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,629 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    I was just thinking this, it seems like Delta has swapped from a respiratory to a more flu like disease. Surely that means its less severe as it doesnt mess with your lungs as much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭feelings


    For comparison (again) - UK v Ireland - we're making great progress. I can see us passing the UK by end of month or early Aug.


    UK | Ireland

    Vaccinated (fully + partially): 67% | 57%

    Fully Vaccinated: : 51% | 43%

    Partially Vaccinated: 16% | 14%



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    We also can't automatically assume that we will be the same but NPHET still tracks the UK or actually England as a model. They have some similar numbers in age groups but have also had some very large potential seeding events in the last few weeks and there is a question of that second dose gap strategy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    No, we don't. Because it's a big gamble. On the watching threads, I've always been a big pusher of the fact that infections have to plateau one way or another. Infections are a pyramid scheme, and eventually you run out of suckers. But the number of suckers is determined by the restrictions that are in place. The UK is in a bad place, and is adding more suckers to the pyramid on Monday.

    So we have no actual idea where the plateau will be. Will it be half the last peak? Twice the last peak? Nobody knows.

    At current rates, the UK will have about 18,000 people in hospital by mid-August. That's about half the last peak. As I say above, nobody knows where the peak is this time because they'll have exposed their entire population to it. So by mid-September, the UK hospital system could be on the verge of collapse, or hospital numbers could be solidly dropping.

    It is that unknown and that big a gamble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,336 ✭✭✭bloopy


    What private medical history? It is statistics.

    Besides, legislation was passed last night to give 'private medical history' to a any auld 16 year old door checker to get into a pub or restaurant.

    So that ship has already sailed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Only if you are in the high risk groups. Anyone else is likely to be optional, like a flu jab.



  • Posts: 543 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The data from Israel is far from conclusive and contradicts data from other countries. The CDC and FDA have disagreed with Pfizer saying they do not yet see evidence that a booster dose is required.

    Boosters will probably be necessary for those who are vulnerable or immunocomprimised but there is no data yet to support their necessity for otherwise healthy people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    HSE linking up with dating apps to get the vaccination message across!

    "The HSE said the aim is to encourage users of these dating apps to support and receive their Covid-19 vaccine when it is offered to them."



    Also a new HSE pitch!


    For-us-All-07.05.2021.jpg


    Post edited by is_that_so on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,079 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science



    Why can't vaccines determine the amount of suckers ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Theoretically they can. But vaccines are like birth control. There's the tested and quantified effectiveness, and then there's the real-world effectiveness. Let's do some rough, back-of-envelope calculations:

    Let's assume two-dose effectiveness is 90%, and one-dose effectiveness is 80%. When I say "effectiveness" I mean the percentage of vaccinated people who, when infected, will annihilate it in a few hours, be completely asymptomatic, and therefore for all intents and purposes cannot pass on the infection.

    In the UK, you have 35,155,767 people fully vaxxed and another ~11m with one dose. That gives us about 5.7m vaccinated people who may become infected/infectious. You also have 22m other people who are not vaccinated at all. So ~27m people who may become infected. Which is a very big well of "suckers" for the virus to burn through.

    The only way for the UK to offset what they're about to do would be to accelerate their vaccination programme. They have in fact done the opposite, it has slowed down to the point that we are vaccination nearly ten times faster than they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,079 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    America opened up with a worse vaccination uptake. Are their hospitals just better ? Same for the UK. Can the NHS just cope better ? Are we just seeing how hopeless the HSE is ? Our hospitals are struggling to cope as things are



    Delta variant getting the blame. Even though there was 50 in hospital with Covid at the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    This is slightly separate from what we're talking about though. Yes, our hospital system is fairly poor and capacity is atrocious. And thus we have less ability to accommodate a surge. At peak, we were bursting at the seams with 2,000 covid patients in hospital, while proportionately the UK had 50% more in hospital. They were also bursting at the seams, but at that level, we'd have completely collapsed; makeshift field hospitals in car parks, etc.

    On the topic of what we were discussing though, the UK is sitting on a potential surge that would have more covid cases than they've seen in the entire rest of the pandemic. And they're not doing anything about it. The same goes for a lot of US states.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    Did Israel not do a deal with Pfizer on the initial roll out?

    Maybe they just done another one, if you get my meaning.....

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,079 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Cases yes . They are manageable for the US. And the UK experts feel like they will be manageable aswel. However, our threshold is way lower due to the HSE. The truth is it was barely able to manage pre Covid . We will probably need close to all our adults vaccinated before we have our 'Freedom Day'. The only issue with that is it will be in Autumn/Winter. There will be no risk taken then . So probably thinking April 2022. Then the boosters will be needed. Thats the reality we are facing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The UK & US have different motivations than we do. The latter are not too concerned about public hospitals being overrun and people dying on corridors because the private health system will do just fine. The UK are willing to take the gamble and push their health service to its absolute limit because there's money to be made.

    I think you're overstating the level of confidence that the UK and US will be "normal" for the foreseeable future and understating where we'll be. We're aiming for sustainable management, the UK are just pushing forward and will reinstate restrictions again if the NHS is overwhelmed, putting the blame on the population for not being safe, or some variant that "nobody could have predicted".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,079 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Its not Boris who is ploughing ahead though . Its their public health experts who are saying they are in a position to do so . I will have to take their expertise on it until proven otherwise .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,658 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Thats not how vaccine effectiveness is calculated at all.

    The headline numbers relate to vaccine performance relative to no-vaccine. Not everyone infected with covid will even be infectious - and the vaccine efficiency % is relative to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    On another note they are expecting 1,000 cases today. Interestingly 19% of close contacts are not being tested due to them being vaccinated. This will increase as more get vaccinated.

    Positivity is about 8% but up to 15% in some centres and average contacts is 4.

    Post edited by is_that_so on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭Klonker


    Would be interesting to know of all those 80 in hospital ended up in hospital because of their covid symptoms or if they attended hospital and happened to test positive while there. As far as I know everybody who is admitted to hospital is tested so say 1000 people a day are admitted to hospital here surely some would happen to have covid especially now as cases are increasing. Maybe these people aren't included in the figures at all but would be interesting to know either way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    They need to start telling us the ages of those in hospitals and why they’ve been admitted, especially icu ages! It’s all hush hush



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    This guy can’t be for real? Needs a pint I’d say




Advertisement