Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

11201211231251261580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    whats story with numbers when was the last covid death in ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    User1998 wrote:
    Its obvious from your previous posts that read click bait mainstream media posts and take it for what it is without doing adequate research.
    I don't read crap as I said in the list you quoted.
    User1998 wrote:
    Should we stay in lockdown forever because a tiny proportion of people get covid twice or get it after being vaccinated?
    I'm certainly not staying in lockdown as I said already. I'm just staying away from areas packed with strangers who I know nothing about. If you call that lockdown then we disagree on that.
    User1998 wrote:
    I thought the whole point of restrictions were to stop the hospitals from being over run?
    My own personal health and that of my family are my primary concern.
    When we get most of the world vaccinated them we can fully relax and go back to where we were before this thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Do you work for the media or something ? No vaccine is 100%. Even with the original strain some vaccinated will get the virus. The vaccine works excellent against the Indian variant, it’s not quite effective after the first jab.

    Matt Hancock mentioned today the Delta variant is 40% more transmissable but vaccines are equally effective against all variants after the second dose. You seem angry that this is coming to an end for some reason.
    Do I work.fir the media, lol.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-40306799.html%3ftype=amp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    eagle eye wrote: »

    Did you read past the headline? After one dose. When fully vaxxed they are are as effective as with all variants.


    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/24/two-doses-of-covid-vaccines-provide-protection-against-india-variant.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Did you read past the headline? After one dose. When fully vaxxed they are are as effective as with all variants.


    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/24/two-doses-of-covid-vaccines-provide-protection-against-india-variant.html

    Unfortunately people don't read past the headlines!

    An analogy I like is, Covid is like a camp fire out of control, A vaccine would be like a swimming pool of water to douse it out it. A much less efficient vaccine would be a bathtub of water. Still enough to do the job, but less impressive as a swimming pool.

    With all these variants going about, not one vaccine manufacturer has being trying to sell an updated vaccine (I know Moderna was testing with variants etc...) but they are that confident the current vaccines are working.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Micky 32 wrote:
    Did you read past the headline? After one dose. When fully vaxxed they are are as effective as with all variants.
    From the article......

    'According to the research, in people who had received two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, levels of neutralising antibodies were more than five times lower against the Indian variant when compared to the original strain, upon which current vaccines are based.

    This antibody response was even lower in people who had only received one dose.'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    eagle eye wrote: »
    From the article......

    'According to the research, in people who had received two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, levels of neutralising antibodies were more than five times lower against the Indian variant when compared to the original strain, upon which current vaccines are based.

    This antibody response was even lower in people who had only received one dose.'

    5 times lower neutralising antibodies does not mean 5 times lower efficacy against mild symptoms ( serious illness and hospitalizations hardly affected)

    You are still being duped by the media.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    An analogy I like is, Covid is like a camp fire out of control, A vaccine would be like a swimming pool of water to douse it out it. A much less efficient vaccine would be a bathtub of water. Still enough to do the job, but less impressive as a swimming pool.
    Whatever about the sentiment, I'm not sure if your analogy helps - what if your "much less efficient" vaccine is just a mug of water? Or a bucket?

    The debate seems to just be the size of the container.. I don't get what clarity or info your analogy intends to introduce..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Whatever about the sentiment, I'm not sure if your analogy helps - what if your "much less efficient" vaccine is just a mug of water? Or a bucket?

    The debate seems to just be the size of the container.. I don't get what clarity or info your analogy intends to introduce..

    They only say a reduction of 500% antibodies (5 times reduced)
    They never mention that the comparison could be 1000x antibody response vs 200x antibodies. Both still way in excess of reducing hospitalizations and deaths. But 5 times less is the click bait title.

    The analogy is based on antibodies, which is just one line of defense we have, we also have T cells, which are still a mystery in defining immunity. With the same analogy, you may only have a bucket to put out that camp fire, but your T cells are a fire hose filling up that bucket to keep dousing that fire!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Micky 32 wrote:
    5 times lower neutralising antibodies does not mean 5 times lower efficacy against mild symptoms ( serious illness and hospitalizations hardly affected)


    You are still being duped by the media.
    How am I being duped? There is a concern, there's a booster planned because of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭aziz


    eagle eye wrote: »
    How am I being duped? There is a concern, there's a booster planned because of it.

    Of course there’s a booster planned

    There’s money to be had


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    eagle eye wrote: »
    How am I being duped? There is a concern, there's a booster planned because of it.

    Boosters were always a plan. There’s nothing definate about a booster being needed yet. If we do need one so be it.

    Either way life is going back to normal whether some like it or not. The vaccines work.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    5 times lower neutralising antibodies does not mean 5 times lower efficacy against mild symptoms ( serious illness and hospitalizations hardly affected)

    You are still being duped by the media.

    This is true.

    The immune system is more than just antibodies. There is also the T-cell response that must be factored in, among many other factors.

    That was misleading by the media to correlate lower antibody level with ineffective. The scientists admit that this isn't the case, but you only find those quotes at the dungeon bottom level of any news article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Boosters were always a plan. There’s nothing definate about a booster being needed yet. If we do need one so be it.

    Either way life is going back to normal whether some like it or not. The vaccines work.

    UK are having over 400 cases in people who have been vaccinated with two doses, its only the start of the 3rd wave their with the Delta variant. While the vaccines are very good on an individual level they have their limitations. We need to be wary here anyway, we have seen that NPHET and Government take a very cautious approach.

    That's said its good to see people out enjoying themselves. Can sense the change in people's moods etc. Balance between positivity and caution is required at this point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 862 ✭✭✭adam240610


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    They only say a reduction of 500% antibodies (5 times reduced)
    They never mention that the comparison could be 1000x antibody response vs 200x antibodies. Both still way in excess of reducing hospitalizations and deaths. But 5 times less is the click bait title.

    The analogy is based on antibodies, which is just one line of defense we have, we also have T cells, which are still a mystery in defining immunity. With the same analogy, you may only have a bucket to put out that camp fire, but your T cells are a fire hose filling up that bucket to keep dousing that fire!

    500% less is negative, you mean a reduction of 80%

    Yes these articles never mention T-cells or anything, anything for a click


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Some updated modelling on the Delta variant in the UK.

    https://twitter.com/JamesWard73/status/1401806768519405569


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭amandstu


    From today, according to RTE

    "Those in an unvaccinated private household can welcome visitors from one other unvaccinated household"

    Is this "without masks" ?(obviously "with commonsense")

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0607/1226375-covid-ireland-restrictions-easing/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,212 ✭✭✭Economics101


    amandstu wrote: »
    From today, according to RTE

    "Those in an unvaccinated private household can welcome visitors from one other unvaccinated household"

    Is this "without masks" ?(obviously "with commonsense")

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0607/1226375-covid-ireland-restrictions-easing/
    This sounds to me like micro-management and control freakery gone mad. Commonsense? Clearly NPHET believe that most of us don't have it, but that nevertheless we will jump to obey their every "rule".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,643 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    Fascinating link to article regarding the virus likely origins, well worth a read imho - https://twitter.com/Laurie_Garrett/status/1401576415976427534?s=20

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 ✭✭✭✭WoollyRedHat


    Supercell wrote: »
    Fascinating link to article regarding the virus likely origins, well worth a read imho - https://twitter.com/Laurie_Garrett/status/1401576415976427534?s=20

    Excellent article thanks for sharing. Didn't know that warmer temperatures reduce transmissions by around 20 percent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    Supercell wrote: »
    Fascinating link to article regarding the virus likely origins, well worth a read imho - https://twitter.com/Laurie_Garrett/status/1401576415976427534?s=20

    That was a great Q and A. Thanks for posting it.

    One additional point this Scientist made really is something that should be discussed more. Every news outlet in Ireland and RTE in particular were guilty of this so called false balance. Not everyone's opinion holds the same weight or should be treated the same.

    Quote: False balance?
    That one says: Okay, here is a majority opinion, which is represented by a hundred scientists. But then there are these two scientists who argue the opposite. In the media presentation, however, you then put one of these hundred against one of these two. And then it looks like it's 50:50, a conflict of opinion. And then what happens is what is actually the problem with it, namely that politicians say: "Well, then the truth will lie in the middle." That is that wrong compromise in the middle. And that's something I didn't know qualitatively. I didn't know this phenomenon existed. I also didn't know that it was so persistent and inevitable. This has happened in practically all countries, this problem. All scientists speak of it. It was not clear to me that a podcast would put me in the middle of this area of ​​tension


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,394 ✭✭✭corkie


    https://twitter.com/roinnslainte/status/1401906586323460096


    As of midnight, Sunday 6 June, we are reporting
    377* confirmed cases of #COVID19.

    26 in ICU. 69 in hospital.

    *Daily case numbers may change due to future data review, validation and update.

    ⓘ "At some point something inside me just clicked and I realized that I didn't have to deal with anyone's bullshit ever again."
    » “mundus sine caesaribus” «



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    No increase in hospitals this weekend! Surely has to be the first time we’ve had less in hospital on a Monday then we did on the Friday? Anyway excellent figures all round

    https://twitter.com/roinnslainte/status/1401906586323460096?s=21


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Figures continuing to DROP!!!!

    No to delaying re-opening!

    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1401907306128891907


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    Lot of fear being pushed in the UK in order to stop the reopening.

    https://news.sky.com/story/father-34-in-hospital-for-nearly-five-months-with-covid-urges-caution-over-21-june-easing-12326951

    "No underlying conditions", sure except the fact the man is grossly overweight which is a massive factor. Funny how they forgot to mention that.

    Nobody is saying Covid isn't dangerous but this sort of nitpicking the very rare cases of young sick people is silly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Incredible numbers based on the usual pattern for bank holiday weekends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Incredible numbers based on the usual pattern for bank holiday weekends.

    Great to see. The vaccines have this thing beat im more hopeful than ever now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    wadacrack wrote: »
    its only the start of the 3rd wave their with the Delta variant.

    Nonsense have you seen the numbers? There is 1 Indian variant patient in hospital for every 16 hospitals in the UK. If it got 16 times worse there would be 1 in every hospital, do you think the NHS could cope with that ? Maybe they should just lockdown the country now eh, just in case.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭thebiglad


    Nonsense have you seen the numbers? There is 1 Indian variant patient in hospital for every 16 hospitals in the UK. If it got 16 times worse there would be 1 in every hospital, do you think the NHS could cope with that ? Maybe they should just lockdown the country now eh, just in case.

    I was listening to BBC 5Live yesterday and one of their expert scientists who apparently is part of their SAGE group (UK Type NPHET) was suggesting to maintain the lockdown restrictions, not because of Delta Variant but because we don't know what the next variant might be and whether the vaccines will be able for it.

    It's not just here that the crazy logic and total fear of ending restrictions is endemic - 2 weeks to their freedom day now - its on a knife edge, we really need it to go well!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    0.01% of cases have ended up in hospital.

    There will be 10 times more people admitted than that by falling off a bar stool pissed in the pub.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



Advertisement